# 4700-07-Notes-bonds by fanzhongqing

VIEWS: 14 PAGES: 4

• pg 1
```									    Copyright c 2005 by Karl Sigman

1     Internal rate of return, bonds, yields
1.1   Internal rate of return
Given a deterministic cash ﬂow steam, (x0 , x1 , . . . , xn ), where xi (allowed to be positive, 0 or
negative) denotes the ﬂow at time period i (years say), we already studied the net present value,
n
xi
NPV =                    .
i=0
(1 + r)i

Here r is the known (annual say) interest rate available to us all. For comparison purposes,
if the investment stream actually came from only withdrawing and depositing money in a
bank account at interest rate r, then N P V = 0 (for example if you place \$100 in a savings
account for 1 year at ﬁxed rate r, then the cash ﬂow stream is (−100, 100(1 + r)) and NPV=
100 + 100(1 + r)(1 + r)−1 = 0). But an arbitrary cash ﬂow does not come from such a simple
bank account scheme, hence N P V is typically quite diﬀerent from 0. (Hopefully positive!) But
this motivates hunting for a value of r that would result in N P V = 0:
Deﬁnition 1.1 The internal rate of return (IRR) of the stream is a number r > 0 such that
n
xi
= 0.
i=0
(1 + r)i

It is the interest rate implied by the cash ﬂow stream (not the current real interest rate, whatever
it may be). Changing variables a = (1 + r)−1 , equivalently we must solve for a positive root
0 < a < 1 of a degree n polynomial:
n
xi ai = x0 + ax1 + · · · + an xn = 0;                        (1)
i=0

then r = 1/a − 1.
In general, there is no such solution but there always is under suitable suﬃcient conditions such
as

IRR Suﬃcient Conditions:
If x0 < 0 and xi ≥ 0, 1 ≤ i ≤ n and n xi > 0, then a solution r > 0 exists. This condition
i=0
means that we put money in only at time 0 (initial investment), and then get back money at all
other times, and that the sum over all those other times exceeds our initial investment. (Easy
A proof of the above: Let f (a) = x0 + ax1 + · · · + an xn , as from (1). Then under the
suﬃcient conditions we have f (0) < 0 and f (1) > 0; thus by the continuity of the function
f = f (a) (e.g., the intermediate value theorem of calculus) there must exist a value of a ∈ (0, 1)
for which f (a) = 0.
IRR can be used as an alternative to NPV for purposes of comparing two diﬀerent streams
to decide which is better. The idea is that of the two, you would choose the one having the

1
largest IRR. (Of course, just as any stream with N P V < 0 would be avoided, any stream with
IRR < r = current interest rate would be avoided too.) Unfortunately it is possible that the
two methods yield diﬀerent conclusions; that is, IRR might rank your ﬁrst steam higher than
the second, while NPV might rank your second steam higher than your ﬁrst!
Finally we point out that a solution to IRR must be solved for numerically in general, using
Newton’s method, for example.

1.2   Bonds, ﬁxed income securities
A Bond is an example of a ﬁxed income security, meaning that the payoﬀ is essentially predeter-
mined, deterministic, ﬁxed: You invest a ﬁxed amount of money now and are guaranteed ﬁxed,
known payoﬀs in the future. (Stock on the other hand is a so-called risky security, diﬀerent
since the payoﬀ is random and potentially highly volatile.) Here we introduce some basics of
bonds, their payoﬀ structure, yields, and prices.

Bonds with no coupons
Buying a bond means you are lending money now (time t = 0) to some institution (government,
business, etc.) that needs to raise capital, and are promised back the money back at a pre-
speciﬁed future time with a proﬁt. Along the way, there may be so-called coupon payments,
meaning, for example, that every 6 months until maturity, you receive a ﬁxed amount too.
The simplest case, however, is when there are no coupons, a zero coupon bond. For example,
suppose you buy a 5-year \$1000 bond, which means that 5 years from now you will receive a
face-value of \$1000, but nothing in between. The price P that you pay now is the present value,
P = 1000/(1 + r)5 , where r is the interest rate. For example if r = 0.04, then P = 822. The
interest rates used for such bonds depend on the length of maturity; you would receive a higher
rate for a longer time period. For example, if instead of 5 years, you bought the bond for 10
years then you might receive a rate of 0.06 instead of 0.04, and then P = 1000/(1.06)10 = 558.
These various interest rates are referred to as spot rates.
During the lifetime of your bond before maturity, interest rates might change causing the
price of new bonds to be diﬀerent than what you paid. If the rates go up then the bond price
goes down, whereas if the rates go down, then the bond price goes up. Bonds are typically
traded on the open market, so you could, for example, sell your 5 year \$1000 face-value bond
(bought at time t = 0) one year later (at time t = 1) as a 4 year \$1000 face-value bond at a
price of the form P = 1000/(1 + r)4 , where r is the appropriate spot rate for 4-year bonds at
