Your Federal Quarterly Tax Payments are due April 15th Get Help Now >>

MODELING OF INDUCTION HARDENING PROCESSES PART 2: QUENCHING AND by 9jjVQuZ

VIEWS: 51 PAGES: 10

									      MODELING OF INDUCTION
       HARDENING PROCESSES
    PART 2: QUENCHING AND HARDENING


                  Dr. Jiankun Yuan
             Prof. Yiming (Kevin) Rong



Acknowledgement: This project is partially supported
by Delphi and CHTE at WPI. Dr. Q. Lu was involved
in the early work of the project.




             http://me.wpi.edu/~camlab
                        Objectives
• To develop a numerical modeling system for analyzing quench
cooling and hardening processes based on temperature field data after
induction heating.
• To provide temperature distribution in workpiece at any time in a
quenching process
• To provide continuous cooling curves (CCC) of any location in
workpiece, for phase transformation analysis.
• To build an algorithm to analyze phase transformation in quench
cooling processes, based on time-temperature-transformation (TTT)
and CCC curves.
•To provide time traces of volumetric content of martensite, pearlite
and bainite formed in cooling.
• To formulate a relationship between martensite content and hardness
values, and to provide hardness patterns formed after quenching
process.
• To investigate key parameters (input AC power, frequency and gap
between coil and workpiece) effects on final hardening patterns.
                                        Principle: Phase Transformation
     Phase transformation kinetics from austenite to pearlite, bainite and martensite
Koistinen-Marburger model for martensite content determination
                                                                              TTT diagram
  f m  (1  f p  fb )(1  er ( M s T ) )
   r= 0.01-0.015
                                                                         (fs,ts)
 Avrami model for fp, fb determination in isothermal
                                                                                   (fe,te)
 transformation
                             ktn
         f 1  e
               ln(1  f s )        Generally
           ln               
   n(T )      ln(1  f e )        fs=0.5%, fe=99.5%                                  TTP curve
                   t 
                ln  s 
                   t                                                  ti
                    e
                                                                              Ms
                      ln(1  f s )
          k (T ) 
                         t sn (T )

 For continuous cooling , fp, fb can be determined
 using following expressions

     fi  (kntn 1ekt )i ti
                                 n



                                                          •Ms: Martensite start temperature
                      N
               f   f i                                 •Martensite can only be formed from austenite
                     i 1                                 after WP temperature lower than Ms
                                    Principle: Hardeness Analysis

               Principle: Relationship between martensite content and hardness

                                                                        fm
                                                                                    HRC
                                                                                                      Aim of
                                                                                                      hardening
                                                                        0.5         47.2              analysis
                                                                        0.8         50.3

                                                                        0.9         53.7

                                                                        0.95        56.3

                                                                        0.99        58.8



                                  0.47%                                HRC  82 .47 ( f m ) 2  99 .21( f m )  76 .187


                                                                                General expression:
                                                                              HRC  a( f m ) 2  b( f m )  c
Page 144, <<Steel and its Heat treatment>>, Karl-Erik Thelning
                                                                  Coefficients a,b,c varying with carbon content

                                                            For AISI 1070, 0.7% carbon, a=80.91,b=97,c=81.61
Case Study:Temperature Field Variation in Water Quenching Process



           t=0.5s
           Total quenching time
                                                    t=2s
           tq = 40s

            f=9600Hz
            s=1.27mm
            J=1.256e6 A/m2




              t=8s                                  t=40s
Case Study: Cooling Curves and Hardening Pattern




   Surface points                                                      Inside points
                                                                       along contour
                                                                       line T=8150C




         Material: Carbon
         Steel, AISI 1070




                                                    Hardness pattern form
                            Automotive parts from
                                                    numerical simulation
                            Delphi Inc.,
                            Sandusky,Ohio
      Case Study: Gap Effect - Hardening Pattern Variation with Tolerance
Tolerance= - 0.0025”             Tolerance= 0”



       S=1.2065mm                      S=1.27mm

       f=9600Hz                        f=9600Hz

       J=1.265e6                       J=1.265e6




          Tolerance= + 0.0025”


                                                           Fig. Hardening depth variation with gap
                   S=1.3335mm                              between coil and workpiece under three
                   f=9600Hz                                different frequencies.
                   J=1.265e6

                                                   • Hardening depth decreases with air gap distance
      Power Effect - Hardening Pattern Variation with Coil AC Current Density

       s  1.27mm                     s  1.27mm
        J  7 106 A / m 2            J  1.256 107 A / m 2
        f  9600Hz                    f  9600Hz
       th  7s                        th  7 s
       t q  40s                      tq  40s




(a) J  7 10 6 A / m 2        (b) J  1.256 10 7 A / m 2



       s  1.27mm                      s  1.27mm
       J  2.25 107 A / m 2           J  3 107 A / m 2
       f  9600Hz                      f  9600Hz
       th  7s                         th  7 s                 Fig. Hardening depth variation with input
       t q  40s                       t q  40s                current density with f=9600Hz, s=1.27mm



                                                               • Case depth increase with input AC
                                                               power
(c) J  2.25 10 7 A / m 2     (d ) J  3 10 7 A / m 2
             Hardening Pattern Variation with Input AC Frequency

  s  1.27mm                s  1.27mm
  J  1.256 107 A / m 2    J  1.256 107 A / m 2
  f  5000Hz                f  9600Hz
  th  7 s                  th  7 s
  tq  40s                  tq  40s




(a) f=5000Hz                (b) f=9600Hz



  s  1.27mm                                         Fig. Hardening depth variation with input
  J  1.256 10 A / m
                 7      2
                                                     current frequency with J=1.256e7 (A/m2),
  f  15000Hz                                        s=1.27mm
  th  7 s
  tq  40s

                              •Case depth decrease with input AC frequency.




(c) f=15000Hz
                           Summary
•   A quenching and hardening modeling system was developed with the
    following capabilities.
      (1) Provide workpiece temperature distribution at any time.
      (2) Provide cooling curve data of any location in workpiece.
      (3) Simulate the phase transformation process and predict volume
         fraction of Pearlite, Bainite, Martensite formed in cooling process.
      (4) Provide desired hardness pattern through proper simulation of coil
         design and optimum combination of control parameters.
      (5) Investigate parameters effects on final hardness pattern, including
         gap effect, AC frequency effect and current density effect.
•   Applied the developed system to investigate the hardening process on a
    complex surface of an automotive spindle.

								
To top