Evidence Based Practice
Document Sample


Criteria for Selection of
Portfolio Projects
1
Stuff to keep in mind…
Selection of projects is a personal decision
and should reflect the student’s interests in
field of OT
May choose to focus on 1 population or
aspect of treatment (a theme approach)
Or be diverse and explore many topics
Portfolio is also the method by which you
demonstrate that you are prepared to practice
as an OT
2
Key Attributes
The 4 Commitments
Life long learning
Community service
Advocacy and leadership
Excellence in practice
3
Required Projects
Must select at least one project to
address each attribute (4 projects total)
– At least one must be written up applying
the OPPM
Literature review
4
Life Long Learning
Demonstrated through participation in
continuing education
– Workshops, seminars, conferences held by UAB,
professional organizations, consumer groups
– Professional presentations by candidates for
faculty positions, grand rounds, speakers from
university Centers etc.
– Self paced clinical study courses including online
courses
5
Life Long Learning
– Non-credit education classes offered by UAB
• Introductory sign language etc
– For credit classes taken in addition to the electives
required for graduation
• Low vision or gerontology certificates
Must complete a minimum of 10 hours of CE
– May do this through a variety of venues but only
one portfolio project is written
6
Community Service
Volunteer in some capacity in a project to
serve persons in the community
Project may be sponsored by UAB or a
private organization
Involvement MUST extend over 4 sessions or
1-2 days
– Week at camp ASCCA (good)
– Participate as a walker in a walk to raise money
(no good)
7
Advocacy and Leadership
Assume a leadership role with a professional
organization such as SOTA or a service
organization
Participate in an event
– Promoting occupational therapy, SHRP
– Advocating for needs of a special needs group
• Homeless persons, low vision etc.
8
Excellence in Clinical Practice
Observe in a clinic or shadow a practitioner
for several weeks to learn how a specific tx is
applied
Participate in providing tx to clients under the
supervision of a faculty member or another
clinician
Develop and implement a research project or
assist in completing a research project being
conducted at UAB
Develop a therapeutic tool for tx of a specific
client population 9
Evidence Based Practice
10
What is Evidence Based
Practice?
Using research literature to identify the
current best evidence for a treatment
intervention
Using this evidence to provide the best
possible treatment intervention for the
client
11
Why is Evidence Based
Practice Needed?
OT is both an art and a science
– The art of therapy is developed through clinical
experience
– But art must be justified by science
The science behind therapy is needed to
facilitate and guide clinical reasoning
– Sound clinical reasoning is necessary to justify
treatment outcomes
12
This is the Age of
Accountability
High cost of therapy means that therapy
has to be efficient and effective
– No time to waste on ineffective treatment
Therapists are held accountable for
treatment outcomes
– Must be able to justify your treatment
intervention in order to get paid
13
Most Important
it’s the right thing to do
Would you want a loved one or
yourself to be given unproven
therapy?
14
Evidence base is integrated
into practice through 5 steps
Write down a clinical question
Gather current published evidence that might answer
the question
Evaluate the gathered evidence to determine the
“best” evidence for answering the question
Communicate with the client and colleagues about
the evidence as clinical decision are being made
Evaluate the chosen evidence based procedures as
they are being implemented and revise and
individualize as needed
» Tickle-Degnen, 2000
15
Formulating the clinical
question
Questions usually surface while working with
the client (or observing a treatment session)
– Why is this treatment technique being used?
– Would treatment X be more effective?
– Could this treatment be used with X diagnosis?
– Which evaluation would be most effective in
identifying the client’s problems?
16
Qualities of a Good Research
Question
Well written question is critical to completing
the evidence gathering process
– Refines the literature search
Question should be specific but not so
specific that sufficient literature cannot be
found
– Example-what is the role of occupational therapy
in working with urban dwelling male teenagers
with fragile X syndrome within the middle school
setting?
17
Question Qualities
Concise questions are best
– Wordiness confuses both writer and reader
But the question must contain sufficient
information to guide the search
– Example What is vestibular stimulation?
• Doesn’t provide enough “key words” to narrow the focus
of the search
– Better: Is vestibular stimulation an effective
treatment intervention for children with autism?
