2010 April 29 LM Meeting
Shared by: niusheng11
-
Stats
- views:
- 1
- posted:
- 4/7/2012
- language:
- pages:
- 2
Document Sample


TYPE OF LIBRARY MANAGERS, APRIL 29, 2010
MEETING
FACILITATOR Barb Wright-Wisner
Janine Reid, Elena Rosenfeld, Cameron Duff, Rita Kadavy,
ATTENDEES Jody Hungenberg, Cindy Osborne, Charlene Parker, Tony Brewer
Location: Carbon Valley Regional Library
BUDGET REDUCTION
DISCUSSION ALL
DISCUSSION
The Library Managers submitted a draft of recommended budget reductions for
Janine’s consideration. Janine, Eric and Cameron were invited to attend the meeting
to give their feedback. Topics discussed:
Substitutes – Because expenses for substitutes are included in salaries, it is difficult
to know how much is budgeted for this. Janine said the budgeted amount is $63,000.
Budget recommendations – Janine said that the recommendations provided by the
library managers help to prioritize the conversation with the Board. She would want
them to know if there were anything that would erode salaries and benefits,
collections, facilities. Janine expressed her thoughts on several of the
recommendations, and asked questions for the rationale behind some of the
suggestions.
Refinancing COPs - Janine feels that one thing we need to act on is to refinance the
certificates of participation this year. Interest rates are lower and it is a three month
process. If the Proposition affecting COPs passes this year, we couldn’t refinance
even if it saved money.
Amount to be saved – Library managers asked how much it is that needs to be
saved. Janine said the amount is $4.5 million.
Staffing reductions – Janine explained that the “expect less” comments came about
because there has been no staff turnover. She thought that the savings could be
achieved by attrition. When that didn’t happen, she realized we need to be looking at
different strategies. There was discussion about the pros and cons of reductions
across the board or by scaling back positions. There was agreement that beginning
discussions about voluntary reductions would be a place to start. .
When we will know revenues –We will know the revenue status by August 25. We
might learn earlier, like June, but Janine is wary of going by information from that
date because they have been burned in the past.
Addressing the concerns - Janine said that she is aware of the concerns of staff as
we go through this process. She would be willing to come talk to staff if that would
help, though she would like to wait until after the May 10 Board meeting, when we
will have a better sense of direction from the Board. She encouraged library managers
to set the tone, communicating that this is not a surprise. Others have gone through
this, and now it’s our turn. It’s cyclical, and the remedy is to go through a thoughtful
and deliberate process, even though not everyone may agree with all of the decisions.
Propositions- There was a question about the propositions. Janine indicated that she
and Andrew are working on the anticipated effects of the propositions. Part of the
problem is that there conflicting opinions on the effects of the propositions. She
mentioned, as one example, the starting point for the Certificates of Participation. So
she is planning on taking the worst case scenario. She has been drumming ideas for
getting the word out. There was also discussion about the BHAG (Big Hairy
Audacious Goal) of recruiting advocates from outside of library staff. Janine
indicated they would get working on this at the May 10 Board meeting.
DECISIONS
Begin conversations about level of interest in voluntary staff reductions.
ACTION ITEMS
PERSON
DEADLINE
RESPONSIBLE
Janine will take the suggestions from the Library
Managers and refine her own list to prepare for Janine May 10
presentation to Board on May 10.
Related docs
Other docs by niusheng11
Get documents about "