Docstoc
EXCLUSIVE OFFER FOR DOCSTOC USERS
Try the all-new QuickBooks Online for FREE.  No credit card required.

complete guide of best antivirus of 2012

Document Sample
complete guide of best antivirus of 2012 Powered By Docstoc
					The Best Antivirus for 2012
The year 2012 has arrived, as have most of the 2012 antivirus tools. Which ones are best?

Contents
      The Best Antivirus for 2012
      Free Antivirus Tools




New model-year security products used to come out in the fall, like new model-year cars. In
2011, though, the first 2012 antivirus (G Data AntiVirus 2012 ($29.95 direct, 3.5 stars) turned up
way back in May. So far PCMag has reviewed over a dozen antivirus tools explicitly identified
as 2012 models, along with a number of others released during the same period.

New model-year security products used to come out in the fall, like new model-year cars. In
2011, though, the first 2012 antivirus (G Data AntiVirus 2012 ($29.95 direct, 3.5 stars) turned up
way back in May. So far PCMag has reviewed over a dozen antivirus tools explicitly identified
as 2012 models, along with a number of others released during the same period.

New model-year security products used to come out in the fall, like new model-year cars. In
2011, though, the first 2012 antivirus (G Data AntiVirus 2012 ($29.95 direct, 3.5 stars) turned up
way back in May. So far PCMag has reviewed over a dozen antivirus tools explicitly identified
as 2012 models, along with a number of others released during the same period.

Antivirus Comparison Chart
              Webroot Secure         Norton AntiVirus    Bitdefender          Kaspersky Anti-
              Anywhere               2012                Antivirus Plus       Virus 2012
                Antivirus            Read Review >         2012                  Read Review >
                Read Review >                              Read Review >




                $39.95               $39.99                $49.95                $39.95
Price
Ratings
              Business, Personal,    Business, Personal,   Business, Personal,
Type                                                                             Personal
              Professional           Professional          Professional
              Windows Vista,         Windows Vista,        Windows Vista,        Windows Vista,
OS
              Windows XP,            Windows XP,           Windows XP,           Windows XP,
Compatibility
              Windows 7              Windows 7             Windows 7             Windows 7
Malware
              4.5                    4.5                   3.5                   3.0
Removal
Malware
              5.0                    4.5                   3.0                   3.5
Blocking
Independent
              Fair                   Good                  Excellent             Good
Lab Results


Testing the Tools
To evaluate antivirus utilities I rely on hands-on, real-world testing. The malware removal test
involves installing each product on a dozen malware-infested virtual machines and challenging it
to clean them up. This article explains how I get from those tests to the figures in the chart that
follows: How We Test Malware Removal.




      Best Antivirus for 2012 malware removal chart For the malware blocking test I attempt to
install the same collection of threats on a clean system protected by the product being tested. The
article How We Test Malware Blocking explains how I analyze and score the results.




      Best Antivirus for 2012 malware blocking chart I also refer to reports from major
independent antivirus testing labs. The labs have vastly more resources than I do, so they can
perform large-scale tests that would take more time than I have available. The chart below
specifically lists results for the companies whose 2012 products are rounded up here. For full
details on how I interpret these lab results see How We Interpret Antivirus Lab Tests.
      Best Antivirus for 2012 lab tests chart Webroot isn't included in this chart because the
current Webroot antivirus is a completely different product from what the labs have used in most
of their tests.

Cleanup-Only Tools
Three of these recent products are specifically designed to clean up malware infestations, with no
real-time protection component. Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware Free 1.51 (Free, 4 stars) was the
most effective of these. Its detection rate wasn't high, but effective removal gave it 6.4 points
overall. The commercial Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware PRO 1.51 ($24.95 direct, 3 stars) does
add real-time protection, but it was the least effective of the entire group.

Norman Malware Cleaner 2.1 (Free, 3.5 stars) wasn't as effective as Malwarebytes. Its rootkit
removal score is especially low because most of the rootkits it detected were still running after its
alleged removal.

While not free like the other two, avast! Rescue Disc ($10/once direct, 3.5 stars) is inexpensive.
Rootkits and other malware types that subvert Windows itself should yield to this bootable tool.
However, in testing one rootkit remained running even after alleged removal.




