Document Sample
BY PATRICK KEEFE Powered By Docstoc
					Spring Edition                                 NEW ORLEANS CHAPTER                                          Vol. 15, No. 2


                                   MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT
                                              BY PATRICK E. O’KEEFE

                        Dear Friends,

                          “It was the best of times; it was the worst of times...” This passage from Dickens’
                       “A Tale of Two Cities” might well be used to describe the current situation in New Orleans.
                       The upcoming regular session of the Legislature may prompt sweeping and significant changes
                       to the structure and methodology of municipal government. Impending citywide elections
                       may bring more profound changes in the direction and future of the city than any election in
                       recent memory. The uncertainties of the post-hurricane era are still with us; the challenges
                       are still just as real. But exciting options for rebirth, growth, and progressive development
   clamor equally for our attention. So it is for our chapter as well, and I’d like to acquaint you with some of the
   opportunities which have been presented to us.
     We have completed taping the forum on urban issues in which we examined the legal ramifications of some of
   the solutions the city is considering. Our producers are completing the final product which soon will be ready for
   distribution. This effort represents an innovative public service, the first of its kind for the chapter and one in
   which we can take great pride.
     Under the able guidance of Virginia Schlueter, New Orleans will again be the venue for hosting the National
   Meeting of the FBA Criminal Law Section and we will host its seminar on May 12, 2006 entitled “The BIG (Not
   So) Easy.” A stellar line up of renowned experts will include LCDR Charles Swift, USN, who recently argued
   for the petitioner in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld in the U.S. Supreme Court. You won’t want to miss this rare chance
   to gain insight into the workings of military law in regard to the status of battlefield detainees and to explore the
   broader implications this case may hold for the rule of law. Last year we were treated to an illuminating
   presentation on the Booker case which challenged sentencing guidelines. This year’s unique seminar continues
   the trend in which we set the standard for thought-provoking content.
     Finally, Sen. David Vitter has agreed to address the annual meeting this summer, affording us an unusual
   opportunity to hear a first-hand report on efforts in Washington to assist in rebuilding our community. This will be
   another “first,” as it is the first time a U.S. Senator has addressed the annual meeting. Information as to the
   annual luncheon will be furnished as soon as the final arrangements have been completed.
     It is true that these are uncertain, unsettled times and, thus, they are arguably the worst of times. Yet they are
   times laden with a rich cargo of hope and possibility, challenge and achievement. In that sense, they may also be
   the best of times–for New Orleans and for our chapter.
2 The Advocate
                                                                                                                       The Advocate 3

                                                BAYOU GUANTANAMO
                                                       By R. Neal Walker1
                                  Louisiana Capital Assistance Center - A Non-Profit Law Office

