Teaming by fanzhongqing


									I am thinking:
1) a scenario followed by an overview of teaming, ...where we are now;
2) how "teaming" relates to the three This We Believe topics; and then.... where we want to go;
3) recommendations for teachers, team leaders, and administrators.... how to get there

Teaming: What does it take?
Years ago I was part of a team whose team leader openly ostracized other team members. The leader
was very knowledgeable and enthusiastic; yet she disagreed with several members whenever a view
was questioned or their view was different. Sarcasm or rolling of the eyes was a common feature
between the team leader and another teacher on the team. It was a very uncomfortable setting. I have
always been surprised to find team leaders who are not advocates for all the members of their team.

(Or start with)… In 2008, George published a concern that middle school teams were disappearing from
middle schools in Florida. Tonso, Jung, and Colombo (2006) shared the impact of a ‘restructured’ school
that eliminated teams. A study by McKewin and Greene (2009) examined…. And found that …. (I have
asked Ken to send me this study… it is a survey of principals from across the US and gives % of schools
that have middle school components; I will send it to you when I get it)

When it came time to come up with a topic for my dissertation, I chose to look at characteristics of more
and less effective teams. In a district that had converted 18 junior high schools to middle schools, I
looked at two years worth of team documents to identify more and less effective teams. From the
baseline data I chose five schools to live in and worked with each principal who verified my choices of a
more and less effective teams in each school. From there, I interviewed members of each of the teams,
and observed their team meetings to identify specific characteristics of teams that appear to be more
and less effective. I lived in their world during the spring and compiled the two years worth of
documents as well as interview and observation notes to identify what appeared to be more and less
effective teams. This is what I found.

I can shrink this to 3 lines instead of 3 paragraphs and wonder if it is too old… although the findings
haven’t changed much….First, effective teams had strong leaders and at least two or more members
who were not only familiar with middle school concepts, but who also believed in the value and
importance of working as a team. The team leaders supported and encouraged each member of the
team and put students first. The leadership of the more effective teams included people who were
organized, passionate about middle school children, knowledgeable about middle school concepts, and
willing to listen and keep the team on task.

A second characteristic of effective teams related to the interpersonal skills that team members
displayed. Teachers who worked on effective teams communicated with one another respectfully. The
topics of communication included students, their parents, and curriculum. Teachers on effective teams
worked collaboratively. There was a mutual willingness to share responsibilities associated with the
team. Teachers appeared to have a positive view of their students and one another. If a teacher was not
feeling well, or was experiencing a stressful situation outside of school, team members encouraged and
looked after them. Teachers may have disagreed with one another, but the atmosphere of the
disagreements was about program or children; it was not personal.

A third characteristic that effective teams displayed was organization. Teachers on effective teams
appeared to have a system for getting through business, focusing on children, and were systematic in
their problem solving strategies. Effective teams had common procedures for their children to follow;
rituals and routines were designed and agreed upon by the team members. There were always agendas
at team meetings and team meetings were planned and prompt. Teachers were focused on the tasks at
hand and were not engaged in grading, texting, or planning during team meetings. Teachers worked
together to create structures that were conducive to helping students learn organizational skills. During
team meetings the focus was on problem solving and planning activities, events, and strategies for
helping students become successful.

It was fascinating to work with teams of teachers who were able to put personal differences aside, focus
on the needs of students, watch their support, respect, and enthusiasm for one another as it played out
in team meetings. These teams were intentional in their planning that included multiple layers of
support for their students. Based on this study, it appeared that teachers who felt valued by the
leadership, held common vision of middle school concepts, and who worked to serve children made a
difference in the lives of children.

Since those early years of my research, I have participated on teams that were developing and I have
worked on teams that were stagnant. Last year I worked in a brand new K-8 school as a 6th grade math
teacher on a team. We were intentional in our efforts to establish common rituals and routines,
common celebrations. We systematically developed plans for managing children as a team and met
together with parents. We attempted best practices of intramurals, curriculum enrichment,
exploratories, and advisory.