• Key words include: vestibular stimulation, treatment
intevention, children, autism
18
Question Qualities
Questions that are worded too broadly
can created super-sized lit reviews
– What type of visual perceptual deficits are
associated with brain injury?
• Typing in the two key words-visual perceptual
deficit and brain injury will yield 600 articles
– Better question: do persons display visual
scanning deficits following hemispherial
CVA?
19
Completing the Literature
Review
Articles reviewed should have the
following qualities
– 1.The study investigates an outcome
variable that is relevant to the selected
treatment intervention (for example: if your
treatment intervention is training persons to
use bioptic lenses in driving, then the
outcome variable must be success in
resuming or beginning driving).
20
Article Qualities
2.The study assessed the outcome variable
in a manner that is valid and reliable
– for example, if the outcome variable in criteria #1
is success in resuming driving then rated
performance on a behind-the-wheel test or
obtaining a license would be valid measures but
asking the person’s opinion of whether he/she was
satisfied with the training is not valid or reliable).
21
Article Qualities
– 3.Study participants include members of
the population identified to receive the
treatment intervention.
• For example, if your treatment intervention
addresses carpal tunnel syndrome, then
literature that addresses tendon transplants
would not be appropriate.
22
Article Qualities
– 4.The study was designed to rule out non-
intervention explanations of the study’s outcome.
The study shows evidence of control for factors
that might affect measured outcomes such as use
of control groups, blind designs, random
assignment of subjects, etc.
• Literature published in peer reviewed journals is more
likely to use higher quality research designs but not
always
• All studies should show evidence of study controls
– Asking a person’s opinion on whether the treatment was
effective is NOT quality research!
23
Article Quality
Most areas of treatment intervention are very
dynamic
– Intervention approaches change as new
information is discovered
The majority of articles comprising any
literature review should have been published
with the last 10 years
If an area has been blessed with a lot of
research investigation, look for articles that
synthesize the research (those employing
meta-analysis are best) 24
How is Evidence Based
Practice Carried Out?
By carefully observing client outcomes and
not being afraid to question current practice
By subscribing to peer reviewed journals
relevant to your practice area
By regularly attending continuing education
venues
– Good ones will provide a bibliography of the
research used to develop the course
By conducting literature reviews to answer
clinical questions
25
Incorporating EB into
practice cont..
By joining an internet listserv for your
area of practice
By organizing or joining a professional
study or journal group
By obtaining practice guidelines for
treatment areas from AOTA or other
reputable organizations
26
Guidelines for Completing
the Literature Review
27
Purpose of Completing
the Literature Review
To demonstrate that you (the student)
are able to pose and develop a clinical
question and then answer it by
reviewing the research literature
28
Criteria for Selection
of the Topic
Must be relevant to the practice of
occupational therapy
Must address an aspect of evaluation or
treatment intervention
29
Literature Requirements
A minimum of 10 articles
All articles must be published in peer-
reviewed journals
– Articles appearing in the popular press
(Newsweek etc.) or trade publications (OT
Advance or OT Practice) are not acceptable
– Websites can not be used
All articles must be published within the last
10 years (exceptions approved by the
advisor)
Full text articles must be reviewed
– Abstracts are not acceptable 30
Components of the Literature
Review
There are three parts to the literature
review
Part 1. Clinical research question
– Use criteria previously discussed to
formulate the question
– In addition provide a reason why thus
particular question was selected
31
Literature Review
Components
Part 2 Review of the related research
– Articles should provide direct evidence for or
against the clinical question
– After reading the articles, identify the major
concepts supported by the articles
– Write a paragraph describing each major concept
and then document support for that concept using
corroborating research literature
• Ex: 5 for a tx intervention, 3 against and two-not sure
– DO NOT STACK ARTICLES ONE ON TOP OF
ANOTHER
• (they said and then they said and then they said)
32
Literature Review
Components
Part 3 Summarize findings and draw
conclusions
– Provide a brief summary of the overall
findings of the lit review
– Draw a conclusion to answer your question
based on what you read.
33
IRB Training
Must be completed by the end of this
semester and certificate given to the advisor
for your file
Route
UAB main website (uab.edu)
Administrative departments
Institutional review board
Investigator and staff training
IRB investigator training
Initial training
Online option 34
Get documents about "