    For several hundred Orleans                 preside over the hearings) ordered the       (E.D. La.). While the petitioners were
Parish prisoners detained in dozens of          release of all detainees arrested for        incarcerated in prisons located within
maximum security prisons in north and           misdemeanors or non-violent felonies,        the Middle and Western Districts of
central Louisiana in the fall of 2006, it       finding that their continued detention       Louisiana, the action was properly filed
seemed like due process took a                  without charge violated their due            in the Eastern District since the
holiday, and a long one at that,                process rights and warranted habeas          petitioners’ cases were pending in the
extending well through the Christmas            relief.                                      Criminal District Court for the Parish
season. Indeed, like the alleged enemy                                                       of Orleans. 28 U.S.C § 2241(d);
                                                    The Orleans Parish District
combatants at Guantanamo Bay, these                                                          Braden v. 30th Judicial Cir. Ct., 410
                                                Attorney’s Office opposed the release
prisoners suffered protracted detention                                                      U.S. 484 (1973).
                                                of any of these prisoners, even those
without charge, without access to
                                                charged with misdemeanors, and                    The petition argued that the
courts and without counsel, hundreds
                                                secured a stay of the release orders in      continued confinement of the prisoners
of miles from New Orleans.
                                                the Louisiana Court of Appeal for the        violated their rights against
     Among the thousands of prisoners           First Circuit. By this time many of the      unreasonable seizures, to due process
evacuated from the flooded Orleans              prisoners were being held beyond the         of law, to counsel, to a speedy trial, to
Parish Prison complex after Hurricane           article 701 time limits, even as             be free from excessive bail and to
Katrina made landfall were hundreds             interrupted by the governor’s storm-         other rights secured by the Fourth,
of prisoners arrested by the New                related order suspending prescription        Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the
Orleans Police Department in July and           and other legal deadlines. Ultimately,       United States Constitution. As the
August but not formally charged when            the Court of Appeal dissolved the stay       petition noted, the Supreme Court has
the storm struck. Many of these                 and upheld Judge Johnson’s release           criticized protracted detentions without
prisoners were arrested on                      orders in their entirety.                    trial in two recent cases. In 2004 “the
misdemeanors and low-grade                                                                   Supreme Court confirmed the
                                                    On November 22, 2005, the
nonviolent felonies. Article 701 B (2)                                                       fundamental right of a citizen to be free
                                                Louisiana Supreme Court issued a
of the Louisiana Code of Criminal                                                            from involuntary, indefinite confinement
                                                brief per curiam opinion reversing
Procedure provides that the failure to                                                       by his government without due
                                                Judge Johnson in part, ordering those
institute prosecution within sixty days                                                      process. See Hamdi v.Rumsfeld, 159
                                                arrested for misdemeanors to be
of the date a defendant is arrested on                                                       L. Ed. 2d 578, 124 S. Ct. 2633, 2647
                                                released, but giving the prosecution
a felony “shall result in release of the                                                     (2004); id. at 2661 (Scalia, J.,
                                                until January 6, 2006, to file formal
defendant if . . . just cause for the failure                                                dissenting); see also Rasul v. Bush,
                                                charges in the remainder of the cases.
is not shown.” In November, a group                                                          159 L. Ed. 2d 548, 124 S. Ct. 2686,
                                                Two justices dissented and would have
of volunteer lawyers filed mass habeas                                                       2692 (2004).” Abu Ali v. Ashcroft,
                                                upheld the release of all the petitioners.
corpus petitions in state district court                                                     350 F. Supp. 2d 28, 30 (D.D.C.
on behalf of several hundred of these                The day after Thanksgiving our          2004) (recognizing the “fundamental
detainees arrested for misdemeanors             office, the Louisiana Capital Assistance     due process rights of a citizen of the
or non-violent, low grade felonies. The         Center, filed a habeas corpus petition       United States to freedom from arbitrary
vast majority of these prisoners were           on behalf of thirty of the detainees         detention . . . and to access to the
picked up on warrantless arrests by             in federal district court, arguing that      courts through the Great Writ of habeas
the NOPD. Following hearings in                 they were being held “in custody             corpus to challenge the legality of that
Baton Rouge, Judge Calvin Johnson,              in violation of the Constitution or          detention.”). The petition argued that
Chief Judge of the Orleans Parish               laws...of the United States.” 28 U.S.C       habeas relief was particularly suited to
Criminal District Court (appointed by           § 2241(c)(3). Patrick, et al. v.
the Louisiana Supreme Court to                  Cooper, et al., Civil No.05-6090 R                                     cont’d on page 4
4 The Advocate