At the end of the year I asked members to reflect on our strengths as a team. We felt that our greatest
strengths were communication, collaboration, trust, and risk taking. These characteristics are identified
in relation to effective business organizations (Mahanty, Yasmi, Guernier, Ukkerman, & Nass, 2009;
Sumner, 2006) as well as middle school teams (Bell, 1990; Bock & Joseph, 2000; Conley, Fauske, &
Pounder, 2004; Mills & Pollack, 1993;      ). We communicated with the children, with their parents,
with the guidance counselor and with one another constantly. We talked about our students all the
time: before school, during our common planning period, at lunch, and after school. Together we
discovered that giving students an opportunity to ‘cool down’ when they were upset helped them
return to class successfully. Together we determined which students needed to be separated from
others, and what made some of our students ‘tick’. We talked about the struggles our students had at
home, socially, emotionally, and intellectually, and we worked together to support them and one
another on our journey. We found that different students responded to different feedback. Together,
we supported our children and one another.
Underneath everything we did was a layer of trust and risk taking. At the very beginning of the year we
talked about our past experiences and what we had to offer to our team. Two members were beginning
licensed teachers, one an alternative certification teacher, and one a former police officer. We realized
that we had different strengths and as we worked together, we encouraged one another and supported
each other’s efforts. This did not mean that we always agreed on what to do; but we were always willing
to take risks when it came time to figure out what would be best for our students. When things went
well, we celebrated; when things did not go well, we talked about what could be adjusted regarding our
schedules or our expectations. As a member of this brand new team, we lived what it means to work as
a community of teachers. Our views fell right in line with what the National Middle School Association
advocates regarding teaming. As you begin your journey, consider the following: you have a role to play
in helping to make a team productive and positive.

How This We Believe (2009) speaks to “teaming”.

       Educators value young adolescents and are prepared to teach them;

A team refers to a group of people who serve a group of students. Thus the team consists first of
students who must learn to work together and alone. As team members we must include the students
in decision making whenever we can. Bock and Joseph (2000) contend that students who participate in
their own development are more successful. Second, the team consists of teachers who must work with
one another to help students reach their potential. Teachers must be willing to combine their strengths,
their knowledge, their ideas, and their concerns to meet the needs of students. Third, principals and
support personnel must work with districts to create professional development experiences for teachers
to meet the needs of their students.

       Leaders are committed to and knowledgeable about this age group,
        educational research, and best practices; and

A third element of teams is leadership. Common views of leaders include administrators and support
personnel who work with teachers to schedule experiences, problem-solve, and allocate resources that
are used to meet the needs of children. Gunn and King (2003) describe a study in which the value and
importance of leadership community plans contributes to student success. A team leader is one of the
most valuable members of the team; he or she must be the initial advocate for team members and must
work tirelessly with administrators to collaborate and communicate expectations. Chrispeels and Martin
(2002) discuss the value and importance of having leadership teams that are trained and an integral part
of the decision making process for schools. Within the team, all members must be committed to serving
the team and working with one another. Leaders in this sense are not just ‘team leaders’ and ‘principals.
Leadership, on a high functioning team, consists of members who utilize their strengths for the good of
the team. Parents should also be considered as “leaders” of the team. We know that when parents are
involved, students perform better. Professional development at all levels must include parents.

       Comprehensive guidance and support services meet the needs of
        young adolescents.

When middle schools were first conceived, the concept of the team focused heavily on the teachers’
role (Alexander, 1963). Today the team is perceived in a more inclusive light including children, teachers,
administration, parents, and partnerships with businesses and universities. School-wide/district-wide
‘safety nets’ that support children, full-service schools, schools that provide after school opportunities
for children, schools that work closely with business partners who serve as tutors and mentors are best
used when team members are part of the planning

There are specific traits associated with middle school teams. The first trait is that of advocate. We as
teachers must advocate for our students. In addition, we must advocate for one another,
administrators, and parents.