time t = 1.

Bonds with coupons
Most bonds give you ﬁxed amount payments at regular intervals up to the face value termination
(maturity) date; these payments are referred to as coupon payments since some time ago when
buying a bond you would be given paper coupons to turn in for your payments. For example,
USA Treasury Notes and Bonds are bonds that pay you a ﬁxed amount every 6 months up to
termination at which time you get both the last ﬁxed amount plus the face value. The price of
such a bond can be computed by using present values with current spot rates (e.g., the current
zero coupon rates).

2-year \$1000 bond example
For example, consider a 2-year \$1000 bond, that has coupons every 6 months in the amount of
\$25, for a total of four times until t = 2 years at which time you receive \$1025. To price this

2
bond we need to know the current rates r0.5 , r1 , r1.5 and r2 ; the spot rates for bonds having
maturity from 6 months to 2 years. The ﬁrst payment of 25 has PV of 25(1 + r0.5 /2)−1 , the
second has PV of 25(1 + r1 )−1 , the third has PV of 25(1 + r1.5 (1.5))−1 and the last has PV of
1025(1 + r1.5 (2))−1 ; thus the price P is given by

P = 25(1 + (0.50)r0.5 )−1 + 25(1 + (1)r1 )−1 + 25(1 + (1.5)r1.5 )−1 + 1025(1 + (2)r2 )−1 .

In the above formula we used simple linear scaling for the interest rate computations (since
we did not specify the type of compounding). Let’s instead assume continuous compounding
in which case the price becomes

P = 25e−(0.50)r0.5 + 25e−(1)r1 + 25e−(1.50)r1.5 + 1025e−(2)r2 .                (2)

For example, suppose that r0.5 = 0.03, r1 = 0.040, r1.5 = 0.045 and r2 = 0.50. Then P ≈ 999.

Bond yields
Given a bond, we can solve for the implied interest rate, that is, the IRR of the cash ﬂow stream
induced by the bond (IRR is deﬁned in Section 1.1); (x0 , x1 , . . . , xn ) where x0 = −P < 0, and
xi = the payment at the ith period. This rate, denoted by λ, is called the yield of the bond,
and it always exists because the IRR suﬃcient conditions given in Section 1.1 hold.
Let us suppose for example, that a 2-year \$1000 bond is issued with price P as in (2). Then
the yield is the solution λ to

25e−(0.50)λ + 25e−(1)λ + 25e−(1.50)λ + 1025e−(2)λ = P = 999.                    (3)

Letting a = e−(0.50)λ we equivalently must solve for a zero of a 4th degree polynomial,

25a + 25a2 + 25a3 + 1025a4 − 999 = 0.

The solution (solved numerically) is a ≈ .976; λ = −2 ln (a) = 0.0486.

Bond yield formula
Here we oﬀer a general formula for ﬁnding the yield λ of a given bond that has price P . Let us
assume that the face value is denoted by F , the coupon payments are given m ≥ 2 times per
year (every 1/m years). Let us assume further that K denotes the coupon amount per period,
and that there are 1 ≤ n ≤ m periods remaining. We wish to compute the IRR, that is, the
implied annual interest rate λ that, when compounded every 1/m units of time for computing
the PV of the bond payoﬀs, would produce the price P : Solve for λ > 0 such that
n
F                K
P    =                +                                                     (4)
[1 + (λ/m)]n i=1 [1 + (λ/m)]i
F        K            1
=                +      1−              .                              (5)
[1 + (λ/m)]n (λ/m)    [1 + (λ/m)]n

The formula is derived as follows: There are n ≥ 1 periods remaining, so the PV of the
F
face value F is given by [1+(λ/m)]n . Meanwhile, the ith remaining coupon payment has a PV of
K
[1+(λ/m)]i
and these payments are summed over all n remaining periods. The ﬁnal simpliﬁed
,
form of the answer is due to the formulas for geometric series discussed in Lecture Notes 1 (in

3
the Appendix, for example). In our 2-year \$1000 bond example, m = 2, n = 4, F = 1000 and
K = 25.
If compounding is continuous, then the formula is given by
n
n                   i
P   = F e−λ( m ) +         Ke−λ( m )                              (6)
i=1
λ n
λ n            λ   1 − e−( m )
= F e−( m ) +Ke−( m )                λ    .                   (7)
1 − e−( m )
λ
By changing variables, a = λ/m, e− m respectively, in either case, ﬁnding λ reduces to the
problem of ﬁnding the zero of a polynomial (in a) of degree n + 1.

1.3   Certiﬁcate of Deposit (CD)
A Certiﬁcate of Deposit (CD) is a ﬁxed income security oﬀered by your bank. It is just like
a bond except there are no coupons and it can’t be re-sold on the open market: You must
wait until maturity to get the agreed upon face value F . Typically maturity for a CD is from
6 months to several years, unlike bonds which might have maturities as long as 30 years. In
essence, a CD is like a savings account that oﬀers a higher interest rate since you are agreeing
not to take any withdraws until a ﬁxed date in the future (at which time you withdraw F ).
Just as for a zero coupon bond, the price of such a CD with maturity (say) T is given by F e−rT
where r is the spot rate for such a CD.

4

```
To top