                        BAYOU GUANTANAMO                                                              THE FEDERAL BAR
                    By R. Neal Walker (cont’d from page 3)                                           ASSOCIATION NEW
unlawful detention cases, noting that       century which prompted our Founding                      ORLEANS CHAPTER
“[t]he writ of habeas corpus commands       Fathers to defenestrate the British yoke                 YOUNGER LAWYERS
general recognition as the essential        and establish a more enlightened order                        DIVISION
remedy to safeguard a citizen against       as embodied by the Constitution and
imprisonment by State or Nation in          its various amendments.”). Historically,                         ANNOUNCES
violation of his constitutional rights.”    the Orleans Parish District Attorney’s
Abu Ali, 350 F. Supp. 2d at 30              office has had a very high refusal rate.             THE LUNCH WITH THE
(quoting United States v. Morgan,           See Jeff Palmer, Abolishing Plea                       COURT PROGRAM
346 U.S. 502, 506 n. 3, 98 L. Ed.           Bargaining: An End to the Same Old
248, 74 S. Ct. 247 (1954)). In a            Song and Dance, 26 Am. J. Crim. L.                       On April 19, 2006, the Honorable
response, the District Attorney argued      505, 533-534 (Summer, 1999)                          Edith Brown Clement, Circuit Court
that the petitioners were merely            (commenting on the Orleans Parish                    Judge for the United States Court of
“inconvenienced” by their detentions        District Attorney’s refusal procedures).             Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, will host a
and could not show that their                                                                    “Lunch with the Court” in West Con-
                                                The matter came on for hearing on
defenses would be prejudiced by the                                                              ference Room #258, second floor at the
                                            December 8, and with Judge Sarah
delays. This betrayed a serious                                                                  Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals at noon.
                                            Vance’s intervention, the matter was
misunderstanding of the issue, for the                                                           Please contact Karen Williams at 504-
                                            settled. The petitioners agreed to
petitioners complained less about the                                                            589-7990 if you wish to attend “Lunch
                                            withdraw the petition in exchange for
effect that their detentions would have                                                          with the Court.”
                                            assurances that the prosecution would
on their cases (if indeed they were
                                            screen their cases before December
prosecuted) than on the fact that they                                                                The “Lunch with the Court” pro-
were being detained without charge.                                                              gram is a project of the Federal Bar
In a traverse, the petitioners argued            As noted, the Louisiana Capital                 Association - Younger Lawyers Divi-
that they were being held in “continuous    Assistance Center realized that the                  sion. “Lunch with the Court” is an op-
detention without charge.” United           Orleans Parish D.A.’s office has                     portunity for members of the Federal
States v. Contreras, 197 F. Supp. 2d        historically had a high refusal rate,                Bar to interact with the judiciary in a
1173, 1176 (N.D. Iowa 2002)                 declining to prosecute roughly 25% of                setting outside of the formal courtroom.
(ordering indictment dismissed where        the cases presented to it by the New
defendant was arrested and detained         Orleans Police Department. Hence, it                     The “Lunch with the Court” pro-
for thirty-one days before charges were     was not a surprise that, when                        gram is free for members of the Fed-
filed in violation of 18 U.S.C. §           December 21 arrived, the prosecution                 eral Bar Association and $10 for non-
3161(b)). “It is the restraint on           filed formal charges against only three              members of the association.
individual liberty, not merely procedural   of the remaining petitioners in Patrick
stagnation following the filing of formal   v. Cooper. The remaining ten                             If you are interested in attending,
charges,” that was the essence of the       petitioners – some of whom had been                  please sign up as soon as possible, as
petitioners’ complaints. Contreras,         detained for five months – walked out                space is limited to 10 attorneys.
197 F. Supp. 2d at 1176; see also           of jail without being charged and were
United States v. Osunde, 638 F.             home by Christmas. A small victory,
Supp. 2d 171, 174 (N.D. Ca. 1986)           perhaps, but one worth the effort.
(rejecting government’s argument in
favor of protracted detention without       1
                                              The views expressed in this article are strictly
charge as “reminiscent of the               those of the author and not of the Federal Bar
governmental powers wielded by              Association or its New Orleans chapter.

merry old England in the eighteenth
                                                                                                        The Advocate 5

  On January 27, 2006, the Younger Lawyers Division of the New Orleans Chap-             THE FEDERAL BAR
ter of the Federal Bar Association hosted its annual Malcolm W. Monroe Federal             ASSOCIATION
Practice Seminar. Malcolm Monroe offers attorneys a unique opportunity to fulfill         NEW ORLEANS
Continuing Legal Education requirements and at the same time obtain admission
to all federal courts in Louisiana, including the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals,
in a joint admission ceremony held at the end of the seminar. In addition, by regis-
tering for the seminar, attendees become members of the Federal Bar Associa-
                                                                                             ASKS YOU TO