In order for teams to be effective there has to be a commitment of the members to work and plan
together. Discussions of student work, student behavior, and student challenges coupled with action
research, opportunities to develop professionally and share strategies can increase productivity of
teams. Teachers who share common procedures, strategies, rituals, and routines help build a learning
community that provides safety, structured high expectations and safety nets to meet the needs of

Second, a characteristic of a team is that members collaborate with one another. When colleagues,
parents, administrators and students agree to work together to promote success for middle grade
students, there is the potential to develop a powerful, successful team. Currently, middle school
curriculum includes the notion of ‘student ownership’ including collaborative planning of
interdisciplinary units, and inquiry based projects, student led conferences, all of which highlight a shift
from teachers as facilitators to teachers and students as communicators. In This We Believe (2009)
authors express “teachers participate actively in learning activities rather than just being observers of
students at work. Such collaboration leads to increased achievement, demonstrates democratic
processes and further meaningful student teacher relationships” (p. 67).

Members of a team must have a shared vision that includes advocacy, collaboration and
communication. The vision and mission of a middle school is used to make curriculum decisions, and
provides a framework for problem solving. Team members must have knowledge of young adolescents,
middle school concepts, best practices and assessment strategies, and knowledge of leadership
qualities. Leaders of middle level students must be risk takers. In successful middle schools leadership
teams meet regularly. School Improvement Teams gather information, problem solve, disseminate
information and act as visionaries or dreamers of possibilities. This We Believe (2009) suggests that
teachers must possess soft skills including “the way adults treat each other, set priorities, establish
policies, and make decisions” (p. 30).

While the focus of middle school has always been on the development and achievement of young
adolescents, effective teams have the power to provide teachers, parents, and administrators with
opportunities to work together and enhance the development of children. The value of collegiality can
impact morale and foster inspiration and creativity.

“Our message is for schools to be academically excellent, developmentally responsive, and socially
equitable for every young adolescent” (NMSA, 2009, p. 66). The authors of This We Believe lay out a
charge for middle school team members to be advocates, to be able to communicate, collaborate, and
be committed to the development of young adolescents.

Choice theory author, Glasser ( 1988) suggests that productivity happens when individuals’ needs are
met including survival, love and belonging, freedom, power, and fun. Together these elements provide
team members with an overview of how a group develops and what is necessary for individuals to
Teaming: What does it take?
The idea is for
a team to come together, perform
its activity (be it on a project or
long-term basis) and then
dissolve with the component
parts able to reform into new
teams ready to face new
Apart from a core (Wellington and Foster, 2009, p.73).

What is a team?
You’ll often meet a manager who
will talk about his or her ‘team’
when in reality, what they are
referring to is a group of
individuals whose commonality
of purpose is simply to prevent
themselves being overwhelmed
by their workload.
In their book ‘The Wisdom of
Teams’, Jon Katzenbach and
Douglas Smith define teams as:
L Working towards a common
L Dependant on others within
the team
L Having agreed a common
L Having complementary
knowledge and skills
L Having fewer than 20
members E (

The 20th century team worker was considered a “specialist” who performed his/her job well. In the 21 st century “team” people work
together to solve problems, which could redefine how a “team of teachers” should address the needs of children … “where ) one
another, check each other’s
work and have a positive impact
on quality. Motivation becomes
higher than that of socially
isolated individuals on the traditional
production line.(p. 74) Different types of teams… p. 7
                                                                    p.75 wellington & foster, 2009

I believe the most effective teams plan together, use problem-solving strategies together and
support one another. Our team view of communication, collaboration, trust and risk taking are
outcomes that are based on these three elements. In my view these are three different things
and thus a team’s effectiveness may depend on how tightly these three elements are woven.
(Planning, Problem Solving and Support)
 •Know your students;
 •Know your content;
                                                       Solving                  •Sharing the same vision
                                                                                •Having "one voice"
 •Plan rituals, routines, rewards;       •How will you communicate with         •Looking out for one another.
 •Meet regularly to talk about            parents?                              •Bad days, good days and the
  kids, content, and activities.         •How will you address the               energy you bring to the team.
                                          deficiencies of your students?
                                         •How will you work together to
                                          reinforce the skills children

                Planning                                                                      Support

The theoretical framework that I believe supports highly effective teams is Choice Theory.
Choice Theory, by William Glasser (1988), involves the interaction of the following elements:
Survival, Love and Belonging, Freedom, Power, and Fun. Glasser suggests that in our lives we
are most satisfied when these needs are met. Erwin (2002) has taken Glasser’s theory and
describes activities that teachers can use to manage children.