Free Antivirus Tools
As noted, Malwarebytes and Norman Malware Cleaner are free antivirus utilities that focus on
cleaning up existing threats. A few other free entries handle both cleanup and real-time
protection.

Panda Cloud Anti-Virus 1.5 Free Edition (Free, 3.5 stars) doesn't have 2012 in the name, but it's
contemporary with the 2012 products. It had the highest detection rate in my malware removal
test, but incomplete cleanup brought its removal score down.

AVG Anti-Virus Free 2012 (Free, 4 stars) turned in a star performance for malware cleanup,
taking the highest or second highest score of all free products in every category. It also scored
well in malware blocking, and the independent labs give it good marks. AVG is our current
Editors' Choice for free antivirus.

The more recently-updated Avira Free Antivirus 2012 (Free, 4 stars) also fared well in my
testing and in independent lab testing. In the rootkit removal test it missed some samples and
didn't completely remove some it detected, putting it a tad behind AVG overall.

Mixed Ratings
Some of the 2012 products offered uneven protection. Outpost Antivirus Pro 7.5 ($29.95 direct
for three licenses, 3 stars) did well in malware blocking tests but quite poorly in malware
removal. Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 ($49.99/year direct for three licenses, 3 stars) skewed the
other way, scoring noticeably better at malware cleanup. G Data AntiVirus 2012 ($29.95 direct,
3.5 stars) had the highest detection rate in the malware blocking test and the second highest
overall blocking score, but in the removal test its performance was just average. ESET NOD32
Antivirus 5 ($39.99 direct, 3 stars) did a decent job of malware cleanup but wasn't nearly as
effective at blocking new malware attacks, especially rootkits.

In a similar vein, BullGuard Antivirus 12 turned in some of the lowest scores in my malware
removal test, but in the blocking test it squeezed in just behind G Data. McAfee AntiVirus Plus
2012 scored a bit better than BullGuard for malware removal, but its malware blocking skills
were just average.

TrustPort Antivirus 2012 ($39.95 direct, 3.5 stars) achieved good scores in both sets of tests.
However, it crashed several test systems, and its behavior-based detection doesn't distinguish
good programs from bad. Trend Micro Titanium Antivirus+ 2012 ($39.95 direct, 2.5 stars)
detected most threats in the malware blocking test, but didn't thoroughly block the threats it
detected. Kaspersky Anti-Virus 2012 ($59.95 direct for three licenses, 3.5 stars) gets rave
reviews from the independent labs. However, it scored poorly in our own tests and needed help
from tech support to clean up one threat.

Norman Antivirus 9 definitely left a bad impression. Even with help from tech support, it never
could install on two test systems, which accounts in part for its very low malware removal score.
Two other late-year arrivals, F-Secure Anti-Virus 2012 and GFI VIPRE Antivirus 2012, got the
same overall score for malware removal, but VIPRE did a poor job of cleaning up rootkits. Their
scores for malware blocking were also close, with F-Secure just a bit ahead.

More Than Antivirus
ZoneAlarm Antivirus + Firewall 2012 ($59.95 direct for three licenses, 3 stars) has added an
advanced disinfection component that did a good job cleaning up detected malware, but its
detection rate was low. It does include significant bonuses, adding firewall, phishing protection,
credit monitoring, and backup.

Bitdefender Antivirus Plus 2012 ($39.95 direct for three licenses, 4 stars) achieved good scores
in PCMag's testing. It includes identity theft monitoring, private data protection, Facebook
protection, and a powerful antiphishing component. The independent labs rate it very highly, and
its new AutoPilot mode means it won't get in your face.

That brings us to Norton AntiVirus 2012 ($39.99 direct, 4.5 stars), an Editors' Choice for
standalone antivirus protection. The labs give it good ratings and it scored very well in our own
tests. It includes exploit protection that's better than what you get in suites from other vendors.

The totally new Webroot SecureAnywhere Antivirus ($39.95 direct, 4.5 stars) is also an Editor's
Choice. It turned in a perfect score for malware blocking and came in second only to Norton for
malware removal. Because its "brains" are in the cloud the local client is unbelievably tiny.

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Tags:
Stats:
views:63
posted:4/10/2012
language:English
pages:5