When More Anxiety Is Better The Influence of Working Memory
Document Sample


Anxiety may hinder our ability to perform
at an optimal level
› test anxiety
› phobias
› Ashcraft & Kirk (2007)
Working memory can be impaired by
anxiety
Math anxiety loads working memory
› Decreases math performance
› Ashcraft & Kirk (2001)
Clinical depression leads to:
› Negative rumination
› Poor working memory
Van Dillen & Koole (2007)
Whether & how loading working memory
can decrease negative mood
Picture
Neutral
Mildly negative
Strongly negative
Task Complexity
Simple math
Complex math
Mood ratings
1- not at all
9 – very much
Increasing task load decrease in negative
mood
Individual differences
› High & low working memory capacity
› High & low trait anxiety
High Working Memory Low Working Memory
High Trait Anxiety Low Trait Anxiety
High Working Memory Low Working Memory
Low Trait Anxiety High Trait Anxiety
1. Complex math tasks will provide more of
distraction from negative mood than easier math
tasks
2. Individuals with high working memory capacity
will experience a lesser distraction from negative
mood
3. Individuals with high trait anxiety will experience
more of a distraction from negative mood
4. Individuals with high trait anxiety & low working
memory capacity will experience the most
distraction from negative mood when completing a
difficult math task
IV’s › Task complexity
› Working memory Easy
capacity Difficult
High › Picture negativity
Low Neutral
› Trait anxiety level Mildly Negative
High Strongly Negative
Low
DV Mood
Informed Consent
Demographics Survey
State - Trait Anxiety Inventory
Working memory
› Operational Span Task
(2*2) + 1 = 5 disk
Picture Viewing Task
Mildly Negative Strongly Negative
Neutral Image
Image Image
(60)
(30) (30)
Simple Complex Simple Complex Simple Complex
Math Math Math Math Math Math
(30) (30) (15) (15) (15) (15)
Mood Rating
Mood Rating
9/3 + 4 = 17 1 - Strongly Negative
9 -Strongly Positive
Significant main effect of mood
› F (1,117) = 42.561, p < .01
Main effect of picture negativity
› F (1, 117) = 194.150, p < .01
Complex math tasks will provide more of distraction
from negative mood than easier math tasks
Significant interaction
› Math Complexity x Picture Negativity
F (2, 117) = 4.666, p = .010
Individuals with high working memory capacity will
experience a lesser distraction from negative mood
No significant interaction
› Picture Negativity x Working Memory Capacity
F (2, 117) = 1.451, p = .237
Individuals with high trait anxiety will experience
more of a distraction from negative mood
No significant interaction
› F (2, 96) = .586, p =.557
Individuals with high working memory & low anxiety will
experience the most distraction from negative mood
when completing a difficult math task
No significant interaction
› F (2, 96) = 1.242, p = .291
Discrepancies
› Cultural differences
Amsterdam v. Erie, PA
More open society
More extreme media
Math performance is higher in Europe
› Different Likert Scale
1- not at all negative, 9 – very much negative
1- strongly negative, 9 – strongly positive
Does anchoring the scale differently completely
change how it is perceived?
Future research
› Investigate situations where loading WM
may improve mood
› Compare across cultures
› Protective effects of religiosity
Implications
› Potential therapeutic interventions
Get documents about "