                                 Power                                       Freedom

                                     Love and

The most important thing a teacher can do is support one her team mates as an interconnected
team member and work to assess the students and present material to them. These two
elements focus on survival (as a team consider setting up rituals and routines) and love and
belonging (respect for team mates). Initially, I found that team members who are new to
teaming may not be able to integrate their lessons as suggested in exemplary middle schools.
However, teachers can focus on common literacy themes such as “main idea” or “compare and
contrast” strategies. Last year when I was on the new team, we did not complete our first
interdisciplinary unit until March.

I recommend starting each day by greeting one another. I was teaching at a middle school and
started talking to my team mate, Connie. Before I finished my second sentence about what was
on my mind, I heard her saying, “Good morning.” She reminded me that we are first colleagues
and second teachers. Part of belonging is being recognized. Take notice of one another. Just like
our students, we have no way of knowing everything that is going on with one another and we
are better teachers when we are loved.

The notion of Power, as described by Glasser refers to the autonomy team members feel. Who
is in “control” and who is being controlled are often elements that permeate schools and
teams. The middle school team usually has a ‘team leader’ but teachers must realize that these
leaders are not necessarily the sole decision makers. They are the liaisons to the team and
willingly help set up the communication process. Erwin (2002) addresses “Power Within”. The
“within” suggests that we as individuals have control of our own lives, what we do and how we
choose to run our lives. We have a responsibility to our students to prepare lessons that are
integrated, interactive, and thought-provoking. We must work tirelessly to create an
environment that is rigorous and relevant to the lives of children. The more prepared we are as
teachers the more likely we are to experience that power within.

A second type of power is ‘Power With’ or how teachers choose to work as part of a team.
Perhaps teachers have worked on a team in which they carried the load. It is difficult to work on
a team when others do not share a common vision or work ethic. Very often I believe this is a
breakdown that leads to conflict and discontent. Cassidy (2007) suggests that conflict is
inevitable, thus recognizing conflict and addressing problems will aide team productivity. As a
team member, a goal should be to work together to support one another and to support the
children. The bottom line of power, according to Glasser, is recognition. Therefore, when
creating a middle school team, teachers should think about the strengths they bring to one
another and to share ideas that are successful. Supporting one another, planning together and
problem solving can help teams develop their power.

Freedom is Glasser’s fourth element of Choice Theory. He describes Freedom From and
Freedom To. Freedom from ridicule and condescension is necessary for a group of people to
work together. I was working on a team in which I asked for help with advisor-advisee activities.
It was my first time working in a ‘real middle school’. The home economics teacher on our team
said, ‘you have your master’s in middle school; I thought you would already know how to do
that.’ I felt so foolish. After the meeting, a team member came to me and shared ideas with me.
We all get frustrated and may make accusations or interpret actions wrongly. This is very
unhealthy and even more unhealthy if we don’t do anything about it. I have had to apologize to
colleagues for things I have said. One of our most important tools is to recognize when we have
posed a threat to our colleagues or our children. A second element of “freedom” is the
freedom to create and contribute. Research on collaboration suggests that those who find
people to work with are more satisfied and more productive (Dalal, Skeete, Yeo, Lucas, Rosenthal ,
2009). When colleagues come up with an idea and implement it, and then analyze the impact,
they are working towards Glasser’s Freedom element. Teams can exercise their freedom to
collaborate regarding procedures and routines. Decision making can be teamed with problem
solving to create positive work places for teachers and students. The interaction of support for
one another, planning and problem solving are strengthened when a team considers the impact
of freedom.