  This year’s speakers included Judges Berrigan, Barbier, Knowles, Shushan and
                                                                                          SAVE THE DATE!
Africk of the Eastern District of Louisiana, and practitioner Richard Westling, on
topics including Avoiding Rule 11 Sanctions, Law Practice Management, Profes-
sionalism, and The Role of the District and Magistrate Judges.                                 ANNUAL
                                                                                         LUNCHEON MEETING
  The seminar is aimed at new lawyers and is usually held in the fall. Due to
hurricane Katrina the seminar was moved to the January date and was scaled                  JUNE 30, 2006
down to a 4 hour seminar rather than the usual 7 hours. We were also forced to
react quickly when, on the morning of the seminar, a major plumbing leak was
discovered in the Eastern District of Louisiana Courthouse. With the help of the
Clerks of Court for the Eastern District and the Fifth Circuit, we were able to
relocate the seminar across the street to the Courthouse for the Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals. Attendees were successfully notified of the change of venue
and we did not lose any attendance.

  To our surprise and pleasure, we ended up with 157 registrants for this year’s
post-Katrina seminar, up from 129 registrants in November 2004.

  Our chapter welcomed 24 current FBA members to the event and enrolled 133
new members.                                                                                   SPEAKER:
                                                                                         SENATOR DAVID VITTER

                           BENCH BAR 2006                                                     LOCATION:
                                                                                             to be announced

                 Work is tentatively scheduled to begin on the
  Bench Bar 2006 Habitat for Humanity House on Saturday, May 13, 2006.
        If interested in participating contact alee
6 The Advocate

  The New Orleans Chapter of the Federal Bar Association will host its 14th Annual Judge Alvin B. Rubin Symposium on Ethics and
Professionalism in the ceremonial courtroom at the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana on Thursday, May
18, 2006 from 2:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. This symposium is held each year as a living memorial to the late Judge Rubin’s contributions to federal
jurisprudence and legal scholarship. This year’s topic focuses on the attorney-client privilege and will address issues such as inadvert-
ent disclosure, proper invocation of privilege, and discovery of electronic information. Seminar attendees may obtain continuing legal
education credit in both ethics and professionalism.

                               Federal Bar Association New Orleans Chapter
                                               Presents The
                            Fourteenth Annual Judge Alvin B. Rubin Symposium
                                   THURSDAY, MAY 18, 2006, 2:00 - 4:00 P.M.
                           500 POYDRAS STREET, CEREMONIAL COURTROOM, 5TH FLOOR

                   An Annual Panel Discussion on Aspects of Federal Law or Federal Practice
    Held as a Living Memorial to Judge Rubin’s Contribution to Federal Jurisprudence and Legal Scholarship.




                                          FEDERAL LAW SYMPOSIUM REGISTRATION FORM

                                             THURSDAY, MAY 18, 2006, 2:00 - 4:00 P.M.
                                     500 POYDRAS STREET, CEREMONIAL COURTROOM, 5TH FLOOR



ADDRESS:______________________________________________________________________                  PHONE:______________________________

FAX:______________________________ E-MAIL:___________________________________________________________________________



                                  ATTORNEY CONFERENCE CENTER
                                  HALE BOGGS FEDERAL BUILDING, ROOM 364
MAKE CHECKS                       500 POYDRAS STREET, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130
PAYABLE TO THE FBA                PHONE: (504)589-7990
                                                                                                                              The Advocate 7

  Several federal New Orleans lawyers flew to Washington, D.C. last month
for the FBA’s Midyear Meeting. The New Orleans Chapter, the largest in the
FBA, was well represented, as lawyers participated in the Sections and Divi-
sions meetings, Chapter Leadership Training Program, FBA’s Foundation
and the Midyear National Council meeting. Those in attendance were Ashley
Belleau, Deputy Secretary of National FBA, Matthew Moreland, Young Law-
yers Division Chair, Virginia Laughlin Schlueter, Criminal Law Section Chair,
Patrick O’Keefe, Chapter President, Mike Ellis, Foundation Historian. Robin
Spalter, a former New Orleans officer who currently serves as President of the     Foundation President and 5th Circuit Vice President,
FBA , together with Patrick O’Keefe and Matthew Moreland judged the Moot                   Baton Rouge lawyer David Guerry,
                                                                                  Vice-President Paul Wallace, and Historian Mike Ellis
Court Final Competition involving 22 law schools from across the country.

