�coulements de surface et souterrains UE 13 (2e ann�e) � Ph. Audra
Shared by: 1bHiDJi
-
Stats
- views:
- 16
- posted:
- 4/11/2012
- language:
- Latin
- pages:
- 21
Document Sample


Ch.1 – Introduction to
Karst development
and speleogenesis
Philippe AUDRA
hydro
h
t ec
pr o
Master
Gestion de projets
hydrotechnologiques & environnementaux
Introduction: the initial conditions
Progressive permeability / porous aquifers
5 conditions:
• Soluble and fissured rock (limestone…)
• Water (solvent, transport)
• Acidity (CO2 from vegetation)
• Hydraulic head
• and time…
Large karst development in:
- Wet regions (rain + vegetation)
- Mountains (topographic gradient) / plateau (long evolution)
Karst development
and speleogenesis
1 – An organized aquifer
2 – An evolutive dynamic
3 – Vertical cave pattern
1. An organized aquifer
1.1. Karst inception
Initial fissured media
Hydraulic head
Organization
Flow concentration (main drain)
Piracies
=> branchwork pattern
Breakthrough time ~ 10 ka
Large drains ~ 100 ka
Development of a karst aquifer
Dreybrodt W. & Siemers J. 2000
Cave evolution on two-dimensional networks of primary fractures in limestone
Speleogenesis. Evolution of karst aquifers, p. 201-211
1. An organized aquifer
1.2. Vertical organization
Recharge (diffuse / concentrated)
Unsaturated (vadose) zone
Epikarst
Vadose zone
Saturated (phreatic) zone
Epiphreatic zone
Vertical organization of a karst aquifer Drain (transmissive)
Annex systems (capacitive)
Vadose + phreatic flow
=> Highly heterogeneous
1. An organized aquifer
1.2. Vertical organization
The epikarst structure
Mangin A. 1975
Contribution à l’étude hydrodynamique des aquifères karstiques
Annales de Spéléologie
1. An organized aquifer
1.3. Perched vs. dammed karst
Perched karst
Spring above base level
Base
No phreatic zone
level Low storage
Main drain along impervious
basement
Dammed karst
Spring at base level
Large phreatic zone
high storage
Main drain at the water table
Base
level
2. An evolutive dynamic
2.1. Information from recession curves
Non linear: drains
Linear: annex system
A karst spring recession curve
Mangin A. 1975
Contribution à l’étude hydrodynamique des aquifères karstiques
Annales de Spéléologie
2. An evolutive dynamic
2.2. Exchanges: drain annex systems
High water
• Water higher in drain =>
recharge annex systems
Low water
• Water higher in annex
systems => recharge drain
=> Long linear recession
Exchanges: drain annex systems.
Left: high water; right: low water
Collignon B. 1988
Spéléologie, approches scientifiques
2. An evolutive dynamic
2.3. Karst aquifers classification [after Mangin]
Highly transmissive karst
(Aliou type)
Sharp flood peak
Short recession
Low storage
=> Highly organized,
evoluted karst, large drains
High storage karst
(Torcal type)
Delayed and gentle flood
Very long recession
Classification of karst aquifers Huge reserve
Mangin A. 1975 => Complex karst
Contribution à l’étude hydrodynamique des aquifères karstiques
Annales de Spéléologie
3. Vertical cave pattern
3.1. Main types of vertical cave pattern
Juvenile karst
Contact caves
Water table cave
Looping Cave
Palmer A. N. & Audra Ph. 2004
Patterns of caves
Encyclopedia of cave and karst science, p. 573-575
3. Vertical cave pattern
3.1. Main types of vertical cave pattern
Juvenile karst
• First karstification
• Recent uplift
• Sparse fracturing => steep WT
• Vadose entrenchment of initial
phreatic tube
=> Young, rapidly developing
karst (PNG), evaporites
Muruk system, Papua New-Guinea [Photo. J.-P. Sounier]
3. Vertical cave pattern
3.1. Main types of vertical cave pattern
Contact cave
• Perched karst
• Torrential flow =>
mechanical erosion
• Large galleries with boulders
• No significant phreatic
passages
Grotte de Méailles [Photo. J.-Y. Bigot]
3. Vertical cave pattern
3.1. Main types of vertical cave pattern
Water table cave
• Dammed karst
• Phreatic zone below base
level
• Regular discharge => WT
cave
Upstream series, Muruk [Photo. J.-P. Sounier]
3. Vertical cave pattern
3.1. Main types of vertical cave pattern
Looping caves
• Top of loops = highest floodwater
level (transition)
• Looping tubes = epiphreatic
• vadose + phreatic morphologies
• Soutirages = loops draining after
flood
Häuselmann, Jeannin & Monbaron 2003
Role of epiphreatic flow and soutirages in conduit morphogenesis
Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie
Hölloch, Switzerland [Photo. U. Widmer, Ballmann]
3. Vertical cave pattern
3.2. Influence of base level changes
Base level lowering
• Cave levels
Base level rising
• Flooded spring
• Flooded karst
• Cave levels “per
ascensum”
3. Vertical cave pattern
3.2. Influence of base level changes (lowering)
Cave levels
• Base level drop => phreatic
zone drop
• Stability of base level =>
new cave level
• Correlation with terraces
• Upper level abandoned
• Vadose extends downwards
Palmer A. N. 1987
Cave levels and their interpretation
The NSS Bulletin, n°. 49, p. 50-66.
Grotte de Saint-Benoît, France [Photo. J.-Y. Bigot]
3. Vertical cave pattern
3.2. Influence of base level changes (rising)
Flooded spring
• River aggradation
• Flooding of spring zone
River aggradation produces flooding of the spring area
[Jaillet & al. 2002]
Echo Spring, Mammoth Cave (USA)
3. Vertical cave pattern
3.2. Influence of base level changes (rising)
Flooded cave system
• Major base level rise
• Phreatic zone moves upward
• Conduits flooding
• Filling of adjacent passages
• Main flow lines remain active
• Vauclusian spring appear
from new ascending routes
or relict conduits reactivation
Bini 1994
Rapports entre la karstification périméditerranéenne et
la crise de salinité du Messinien…
Karstologia
Audra Ph., Mocochain L., Camus H., Gilli É., Clauzon G., Bigot J.-Y. 2004
The effect of the Messinian Deep Stage on karst development
around the French Mediterranean.
Geodinamica Acta, vol. 17, n° 6, p. 27-38
Fontaine de Vaucluse, -308 m (-254 m below sea level)
3. Vertical cave pattern
3.2. Influence of base level changes (rising)
Cave level “per
ascensum”
• Cave levels develop
according to the successive
stages of base level rise
• Deep flow lines remain active
• Level connected by chimney-
shafts
Chimney-shaft [Photo. J.-Y. Bigot]
Mocochain & al. 2006
Geodynamic evolution of the peri-
Mediterranean karst during the
Messinian and the Pliocene…
Sedimentary Geology
Horizontal tube, Saint-Marcel Cave, France [Photo. J.-Y. Bigot]
Conclusion
Heterogeneous
Evolutive
=> complex!
Conditions for speleogenesis
• Passive parameters: Geological structure (perched /dammed)
• Boundary conditions
Recharge (un)regular
Geomorphological evolution (base level changes)
=> Polygenic cave patterns
Get documents about "