The fifth, and probably the golden thread that ties a team together, is fun. A team that ‘plays
together’ has potentially high levels of productivity. The notion of ‘creativity’ within an
organization has been shown to be related to ‘fun’ (McCrea & Hughes, 2004). Laughter and
care, looking at the bright side of life, can keep a team functioning. We started the year
bringing lunch in. One of our team members shared this idea with us as a way to support one
another. Later in the year we found that contributing $5.00 to share pizza worked just as well.
One team member would order pizza on line and when our lunch break came, there it was…
hot pizza. This was a great way to celebrate Fridays once a month. Fun can be spontaneous or
planned. The use of spirit boosters, fun Fridays, pick-me-ups, and finding support for one
another must be intentional. If you hear of good things, tell the colleague. We must advocate
for one another. Teaching is hard. It is emotionally draining. If we work together we can be
more productive, more purpose driven, better.

Teams go through various stages of group dynamics. I believe that the element of Choice
Theory and specifically the ability of a team to plan together, problem solve and support one
another interact with the progress teams make from Forming to Producing.

Teaming: What does it take?

Scenario 1: “Welcome to our middle school.”
 Talasia has come for an interview. She was trained at an institution of higher learning. She is equipped
with the knowledge of 21st Century schools research. She spent time in a ‘Schools to Watch’
environment. Her background is mathematics and language arts. She is technologically savvy and her
cover letter indicates she studied the effects of using multiple intelligences strategies on students’
academic achievement as well as their attitudes towards learning.

When she arrives at ___ Middle School she is greeted by the administrative assistant where she is
invited to observe part of a mathematics lab before sitting in on a team meeting. The teacher and
students are engaged in an interdisciplinary unit on the Rain Forest. They are illustrating rain forest data
around the world, creating brochures that illustrate three rain forests, how long it would take to get
there, what would be seen, and the cost of a round trip visit.

During the team meeting a parent is meeting with the team to first discuss the Rain Forest night events
that will take place in three weeks. An administrator, the guidance counselor, the literacy coach, and
media center specialist are finishing up reports and updates and getting feedback from the team. It
appears that the technology teacher and the media specialists are leading the ‘Rain Forest’ meeting. The
literacy coach provides a time-line based on last year’s event.

After the meeting two students take the prospective teacher on a tour of the school. They explain how
the teams are arranged. Sixth grade students are on two-person teams; seventh grade students are on
two or three person teams, and eighth grade students are on four person teams. Students participate in
an advisory program, intramurals, exploratories, and school wide interdisciplinary units that include
service projects. The school is a full-service school and there is a full complement of ‘safety nets’ to
support students’ academic and related arts interests.

When it is time for the interview, Talasia has a list of comments and questions. The team of teachers sit
around a table. They are members of the sixth grade teams. In addition, a physical education teacher, a
special education teacher, an ELL teacher and a guidance counselor are at the table. They ask her to
share her philosophy.

Talasia has done her homework. She knows the school was a ‘Schools to Watch’ organization. She knows
about specific programs and opportunities. What do you think Talasia should focus her interview on?

Scenario 2: Sharks and Manatees

What are the characteristics of more and less effective teams? In the skit "Manatees and
Sharks" two teams are described using the language of teams that I have had contact with.
After reading each of the skits, write down your views of at least 10 characteristics of the good
team and 10 characteristics of the bad team.

After you have written down your views, go to responses from other educators to see how your
view of what you read compares to what others who have read the skits say.
When you finish, write a brief statement of what you perceive to be the most difficult part of
teaming and the biggest benefit to it.

Characteristics of the Manatees                   Characteristics of the Sharks

Manatees and Sharks a skit about teaming…
The Sharks are sitting in an area, but not in a circle. The LA and MA teacher are having a

Team Leader the team leader knows about middle schools and believes that it is a good
approach to work with children.


Team Leader: Well, let’s go ahead and do something.

Math: (looking at their grade book, is averaging their grades)

Team Leader: Since it’s the beginning of the year we are told that we have to do something for
our students.

