Docstoc

11871

Document Sample
11871 Powered By Docstoc
					From: "Bob Slapnik"
To: "Aaron Barr" ,"Aaron Barr" ,,
Subject: RE: Network monitoring at QNA
Date: 2010-08-15 00:00:00


I agree with Aaron to get one box in. Hopefully Fidelis will work with us.


I told Matt Anglin that I'd get him a new proposal by COB Monday. I may
have to tell him I need more time to get the Fidelis info.


BTW, he said the connections there are either DS3 or T1. Fidelis needs that
info to provide the correct box.




-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Barr [mailto:aaron@hbgary.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 10:56 AM
To: Bob Slapnik
Cc: Greg Hoglund; Penny Leavy-Hoglund; Michael G. Spohn
Subject: Re: Network monitoring at QNA


My 2 cents. Get one box in. If it's effective they will come up with
the money for the rest or figure out how to span or reroute traffic.


Aaron


Sent from my iPhone


On Aug 15, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Bob Slapnik wrote:


> Greg, Penny and Mike,
>
> I need to submit a proposal for managed services to QNA by Monday, so I
need
> the info regarding Fidelis by then. I suggest we propose ONE Fidelis box
> for ONE QNA location, especially if we get it on a 3 or 6 month trial.
>
> I agree that Fidelis is the right technical solution, but it may not be
the
> right financial solution. Their boxes are expensive and QNA has 6-7 small
> locations. At QNA the total cost of Fidelis will exceed the total cost of
> AD software.
>
> Bob
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Hoglund [mailto:greg@hbgary.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 9:27 PM
> To: Bob Slapnik
> Cc: Penny Leavy-Hoglund; Michael G. Spohn; Aaron Barr
> Subject: Re: Network monitoring at QNA
>
> Fidelis is the correct solution. Penny is working with Mary Sullivan
> re fidelis boxen. I think we are green light. Get penny into the
> conversation and let's finalize the solution please.
>
> Greg
>
> On 8/13/10, Bob Slapnik wrote:
>> Mike, Greg, Penny, and Aaron,
>>
>>
>>
>> QNA wants us to expand our managed services proposal to include
monitoring
>> the network. Including the network would allow us to charge more and it
>> will make our host monitoring better if we also have network visibility.
>>
>>
>>
>> A complication is that QNA has 6-7 locations. We've been talking about
>> Fidelis but it is my understanding that Fidelis requires a box at each
>> location.
>>
>>
>>
>> Given the cost of Fidelis this may not make sense. Is there a cheap or
>> freeware alternative? I want to get QNA a proposal by COB Monday.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>>
>>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3071 - Release Date: 08/14/10
> 04:48:00
>
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3071 - Release Date: 08/15/10
02:35:00

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:4
posted:4/21/2012
language:
pages:2