  The Foundation’s mission is to foster improvements in the practice of
federal law and to facilitate the administration of justice. One of the present
initiatives for the Foundation is the Hurricane Katrina Disaster Relief Fund,
established to provide funds to support legal assistance and/or professional
support for those affected by this tragedy. A special presentation was made
to the FBA’s Past President, Tom Schuck, by the New Orleans Chapter in
grateful appreciation of the support given to local lawyers following Hurri-
cane Katrina. The Midyear meeting included a luncheon at which all the
Sections and Division Leaders networked.

                                                                                      Ashley Belleau & Past President Tom Schuck

                     Robin Spalter

                                                                                             Section Chairs regular meeting
8 The Advocate

 SUMMARY OF RECENT CIVIL AND               sustained after the starboard engine of       Following a two week trial, the jury
   CRIMINAL VERDICTS IN THE                the push boat failed while he was at-         returned a verdict for the defendant.
                                           tempting to abort the crossing of a large     The jury found that Merck was not
CIVIL CASES                                ship. Plaintiff maintained that, as a re-     negligent in designing or marketing
                                           sult of the stalled engine, the ship struck   Vioxx, did not fail to warn of Vioxx’s
                                           the tow being pushed by the push boat,        side effects, and did not defectively
Gerard Gisclair v. Larry Griffin           and the collision caused plaintiffs to be     design Vioxx.
Towing Co. et al., 05-833, Section         thrown about the wheelhouse.
L (Jury trial held March 27, 2006)
                                           In July 2005, a jury initially returned
                                                                                         Judy Jordan et al. v. Transport Ser-
Marine Personal Injury/Jones Act           an inconsistent verdict, finding that the
                                                                                         vices Specialist, Inc., 04-1102, Sec-
                                           employer’s negligence was not the
The captain of a tow boat sued the                                                       tion D (Jury trial held August 15, 2005)
                                           proximate cause of the injuries, but
shipowner and operator for negligence,
                                           nonetheless assigning the employer            Personal Injury/Motor Vehicle Acci-
unseaworthiness, and maintenance and                                                     dent
                                           20% of the fault. After receiving in-
cure. The captain claimed he had in-
                                           structions from the Court on the incon-
jured his shoulder in three separate in-                                                 The plaintiff maintained she was injured
                                           sistencies in the verdict, the jury fur-
cidents: when he cranked a winch,                                                        when an 18-wheeler struck a public
                                           ther deliberated and found that the
when he exited a manhole, and when                                                       transportation bus in which the plain-
                                           employer’s negligence was a proxi-
he slipped and fell in the engine room.                                                  tiff was a passenger. The 18-wheeler
                                           mate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries.
The defendants had paid maintenance,                                                     stipulated to liability, but disputed the
                                           The total to plaintiff from the jury was
but had refused to pay cure.                                                             extent of plaintiff’s injuries. Plaintiff
                                                                                         claimed she suffered a torn rotator cuff
The jury returned a verdict for the de-
                                           The December 2005 bench trial ad-             or at least aggravation of a pre-exist-
fendants on liability, but awarded                                                       ing torn rotator cuff.
                                           dressed only the plaintiff’s claim for
$3,980 in maintenance and $22,836
                                           maintenance and cure. The Court
in cure to the plaintiff. The Court en-                                                  The jury awarded $11,493, which con-
                                           awarded $2,368 in maintenance and
tered judgment as a matter of law for                                                    sisted of $10,000 for pain and suffer-
                                           $5,693 in cure together with pre-judg-
the defendants finding no evidence of                                                    ing and $1,493 for past lost wages.
                                           ment interest. There was no award of
arbitrary, capricious, or wanton con-                                                    Plaintiff had sought roughly $90,000
                                           attorney’s fees or punitive damages.
duct in defendants’ failure to pay main-                                                 in damages.
tenance and cure.
                                           Evelyn Irvin Plunkett v. Merck &
                                           Co., Inc., 05-4046, Section L (Jury
Eric Blackwell v. Mid-Stream Fuel
                                           trial held February 6-17, 2006)
Svc, et al., 04-1686, c/w 04-1930,
Section L (Bench trial held December       Products Liability
22, 2005)                                  The widow of a man who died from a
Marine Personal Injury/Jones Act           heart attack sued the manufacturer of
                                           the drug Vioxx. The plaintiff claimed
The captain of a push boat sued his
                                           Vioxx had caused her husband’s death.
employer and the vessel owner for neck
and back injuries he claimed to have
                                                                                                            The Advocate 9