(they all look up at the Team Leader with questionable looks)

Science: Whatever

Team Leader: One thing we could do is get our AA groups to do some intramurals or use a
reward system to get our students to work toward a goal of coming to school and be on time
and work hard.

Social Studies: We don’t have any control over whether our students come to school or not.
How do think we are supposed to teach. If the parents would take part in their children’s life,
maybe we could get our job done.
LA (speaks to Math): I hear they are having a sale at Belk’s this week.

Math: Cool. Maybe I’ll go there this week too.

Science: (to the team leader) I’m for whatever. Just make it easy. I don’t want to have to keep a
lot of records.

Team Leader: Is anybody having trouble with any of your students?

Social Studies: Sam came in the class and asked for a hall pass. She left for half the class and
didn’t have any excuse for being gone all period. I said to her, “where have you been?” she
says, “you wouldn’t understand.” Unbelievable.

Science: (yawns and looks out the window)

Math: (closes the grade book and packs up their stuff) Is there anything else we need to talk
about? I need to go run off a worksheet for next period.

The skit shifts gears. The next scenario ”Manatees” is a very different team. …

The Manatees are sitting in a circle; they all have agendas; there is food and everyone has
their calendar with them.

Language Arts
Social Studies
Team Leader


   1.   Announcements
   2.   Beginning of the year
   3.   Good things
   4.   Children

Math: Hey (Science) thanks for bringing in the treats. This is great.

Science: You’re welcome. I figured we could use some chocolate after last week.
Everyone smiles, snickers and nods in agreement.

Social Studies: I was so tired Friday I had to take a nap before dinner.

Everyone smiles, snickers and nods in agreement.

Team Leader: At least we all kept our heads together and our kids had a good time.

I hope you all did get some rest this weekend.

I had a note in my box from Principal Ruppert. She said that she would like to thank all of us for
working so hard in the week of welcome back Manatees. She hopes we will put our week in
pictures for a presentation at the North Carolina Middle School Association.

Math: Why don’t we get our AA kids to put the show together?

Science: That’s a great idea.

Language Arts: I could have them write about it in Language Arts and perhaps there are a few
kids from each AA who might like to work together during Club Time. We could work with 20
kids in the computer lab and use imovies like we were talking about using this year.

Team Leader: That’s great. What do you think (Social Studies)?

Social Studies: Since I don’t know anything about computers, I feel kind of bad that I can’t help.

Science: I’d be glad to work with (Language Arts) so that we could put together a “suggestions
for AA” ideas prior to asking the kids. That way we could get enough information out for you
(Social Studies).

Social Studies: I don’t know. It makes me nervous. In fact, I’m not real comfortable with Club
time anyway.

Team Leader: You know (Social Studies) I wonder if there are other teachers who also aren’t
comfortable with Club. If it’s okay with you, I’d like to take that concern to Dr. Ruppert. In the
meantime I’ll work with you in planning a club that addresses your expertise and interest in
current events.

Social Studies nods okay.

Math pats Social Studies on the shoulder and says: We’ll work with you.

Team Leader: Last week we shared concerns about Emma, Sylvia and the Spencer brothers. Has
anyone seen any differences?
Language Arts: Since we changed the schedules of the Spencer brothers, I have seen vast
improvements in Jim. It has really helped him focus.

Math: I have seen that too.

Science: Since Emma and Sylvia are in my AA I have seen that they are not “ranking” this week. I
think it helped that we brought them in and spoke to them as a team.

Social Studies: I just hope they aren’t just putting on a show.

Language Arts: Well we have to start somewhere.

Team Leader: Do you think we should invite the guidance counselor in to our AA groups to talk
about friendships or to give us some activities to talk about?

Math: I think that would be a good idea. I also think that the kids are getting along okay not
only because we’ve talked to them and moved them around but also because of last week’s

Science: I hope so.

Team Leader: Is there anybody we need to keep our eyes on or talk about?

Social Studies: I noticed that Janice isn’t eating any lunch and she was talking to Lynn about
seeing how much weight she could use.

Science: We are talking about nutrition in class. This is serious though. I think we need to call in
the guidance counselor.

Math: She’s in my AA. I’ll see about getting her to go meet with the guidance counselor. Ms.
Vining is fabulous about meeting with the kids and I know that Janice has met with her before.

Team Leader: We’ll keep our eyes open. Is there anything else? (looks around the group.)

Thanks again (Science for the treats.)

(Return to the chart and fill in your thoughts. Share these with a colleague.)

The role of the team leader
The advantage of working together as a member of a brand new team is that there is very little history. I
viewed my primary role as one of “advocate”. As a team member, I would ask myself ‘what does this
person need?’ or ‘what do we need?’ Much of the experiences of being a team leader have to do with
supporting and encouraging team members.

     Demonstrate a commitment to middle school concepts, students and colleagues

     Be a role model

     Organize the agenda

     Communicate objectively

     Make sure all team members are contributing

The role of the team member
As a team member, you may not begin your year as the leader, so your job will be one of advocate for
your students and their parents.

     Listen

     Take initiative

     Support

     Have a positive attitude

     Be on time

     Give undivided attention

Building an effective team.
     Determine team “rules”

     Decide what supplies the students need

     Discuss each other’s strengths

     Agree on how to communicate with students

     Agree on how to communicate with parents (parent logs)

     Be intentional, be multi-layered, and be sustained in your efforts to meet the needs of young
   When I conducted research years ago I linked knowledge of middle school concepts and
   commitment to these ideals by at least two of the team members made teams more
   effective (Bell, 1990). I have since come to the reality that middle school components are
   missing in middle and K-8 schools because there is little knowledge of the components and
   how to implement them.

   As you begin to explore the concept of “teaming” realize that it is not something to take
   lightly and it is not always easy. The focus of a team should be on advocating for one
   another and advocating for the children through support, planning and problem solving.

   We as teachers must work together to build relationships with our colleagues and our
   students. Relationships are built on trust and risk taking. When teachers advocate for one another,
   they provide a safe place to gather ideas and share experiences.


       Bock, M. & L. Joseph (September, 2000). Student as a strategic participant on
              collaborative problem-solving teams: An alternative model for middle and
              secondary schools. Intervention in School & Clinic. 36(1), 47.

       Carnegie Council for Adolescent Development (1989). Carnegie Council on Adolescent
               Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century.
               New York: Carnegie Corporation.

       Cassidy, K. (2007) New model of group development for practitioners. Journal of
              Experiential Education. 29(3), 413-417.

       Chrispeels, J. & K. Martin (2002). Four school leadership teams define their roles within
              organizational and political structures to improve student learning. School
              Effectiveness and School Improvement. 13(3), 327-365.

“The SLT seminars taught team members skills in how to work together,
strategies for problem-identi®cation, data collection, analysis, and problem
solving” (p. 25). As highlighted in the ®ndings, the teams assumed the roles of communicators,
staff developers, problem-solvers, and leaders/decision-makers, but the
intensity and performance of the roles varied across the sites. The roles
assumed were in¯uenced by the interaction among pre-existing organizational
structures and political and cultural norms and expectations of relationships
between the principal and the team, the team and other committees, and the
        team and other teachers(p.26). “communication” (p. 26) “organization” “staff
                development (p. 27). Problem solving (p. 28) leadership/decision makers (p. 29)
Chung, W. Stephen, J. Clifton, A. Rowe, R. Finley, G. Warnock, (Oct., 2009) Strategic
       faculty recruitment increases research productivity within an academic university
       division. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 52(5), 401-406.

Conley, S., J. Fauske, D. Pounder. (December, 2004). Teacher work group effectiveness.
       Educational Administration Quarterly. 40(5). 663-703.

Dalal, M.; R. Skeete, H. Yeo, G. Lucas, M. Rosenthal (Dec., 2009). A physician team’s
        experiences in community-based participatory research: Insights into effective
        group collaborations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 37(6), 5288-

Dickinson, T. (2001). Reinventing the middle school. NY, NY: Routledge Falmer

Eaker, DuFour, and DuFour (2002). Getting Started: Reculturing Schools to Become
       Professional Learning Communities. National Educational Service, Bloomingto,

Felner, R., A. Jackson, D. Kasak, P. Mulhall, S. Brand., and N. Flowers (1997). The impact
        of school reform for the middle years. In Research on Middle Grades Special
        Insert. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(7), 528-549.

Flowers, N., S. Mertens, P. Mulhull (November, 1999) The impact of teaming: Five
       research-based outcomes. Research on Middle School renewal. Middle School
       Journal 31(2), 57-60

George, P. S., & Alexander, W. M. (2003). The exemplary middle school (3rd ed.).
      Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth Learning.

Glasser, William. (1998). Choice Theory: A New Psychology of Personal Freedom. New
       York, NY:HarperCollins.

Gunn, J. & M. King (2003). Trouble in paradise: Power, conflict, and community in an
        interdisciplinary teaching team. Urban Education, 38(2), 178-195.

Gutman, L.M., and Midgley, C. (2000). “The Role of Protective Factors in Supporting the
     Academic Achievement of Poor African American Students During the Middle
     School Transition.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(2), Plenum Publishing
     Corporation, 223–248.

Hough, D. (March, 2005). The Rise of the "Elemiddle" School: Not Every K-8 School Truly Applies
       Best Middle-Level Practices and Deserves the Designation.” The School Administrator. V
       62 n3 p10-14.
Jackson, A. & G. Davis (2000). Turning points 2000. NY: Teachers College Press

Khanna, M. (April, 2008). Using the community to build parent engagement and support
        Families and Schools Partner for Student Success. Middle Matters, 16(4) [online]

Langer, G., A. Colton, & L. Goff (2003). Collaborative analysis of student work: Improving
        teaching and learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD

Lounsbury, J. (1991). As I see it. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.

Mahanty,S., Y. Yasmi, J. Guernier, R. Ukkerman, & L. Nass (2009). Relationships, learning, and
      trust: lessons from the SNV-RECOFTC partnership. Development in Practice. 19(7) 859-

McCrea, B. & A. Hughes (September, 2004). Business and pleasure. Black Enterprizes.
      35(2), 46.

Mills, G. (2000). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River. NJ:


Mills, R. & J. Pollack (May/June, 1993). Collaboration and teacher change in the middle
        school. Clearing House. 66(5), 302-304.

Mo, Y. & K. Singh (2008). Parents’ relationships and involvement effects on students’
       school engagement and performance. RMLE Online, 31(10). Retrieved from

NMSA (2009). This we believe. OH: NMSA

Spencer, J., C. Toy and K. Bailey (September, 2008)."Three Keys to Building Effective Leadership
       Teams" Middle Matters.

Spencer, J. & C. Toy ( 2009) Advocating for young adolescent learners in the 21st Century. NMSA
       [online] Retrieved from
       Stiggins, R. (2006). “Assessment for learning: A key to motivation and achievement.”
              Edge 2(2), 3 - 19..

       Sumner, J. (May/June, 2006). Trust, collaboration and communication. KM Review 9(2) 2

       U.S. Department of Education (2009). Parent involvement in the middle school.
              Middleweb. [on-line] Retrieved from

       Tonso, K., M. Jung, & M. Colombo (2006). It’s hard answering your calling: Teacher
              teams in a restructuring urban middle school. Research in Middle Level Education
              Online, 10848959, 30(1).

       Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin,
             63, 384-399.
       Tuckman, B. & M. Jensen (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group &
             Organizational Studies 2, 419-427.

       Wellington, F., & N. Foster (2009). The 21st Century Team. Engineering & Technology
               (17509637); 10/24/2009, 4(18) 72-75.

I worked on a team last year in which we made decisions about how to group students, how to
integrate language arts skills in each of our classes, and helped one another engage in
strategies that would meet the needs of our lowest learners.

To top