                                                                                   NEW MEMBERS
                    CLERK’S CORNER                                               The Federal Bar Association
                 by Honorable Loretta G. Whyte                                   welcomes its new members:

                                                                                      Michael Ecuyer
                                                                                 Gainsburgh Benjamin David
         ELECTRONIC FILING UPDATE                                                      Meunier et al

  Well, it is finally here! After a long period of preparation and several              Devin Morris
delays, the Eastern District of Louisiana is ready for electronic filing.        Taylor Wellons Politz & Duhe

  The court will be conducting training sessions at the courthouse twice
a day for the forseeable future. Lawyers must attend one of the ses-
sions in order to receive their passwords and be authorized to file elec-
tronically. You are welcome to bring one member of your staff with you                ATTORNEYS
and we will also offer classes for additional staff as soon as possible.             ON THE MOVE
  As an added bonus, the classes will be approved for CLE credit, and
of course, there is no charge.                                               Valerie T. Schexnayder, Esq. has opened the
                                                                             firm of deLaup & Schexnayder, LLC. The
                                                                             firm is located at 110 Veterans Memorial Blvd.,
  You are invited to sign up for this training at
                                                                             Suite 535, Metairie, LA 70005.

  You should review the information posted on the court’s website be-        Any member of the Federal Bar Association
                                                                             wishing to announce a move or professional
fore coming to training. You will also want to make sure that your office
                                                                             intention should contact an FBA Board
equipment conforms to the technical requirements for electronic filing.
                                                                             member, or Karen Williams at the Attorney
It will also be helpful for you to be familiar with the Administrative       Conference Center (504-589-7990) with the
Procedures adopted by the court to assure effective operation of the         appropriate information. Consider this an
system. These procedures can be found on the court’s website at              added benefit of FBA membership.

                                                                                        National FBA
                                                                                      Newsletter Award

 Don’t forget to visit our website at
10 The Advocate

                              NEW ORLEANS FBA HOSTS FORUM
                             ON NEW ORLEANS RECOVERY ISSUES

           On January 31, 2006 the Chapter hosted a spirited dialogue on urban issues confronting the restoration of New
         Orleans at WWL-TV. The program, which was taped in the studio, featured a panel of experts from disciplines as
         diverse as housing, labor, education, public health, tourism and legal services. Moderated by broadcast veteran
         Charles Zewe, the panel discussed the many connected issues which confront not only the rejuvenation of the city
         but the path to its improvement. To keep the discussion moving, Judge Sarah Vance was stationed in the control
         booth and Chapter members posed questions to the panel following their responses to topical questions presented
         by Mr. Zewe.

            The ninety-minute program was edited by a team headed by Chief Judge Berrigan and the resulting one-hour final
         product was polished by WWL to include introductory music and closing credits. We intend to make the program
         available to public broadcasters free of charge, as a public service. Funding for broadcast expenses on network
         television is being solicited as well. Look for this program, entitled “Issues and Information,” to appear in the near
                                                                                                                           The Advocate 11

                                        THE BANKRUPTCY BEAT
  The main themes of the last article that I wrote for the FBA in       After October 17, 2005, our
March 2005 were change, and how interesting it is to be the clerk    case filings plummeted to less
of the bankruptcy court. These themes have continued in full         than 75 per month for the months
force during the last year.                                          of November 2005 through Feb-
                                                                     ruary 2006, and increased only
  I get frequent questions these days about the number of            slightly to 185 cases in March
bankruptcy cases that have been filed post-Katrina and the           2006. This trend has also been
effect on case filings of the changes to the bankruptcy laws that    experienced nationwide. It is,
became effective in October 2005.                                    of course, related to the huge
                                                                     number of filings made prior to
  After Hurricane Katrina struck, the Bankruptcy Court for the       BAPCPA’s effective date. Our
Eastern District of Louisiana opened up temporary offices in the     filings may be even a bit slower
“old” federal building in Baton Rouge. Our offices were in the       to rebound than other courts
same building and adjacent to the Bankruptcy Court for the           because many of the mortgage
Middle District of Louisiana. Its help was critical post-Katrina     companies have thus far been holding off on filing foreclosure
because we were able to combine computer systems, personnel,         proceedings since Katrina.
and resources in an efficient way so as to expedite the opening
of our court. I am proud to report that because of the initiative,     A positive piece of good new for the bankruptcy court and
dedication, and determination of our employees, we were able to      bankruptcy attorneys – where bankruptcy filings are good
open up the court for electronic filing (“ECF”) on September 15,     news – is that the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts
2005.                                                                projects that nationwide, bankruptcy filings will be fairly close
                                                                     to pre-BAPCPA filings by January or February, 2007. It is
   Electronic case filing was a godsend during our stay in Baton     problematical what the filings in our district will be because of
Rouge. It allowed attorneys to file remotely from wherever they      the effects of Katrina.
happened to be. Moreover, it provided them with notification of
case events by email at a time when the U.S. Mail was unreliable.      So, times have been interesting in the bankruptcy court. We
If ever the advantages of electronic case filing were apparent, it   have seen many changes recently and expect many more
was in the aftermath of Katrina.                                     changes in the future as BAPCPA is implemented. We are still
                                                                     in the process of modifying our procedures as new issues are
  It was a good thing we were up and running by mid-                 raised under BAPCPA.
September because the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and
Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”) became                       In closing, the bankruptcy court website is located at:
effective on October 17, 2005. This law enacted the most    We make a concerted effort to
sweeping change to the Bankruptcy Code since 1978. The Act           keep it current – it contains a lot of useful information. Also, as
greatly increased the court’s work load in the month before it       we prepare for our upcoming hurricane season, practitioners
became effective, as shown by our case filings. For each year        should be aware that we will put any cancellations of court
from 2001 through 2004, the annual filings for our court have        hearings on the website, and will also send an email to our
been approximately 10,000 cases.1 Thus, we have, on average,         attorney list. So, remember to keep your email address current!
typically received 833 new bankruptcy files per month. During        You won’t get our email notices if we don’t have your address.
the period from October 1, through October 17, 2005, however,
we had 3,643 filings.2 Put another way, we had a little over one-    1
                                                                         Recent total case filings:
third of our average yearly case filings during the first two and                       2001 - 10,113;
one-half weeks of October 2005! To say we were busy is an                               2002 - 9,512;
understatement.                                                                         2003 - 9,942; and
                                                                                        2004 - 9,658.
  All bankruptcy courts around the country experienced similar           The 2005 case filings ended up to be 11,642.
surges in filings. We referred to these cases as they were
working their way through the system as the “pig going through
the python”. Our filings in anticipation of BAPCPA’s effective
date might have actually been higher because many evacuated
debtors from the New Orleans area filed for bankruptcy
protection in other courts, mainly Baton Rouge, Houston,
Dallas, and Atlanta.
12 The Advocate

Federal Bar Association                                     FIRST CLASS MAIL
                                                             U.S. POSTAGE
New Orleans Chapter                                              PAID
                                                             PERMIT NO. 365
c/o Patrick E. O’Keefe
                                                            NEW ORLEANS, LA
Chapter President
500 Poydras St., Room 364
New Orleans, LA 70130

Interested in becoming a member of
the Federal Bar Association?

Federal Bar Association
1815 H Street, N.W., Suite 408
Washington, D.C. 20006-3697
(202) 638-0252
Membership Chair
Stevan C. Dittmann
c/o Attorney Conference Center
500 Poydras Street, Room 364
Hale Boggs Federal Building
New Orleans, LA 70130
(504) 589-7990

Membership fee of $125 includes both national
and chapter membership in the FBA. You can
apply online at

EDITORIAL BOARD: Barry W. Ashe and Valerie T. Schexnayder

Shared By: