Get documents about "VLF EM AND MAG SUR AND OB SAMPLING OF THE DUMAS L CL
Shared by: xiangpeng
-
Stats
- views:
- 2
- posted:
- 3/24/2012
- language:
- pages:
- 78
Document Sample
III Illllll II 1*1.1.... . -..— --
42EI4SEW89 2.9429 LAPIERRE LAKE 010
VLF ELECTROMAGNETIC AND MAGNETIC
SURVEYS AND OVERBURDEN SAMPLING
OF THE DUMAS LAKE CLAIMS
TO JULY 31, 1986
BY: R. DAVIES
RECEIVED
SEP 20 1988
MINING IAXOS SKHMl
Toronto, Ontario
15 September 1986
(FILE: Dumas/Cover
D5;E-Monopros)
TABLE O
42EHSE8889 3.9429 LAPIBJRE LAKE
01OC
INTRODUCTION l
PROPERTY l
EXPLORATION HISTORY 3
REGIONAL GEOLOGY 3
PROPERTY GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION 5
CURRENT EXPLORATION PROGRAM 5
GROUND MAGNETIC SURVEY 8
GROUND VLF ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY 8
OVERBURDEN SAMPLING 9
ASSAYS 16
LARGE HINKIE DRILL AND PIT SAMPLE RESULTS 17
SMALL WINKIE DRILL, PIONJAR DRILL AND PIT SAMPLE RESULTS 19
DISCUSSION OF SMALL SAMPLE RESULTS 21
EXPENDITURES TO JULY 31, 1986 22
PROPOSED WORK AND RECOMMENDATIONS 22
CERTIFICATE 23
TABLES
TABLE l - Winkle Drill Sample Data for Large Samples 11
2 - Minkie Drill Sample Data for Small Samples 12
3 - Pionjar Drill Sample Data 13
4 - Pit Sample Data for Large Samples 14
5 - Pit Sample Data for Small Samples 15
FIGURES
FIGURE l - Location of Dumas Lake Claims 2
2 - General Geology of the Geraldton/Beardmore Area 4
3 - Property Geology 6
4 - Distribution of Greenstone Interpreted from Pebble Counts 7
5 - Winkie Drill Sections 10
6 - Histogram - Winkie Drill 20
7 - Histogram - Pionjar Drill 20
Contents cont'd - 2 -
ILLUSTRATIONS
MAPS l - Sample Locations In Pocket
2 - Magnetometer Survey - South Grid N-S and E-W Lines " "
3 - Magnetometer Survey - North Grid " "
4 - Compilation Electromagnetic, Magnetic, Overburden
Sampling-South Grid N-S Lines
5 - Electromagnetic Survey - North Grid " "
6 - Electromagnetic Survey - West Grid N-S Lines " "
7 - Electromagnetic Survey - South Grid E-W Lines " "
APPENDICES
APPENDIX l 22 Element Neutron Activation Analyses on
Concentrates from Dumas Lake
APPENDIX 11 Breakdown of Expenditures
FILE: D/Contents
(D5;E-Monopros)
INTRODUCTION
Hudson Bay Exploration and Development Company Limited hold 125 claims on Dumas
Lake, which are believed to contain the source of anomalous gold found in the
area's glacial tills.
VLF electromagnetic and magnetic surveys have been completed over part of the
property and overburden samples have been collected down-ice of geophysical
anomalies. Large (5-50 kg) overburden samples have been concentrated and
examined for visible gold particles and the concentrates have also been assayed
for gold and 21 other elements by neutron activation analysis. Small (100-200 g)
overburden samples collected just above bedrock have been assayed for gold using
the "free gold" or "metallies" method as provided by Assayer's Laboratory of
Toronto.
Diamond drilling is planned of selected geophysical targets coincident with
anomalous gold on the down-ice side.
PROPERTY
The property consists of 125 claims covering an area of 5000 acres at the north
end of Dumas Lake (figure 1). The claims straddle the north-south boundary
between Hipel and Kirby townships and the northern boundary of both townships,
with unsurveyed ground to the north. It lies in the Thunder Bay mining district
of Ontario.
Claims were staked between August and September of 1985 and are listed below with
their recording dates. Twenty days' work is due on each of the claims, which
will hold them for a year beyond their one year anniversary dates.
Number of Assessment
Claim Numbers Claims Recording Date Credits
TB 856911 I 9 August, 1985 Nil
TB 856913-923 inclusive II 9 August, 1985 Nil
TB 856929 l 9 August, 1985 Nil
TB 862700-709 inclusive 10 9 August, 1985 Nil
TB 862487-495 inclusive 9 6 Sept., 1985 Nil
TB 862500-516 inclusive 17 6 Sept., 1985 Nil
TB 862614-641 inclusive 28 6 Sept., 1985 Nil
TB 863335-358 inclusive 24 6 Sept., 1985 Nil
TB 863359-382 inclusive 24 6 Sept., 1985 Nil
125
- 2 -
8
862913 J**24JI4J M2493 ' "63 358^86 33 47 ' 86J3J6.. J."?333 ?',.19* 3 .?. 8.*!^t3 3 ?l|- l"^U'''.3 i2
863378
l 863344 '
l '
6 3:374'
'it^ '
ft 863 372 t
2 M 862 3 l/ ) 862SOOI^)86249I,8633S6'863349 | [863,3-frsj 51^863371
WEST
r~~|~"~7
862490
\~\
(86335 si
l
1663350
;"\
vTI
t ^s. 333_ 196 336 7 J.i
l
8;6 _ 8 l_ _ _ '863368 (863369
l
^^662302, , |86? r si (- e6 ^. 42
3 i xCJ l l
^^1 ,-^^ J64 '^WJ 3
86M39 '8633661 63;J65,aj5 :J
~nT i n i i "
863340 83389*B6336QI86336 l l 863362
862504 86248 1862700 ' 5M
856916 185691/Si 862702*862632
KIRBY TWP.
e369!4 j 8626 3O (862631
- -L- - —————
sS692t '836918 1862628
836920 1836919 1862627
862623/462709 3^ .862624 86Z62S 362626 AREA
TREPTOW LAKE
and KIRBY TWP.
862621 ,86 2 622 , S
M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
GERALDTON
HIPEL MINING DIVISION
THUNDER BAY
lAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION
THUNDER BAY
FIGURE l LOCATION OF DUMAS LAKE CLAIMS
r- -3-
n The property is accessible year round by float- and ski-equipped planes based 38
kilometers to the northeast at Nakina (Leuenberger Air Service) or in the summer
only by float planes based 16 kilometers to the southwest at Jellico (Kyro Air
Service). A lumber road reaches within 500 meters of the north end of Treptow
Lake, on which part of the north boundary of the claim group lies 5 kilometers to
the south. The claims are also accessible by canoe or skidoo from the south via
Dumas Creek and Tigerlily Lake and a number of cut portages, or from the north
via Treptow Creek and Treptow Lake. The southern boundary of the claims lies
6 kilometers north of the Canadian National Railway and 11 kilometers north of
highway 11. The town of Geraldton lies 22 kilometers to the southeast.
EXPLORATION HISTORY
There has been no recorded exploration in the immediate area of the claims,
which is shown on geological maps (figure 2) as being underlayed by granite but
in reality is an area of poor exposure, little relief, and with a few granite
outcrops.
Claims have been staked in volcanics surrounding the granite area. Massive
sulphides, which produce good electromagnetic anomalies, and iron formations,
which produce strong magnetic anomalies, have been the main exploration targets.
Pebble counts on reconnaissance samples collected by Hudson Bay in the area of
the claims show greenstones relative to granite, ranging from 14 to 76 percent,
suggesting the presence of some greenstone bedrock beneath the extensive
overburden.
REGIONAL GEOLOGY
The Dumas Lake claim group is located along the north boundary of the Beardmore-
Geraldton greenstone belt, which lies at the southern boundary of the
east-trending, isoclinally folded, Early Precambrian, metavolcanic-
metasedimentary sequence of the Wabigoon Subprovince. Fine-grained metasediments
(wacke, siltstone, argillite) bounded on the south by laterally extensive mafic
to intermediate metavolcanics is apparently overlain by coarser grained
metasediments in the Geraldton area (conglomerate, wacke, argillite, ironstone).
The metasediments are overlain by mafic to intermediate volcanics north of
Beardmore, and farther north in the Paint Lake area by felsic pyroclastic rocks
interfingering with coarse, clastic metasediments. The belt is intruded by
felsic batholiths, stocks and sills, and lenticular mafic intrusions. Late
Precambrian diabase dykes and sills intrude all rock types. The regional
metamorphic grade is greenshist facies.
c*r -Vli ' l * ^VLL 'f
GRANITE
BASIC VOLCANICS
ACID VOLCANICS
SEDIMENTS
BASIC IGNEOUS ROCKS
M.m 2 l O 10 12 16 18 X
6000 10 30 Kilomtrct
SCALE
FIGURE 2 GENERAL GEOLOGY OF THE GERALDTON-BEARDMORE AREA
- 5 -
r
PROPERTY GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION
The property 1s shown on geological maps as being underlayed by granite, based on
outcrops of granite exposed l kilometer southeast of Dumas Lake, a small outcrop
on the shore of an Island 1n the lake, outcrops of granite 2 kilometers northwest
of Dumas Lake, and abundant outcrops of granite on the shores of Treptow Lake to
the north. Outcrop on the claims 1s sparse and confined to the southeast, as
shown 1n figure 3.
Airborne magnetic surveys show a magnetic high crossing the northern part of the
property which Indicates a variation 1n bedrock composition.
Pebble counts made In 1985 on overburden samples show greenstone counts ranging
from 14 to 76 percent. Percentage greenstone relative to granite 1s shown on
figure 4, with an Interpretation of bedrock geology.
A number of prominent linear features are evident on magnetic and topographic
maps. Two of these features are shown in figure 3. The dominant one strikes NNE
from Treptow Lake through Dumas Lake south to Tigerllly Lake. A second linear
strikes NNW through a small lake NE of Kirby Lake.
CURRENT EXPLORATION PROGRAM
Exploration of the claims was Initiated in the fall of 1985. Lines were cut at
800-foot Intervals in north-south and east-west directions and subsequently
surveyed using 100-foot stations with an EDA OMNI-IV magnetometer and an EM-16
VLF electromagnetic instrument. Work in 1985 totalled:
25 miles of line cutting
25 miles of magnetic survey
25 miles of VLF electromagnetic survey (NAA/NSS)
In the winter of 1986 further line cutting and YLF electromagnetic surveying was
carried out as follows:
43 miles of line cutting
43 miles of VLF electromagnetic survey (NAA)
/T-
VOLCANICS
DISTRIBUTION OF GREENSTONE
INTERPRETED FROM PEBBLE COUNTS ( GREEN
STONE AS PERCENTAGE OF GREENSTONE
GRANITE )
e—O ..—-W
•THU'-'-V :."-"
JKrfrr LoAaxXA. -,
SS: Sg S,
7=0--: .f^i rff ,i
P- -*-.^—-^a ^.- -..^'^""^-frtfcJZi -.*"T*"*' U-y ^-'.'-si-- -
^•?iiB*3S2r! -J^^^fea^9.-.. E Scale J53J5 or l Inch to l MUe
40 O____ 1 z 3 ^^^4 MllM
l Mttrw 1000 6 KIMfiMlra*
FIGURE 3 PROPERTY GEOLOGY ( From Ontario Department of Mines maps
45a and 50f, scale l inch to l mile, and map 2143G, scale
l inch to l mile )
r-
Overburden sampling down-ice of geophysical anomalies was carried out on part of
the property using three methods. Initially, a "Winkie" drill equipped with
auger rods was used to recover samples weighing 2-50 kilograms but proved
difficult to move and set up. A Pionjar percussion drill with a 100 gm capacity
flow-through sampler was introduced to probe ahead of the "Winkie" drill and
identify areas of shallow overburden where samples could be readily and more
easily obtained using a shovel. The Pionjar was also used to test deep anomalies
when snow conditions made moving of the "Winkie" drill virtually impossible.
Locations of samples are shown on Map l (in Pocket).
GROUND MAGNETIC SURVEY
A magnetic survey was carried out on north-south and east-west lines spaced 800
feet apart with stations at 100-foot intervals. An EDA OMNI-IV magnetometer was
used with a base station. Data is contained on maps 2 and 3 (in pocket).
Total magnetic variation was 698 gammas, with a prominent 350 gamma magnetic
anomaly laying in the northern part of the property and a narrow linear 200-300
gamma anomaly laying close to line 48+00 S between 8+00 W and 10+00 E.
GROUND VLF ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY
A VLF electromagnetic survey was carried out at 100 foot stations on north-south
lines spaced 400 feet apart. Transmitter NAA (Cutler Maine) was used, with all
readings recorded facing north. Profiles are shown on maps 4-6 (in pocket).
A second survey was carried out at 100 foot stations on east-west lines spaced
800 feet apart. Transmitter NSS (Annapolis Maryland) was used with all readings
recorded facing north northeast. Profiles are shown on map 7 (in pocket).
A geonics EM-16 electromagnetic instrument was used for the survey. The
instrument is a very low frequency receiver which operates in the 15 to 25 Khz
band and makes use of radio signals transmitted by components of a communications
network operated by the United States Navy. Signals transmitted from vertical
antennae produce concentric, horizontal, magnetic fields (the primary field)
around the antennae. Under the influence of this primary field conductive bodies
generate weak, secondary fields which are detected by the instrument.
- 9 -
The EM-16 receiver consists of two receiving colls at 90 0 to each other and the
Inputs of these colls are used to measure the secondary field. When the
Instrument 1s properly oriented, the signal from the vertical coll Is minimized
by tilting and the percentage of tilt is recorded (1n-phase reading). The
remaining signal in this coil is balanced out by a measured percentage of the
signal in the other coll (out-of -phase reading), after being shifted by 90 o
in-phase. Normally this coil is parallel to the primary field.
Coupling of transmitter NAA (Cutler, Maine) with ENE-WSW conductors while
traversing north-south lines was reasonably good. A prominent "main" ENE-WSW
conductive zone, offset by a number of NNW-SSE structures, follows a creek east
of Dumas Lake. Parallel but less conductive ENE-WSW zones lie to the north and
south of the "main" zone. The ENE-WSW zones are Interpreted as being conformable
to bedding or foliation.
Coupling of transmitter NSS (Annapolis, Maryland) with the NNW-SSE structures
while traversing east-west lines is good. The NNW-SSE structures are interpreted
as faults related to the large regional NNE-SSW linear that passes through the
west side of Dumas Lake.
n
OVERBURDEN SAMPLING
The "Winkle" drill equipped with 3-inch diameter anger equipment proved effective
in obtaining reasonably large samples of overburden that could be panned and
examined for visible gold. Approximately 7.5 kilograms of sample are obtained
per metre. Large samples were screened and the -0.5 mm fraction concentrated
over a Deister table and examined for visible gold. A small 100-200g cut was
taken from each larger sample and a similar size sample was taken from the bottom
of each drill hole and assayed for gold. The major drawback to using this drill
equipment is the time required to move it from site to site. When snow
conditions are poor moving becomes very difficult. "Winkle" drill sections are
shown in figure 5 and the sample data is summarized in tables l and 2.
A Pionjar percussion drill was used to drive a string of l metre long rods,
tipped with a 100 gram capacity flow-through sampler, to bedrock. The technique
was effective in obtaining 100 gram samples, 1n most cases from the six inches of
"till" immediately above bedrock. Pebbles, in some cases, block the flow-through
sampler preventing the recovery of the desired lower section of the hole. A
summary of the Pionjar drill hole data is contained in table 3.
- 10 -
*-..^s
w
i~ ' i i *
*Tf i5
t;
c1 s li ZED
P S
li
M
l-.
Jl
1
fi
O-—^-—
** S
*
s s fs \ s- *
k 1 "
f
lo
s fi
I'll ft * ;
7 o-1
8 8 0.
0
tt
*
II
J- '
0 5 O J^
i: - II
EC
i i
(/)
i-
M
1 H
If
1 0 1
f- '.
J-*
i | J
it
tn
0
O i ji J s
o V * n
"j*
S* n
o L "
;w
! ^-
•o ix l
in u
t 4
u) 5 S'
3*
' U\ s* S^ "
z.
1* Ml o \
1 * * o
r
iV 'u
111
o v \fi
i --
H
O
UJ
f ji
i i* s
? K i
i
vn B
i 3
S*
.
MS II
8 ,
w l (n s
tt
Q
ft j~ II f
ill
i
S J *
s 1 t S r
, l
o -* S :
———5————"
II Ul i- *)
0 o
t f
i. ** ? * U! ^
-a S
1 ul V/1 3
?5t 0 II ^ tt
I*
t s
j 2
L
v
3
0
j fe:
J UJ
, j,fl 1
UJ •*v
8
i
i; -r O *.
i
5-
••i
*
"M
i ** ,^
*
a* * ' 1
TABLE l
NORMALISED GOLD COLOUR COUNTS AND ASSAYS OF
CONCENTRATES OF LARGE SAMPLES FROM WINKIE DRILL HOLES
COMPLETED ON DUMAS LAKE CLAIMS TO APRIL 30, 1986
HOLE SAMPLE FROM TO GOLD SAMPLE COLOURS/ PPB Au CONC. WEIGHT WEIGHT ug Au/
NO. NUMBER (Feet) COLOURS WEIGHT 30 Kg IN CONC. GMS OF Au ug 30 kg
l 4.1 7 < 38 1.96 ^.074 ^.548
l 4.1 7 < 30 2.24 ^.067 ^.496
2 2.3 26 11 1.97 0.022 0.287
O 2.4 7 1.82 0.013 0.162
l 8.1 < 30 2.36 0.071 0.263
O 20.3 330 4.24 1.399 2.067
HOLE TOO SHALLOW - SAMPLE TOO SMALL
l 1.8 17 55 1.16 0.064 1.067
l 13.5 2 270 2.25 0.608 1.351
O 8.1 < 36 2.04 ^.073 ^.270
ORGANIC MATERIAL TO BEDROCK
18.0 52 3.55 0.185 0.308
0.166 0.283
^.057 ^.115
O 5.0 ^.050
O 4.5 < 42 ^.080 ^.533
SAMPLE LOST
SAMPLE WASHED AWAY
O 5.9 < 42 3.58 ^.150 ^.763
2 11.7 5.1 77 2.71 0.209 0.536
TABLE 2
FREE GOLD DETERMINATION ON CUTS TAKEN FROM LARGE SAMPLES FROM WINK IE DRILL MOLES
AND ON SAMPLES TAKEN FROM THE BOTTOM OF EACH WINKIE DRILL HOLE
COMPLETED ON DUMAS LAKE CLAIMS
Au
HOLE SAMPLE FROM TO WEIGHT Au WEIGHT Au WEIGHT TOTAL ORIGINAL Au Au ORIGINAL
NO. NUMBER (Feet) +40 MESH -40 -H15 MESH -40 +115 MESH -115 MESH -115 MESH WEIGHT SAMPLE -40 -H15 MESH -115 MESH SAMPLE
g ug g ug g g ug PPB PPB PPB
^^ H-10 0 4.5 20.0 * 11.6 0.84 45.0 77.8 * * 19 *
-*Bb 117.9 * 37.3 14.10 206.0 327.0 * * 68 *
•*^-^ -12 0 4.0 26.8 * 13.1 0.14 49.4 88.0 * * 3 *
^"--w^—4*J •*W* 19.4 7.5 * 8.1 0.63 47.1 75.9 * * 13 *
-14 TT 98.4 * 38.3 8.56 250.9 389.3 * * 34 *
4^ -15 0 1.5 15.2 * 10.4 1.77 43.3 69.6 * * 41 *
2.6
—J^.*^^^^^l 20.6 * 19.9 1.55 37.6 78.1 * * 41 *
-15B 2.0 MISSING
-16 1.5 2.0 64.5 * 23.2 4.42 258.9 349.8 * * 17 *
^S-T,.,^-!-? 2.0 6.0 17.5 * 7.3 1.34 62.3 87.4 * * 22 * ro
^rrj""—-""M* 8.0 7.7 * 19.9 11.57 123.0 150.8 * * 94 * i
-19 JUT""i** 113.0 * 28.5 1.18 344.9 568.8 * * 3 *
0 0.5 34.1 * 13.0 1.24 90.4 142.1 * * 14 *
-21 ****i* 11.2 * 6.4 0.70 58.1 76.1 * * 12 *
2.0
"W — '"?r^•*4^-i*.—^ rt 13.0 * 5.2 1.95 59.1 77.6 * * 33 *
-22A ™*itwc* rf
-23 2.0 2.5 54.8 * 42.7 5.73 222.6 323.1 * * 26 *
4*-*.*^ -24
^^"""*i^ 0.5 7.0 49.9 3.05 42.8 1.48 57.6 150.3 4.53 71 26 30
•6^7*0 11.5 34.0 2.35 29.8 4.94 96.3 160.1 7.29 78 51 45
-26 Tfife,J3.0 20.9 2.80 27.7 3.17 61.3 109.8 5.97 101 5 54
-27 13.0 f&jL 346.9 7.15 60.2 18.65 259.9 666.9 25.80 119 72 38
-S*.—————-T?l, —~4r 4.7 52.6 1.15 26.3 14.22 130.1 209.0 15.37 44 109 73
-28 ^fc*. 495.2 2.54 38.1 14.93 264.1 797.3 17.47 67 57 22
'*-——-30 •aa*.,
—WL 7.6 76.7 3.20 40.0 5.69 74.1 190.7 8.89 80 77 46
•tMk 718.0 4.80 29.8 8.32 212.3 960.2 13.12 161 39 13
NO SAMPLE R ECOVERED
H^^^W-Se -A*, 12.5 MISSING
*M 303.2 2.55 89.4 9.76 378.8 771.4 12.31 29 26 16
**-———-3fl 7.5 18.5 MISSING
-39 n^^^^^*Mfc 93.3 10.35 48.7 40.91 505.0 647.0 51.26 213 81 79
TABLE 2 - Continued Page 2 of 2
Au
HOLE SAMPLE FROM TO WEIGHT Au WEIGHT Au WEIGHT TOTAL ORIGINAL Au Au ORIGINAL
NO. NUMBER (Feet) +40 MESH -40 HIS MESH -40 H15 MESH -115 MESH -115 MESH WEIGHT SAMPLE -40 HIS MESH -115 MESH SAMPLE
g ug g ug g g ug PPB PPB PPB
***Vlf" -40 0 13.0 MISSING
r -41 13.0 4ivfr 131.0 5.85 46.7 19.09 285.4 463.1 24.94 125 67 54
•O— -42 0 26.3 6.8 1.20 4.2 8.88 107.8 118.7 10.08 286 82 85
-43 26.3 *didta. 116.9 3.45 71.6 50.03 442.6 631.1 53.48 48 113 85
•W— -44 6.0 12.0 10.1 1.55 22.5 6.62 55.7 88.3 8.17 69 119 92
-45 12.0 18.0 16.0 0.60 21.6 10.47 129.7 167.2 11.07 28 81 66
-46 A? -J ^^db
1Q * C ^^^^^^ MISSING
46* -47 0 15.2 97.3 1.75 64.8 12.32 359.2 521.2 14.07 27 34 27
-48 15.2 4M* 30.2 0.55 8.2 2.50 34.2 72.6 3.05 67 73 42
*r~ -49 3.0 4.5 77.8 2.00 33.5 12.57 152.6 263.9 14.57 60 82 55
-50 4.5 4* 144.4 2.35 50.0 22.07 204.3 398.7 24.42 47 108 61
18 -53 MISSING
-54 330.3 0.65 7.02 10.10 367.0 704.3 10.75 93 28 15 ro
3*
W-10(2) 68.5 2.35 23.1 5.55 72.0 163.6 7.90 102 77 48
W-13(2) 28.8 0.45 22.5 7.02 85.9 137.1 7.47 20 82 ' 54
W-15(2) 24.0 0.60 15.7 2.81 62.5 102.2 3.41 38 45 33
W-17(2) 60.4 2.70 35.1 7.41 111.5 207.0 10.11 77 66 49
W-18(2) 73.4 " 2.70 35.1 10.20 164.9 273.4 12.90 77 62 47
W-2K2) 18.5 1.25 27.1 5.05 98.4 144.1 6.30 46 51 44
W-22(2) 65.6 2.15 45.3 6.60 128.3 239.2 8.75 47 51 36
W-24(2) 28.7 2.20 38.8 5.99 120.9 188.4 8.19 57 50 43
W-26(2) 84.3 4.35 104.5 12.28 395.6 584.4 16.63 42 31 28
W-28(2) 72.6 2.05 62.1 10.51 245.7 380.3 12.56 33 43 33
W-29(2) 48.9 2.80 28.4 5.17 73.8 151.2 7.97 99 70 53
Assays on samples W-10 to W-23 were first reported with unrealIstlcally high values. Repeat assays carried out on the -115 mesh
fractions produced much lower values. The -40 +115 mesh fractions, having been used entirely In the first assay, could not be
repeated. Being extremely suspect, the first assays on the -40 +115 mesh fractions should be discarded and the calculated value for
the original sample can therefore not be calculated.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
l l i-'H-H-i-'i-'i-'i-'i-'i-'i-'iooo-joiui^oJiN}!-'
cD^icnai
en j* ra T*
i-* ro i-- roroi-*ro*~ro i— k-* H^ *- ro ro h-* i— i—
ininin o in in in o m in o m in in in in in in in in in o in ui in in
uirocjro^^^-*!^ i-* n^roc^H'CJ
i— CTi ui 10 o i— (J i— -~j i u ^- H- U) o o *o oo f ~i vo -l* l ua 10 -t* "— O5 H-
10 H-* ^ -vi 01 f- i-- CD -p. -j n 10 to -j ro vo 01 ro w o ai ax in Co r- -4 -u
h-roro ro K* i-" ro ro ro ro i—f ro i-* ro t-* H-* ro
m
o :E a
c m m
S I
-
w ut ro ro ro i-* LO ro ^ to ui-o u ^ ro ro ro ro vi t-* ro i-" -o w w * ro cj CD *-*
m o
o z
i— ro ro ^-i-- oi-'O ro ro o ooocj^ro CJt—ro
•o o
2 SP
l-* -H
3 = 3
01 O
- EI -
- 13A -
o
^H rj-or—inocOoocM—'cv^r-v-i
CM az
: -" S ii r* en ** n .i "-i ^H t-i "-i CM CM i-* i-i oo m*-i -H CM CM rt v CM in vooo f- CM
Kin
O. o
x: co coior-
3 O. in ci *H rt t-i .-i CM CM fo ro t-i rn 9F *c -* n ro ro m in co us en co eo CM
•tin o.
*
o
coininoincocnoocoininincoowininin oooinmoocMOOtoincno
US rt CM rt rt rt *T rt rt CM rt rt CM CO rt PJ m en in CO
tt co
o
r
OUJ CO rt rt m oo en S m r-* co co oo en co to t*. t~- rt r-10 10 co \o v 10 co co m co o t** CM
uj co m m m o co en o o co in m m co o rt rt rt rt o O o m o m o CMO mio o en m
•t m 3 ro rt rt VVVVCM rt CM —i CM co r- ^ CM
rt
f-i
wj
B '-
CM rt 3 "* CNJ CM * CO CM CO * "* CO CM CM ^ i-" CM -H CO CM CM ft CM CO CO m m rt
l'
oooinmoooomoooinomininm o—irtoinmooomomoi
VCM^H^^ CO t-IVV rt rtrtrtrt
o
z
in
UJ
cam
UI^H cn^U)*H^OCOOJO^lOO^OOO^t'Cncy)tnc\J^'Cij incoioincMi-ior-cocoip'^inin
o
uj 10 r* CM 10 m r^ o in-H m CM ^ CM CM en ro ^^ **- TJ- -^ m co 10 CM co f^ co oo m co r*
^H l i 4*4 ro t^. ^ io ^^ m 10 10 r^ m co ^^ *^ in en m c.* co co co fo C3 en en CM oo CM CM f*.
^f CM CM CO CM i-H i^ CO CO CM CM CO *^ CO *"H CO CM r^ t^ ^H CO ^-t CO ^H CM CO "^
•o
O)
m inmoooomomininoo otnininomoininminininino
4J uih-ac - . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..............^
c
o oua m CM co io 10 en m en co co o m en 10 m co CM 4- en v m m CM rt * m m co en CM co
o — Q 1-1 CM CO i-l CM CM i-l rt rt rt PO CM rt
l
CO
UJK
ti
UJ -JUJ
3 l l l l
D.
iiiiliiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
- 13B -
o
ro ssgs
51/) 0"
o
a o.
on o. t-l CM ^1 -H
tn co
3—in.
o
35|^
**~
•^ ^
ac v)
n ro N in m ^^ - in ro rj *-i t-i cj ro ro m rn
o
i-tor ro
aa vo t~- eo
CM CO r* * CM •-l CM r* CO in CO i-l t-l ^-1 CM CM CM t-H
ui in
:*-*
—i
i
inoooooininininomoinominininoominin
ooooininininomoino o -
a(r-iocooor-inncoir) 1-ioovo oO
to
6*
C9 in
o
i-l CM -H CM t-l i-l CM CO i-l f- CM CM CM i-l W *-l CM CO CO ^- rH *H
oininininoininintnininoininininoininooom
i
ro
Ul Of
i i i i i l i i i l i l l l i i i i i l l i l
- 14 -
Pits were dug using a shovel where the Pionjar drill showed shallow overburden.
Approximately 20 litres (30 kg) of till was collected at each site; the sample
was screened and the -0.5 mm fraction concentrated over a Deister table and
examined in a gold pan for visible gold. A small 100-200g cut was taken from
each sample and assayed for gold. Details of pit samples are shown in tables 4
and 5.
ASSAYS
Concentrates from the larger samples were assayed for gold and 21 other elements
(Na, Ca, Se, Cr, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn, As, Se, Mo, Ag, Sb, Ba, La, Lu, Hf, Ta, W, Th,
U) using neutron activation analysis. Assays are shown in appendix 1. Care was
taken to normalize all gold values to micrograms of gold/30 kilogram sample.
Small samples obtained by the Pionjar equipment and those taken from Winkie holes
and hand dug pits were treated by Assayer's Laboratory of Toronto so as to
indentify and overcome the problem of the nugget effect that might be caused by a
single but reasonably large partical of gold in the sample. Their "Free Gold"
determination is carried out on the entire dried and weighed sample. Pebbles are
removed by screening through a 40 mesh screen. They are weighed and saved for
later microscopic examination. The minus 40 mesh material is pulverized in
stages of fineness and each run is screened through 115 mesh. The +115 mesh,
-115 mesh fraction is repulverized until this fraction is +15 g. Two samples are
cut from the -115 mesh fraction and together with the -40 mesh +115 mesh fraction
are assayed for gold. Values are calculated to the original sample.
TABLE 4
NORMALISED GOLD COLOUR COUNTS AND ASSAYS OF
CONCENTRATES OF SAMPLES FROM HAND DUG PITS
COMPLETED ON DUMAS LAKE CLAIMS TO APRIL 30, 1986
SAMPLE DEPTH GOLD SAMPLE COLOURS/ PPB Au CONC. WEIGHT WEIGHT ug Au/
NUMBER INCHES COLOURS WEIGHT 30 Kg IN CONC. GMS OF Au ug 30 kg
W- 15 A 31.0 0 17.8 . < 49 0.97 ^.048 ^.081
W- 15 B 31.0 2 19.8 3 1200 1.10 1.320 2.000
W- 21 6.0 0 18.0 . < 59 1.76 ^.104 ^.173
W-22 A 36.0 0 25.2 . 58 1.91 0.111 0.132
W-32 6.0 0 25.2 - < 57 3.14 0.179 0.213
W-33 27.5 1 32.9 1 1700 3.28 5.576 5.084
W- 34 51.5 0 23.0 - 68 2.60 0.177 0.231
W-35 190.0 0 32.4 — 35 1.58 0.055 0.051
W-51 4.0 1 22.0 1 510 1.90 0.969 0.321
W-52 7.0 1 21.2 1 270 1.79 0.483 0.683
W-55 0 7.7 . < 20 1.75 ^.035 ^.136
W-56 8.0 0 0.7 - < 9 1.52 ^.014 •(0.600 l
W-57 41.5 14.9 2 6 3.04 0.018 0.036 I-*
1 tn
W-58 22.0 0 16.2 - 52 1.91 0.099 0.183
W-59 51.5 0 22.5 — < 25 4.86 ^.122 ^.163
W-60 31.5 0 25.7 . < 45 2.52 ^.113 ^.132
W-61 31.5 1 32.4 1 690 1.13 0.780 0.722
W-62 31.5 1 11.7 3 1700 1.71 2.907 7.454
W-63 14.0 0 15.8 - < 58 1.68 ^.097 ^.184
W-64 15.5 1 29.7 1 390 1.54 0.601 0.607
W-65 41.5 0 12.2 . < 47 1.74 ^.082 <0.202
W-66 90.5 0 12.2 - < 55 1.61 ^.089 ^.219
W-67 31.5 1 11.7 3 240 1.68 0.403 1.033
W-68 31.5 0 15.3 . 140 2.18 0.305 0.598
W-69 51.5 0 8.1 - < 42 0.74 ^.031 ^.115
W-70 31.5 0 12.2 - 30 2.02 0.061 0.150
TABLE 5
FREE BOLD DETERMINATION ON CUTS TAKEN FROM PIT SAMPLES
FROM DUMAS LAKE
TO APRIL 30, 1986
Au Au
SAMPLE PIT WEIGHT WEIGHT Au WEIGHT Au TOTAL ORIGINAL Au Au ORIGINAL
NUMBER DEPTH +40 MESH -40 -t-115 MESH -40 -H15 MESH -115 MESH -115 MESH WEIGHT SAMPLE -40 +115 MESH -115 MESH SAMPLE
INCHES g g ug g ug g ug PPB PPB PPB
W-15A 31.0 20.6 19.9 0.60 37.6 1.55 78.1 2.15 30 41 27
-15B 31.0 NO SAMPLE . . . . . . . . .
-21 6.0 18.5 27.1 1.25 98.4 5.05 144.1 6.30 46 51 44
-22A 36.0 NO SAMPLE . . - . . . - . -
-32 6.0 100.5 35.4 1.60 98.5 7.78 234.4 9.38 45 79 40
-33 27.5 81.9 24.7 8.20 110.4 15.54 217.0 23.74 332 141 109
-34 51.5 157.8 35.0 2.45 88.2 5.43 280.9 7.88 70 62 28
-35 190.0 184.0 50.2 2.70 149.7 14.29 383.9 16.99 54 95 44
-51 4.0 30.1 20.6 2.35 73.9 4.05 124.6 6.40 114 55 51
-52 7.0 20.1 15.8 1.60 61.2 3.17 97.1 4.77 101 52 49 t
-55 31.1 14.0 1.20 32.5 1.80 77.5 3.00 86 55 39 ~
-56 8.0 12.3 8.7 0.75 45.3 4.13 66.3 4.88 86 91 73 T
-57 41.5 17.4 17.4 0.60 59.9 2.87 94.7 3.47 34 48 36
-58 22.0 25.8 22.7 0.35 43.1 1.05 91.5 1.40 15 24 15
-59 51.5 27.0 26.9 0.10 53.9 2.12 107.9 2.22 4 39 20
-60 31.5 131.4 48.0 2.30 83.7 9.20 263.1 11.50 48 110 44
-61 31.5 95.5 19.7 1.45 45.6 1.17 160.8 2.62 74 26 16
-62 31.5 5.9 6.9 1.75 35.5 0.60 48.3 2.35 254 17 48
-63 14.0 38.7 25.9 2.05 63.6 6.10 128.1 8.15 79 96 63
-64 15.5 NO SAMPLE . . . - - . . - -
-65 41.5 10.7 9.7 1.15 47.2 2.27 67.7 3.42 119 48 50
-66 90.5 26.3 23.6 1.10 65.1 2.55 115.0 3.65 47 39 32
-67 31.5 40.6 19.9 1.15 63.7 2.30 124.2 3.45 58 36 28
-68 31.5 29.2 14.8 1.10 38.7 0.95 82.7 2.05 74 25 25
-69 51.5 5.7 2.5 .50 16.2 0.65 24.4 1.15 200 40 47
-70 31.5 32.8 7.8 1.10 23.5 1.80 64.1 2.90 141 77 45
- 17 -
LARGE WINKIE DRILL AND PIT SAMPLING RESULTS
Winkle drill samples are equivalent to pit samples In all respects except for
size. In size, they are equivalent to those recovered In reverse circulation and
sonic drill programs which are currently part of the standard exploration
procedure for sampling overburden.
All Winkle drill and pit samples collected at Dumas Lake are normalised to a
30 kg standard sample. Normalization of small samples gives erratic colour
counts and concentrate assays compared to those of large samples. At Dumas Lake
the results from small samples will be extremely erratic because the colour count
anomaly threshold for a normal 30 kg sample is 3 for a table concentrate (9 when
hand panned).
A fence of samples on line 56+00 S that crosses the projection of a regional
train contains the following 8 positive sites over a length of 1500 feet.
WINKIE SAMPLE
HOLE SAMPLE GOLD WEIGHT COLOUR/ ug Au ug Au/
NUMBER PIT NUMBER COLOURS 30 kg 30 kg
1 W-10 1 4.1 7 ^.074 ^.548
2 W-12 1 4.1 7 ^.067 ^.496
W-13 2 2.3 26 0.022 0.287
3 W-15 0 2.4 0 0.013 0.162
W-15 W-15A 0 17.8 0 ^.048 ^.081
W-15 W-15B 2 19.8 3 1.320 2.000
4 W- 17 1 8.1 4 0.071 0.263
W-18 * 20.3 * 1.399 2.067
W-21 W-21 0 18.0 0 ^.104 ^.173
6 W-22 1 1.8 17 0.064 1.067
7 W-24 1 13.5 2 0.608 1.351
W-25 0 8.1 0 K0.073 ^.270
Total
6 2 12 9 120.3 66 3.497 7.197
holes pits samples colours kg Colours ug Au ug Au
Averages
2.2 5.5 0.872 0.600
colours/ colours/ ug Au/30 kg ug Au/30 kg
30 kg 30 kg
- 18 -
Twelve samples from the anomalous sites weighed a total of 120.3 kg and their
concentrates contained a total of 9 colours after processing over a Delster
table. Normalising the 12 samples together gives 2.2 colours/30 kg. If each of
the 12 samples is normalised individually, high counts for individual samples are
obtained and the average is 5.5 colours/30 kg. Values would probably be higher
had all samples weighed 30 kg. Small samples containing no colours do not
Indicate how many colours there would be in 30 kg!
The fences of Hinkie drill and pit samples on lines 48+00 S and 40+00 S are not
very anomalous in terms of colour counts but assays on thier concentrates are
anomalous. Gold may have been missed during examination of concentrates, or gold
may be contained in pyrite.
The most anomalous section of line 48+00 S contains the following samples over
1500 feet:
SAMPLE GOLD SAMPLE COLOURS/ ug Au ug Au/
NUMBER COLOURS WEIGHT 30 Kg 30 kg
W-61 l l 0.780 0.722
W-64 l l 0.601 0.607
W-51 l l 0.969 1.321
W-59 O O ^.122 ^.163
W-52 l l 0.483 0.683
W-58 O O 0.099 0.183
W-67 l 3 0.403 1.033
W-57 l 2 0.018 0.036
TOTALS 170.6 3.353 4.585
AVERAGES 1.1 colour/ 1.1 colour/ 0.590 ug/ 0.573 ug/
30 kg 30 kg 30 kg 30 kg
- 19 -
and the equivalent part of line 40+00 S on the up-ice projection of the regional
train contains the following samples:
SAMPLE GOLD SAMPLE COLOURS/ ug Au ug Au/
NUMBER COLOURS WEIGHT 30 Kg 30 kg
W-49 O O ^.150 ^.673
W-32 O O 0.179 0.213
W-33 l l 5.576 5.084
W-34 O O 0.177 0.231
W-35 O O 0.055 0.051
W-62 l 3 2.907 7.454
TOTAL 131.1 8.894 13.033
AVERAGE 0.5 colours/ 0.7 colours/ 2.035 ug/ 2.172 ug/
30 kg 30 kg 30 kg 30 kg
The results are summarized below:
SAMPLE
LINE GOLD WEIGHT COLOURS/ ug Au ug Au/
NUMBER COLOURS kg 30 Kg 30 kg
56+00 S 120.3 2.2 3.497 0.872
48+00 S 170.6 1.1 3.353 0.590
40+00 S 131.1 0.5 8.894 2.035
It appears that the regional train of gold parti cal s does extend as far as line
40+00 S.
SMALL WINKIE DRILL. PIONJAR DRILL AND PIT SAMPLE RESULTS
Small samples taken from Winkle and Pi on jar drill holes and from hand dug pits
have been analyzed for gold without prior concentration. Assays have been run on
the -40 +115 mesh and the -115 mesh fractions of each sample and assuming that
the +40 mesh fraction of each sample contains no gold, a value has been
calculated for the original sample. Histograms of these assays are shown in
figures 6 and 7.
- 20 -
FIGURE
P\STrt\aUTlON OF G 01. D IM
Ui
Q.
I
(A
h
S
Ui
o.
PPB
FIGURE y
I/I If-
UJ OF
o!
i 10-
IN
o
*L
*1
too ISO leo
PPB
- 21 -
Winkle drill and pit samples are from fences along cut lines and represent the
entire overburden section which is apparently homogenous. The histogram of these
samples shows only one population (figure 1).
There are clearly two populations present in the histogram of Pionjar drill
samples (figure 2). Pionjar samples taken from the 6" above bedrock and within
100 feet of geophysical targets closely tested the targets which are either
anomalous in gold or not.
Anomalous Winkle drill and pit samples are those greater than 80 ppb Au or higher
values than 931 of the samples. Anomalous Pionjar drill samples are those
greater than 100 ppb Au or higher values than 912 of the samples, although most
samples greater than 60 ppb Au are part of the higher grade of the two
populations present. The entire latter population may be anomalous.
DISCUSSION OF SMALL SAMPLE RESULTS
High gold values of all small unconcentrated samples taken at Dumas Lake
indicates that the property is anomalous in gold. The arithmetic average of all
Winkle drill and pit samples is 45 ppb and that of Pionjar drill samples is 58
ppb. The modal average for Winkle drill and pit samples is 45 ppb but for
Pionjar drill samples there are two peaks, one at 20 ppb and the other at 65
ppb.
Cuts of small samples from large Winkle and pit samples on lines 40+00 S, 48+00 S
and 56+00 S are analysed below:
Average Value
Line Total Samples ppb^—-—
56+00 S 12 42
48+00 S 7 31
40+00 S _6^ 54
Total 25 42
Values along the three fences across the regional train are not very different
from each other.
- 22 -
EXPENDITURES TO JULY 31, 1986
1986
1985 To July 31 Total
Salaries/Fringe Benefits 2,542.62 51,265.59 53,808.21
Travelling 250.15 5,838.54 6,088.69
Equip. Rentals S Purchases 251.66 23,677.87 23,929.53
Rent and Services 449.84 90.45 540.29
Linecutting 9,459.00 12,795.00 22,254.00
Geophysics 3,775.00 - 3,775.00
Camp Costs 24.00 5,216.96 5,240.96
Accommodation 323.50 219.07 542.57
Aircraft Charter 805.00 5,380.00 6,185.00
Truck/Tractor Rental - 7,247.96 7,247.96
Assaying - 5,822.00 5,822.00
Drafting 661.88 180.93 842.81
Air Freight - 183.21 183.21
18,542.65 117,917.58 136,460.23
Claims, Stkg/Hldg 12,750.00 - 12,750.00
31,292.65 117,917.58 149,210.23
Detailed breakdown of expenditures is shown in appendix 2.
PROPOSED WORK AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The work carried out to date was designed to complete magnetic and
electromagnetic surveys up-ice of the regional gold particle train and to test
the basal tills in the vicinity of geophysical anomalies for the presence of
gold. Use of the Pionjar drill allowed many more sites to be sampled than was
expected had only the "Winkie" auger drill been used. Unexpected shallow
overburden indicated by the Pionjar drilling allowed many pit samples to be taken
down to bedrock manually.
Diamond core drilling of geophysical targets was initiated in June 1986 and
results of the first 6 holes showed that the targets were not the source of the
anomlous gold. Additional overburden samples were collected but had not been
processed by August 9, 1986.
Diamond drilling will continue with the testing of 3 more geophysical targets and
additional overburden samples will be processed before year-end. Future work
will depend on the results of the remainder of this program.
- 23 -
CERTIFICATE
I, RAYMOND DAVIES, of the Borough of North York in the Province of Ontario
hereby certify:
1. That I ara a geologist employed by Hudson Bay Exploration and
Development Company Limited.
2. That I am a graduate of McGill University in Montreal and hold a Ph.D.
degree in Geology and I am a member of the Association of Professional
Engineers of the province of Ontario. I have been practicing my
profession for over twenty-nine years.
Dated at Toronto, Ontario this 15th day of September, 1986.
15 September 1986 Raymond Davies, Ph.D., P.Eng.
15.9.86
File: Dumas.24
(D5;E-Monopros)
APPENDIX I
22 Element Neutron Activation Analyses on
Concentrates from Dumas Lake
X-RAY ASSAY LABORATORIES LIMITED
1885 LESLIE STREET* DON MILLS* ONTARIO M3B 3J4
PHONE 416-445-5755 TELEX 06-986947
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: HUDSON BAY MINING E SMELTING COMPANY LIMITED
ATTNs R* DAVIES CUSTOMER NO. 791
P.O. BOX 28
TORONTO-DOMINION CENTRE* SUITE 28 DATE SUBMITTED
TORONTO* ONTARIO M5K 1B8 l-MAY-86
REPORT 27976 REF. FILE 23379-X4
53 HEAVY MINERALS
C WERE ANALYSED AS FOLLOWS
METHOD DETECTION LIMIT
AU PPB NA 5.000
NA Z NA 0.050
CA * NA 1.000
SC PPM NA 0.100
CR PPM NA 10.000
FE X NA 0.020
CO PPM NA 5.000
NI PPM NA 200.000
ZN PPM NA 50.000
AS PPM NA 2.000
SE PPM NA 5.000
MO PPM NA 5.000
AG PPM NA 5.000
SB PPM NA 0.200
BA PPM NA 100.000
LA PPM NA 1.000
LU PPM NA 0.100
HF PPM NA 1.000
TA PPM NA 1.000
W PPM NA 4.000
TH PPM NA 0.500
U PPM NA 0.500
WEIGHT GM 0.010
X-RAY ASSAY LABORATORIES LIMITEI
DATE 09-JUN-86 CERTIFIED
(j: NOTE: DETECTION LIMITS ARE VARIABLE DUE TO THE
NATURE OF THE SAMPLE.
X-RAY ASSAY LABORATORIES' 09-JUN-.86 REPORT 27976 REF.FILE 23379-X4 PAGE l OF
NA X CA Z SG PPM CR PPM FE *
n**V "*"
1 W 1-86 1500 CO. 08 C8 12.0 1100 55.1
W 3-86 71 . 0.06 C5 14.9 870 45.1
W 4-86 37 CO. 05 ^ 29.4 1600 55.3
W 5-86 40 CO. 07 12 20.9 1200 49.1
W 6-86 .1900 0.07 3 34.8 1000 48.9
W 7-86 250 <0.05 C3 29.6 1100 47.9
W 8-86 270 <0.05 0 16.8 1000 55.7
W 9-86 2000 CO. 09 C9 10.1 1200 56.3
1 44 10-86 C38 <0.05 C6 24.8 880 46.6
1 4L 12-86 00 0.07 C5 25.6 730 38.2
T- ^ 13-86 11 0.21 C2 29.0 630 36.7
3 4. 15-86 7 0.43 3 36.8 470 26.8
3 l 15A-86 16.6 1200 51.2
T- f 158-86 L^p 0.12 C9 23.1 1200 48.3
"*-W 17-86 OO CO. 05 C5 14.9 870 44.0
V^W 18-86 330 ^CO.ll C7 13.1 1000 53.9
W 21-86 C59 0.16 C12 60.5 1100 22.6
;6 ^W 22-86 55 0.21 36.6 900 36.8
V 1 22A-86 58 C9 17.6 1000 45.1
T--*/ 24-86 270 ^.28 O 14.9 1200 55.8
^-*W 25-86 O6 0.08 C6 16.5 990 46.2
^-W 29-86 52 <0.13 <B 18.9 1000 51.5
S-4* 31-86 C42 CO. 08 ^ 14.8 1200 56.1
W 32-86 C57 0. 18 CIO 24.2 1100 47.5
W' 33-86 1700 ^.15 C8 16.3 1100 51.2
\ H 34-86 68 <0. 15 C9 10.1 1100 55.5
W 35-86 35 <0.39 C4 11.5 1400 61.7
Vi—*W 36-86 O8 CO. 11 C6 11.9 960 51.2
\t*-^ 38-86 O8 ^.08 C7 13.3 1000 50.5
\V^ 40-86 **M* <0.07 C4 9.7 1100 56.8
v^*TW 42-86 O8 <0.07 C7 24.6 1100 45.8
1-5*44 44-86 C42 <0.09 C8 23.1 1200 43.7
tf"Hf 45-86 C43 <0.09 C8 20.7 1100 48.9
V^-W 49-86 <42 ^. 11 C6 24.3 930 48.7
(^ M 51-86 510 <0.16 C14 42.7 1100 36.6
W 52-86 270 CO. 65 C4 24.1 1100 47.3
\fc —W 53-86 77 <0.14 C8 20.9 1100 53.5
W 55-86 ^0 *:o.os C3 17.0 1200 57.0
W 56-86 <9 0.91 2 12.3 130 8.79
H 57-86 6 CO. 06 4 23.7 1000 49.5
M 58-86 52 <0.05 ci 2.1 210 10.5
H 59-86 <25 CO. 05 C2 11.7 1200 62.9
W 60-86 C45 ^.12 C8 16.3 1200 50.6
W 61-86 690 0.27 CIS 41.1 1300 33.0
W 62-86 1700 0.14 C4 42.9 930 39.4
W 63-86 C58 CO. 16 CIO 44.5 910 36.6
W 64-86 390 CO. 18 Cll 17.8 1300 54.2
H 65-86 C47 CO. 14 C8 15.5 1200 55.6
W 66-86 <55 CO. 17 CIO 20.0 1300 54.9
--r- H 67-86 240 CO. 15 C9 17.2 1200 53.9
X-RAY ASSAY LABORATORIES 09-JUN-86 REPORT 27976 REF.FILE 23379-X4 PAGE 2 OF l
4PLE AU PPB NA Z CA Z SC PPM CR PPM FE Z
W 68-86 140 ^.13 <8 27.7 1200 47.7
W 69-86 ^2 . 0.70 <6 38.7 380 23.2
H 70-86 30 <0.10 ^ 24.2 680 50.5
X-RAY ASSAY LABORATORIES 09-JUN-86 REPORT 27976 REF.FILE 23379-X4 PAGE 3 OF
MPLE CO PPM •HH MHHW AS PPM SE PPM MO PPM
H 1-86 47 OOO 1100 27 O2 O
W 3-86 41 . 600 160 16 12 13
W 4-86 29 ^00 120 O <B O
W 5-86 40 OOO 2800 ^ 32 23
W 6-86 33 OOO 150 <<^ O 5
W 7-86 33 OOO 350 O ^5 15
W 8-86 34 OOO 130 0 O 9
W 9-86 31 OOO 120 ^ 05 ^
W 10-86 48 OOO 120 o 19 0
W 12-86 33 OOO 120 o 0 O
W 13-86 31 OOO 60 o O O
W 15-86 25 ^00 70 o O O
W 15A-86 29 000 130 01 14 44
H 15B-86 26 OOO OO 01 09 9
W 17-86 26 OOO 140 o O 58
H 18-86 24 000 80 00 O8 O
H 21-86 20 OOO 300 04 13 0
W 22-86 26 ^••^ 80 0 27 17
W 22A-86 24 OOO 120 19 0 6
W 24-86 28 000 60 O4 O4 O
M 25-86 27 ttOO OO O O6 O
W 29-86 72 000 120 02 0 94
W 31-86 77 OOO 170 77 29 78
W 32-86 28 OOO 220 05 19 O
W 33-86 28 1200 100 04 09 O
W 34-86 27 OOO OOO O4 09 15
W 35-86 28 OOO 00 O8 05 0
H 36-86 29 000 130 OO 0 20
W 38-86 70 ^00 150 70 26 70
M 40-86 24 ^00 250 8 Ol 24
W 42-86 66 OOO 130 41 5 24
W 44-86 53 000 OQ 46 12 23
W 45-86 32 OOO 150 OO 7 25
W 49-86 32 800 100 02 03 24
W 51-86 26 OOO O30 04 OO ^
M 52-86 25 OOO 90 O8 O6 O
W 53-86 110 900 170 32 Ol 43
H 55-86 26 OOO 80 O O O
W 56-86 10 ttOO 80 ^ O 7
W 57-86 24 OOO 90 O O9 O
W 58-86 5 OOO OO ^ 0 O
H 59-86 27 OOO 300 O O O
W 60-86 27 OOO OO 01 O 35
W 61-86 23 OOO OSO O5 06 ^
M 62-86 29 OOO 100 O4 O O
W 63-86 29 1000 110 39 0 5
W 64-86 37 OOO 120 05 60 30
W 65-86 30 OOO 180 O4 O6 18
W 66-86 25 OOO OOO O4 ^ O
W 67-86 36 OOO OOO O4 17 0
X-RAY ASSAY LABORATORIES 09-JUN-86 REPORT 27976 REF.FILE 23379-X4 PAGE 4 OF
^ MPLE CO PPM NI PPM ZN PPM AS PPM SE PPM MO PPM
W 68-86 30 ^00 90 <12 <39 <12
W 69-86 28 . <600 <80 <9 C18 10
W 70-86 28 800 C70 <ll <5 33
r,
X-RAY ASSAY LABORATORIES 09-JUN-86 REPORT 27976 REF.FILE 23379-X4 PAGE 5 OF
1PLE SB PPM BA PPM LA PPM LU PPM HF PPM
''""•
W 1-86 71 29.0 {200 708 3.5 460
W 3-86 0 . 1.9 <400 426 2.7 310
M 4-86 ^ 1.0 {500 Bil 5.4 700
W 5-86 X5 1.2 800 800 5.0 660
H 6-86 ^ <0.5 <200 467 4.5 460
W 7-86 O 1.4 500 504 4.2 510
W 8-86 ^ {0.5 300 486 2.1 240
H 9-86 ^5 <l• 1 ^00 1000 3.1 420
H 10-86 88 {0.7 300 420 3.5 380
W 12-86 O <0.9 <100 349 3.0 320
W 13-86 ^ <0•4 300 263 2.4 200
W 15-86 ^ <0•4 100 264 2.4 180
H 15A-86 <5 <1.4 300 944 5.0 720
H 15B-86 ^ O .5 200 1240 6.8 920
H 17-86 O {0.9 <500 469 3.3 400
H 18-86 ^ l O.I 100 608 3.4 460
M 21-86 ^ <1.6 300 1700 12.1 1500
H 22-86 O <1.2 ooo 567 5.4 620
H 22A-86 ^ <1.2 500 1170 5.3 730
H 24-86 ^ <0•7 200 662 4.1 570
W 25-86 O <1.0 600 551 3.5 450
M 29-86 ^ O.3 <100 701 3.6 460
W 31-86 ^ O.2 C400 911 4.1 570
W 32-86 ^ <l•6 300 1220 6.3 890
W 33-86 ^ <1.2 500 840 4.0 610
1 W 34-86 ^ <1.4 1200 656 3.0 370
M 35-86 ^ <0.9 300 923 3.8 520
W 36-86 ^ 1.5 500 607 2.5 350
H 38-86 ^ O.O ^00 622 3.7 510
W 40-86 O 0.6 500 747 2.7 320
W 42-86 ^ O.I <500 615 4.4 510
W 44-86 <5 0.2 1300 888 5.6 700
H 45-86 <5 0.2 1400 672 5.0 580
W 49-86 ^ 0.2 ^00 487 3.2 370
W 51-86 <5 0.7 <1000 1990 11.5 1500
W 52-86 <5 < 1 .3 400 979 4.9 770
W 53-86 <5 0.5 <600 609 4.2 490
W 55-86 <5 {0.6 OOO 630 3.8 510
H 56-86 ^ {0.3 300 40 0.8 55
W 57-86 <5 <0.6 <200 545 4.9 640
H 58-86 <5 <0•2 <100 135 0.7 90
H 59-86 <5 < 1.2 400 632 3.0 370
W 60-86 <5 O.2 100 1010 4.3 660
W 61-86 <5 <l .9 500 2640 10.5 1600
W 62-86 <5 <1.4 600 717 7.0 850
W 63-86 <5 <1.6 600 1150 7.8 1000
W 64-86 <5 <l•6 600 1140 4.7 720
W 65-86 <5 0.3 400 745 4.3 620
W 66-86 ^ O. 6 OOO 1040 5.0 800
W 67-86 <5 0.4 1300 869 4.7 590
Jj X-RAY ASSAY LABORATORIES 09-JUN-86 REPORT 27976 REF.FILE 23379-X4 PAGE 6 OF
/""AMPLE AG PPM SB PPM BA PPM LA PPM LU PPM HF PPM
'""J H 68-86 <5 <1.3 300 938 5.2 700
W 69-86 O . <1.2 200 238 2.9 280
W 70-86 ^ <1.2 500 448 4.2 560
X-RAY ASSAY LABORATORIES 09-JUN-86 REPORT 27976 REF.FILE 23379-X4 PAGE 7 OF
TA PPM W PPM TH PPM U PPM HEIGHT GM
/O W 1-86 0 410 270. 26.9 1.72
W 3-86 6 . 190 160. 16.4 2.37
W 4-86 9 57 390. 32.6 0.66
W 5-86 5 73 310. 31.1 1.36
W 6-86 5 73 190. 26.6 1.01
W 7-86 3 30 200. 22.3 2.98
W 8-86 4 74 210. 12.7 3.25
W 9-86 8 44 390. 26.4 2.28
W 10-86 5 320 160. 25.8 1.96
W 12-86 6 51 120. 16.9 2.24
H 13-86 3 77 93.0 12.5 1.97
W 15-86 4 19 100. 11.0 1.82
W 15A-86 7 45 360. 43.1 0.97
W 15B-86 17 46 500. 45.4 1.10
W 17-86 4 43 180. 21.0 2.36
W 18-86 6 \ 52 220. 25.5 4.24
H 21-86 22 38 650. 78.9 1.76
W 22-86 6 <Z f^ 180. 30.2 1.16
H 22A-86 11 51 440. 35.3 1.91
W 24-86 5 40 270. 35.3 2.25
H 25-86 5 ^l 210. 27.1 2.04
W 29-86 7 590 250. 23.8 3.55
M 31-86 14 30 360. 30.7 1.35
W 32-86 13 ^1 480. 44.7 3.14
W 33-86 7 O6 330. 33.6 3.28
H 34-86 9 06 250. 18.0 2.60
W 35-86 10 90 400. 37.2 1.58
W 36-86 11 47 230. 14.9 4.38
W 38-86 12 27 320. 27.7 1.50
H 40-86 11 44 370. 30.4 5.17
W 42-86 7 ^2 230. 30.5 1.32
W 44-86 6 37 340. 42.1 1.91
W 45-86 <*^ 39 250. 31.5 1.60
W 49-86 O 47 170. 21.2 3.58
W 51-86 26 76 750. 84.8 1.90
W 52-86 9 240 370. 45.3 1.79
W 53-86 8 700 220. 30.0 2.71
M 55-86 7 77 270. 27.8 1.75
W 56-86 1 29 22.0 4.7 1.52
H 57-86 6 30 230. 32.5 3.04
W 58-86 1 11 52.0 4.5 1.91
W 59-86 9 22 290. 26.4 4.86
W 60-86 5 62 400. 35.0 2.52
H 61-86 27 97 1000. 95.5 1.13
H 62-86 8 O8 260. 43.6 1.71
W 63-86 14 83 460. 65.1 1.68
W 64-86 24 74 460. 44.1 1.54
M 65-86 14 03 280. 31.4 1.74
H 66-86 12 63 400. 41.8 1.61
W 67-86 6 O8 350. 28.0 1.68
X-RAY ASSAY LABORATORIES 09-JUN-.86 REPORT 27976 REF.FILE 23379-X4 PAGE 8 OF
TA PPM W PPM TH PPM U PPM WEIGHT GM
B-.86 11 O3 360. 43.0 2.18
9-86 8 . <26 77.0 18.6 0.74
0-86 O 00 170. 30.0 2.02
l r
r
APPENDIX II
Breakdown of Expenditures
COSr OF EXPLORATION
August 9. 1985 to July 31. 1986
SALARIES/FRINGE BENEFITS (Accounts 20. 21. 81)
1985
Douglas, G. Hi__ days
1986
Douglas, G. 82-1/2 days
Wade, W. 32 w
MacKenzie, J. 59 it
Molyneux, S. 38 n
Kong, J. 38 H
Davies, R. 16 II
Moncur, C. 4 II
Davies, A. 62 II
Fisk, K. 62 II
Stearman, A. 14 II
Scott, A. 15 H
St. Jean, J. 4 II
Doull, M. 1 II
Watson, W. 3 II
Cervanek 5 II
Total Salary ft Fringe Benefits 53,808.21
TRAVELLING (Account 29)
1985
Douglas, D. Nov. 15 S 250.15
1986
Wade, W. Jan. 31 29.05
Feb. 28 198.24
Mar. 15 7.70
Apr. 15 27.45
Apr. 15 14.19
Douglas, G. Jan. 25 254.49
Jan. 25 8.03
Mar. 13 761.50
Apr. 14 253.07
June 12 155.32
June 12 88.00
July 12 266.56
MacKenzie, J. Apr. 16 216.90
Davies, A. June 30 16.00
Davies, R. Mar. 03 945.41
Mar. 15 463.72
Mar. 22 157.37
Mar. 22 86.00
Mar. 29 452.66
Apr. 05 317.75
Apr. 12 234.62
July 12 731.41
July 19 153.10
Total Travelling Costs S 6,088.69
FILE: MONOPROS, D5;E-MONOPROS
- 2 -
EQUIPMENT RENT AND PURCHASES (Account 32)
1985
Geraldton Mi 11 works Sept. 17 11824 251.66
1986
JKS Feb. 18 22198 666.91
Mar. 24 22752 80.91
May 15 2427 102.28
May 26 2379 207.62
Jun. 27 24387 1022.96
Jul. 7 24508 1087.56
Jul. 9 24555 194.89
Jul. 24 24795 792.02
Creighton Mar. 31 18038A 3,750.00
Mar. 31 18037A 4,000.00
Apr. 09 18043 365.00
Northern Miner Press Jan. 20 9481 333.68
Jan. 20 9478 39.59
Mar. 06 10567 448.33
May 09 12240 278.09
Jul. 24 14803 57.14
North West Canvas Feb. 04 29741 323.40
Temiskaming I. M. E. Jun. 04 CS24278 568.85
Marino 211.38
J J 455.26
Jul i 02 7 243.07
Arkay Radio Ltd. Jul. 08 S16492 214.00
Douglas Jan. 25 1,004.18
Jan. 31 581.12
Feb. 17 511.08
Mar. 13 33.16
Apr. 14 210.49
Apr. 14 2,400.00
June 12 2,198.04
June 30 270.32
July 07 273.71
Wade Jan. 31 20.85
Mar. 24 331.00
June 22 1.23
Davies, R. Mar. 15 37.48
Mar. 22 79.09
Davies, A. June 30 239.69
Fisk June 30 43.49
Total S 23,929.53
FILE: MONOPROS, 05;E-MONOPROS
- 3 -
RENT AND SERVICES (Account 35)
1985
Northwest Geophysics Nov. 25 337.84
Nov. 28 112.00
1986
Douglas Apr. 14 46.83
July 07 7.95
Wade Mar. 15 35.67
Total S 540.29
LINECUTTING (Account 54)
1985
Northwest Geophysics Ltd. 9,459.00
1986
Northwest Geophysics Ltd. 12,795.00
Total S 22.254.00
r\ FILE: MONOPROS, D5;E-MONOPROS
- 4 -
CAMP COSTS (Account 82)
1985
Douglas, G. Nov. 15 24.00
1986
Jell i coe General Store Jan. 30 1951 1,218.12
Mar. 19 1862 549.95
1967 820.11
Hudson Bay Store Feb. 27 13420 37.13
WA58211 253.82
Douglas Mar. 13 128.84
Apr. 14 69.88
June 12 4.89
June 30 81.73
July 07 124.40
Wade Jan. 30 1,158.09
Feb. 28 158.35
About Apr i 1 331.00
Apr. 15 160.76
Apr. 15 77.37
MacKenzie Apr. 16 42.52
Total S 5,240.96
ACCOMMODATIONS (Account 83)
1985
Northwest Geophysics Oct. 29 250.00
Douglas Nov. 15 73.50
1986
Hutchison Lake Jun. 11 55.12
Douglas Jun. 12 29.85
Jul. 07 134.10
Total j 542.57
FILE: MONOPROS, D5;E-MONOPROS
- 5 -
AIRCRAFT CHARTER (Account 86)
1985
Leuenberger Oct. 15 14968 266
? 14991) 539
? 11454)
1986
Leuenberger 7 11273 798
7 11274 182
7 11275 182
7 11276 686
Mar. 04 4151 141
Mar. 06 4163 182
Mar. 11 4195 182
Mar. 21 4236 182
Mar. 24 4250 182
Apr. 04 4356 141
Apr. 07 4368 141
Apr. 08 4371 703
Apr. 09 4383 141
June 13 4888 290
June 17 4942 414
June 30 5094 170
July 07 5154 166
July 08 5172 74
July 17 11827 141
July 21 5301 282
Total S 6,185.00
FILE: MONOPROS, D5;E-MONOPROS
- 6 -
TRUCK RENTAL (Account 87)
Me! Murdock Jan. 803190 920.20
Feb. 803267 920.20
Mar. 803347 920.20
Apr. 803432 306.73
May 803539 920.20
June 803627 815.55
July 803849 486.51
Avis Mar. 1449022 655.68
Gaetan Quirion June 26 4191 126.39
June 4280 52.42
June 4281 188.19
Douglas Jan. 25 89.76
Mar. 13 75.01
Apr. 14 185.19
June 12 124.70
July 07 60.80
Wade Jan. 31 249.80
Feb. 28 33.00
Mar. 15 107.48
Stearman July 16 9.95
Total S 7.247.96
ASSAYING (Account 89)
Assayers (Ont.) Ltd. Mar. 24 4805 350.00
Apr. 10 4844 1,000.00
May 01 4899 1,350.00
May 08 4910 1,375.00
July 28 5128 1,215.00
X-Ray Assay Lab May 01 27976 532.00
Total S 5.822.00
DRAFTING (Account 91)
1985
Northwest Geophysics 112.00
Mapping 4 Artwork Services 420.11
Ashley Gilbert Dec. 17 129.77
1986
Ashley Gilbert Feb. 11 952 72.52
Mapping A Artwork July 05 86579 108.41
Total 842.81
FILE: MONOPROS, D5;E-MONOPROS
- 7 -
AIRFREIGHT (Account 96)
Douglas Jan. 25 130.15
Jan. 25 10.98
July 07 16.50
Northern Miner June ? 25.58
Total S 183.21
GEOPHYSICS (ACCOUNT 90)
1985
Northwest Geophysics Oct. 29 3,775.00 S 3.775.00
GRAND TOTAL S 136.460.23
FILE: MONOPROS, D5;E-MONOPROS
- 8 -
DUMAS
PERSONNEL
The following contractors and oonpany personnel carried out the work
en the property:
CONTRACTORS
Northwest Geophysics Limited
Northwest Geophysics Limited - Jan. 15 - Jan. 31 512,795
Linecutting - 37.0
HJDBKf PERSNffiL
OVERBURDEN TOTAL
EM DIAMOND SAMPLING SAMPLE MOBILIZING MAN
MDNIH SURVEY/OFF DRILLING DRIIUNG PROCESSING EQUIPMENT DAYS
G. DOUGLAS OCT. 15-24 6 4
NOV. 25-29 5
JAN. 13-24 12
FEB. 17-31 2 1 9
MAR. 1- 8 6 2
MAR. 17-31 7 1 4 3
APR. 7 8 2
MAY 1/2
JUNE 9-27 IB
JULY
AUG.
TOTAL 15 13 18 11 8 32 1/2 97 1/2
H. WADE JAN. 15-24 10
FEB. 18-28 1 3 7
MAR. 1- 6 1 5 2
APR. 5 1
APR. 9-1O 2
TOTAL 2 - B 22 32
J. MCKENZn FEB. 15-28 1 3 10
MAR. 1-31 4 27
APR. 1-15 6 8
TOTAL 5 - 36 8 1O 59
S. MX5WEUX KAR. 7-31 5 19
APR. 1-14 6 8
TOTAL 5 - 25 8 - 38
J. KONG MAR. 7-31 5 18 1 1
APR. 1-13 6 7
TOTAL 5 24 8 1 3B
R. DAVIES MAR. 4- 7 2 2
MAR. 16-23 6 2
JULY 11-14 2 2
TOTAL - 1O 6 16
C. KMCUR M^R. 4- 7 2 ————2—————
2
TOTAL 2 4
A. DAVIES JUNE 6 1
JUNE 10-3 O 21
JULY 1-31 31
AUG. 9
TOTAL 62 62
K. FISK JUNE 6 1
JUNE 10-3O 21
JULY 1- 3 31
AUG. 9
TOTAL 62 62
A. STEAHMMI JULY 4-14 8 3
(17,21-22) 3
AUG. ———8———— ~14———
TOTAL 3 3
A auurr JULY 5-19 8 6 1
TOTAL 8 6 1 15
J. ST. JEAN JULY 17-2O ———4————
4
TOTAL 4
M. DOULE JULY 15 1
TOTAL 1 1
N.WATSON JULY 3
TOTAL 3 3
P. CERVANEK JULY 5
TOTAL 5 5
GRAND
TOTAL 32 13 142 132 54 77 1/2 450.5
TOTAL MAN DAYS 450.O DAKS
MAN ERXS EM 45.0 "
MAN DAYS OVERBURDEN SAMPLING 263.5 "
MAN DAYS DIAMOND DRILLING 142.0 "
FILE: 0*RS, KTOPRDStS
- 9 -
BASIS FOR CALCULATING OVERBURDEN SAMPLING CREDITS
During the period January - April, overburden sampling was carried out
in conjunction with VLF electromagnetic surveying. During the period
July - August overburden sampling was carried out in conjunction with
diamond drilling. General expenses are distributed in proportion to
man days involved in these programs.
Drilling equipment purchased in January - April period was exclusively
for overburden sampling. Drilling equipment purchased in June - August
period was for diamond drilling. Linecutting relates entirely to the
geophysical surveys. Assays to July 28 relate to overburden sampling.
Total Man Days (1985/1986) 450.5 days
Man Days EM/Linecutting 10 2
Man Days Overburden Sampling 58.52
Man Days Diamond Drilling 31.52
Total Costs (1986) S136 .460.23
Costs Contract Geophysics (3, 775.00)
Costs Linecutting (22. 254.00)
Costs EM 102 Camp Costs S 524.10
102 Air charter s 618.50
102 Accommodation s 54.26
102 Travel s 608.87
102 Salaries s5,380.82
102 Rent/Services s 54.03
102 Truck Rental 1 724.80
102 Drafting s 84.28
102 Air freight
102 Rent/Purchase equipment
s 18.32
(excluding drill equipment) 1,165.94
J 9,233.92 (9,233.92)
Costs Diamond Drilling
31.52 Camp Costs S 1,650.90
31.52 Air Charter 1,948.28
31.52 Accommodation 170.91
31.52 Travel 1,917.94
31.52 Salaries 16,949.59
31.52 Rent and Services 170.90
31,52 Truck Rental 2,283.11
31.52 Drafting 265.49
31.52 Air freight 57.71
31.52 Rent/Purchase Equipment
(excluding drill equipment) 3,672.70
1002 Drill equipment June-Aug. 3,097.43
32,184.25 (32,184.25)
THEREFORE, COSTS OF OVERBURDEN SAMPLING S69.013.0b
FILE: MONOPROS, D5; E-MONOPROS
SUMMARY OF EXPLORATION
CARRIED OUT ON THE DUMAS LAKE CLAIMS
IN LA PIERRE AND HIPEL TOWNSHIPS,
THUNDERBAY MINING DISTRICT, ONTARIO
________TO JULY 31, 1986________
By: Ray Davies June 30, 1987
An anomalous gold particle train was followed during the summer of 1985
in the up-ice direction to the area of Dumas Lake. Sampling had been
of a reconnaissance nature with sample locations based on pace and
compass traverses. The source of the gold particle train was believed
to lie within an area of 4 square miles.
A total of 125 claims were staked to cover the area of the probable
source of the gold particle train and possible extensions to any
mineralization that might be discovered.
The "probable source area" contains very few outcrops has a swampy
section running through it slightly oblique to the gold particle train,
has been mapped as granite and is very poorly understood geologically.
r An exploration program was centred on the "probable source area" to
establish primarily the cut-off point of the gold particle train.
Magnetic and electromagnetic surveys over the "probable source area"
were considered useful to establish some "structure" that might be
related to gold mineralization. These surveys could be best done and
in parts of the area could only be done in the winter months. The
electromagnetic survey was extended beyond the source area to cover
Dumas Lake while it was possible, in case the information might be
needed after geochemical work had been done.
An attempt was made to sample the overburden in the target area during
the winter using a "Winkie" drill with auger rods. This provides a
complete overburden section and large samples that can be panned
but proved very slow. Sampling the base of the overburden, using a
Pionjar percussion drill which drives rods ripped with a flow-through
bit to bedrock, was much more productive and was not hampered by winter
conditions. Samples, however are small, must be assayed and represent
only the base of the section so will only be effective when close to a
mineralized source, probably within 300 feet on the down-ice side.
n r
It was not feasible for the entire 4 square kilometer target area to be
sampled on 100 meter centres (400 samples) with necessary further
sampling around any anomalous values. It was decided at this stage to
sample down-ice of geophysical targets in the belief that the gold
mineralization could be related to shear zones.
Some VLF electromagnetic anomalies and a magnetic anomaly coincident
with gold anomalies in the overburden were considered diamond drill
targets. Some of these targets were drilled without success.
DISCUSSION
It must be stressed that the drill targets at Dumas Lake are primarily
geochemical (gold) targets and some of these, where believed to be
coincident with geophysical targets, have been tested.
It is probable from the limited drilling done that the gold
mineralization at Dumas Lake does not have a geophysical response.
CONCLUSION
Further work is necessary to define more closely the geochemical
anomalies. A grid of overburden holes up-ice and adjacent to current
anomalous values should be completed on 100 foot centres.
Once geochemical gold anomalies have been defined re-evaluation of the
geophysics may show that the geochemical anomaly has a geophysical
response. The targets are geochemical anomalies and not geophysical
anomalies.
File: Pierre/Hipel
E-Monopros
r
2.9429 LAPIERRE LAKE 300
November 28, 1986 Your File Nos.203,204,205 4 206
Our File. 2.9429
Mining Recorder
Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
435 James Street South
P.O. Box 5000
Thunder Bay, Ontario
P7C 5G6
Dear Madam:
RE: Notice of Intent dated November 10, 1986
Geophysical (Magnetometer S E]ectromagnetic)
Surveys and Overburden Drilling on Mining
Claims TB 865911, et al, In Lapierre Lake,
Treptow Lake Areas and Kirby Township
The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned
Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.
Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and
so Indicate on your records.
Yours sincerely,
J. C. Smith, Supervisor
Mining Lands Section
Whitney Block, 6th Floor
Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 1H3
Telephone: (416) 965-4888
DK/mc
cc: Hudson Bay Exploration and Development Company Limited
P.O. Box 28
Toronto-Dominion Centre
0
M5K1B8 ' Ontarl0 CC; S
H UndsCo*m1ss1oner
Attention: Raymond Davies Toronto. Ontario
cc: Resident Geologist
Thunder Bay, Ontario
End .
Ministry of Technical Assessment FM*
Northern Development 2.9429
and Mines Work Credits
r
Date Mining fl*cord*r'i Rtport of
Ontario WorKW 2Q3
November 10,1986
Recorded Holder
HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED
Township or Area
LAPIERRE LAKE, TREPTOW LAKE AREAS AND KIRBY TOWNSHIP
Type of survey and number of Mining Claims Assessed
Assessment days credit per claim
Geophysical
14 TB 856911
856913 to 18 inclusive
856921 to 23 inclusive
856929
862502-03
Other days 862628 to 39 inclusive
862700 to 702 inclusive
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column 862704
863340 to 42 inclusive
Rcolngiral days 863351 to 53 inclusive
863359 to 62 inclusive
Genchemical , . ,. days 863365 to 68 inclusive
863373 to 76 inclusive
Man days Q Airborne Q 863381-82
Special provision f~\ Ground [y\
PH Credits have been reduced because of partial
coverage of claims.
Q Credits have been reduced because of corrections
to work dates and figures of applicant.
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
not sufficiently covered by the survey [~~1 insufficient technical data filed
TB 862489
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not
exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal -40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) -60.
828 (85/12)
Ministry of Technical Assessment File
Northern Development
and Mines Work Credits 2.9429
Date Mining Recorder's Report of
Ontario
r November 10/86
Work No.
204
Recorded Holder
HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED
Township or Area
LAPIERRE LAKE, TREPTOW LAKE AREAS AND KIRBY TOWNSHIP
Type of survey and number of Mining Claims Assessed
Assessment days credit par claim
Geophysical
PlBrtrnmagnptic *LF (NSS) 13 d!ly,. TB 856911
856913 to 18 inclusive
856921-22
856929
862488
Induced polarization . . . , ,... . days
862503
862628 to 39 inclusive
Other days
862700 to 702 inclusive
862704
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column
863340-41
863352-53
fipnlnrjiral Hays
863359 to 62 inclusive
Geoohemir?! , . , , days
Man days | | Airborne l l
Special provision PH Ground (jj
l ] Credits have been reduced because of partial
coverage of claims.
[~| Credits have been reduced because of corrections
to work dates and figures of applicant.
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
| | not sufficiently covered by the survey | | insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not
exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.
828 (85/12)
Ministry of Technical Assessment Fit*
Northern Development
and Mines Work Credits 2.9429
r*
Data Mlnlna Recorder'! Report of
Ontario f0'" 0' 203,205
November 10,198
Recorded Holder
HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED
Township or Area
-APIERRE LAKE. TREPTOW LAKE AREAS AND KIRBY TOWNSHIP
Type of survey and number of Mining Claims Assessed
Assessment days credit per claim
Geophysical
TB 856911
Electromagnetic VLF (NAA) 31_____ days
856913 to 18 inclusive
(includes linecutting) 856921 to 23 inclusive
Magnetometer ————————————————————— days
856929
862489
Radiometric. .days 862502-03
862628 to 39 inclusive
Induced polarization. .days 862700 to 702 inclusive
862704
Other —-—————— .days 863340 to 42 inclusive
863351 to 53 inclusive
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column
863359 to 62 inclusive
863365 to 68 inclusive
Geological ———————————————————days 863373 to 76 inclusive
863381-82
Geochemical ——————————————————days
Airborne [~~l
862487-88
Man days f~|
862490 to 95 inclusive
Ground 60
862500-501
Special provision [XJ
862504 to 06 inclusive
Q Credits have been reduced because of partial
862516
coverage of claims.
Q Credits have been reduced because of corrections
862614-15
to work dates and figures of applicant.
863354 to 58 incl.
862617 to 20 inclusive
862640-41
863363-64
863369 to 72 incl
862703
862707-08
863377 to 80 incl 863335 to 39 inclusive
863343 to 50 inclusive
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
| \ not sufficiently covered by the survey [~~l insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not
exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.
828 (85/12)
Ministry of Technical Assessment File
Northern Development
ani Work Credits 2.9429"
r
Data Mining Recorder's Report of
Ontario Work No.
November 10,1986 206
Recorded Holder
HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED
Townthip or Area
LAPIERRE LAKE, TREPTOW LAKE AREAS AND KIRBY TOWNSHIP
Type of survey and number of Mining Claims Assessed
Assessment days credit per claim
Geophysical
Electromagnetic. .days
Magnetometer. .days S69,013.06 SPENT ON OVERBURDEN DRILLING ON
MINING CLAIMS:
Radiometric — .days
TB 856914
Induced polarization. .days
862630 to 33 inclusive
Other _________ .days 862635 to 38 inclusive
862701-02
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column 863340-41
863359
Geological ___________________days
Geochemical . ————————————————days
Man days l l Airborne l l
Special provision Q Ground l l 4600 ASSESSMENT WORK DAYS ARE ALLOWED WHICH MAY
BE GROUPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 76(6) OF
[~| Credits have been reduced because of partial THE MINING ACT.
coverage of claims.
[~1 Credits have been reduced because of corrections
to work dates and figures of applicant.
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
| | not sufficiently covered by the survey | | insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not
exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80: Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.
928 (85/12)
M-niSirv o; . Report of Work l nstructioiis:
.Northern Development
//"o?Qo) ^ l' lumber of mmmg claims traverseo
; ca!, Geological ^ "xc^eri'i ;oace on -r-is form, attach a IIST
Mote — ^ ~ . '!,iv'- rrorj:-^ calculated n tnti
' S • ot-rviiiu!'!'; ' '.ec'ion mav oe •inter"-:
. "Exoerc:. Days C'" column,
Mining Act - 2o -.0: j e inaaea areas below
-..;e -, ; -ST*5 LINECUTTING, -MAGNETIC, UVEHBUKDfclN SAMPLING~~~
4/tr' ffLV/L Tov.nsr;Q 3 f -wea "H
VLF ELECTROMAGNETIC (NAA) VLF ELECTROMAGNETIC (NSS)
"osoector s Licence
[UDSON BAY EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED A-178 99
VU,.SL " P.O. BOX 28 ,~ TORONTO-DOMINION CENTRE; "SUITE" 2801" ~ ~ " "
"ORONTO, ONTARIO, M5K IBS
"e~y""lo-r.Tny""NORTHWEST GEOPHYSICS 'Date o* Survey 'from Si :o) 'Total MiieT"oTTTne"Cjt
IUDSON BAY MINING AND SMELTING COMPANY, LIMITED o^y a,0 85 r 3^ 7-10 86, 30
•^e'V.T -n-vess of Author 'of GeoTecr.n,cai reoo't' RAYMOND DAVIES, P . O . ' BOX 28,' TORONTO- DOMINI O W CENTRE"
SUITE 2301, TORONTO, ONTARIO M5K 1B8
•.IKr Each Claim r, Columns ji ;icjrv. Mining Ciairns Traversed l List ;n numefcal sequence!
V i n . n g Claim E xoe^a. M*nifig C'3inn Exoena.
3 ^* Geoon ysica;
P'eT , * Numner Days Cr ?'et x Numoer Days Cr.
A '~3*T
Or i,r s , -.urvey VLF. NA
?":o' 40 ^Iav5. 'This
c ! ec vomagret
7 TU fl^ft Q11 •ra 862 636
•ne -C'iS .me cutt;ng) . Maqnetorreter
~
r O' -iac- lOdit'Ona: survey:
Radior-etr.;
-16..JCL
—4l ..a
s
" 56 913
56 914 "
862 637
862 638--
sirs -iJ ;ame qnd'
t' -::r 20 rlavi 'for -?3C p 65 915 -S62- 639--
Geoiog cal
- - - L -B56 9L6 862 700
SEE ATTACHED
1
3.^ft Q17 862 701
Dav5 Per
Geoonysicai
: 8 56 918- — 862 702
Coi^D-^t*! "jverse •iioe
c
jnc i"iBr to'ai'si 'lei* " r a 56. 921 . -
—— — L-8 56.. 922 - ' - —— - —— 363 340
. *L- a 56-923 ..863 ..3AL--
- Other
•- i 8 56 929 861 142
G*joloq'Cal
, .... L 8 62. 489. . 961 151
--I
Geocnerrical
l 8 62 502 ... R61 tt?.
i s 62
Cays
Ti
503 861 151 \
Mote St-iC^i orovisior.5 Eisctro magnet *.
"-i l, "s ' :o not upo'v
l -8 62 628 861 359
•? - r:iorr- Surveys Maqnet
La 62 629 R61 Ifin
-ifitr ic i
r a62.J530 . fl.61 363—
cxnercir^res 'excludes pov/er strinpmgl
y v:eo- '.\0-- ^enorrrac: ' ...a62 63JL QC "i 1C, O
-, '''
;.a62-632. . 863 365
\^''
a 62 611 ^ flfil Ififi
j__ -^ - A'
: .3 62,63.4, ' '-. v* R63 367
fi 2-633...... j
rotxA,
Cjicj.a: ^~ o* n xneriT "ure Davs CreO'TS ——— —
"otai
Jays Crec: S
j&j
' 9 j)
S 15
r
r- r o*3i number ot mmmg
_
ciatTis cove^eo ay This
••eport of work.
TC:JI -3vs C-'eoits '^av tio joooMtoreci ai t^e ^ j m noiuer s
cno'ce, Enter numner o' Liavs creaits per nai^ set ecieci For Office Use Oniv 1.1^______,
Torai Days Cr. Date Recorded ^Minmq Recoraar ~ "~|~*
* -—T^v
•^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^M ^ 1^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^r^^-S^.,
d^
"a i /lu*^
•••••••J
C^rtiTicsT on Verifying Report ot VVoik
•lerer'v cetntv That 1 have a oersonj jnd intimate knowiedae J' tne 'acts set :ortn m trie Reoort ot Work annexed hereto, having performed the work
or wiT"'isstfd sjme i1uff*q anci'or jtter •li coinoietion jnel the .innexeu report :s true.
"^:i'rie .m^ ^ostji Address or PC'SOn Corti'v-nq
t
/? rt N. ^f e-n. -5 ^•^ y? .x ( /f c- t-
>
t
^*
O C X T-^i "Cx1 ^,, 7i t^, A . (^ i'gf&K/Zu 'T*asc.i
/ Ojle C^M I"BO -Z-j't ' *K^^V 5'^fiaiuret
•^^^ T^ /^X -*1
fc. . 3 -^
#303
Mining Claim :KO*nd. Mining Oftim :xp*nd.
Pr*f in i Number 3av* C'. PrafiM Number O*vt Cr.
-W* 863 373
- : -: ;. 863 374
~ - 863 375
863 376
863 381
863 382
,'
* *
.— . -
\
\
t
JcLnC. y\o-^x^nv^Xt,
UtniSlry Ot Report of Work tructions: —V P'easel'iype or onrvt.
vpe
"onnern Development — l* number of mining claims traversed
exceeds sp.ice in tnis form, attach a iist.
fjr:CjC!""."~~ "O. Note: — On',- t,iv, vsriits calcuiateu n in"
jnlano
"ExrjHmMur-r," iection may be enteron
'n -he "Exce'-n. Days Cr." coiumns.
Mining Act - Do not use srarjeti areas beiow.
i oe o f i..f vev Linecutting , Magnetic, overburden sampling
VLF Electromagnetic (NAA) VLF Electromagnetics (NSS)
^ o : '~ e r * i
HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION S, DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED A-178 99
-5;, mss P-.0V BOX 28, TORONTO-DOMINION CENTRE " " ""' " ~~"
SUITE 2801, TORONTO, ONTARIO M5K IBS __
rr^rcoTnornv" NORTHWEST GEOPHYSICS 'Date 0- survey from 4 toi~ ~toYafviii~ei of i
HUDSON BAY MINING S SMELTING COMPANY LIMITED ^ ^ a5r ^1 JQ 86 35.
\rm"eV.-.'A-r:rOS, Ot Aumor o* Geo T*C-.- -", -epO r:. RAYMOND DAVIES, P.O. "BOX 28 , TORONTO-DOMINION CfcNTWr
SUITE 2801, TORONTO, ONTARIO M5K IBS
Mining Claims Traversed i L,s; ;n numerical sequence;
S ne'- .-i- Davs aer Vlmmg Claim r xoeni-i. Mining Claim Expend.
C:aim Pr,*T . * Nurnner Days Cr. P-efi* Number Davs Cr.
NAA —xi—sr-
TB i 862 487 TB 862 703
; 862 488 - \ 862 707
ror -?acn stlditionai survey 862 490 862 708
•jSinc :he ;anne gmr
E^T^-- 20 aavs i*nr eac^ 1 662 491 863 335
0*0.09^1 862 492 863 336
See Attached
! 862 493 ! 863 337
Davs pe'
'*862 494 i 863 338
862 495 863 339
862 500 *' 863 343
; 862 501 863 344
- O mer \ 862 504 863 345
, 862 505 j 863 346
' 862 506 863 347
Airnorno C' Davs uer
Claim - 862 516 863 348 (
Note: Sc- : 862 614 \ 863 349 ,
i 862 615 863 350
! 862 617 | 863 354
zxoena;:-jres iexclucies oo'.ver -.tr.coinqi
862 618 1 863 355
.XOrK Per'orrr;^:
862 619 863 356
'S'T cr n^.2',; .j r C'j'f^'Si
862 620 ^ X ! 863 357
. 862 640 ^y/ 863 358
; 862 641 V 863 363
L -.
\) \
i- ' 15
' -is T f jc: ons
Tot3t Dav JV l^e jyoor'.ioret: at
o t .:avs creai:s ;:or r!
nqh r .
. /( ^
rirT;:ic3t on Renort OT \\'
cerTify that \ h.ivw J peisonui .ind .nt.rrjte knowietlqe of the facts set *orth m ;he Repon of \*Vork annexed hereto, having performed the work
'*iect ^.imn iiurnia rmci (ir aner is coin D e^-on .inn the annexed report : s true.
01 Ppr-jor 1 ^
O.--/ "
O.lt^: Cor ' IT irfo 'q^oanire)
S S"
Mining Claim ixpencJ. Mining Claim :xp*nd.
Pr.li x Number O*vi C' Prsfix Number D*V1 Cr.
~'-
TB 863 364
" -
863 369
'."' - - 863 370
863 371
863 372
863 377
863 378
863 379
, 863 380
t
——————— . - — ———
- --
*
K -i-
•- —— -
i
Total numher ol mining
claimi covered by thit
raoort o* twork.
- /X
Ministry ot Report of Work X 7 jj ructions: — ?\j i 'vji
Northern Development X f "" - : ; -urrDer of Tnn.nq c;aims t'raversec:
Ontario
^nc Mines ;Ci'. G-''. v:-3',
r.-o r (r-;
,- ^r
' f
. 'v
Note —
••"•'i-':', ,p.ice T" rnis t'orrr.. attach a list
D- . :a-. s --e'l'"; •-.aicuiaiec! n ;r.-;
' E ' r-T:,-u--^ ' ",ec* on T^av De enterf;
'"•- - *c*r'"'J Ddyi C' ' coiurnn 1 ,
Mining Act j r. "".* j'j^ iPacx r : urpas D^iovy
Line'cutting, Magnetic, Gverourden o,--n s n. 3 -j- i-,a LJLi'LAL' LRlkL——— -^
VLF Electromagnetic (NAA) VLF Electromagnetic (NSS) IIIPCL. III HP IT TOS
HIPEL, I'.IPDU TT.Tr7rfr^**?rT*
3 '"s:;*,*cTor's L ne" c e
HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED A-178 99
Annresrp'lC. BOX 28 , TORONTO-DOMINION CENTRE ---.---—.- . - -
SUITE 2801, TORONTO, ONTARIO M5K IBS
l^eTcoi^oaSv NORTHWEST GEOPHYSICS 'Date o, s^vev W es or .ne C-t
HUDSON BAY MINING AND SMELTING COMPANY
N^^Tarc A'ne-assot Author"01 Geo Tecnmcai -eoo-. RAYMOND DAVIES ' P.O. BOX 28, TORONTO-DOMINION CENTRE
SUITE 2801, TORONTO, ONTARIO M5K 138
C: sens 3"';u-S'-;ci pe! Ejch Claim n Coiumi'-j j' Min.ng Claims Traversec: i L /u r, nume! Ci- sequence!
5ouc'L*: f^'O-. S'Oi'ii Mining C ' a ' rn SxOtVlrj. M i n . r 5 Z '. a i m Expend.
Geopnviicai
^•eii, Numner 3av5 C' *-,- x NL.moer Days C'
For T ; rsi survey :
E-t6' 40 navs. 'This
VLF E..crroma S r
TB ! 856 911 ' 862 638
• nriuiies :;ne cutTinql - Magnetometer
: 856 913 : 862 639
- Radiometr c
For sac*- additional -.urvey 1856 914 . i 862 JOG
j^mg -ne iarr? grirl:
- Other
5"te r 20 lays i'or wach) 856 915 i .862 701
SEE ATTACHED Geological 856 916
Geocheniicai
' 8^ 917 ; S6ZjZOA
r '856 918 I-fi63 340... .
Como ••I" '"verie sicn
856 921
lin] onTt-r rotac;) here . .865 141 .
l 856 922 -*
;. .5.63.. 352.
i 856 929
-~- •~- L. 865 .353. . -- —— -
- Other | 862 488 : 863 359
Geological 862 503
863 360
Geochemica*
! 862 628 ! 865.361 ..
-avs
j 862 629
Cia
' 863 362 i
Note: 3oec:3i Divisions 6 .ectromagnp 1 862 630
:-^c:.'s no nor noo'
•o A -oorr^ S^i'/ev l 862 631
^aciorreti- c 862 632
Exoe^aitures ^xcluaes DOwei striDDinq) 862 633
862 634
862 635 •-1 **/^
ffi'
862 636 : ,^,
; 862 657 ?~,~ a, -
CJU:L,.JI o^ c* ExDerun'i.re Davs Credits
Total E .*cenninures
:3. n-s crverec 3v
"ST'UCT OIIS
Total Oav5 Oeclns .Tiav be apportioned .it t h i- i. mn
chO":e c'"ter nurriner ot nays rrreairs ;n?r 1:1^11'^ ^oiect O
n CO' .'^n* .it ^iqht. Totat Cays Cr. D&ff Recoraert lining Recorder
-X-
Rei
f ru
o-i r ;f'o.i"!OP Verifvincj Report ot Woik
l Mttirirv JJ.MMV thin l have j uer^on.il ^inci mt . novviuc^e j' :tu' tncts sei 'o^th m the Report oi Work annexed ie--'to, having performed the work
or iMifesst-ii s:iiTie ilur'iiq ;mri;or , liter its com inci t--1 .."^execi leonrt .5 true.
ir-:j Pcstji Aiulross OT
f-
O.ite Cer
' .'ft-,
M i ri s;r/ 'j'
horri Develop.nent
Report of Work •:7i7^a. l mi r ut, t ions. —
—
P ; --;i .*- ' *ftl v or p r .r\\.
H numher of mining claims traversed
exceeds soace on this form, attach a list.
l
Mines (Geophysica!, Geological,
Geochemical and Exnenauures)
V
0^ Note: — On! Y nnv* credits calculated m the
"ExnT.riiiijros" section may he entered
• M * Mn "Evpcnr] Days Cr " columns.
Mining Act — Do MOT JSP shaclHti areas below.
,-oi/Surv.y^ INECUTTtNG, MAGNETIC, (WEKHlmDm SAMPLING ;To.vnshtp o' Area
VLF ELECTROMAGNETIC (NAA) VLF ELECTROMAGNETIC (NSS)
Claim Hoider(s) l Prospector's Licence N
HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED l A-17899
Address
P.O. BOX 28, TORONTO-DOMINION CENTRE, SUITE 2801
TORONTO, ONTARIO. M5K IBS
Survey Company NORTHWEST GEOPHYSICS fDate of Survey (from 81 TO) .Total Miln of line Cut
HUDSON BAY MINING AND SMELTING COMPANY^ LIMITED ^_L.9f.v.l Mo- '\ Yr- i Da v l MO. l yr . { ^^.^^
\UmeandAddreiiofAuthorlofGeo-Technicalreport) RAYMOND DAVIES, P.O. BOX 28, TORONTO-DOMINION CENTRE
SUITE 2801, TORONTO, ONTARIO M5K IBS———————————-——————————————^—————————
'.redits ReauestecJ per Each Claim in Columns at riyht Mining Claims Traveisccl (List in numerical sequence!
ociai Provisions O.nys tier Mining Claim Mining Claim : x pen ri.
Geophysical ; Cl.lnri
Prolix Numlinr D. iy. (Ji I'rt't i* i Number * Cr.
For first survey:
- Electromagnetic ;
Enter 40 days. (This
includes line cutting) - Magnetometer
- Radiometric ;
For each additional survey:
using the same grid:
- Other '
Enter 20 days (for each)
Geological
t..— —
Geochemical \
vlan Days l Days per
Geophysical i Claim
Complete reverse side
- Electromagnetic
and enter total's) here
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological ;
Geochemical
Airborne Creoits 1 Days per
l Claim
Note: Special provisions Electromagnetic
credits do not apply
to Airborne Surveys. Magnetometer
Radiometric
xpenditures (excludes power stripping)
"ype of Work Performed
g r* t' P S/?*///- 6 ;.
'eriormed on Claimisl
?B856914, 862630, 362631, 862632, 862633
86263b, a6263b, bb^b J l , bbZbJtJ, 862 Ttrr
862702, 863340, 863341, 863359
Calculation of Exoenaiture Days Credits
Total
^otai Exoenoitures Days Credits
S 69 .013 .06 Total number of mining
claims covered by thil
nstructions report of work.
l
Total Days Credits may b8 apportioned at the claim hoider's
cnoice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected For Office Use Only
n columns ar r.qht. SEE Total Days Cr.,Date Recorded
Record)
late RecorcKjjrfHoiper o\ Agent iS'gnaiurel
01 AUGUST 1986
ertification Verifying Report of Work
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge o) the facts set forth m the Report of Work annexcti hereto, having performed Ihe work
or witnessed same durmq and/or after its completion anil the annexed report is true.
lame ana Postal Address of Person Certifying ^ N
- J}aymonc^ Davies, ^P.O.Bpx 28, Toronto-Dominion Centre, Suite 2801, Toronto, Ontario, M5K J.B8
Date Certifia* , Coriit.eouy
IL.
of on
bu f. 'cs Jont
maps
to 6 b * /fi
E R E N C E S FULLERTON LAKE G-40
87 0 30' 29' 28' 27
c
r v O
^-'
.
TOPOGRAPHY
- 500MDARY OF HIPEL, LAPIERRE, 49 0 52'30'i
AND THE EAST BOUNDARY OF LAKES RIVERS ETC.. FROM FOREST
RESOURCES INVENTORY SHEET No 497872
, "CV.'KSHIP SURVEYED BY
"I-.-FE O L. S 1934
~ -, BOO K N 0 2580
- e:^-,2A^YOF LAPIERRE , HI PEL,
52'
; ' i 3 T BOUNDARY OF HIPEL,
..'E 3 TOWNSHIPS SURVEYED
:--L-AGHER O.L S. 1935
- " T E 3 OO K N" 2378
iC. v,DARY OF LEDUC AND THE
It.sDARY OF R1CKABX TOWNSHIPS
.: -i o M KILKENNY OLS. 1935
Z' E 5OOK N 0 2394
5 l
T H L1 ::'j-l 2 BAY
I ".T'G D" :IO"
SUHNEMEQUAT LAKE
'M
^ SEP 1
M S 89 0 57'46"W 3,M
S. 89"58'5B"W
50
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS
TYPED F D QC U MJENT SYMBOL
PATENT SUREACE 6 MINING RIGHTS.. .. G
(L/7TLE .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY........ ... f*
\ , MINING RIGHTS ONLV .....,,.. .. . ... S
' J LAKE LEASE. SURFACE 8- MINING RIGHTS.. . ...... .... , D
SURFACE RIGHTSONLY........ ........ ,. H
MINING RIGHTSONLY.. ... .,.......: .. .. ... H
LO LICENCE OF OCCUPATION - —^..—..,........... T
l ORDER IN COUNCIL ...... .. . .^ ... . QC
O 49' RESERVATION ......... ,. . ... ,.,., ........ (J)
CANCELLED .......... ..... .. ,. ......,.. .,, ®
SAND ft GRAVEL.__......_............... . ........ 0
LU
LA P l E R R NOTE MINING RIGHTS IN PARCELS PATE MED PRIOR TO lUIAt 6
1913 VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC
LANDS ACT R SO 1970 CHAP 380 SEC 63 SUBSEC l
HIPEL PAVED ROAD
LEGEND
GRAVEL ROAD
DQ OTHER ROADS
48' TRAIL OR PATH
HIGHWAY ROUTE No
ELECTRIC POWER LINE
TELEPHONE LINE T T T T T T
RAILROAD ft RIGHT OF WAY
RAPIDS. PORTAGE
NON-PERENNIAL STREAM
EDGE OF CLEARING
TREELESS MUSKEG OR MARSH
BRIDGE BUILDINGS
47 SCALE 1 INCH = 40 CHAINS
FEET
O 10OO 2OOO 4OOO 6000 8000
O 200 1OOO 2OOO
METRES (1 KM) (2 KM)
AREA
LAPIERRE LAKE
46 M N R ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
NIPIGON-GERALDTON
LSfi 615563 6455C-, t: 45 5 76 i 64 5 5 7 9 ,
MINING DIVISION
THUNDER BAY ,
645567 , 645566 '64556S l 6 4 55? 7 , 645 5BO IB617I9
; L. AND TITHES/ REGISTRY DIVISION"
i
614412 645568 '64EE.69 l 6 4 5 5 70 ' 645571 .64556, THUNDER BAY
2fi M I 6l44lf0 '61441,
36 M WEST LEGAUL1 TWF MAKLINE S-69-57.3- W.
Ministryof Land
COLTER TWP.
FOR STATUS REFER TO PLAN G-170 OR STATUS REFER TO TWP PLAN L- 49 0 45
Natural Management
Resources Branch
TWP.
PLAN G-169 29' 20' 16' Ontario
87-30' 28 27' 24' 23' 22' 21 19 IB 1 17'
Date Number
G-65
JANUARY 1981
42EMSE0W9 2.9429 LAPIERRE LAKE
200
SOUTH OF LEGAULT TWP G-131
GRETA LAKE AREA G-263
87
49 0 52*30— ^
,>
X
v ' -' ' i7^ ''^i
^;
Treptow Lake
'Scalpel
'C" f. n l ^ n l . "
"f
.J ,^"' •v
THUNDER BAY
MINING DIVISION
f K) 7 v - X , ~^-
7 , s" ' - l- fag""'0 , --^ "^ -^^ '--/X - - ~'
----r-~/, T j — ,- - - -.^--j----, . AUG l 8 1986
1 7 X 1 yA IV "SX 1 ' 1 )
AM
7|8|9|10|11|12H|2[3|4|5|6
862513 JB624 94 (8624931863358^863347 863346 ^ 863 3 3 5^863 362 j 863 38 1 |B 6 3 380 | 863 3r9^
1 /is 'i C -1 s ' ^-^ | -^ ' , - " —r^~ ~^~ \
862512 1 a42495'i 1 862,.^92'8 63 357 ' 86 3348^863345 ^8633 36l86 33 7 5 J* 6 3 -3-7^J ^_ ' 863 3 78^ LEGEND
r l X' ' /''' ' if ^S 1 A/ t y/ ' ^ 1 l/'?'' ^ \ { ' \ "'Q
862511 |B6250IOIJMB6249l,863356lB63349 J 6 M 863 337 1 - (8633 7sl 5^863371 | 4M 3M M. inn, IM.S lOclt HIGHWA - AM i- ( H 'T E No
/'^Si ^ -' */"*^ -^' 4v^i t/i - i */! 'x
.g1 - ;* , -^ '862490 J863355I -x/ , 86 333 8 ,B6 3367 86 3 368 | 863 3 69 ' 86 33 7 O,
' ^.^ . ,
OTHfcR ROAUb
TRAILS
Su h . t i L O ' NL j
TOWNS' PS. BASl i INES ETC
fi iTl 86*^ 02 !/ 'S L/ ,B6y35l 8ekj42
863339 '8633661 863365,8633641863363 1
^X ii' i/ 'i ^ 'i
i ' 1i X v^
vv
\ J
'3
--1 I fjfS MINING C' A.MS PARCELS ETC
•f .' -J IJ362489 JJS63354 '^ ——1— UNSURVn FH LINFS
o^J A? i ^yy^i ttS'.'~ f ' x1
61 ,/ n' ~ i
i ^ '' ^ "1! -; "^
\ 'j "
LOT l INES
PARCEL BOUNDARY
IO f ' ' 862 503 , '^~ J '-f 8 '63352J86334I
863340 86 3359' 86336ol 863361 i 863 362j MINIM AIMS ETC
CO RAILWA1 ANu MIGHT OF WAY -.
l (V 1 '^"flf? C
J ("W '862634
UTILiTv i IMES
o
-- 1 l '
8626371 B62638j^86264Oj - Vr^'f
# '862504 '862487^ B569I 1 1 862 7OO 5M NON PERENNIAL STREAM
— —4- — — "~ ^x— — "" ' 'Kirby " L
/fca .
/RW
r', j. c -
ri*/ n ~ t jr
.y
*S
862635 ^
|
' /X
|
1
,^--~-
^~___^ ;'
FLOODING OR F LOODIMG RIGHTS ;
W' ]ftf- ' /- ?^ ^ SUBDIVISION OR COMPOS.IE PLAN
•;1"~" ) 'y
^ '-8X2505 J B~5691 5 856929 8627OI ^ 862636 '862639 j "^ x
J|\'8569zU
W4m\Zt*S)
|
j
X S \s
lB569l'^i 863702 '86263?
1
862633J V^
- v ,'
RESERVATIONS
ORIGINAL SHORELINE
MARSH OR MUSKEG
UJ --t+T^y- --V-— —— r - —— — — — -f - - - -
en ^ ,.- l "!/^' "x x MINES
rCXTV^v-^ -—'
^^
TRAVERSE MONUMENT
^**il"*-*-sOK
s^1
,' 1,-^ \ '- J-O
l** 856922 1 ,' ;8569!4 86263O 86E63I
UJ ^X^
r.x-o " A' DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS
^ [BS6III Ji5*9l*
- ,-- n- n
1 •62628|B6Z629 J 4M
^ ~"
C TYPE OF DOCUMENT SYMBOL
LU ! J' | 856920 '856919 862627^
i ^ fx * PATENT, SURFACE fi. MINING RIGHTS *
(T
01
o10 ' 1 SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY ... e
UJ
^
|c#"
1 1
l B626E 4j 862625 862626 . MINING RIGHTS ONLY ,... e
-h 3M-f?9chk rcr.-- -i LEASE SURFACE fc MINING RIGHTS
CL SURFACE RIGHTSONLY n
y ,^-p BI ?19J- MINING RIGHTS ONLY . . u
HIPEL T W/l'"
R*/ " 3M i
^'^ . .
•3M
FULFORD TWP. LICENCE OF OCCUPATION . . T
A
, 873498 - -4 "-
-t x -^ ~ %-j^
ORDER IN COUNCIL oc
^-f /^7^
C\ov gf ,r^t t' - -- — -4
— —— r "T D
^
- erofc"e x~l RESERVATION
x——- ^"^ ' , ~ --^v,'
i ^^X - ^X ,^ 873497V,,
873497 V 9J^-V? \93XOi/ CANCELl ED
95^| fj^3j '^-i^\')3tois -?j*t)oy wioot \iiooi ^ -
i- ^
v^v ^ fj^/i
93iiwy
S
-- - L - ---* T - - -,
7/9^ O 7'*. ^' ^ yj^ovjr ^ vj^— ~^-~a*^i^ 9Jf}?T~
SAND Si GRAVEL __. .......
, \ 9H032 ') A , Lake \ ^
J ' i
l ^' '"' ' 1 " OjO^i/T
\JriJ J *l\ i
i
1—i———™———— ——— t\ —————\^^ NOTE MINING Hu,MTS IN PARCE LS PAIfcNTED PRIOR TO MAY 6
r . -V - fjg050 9320f7 93 W W 9^^^^ ' ?j?W ' 4i?^J ^ l&OLO. wool ,t}J*Jol ^ qbii, 1913 VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE B^ THE PUBLIC
f_ , /S ^--^ — ^f ' LAXiOS AC' RSO 1970 CHAP 3BO SEC 63 SUBSEC l
i "*
A/ /•fi/ l/. x , 'i ' - *~ ^ ^- ,
/' , - . i. . ..j ,.-\ ^S
r'pfv wiw
( ^' '. kir b) \L j 1 1
''*ft- 1 U BCVi
JO4UBCT.^ ' j ^*}/
- nove- .l ,w97j, ;w97^ .^.irr^ti^r
s •}3*O5/ won Wwyj won \wotf^ 9^0/1 m^ooL iqilJoi Qilin f^j?^
r^ ' " -. '47'
I?B 4OO|^H?BMaBay
l *j
--r i , -.
J V
-s'—————— —— ^
fj^yy
/~^\ i\ - *—'
i" \Sk-
.^ 1
^^ ' v , J' -^ SCALE 1 INCH = 40 CHAINS
r - -^ r T - 4W'^ C
} L-
' 0150/7 l
^yflos" 9m0ffy Mm iilWJ
; 2M
"* - ' ^ ;
^ 13*^!fA s^- oren* le L o*e
9^^3^
yj^tf/j ~ ^ O 1I1OU .'OOO 4OOO 6000
/-'
^ v W37
w^-^-.^.w^.'"^1;
•*^" 0' "x ^ ,
———— -4 -^^ — ^—-- ' -- , -*
^ -r -
1 -^) C ?00 1OOO 2000
/. ^
, - T** , *
Ml TRF S l 1 KM (2 K M
j ."' i
s '"t-/1 ^'
i
i l . 0 ' 7^7^/7' y^'5^^
t*7Mi"fcSJ.0*l ?^J03 'K3J/6 918 W ?JM? fysteo ?J*WJ ( P/wswy to^o^ ^^03 y!^^^ ^t?JX7
y' W^JA- ?JfJ3/ ^sjyy
/"Vv" /?''\~~~~ s
AREA
i—i
\^
•r - ~": - -- - - -— ,^ '' T --.i—''
--\ N-' X
J, ^-'
TREPTOW LAKE
r ^
'
)
r\ wsio 9^ of
9Jtsi*i' tem xfey^v WT^ f^yjj- tetofa ,*~ ^ i '
^"* 1 "
7^7-f/o ?J8K7 WfJo/ fczrir ?i#3Ji 9JJJJJ.
t,™
/i
f ortfi
f ^ ^3
•^
~*~ s t,-*
,- -^ ' 1
and KIRBY TWP.
, — ~ *- — * ^v^
1 '
N ' ^
1 9M.UP L\
V * i
iu
" 0?y " ' 0 ^'* 3+1?'*
?.v^/ ^7V900 fjfocs;yiBJ.ii
1
KiycS ^y// J^rv^ ^yj/ luiu, 7-Zm-i" rg^/ \^JJ^L rroZ±- JU?33?{
IM
d t
5M^-, ^ A,^- - e 46 M N R ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
i "^- 1 >
^^^T
-\'j
f y^/^ 9e7Stf 507Jty fo73JJ jQ\ltf q^P
, o loo mo j WoVj. . WOH Qo9a-n 7~'7b?^ 2*7.999
K7tfJi 9*7991 Wioj
T1 " ' 9J87J7 ^^ry- GERALDTON
i ^-^n)
T^^ib [9tf3tf
j
, , c -- y
MINING DIVISION
i ——" ,
i
^
t
i y
V
-^ ,--^ ^
J - f^- ' ' ' fjfftm
9-f'9f3 711819
1 :',
9** 'f 9'3
fjfj.21 '7*.^Upi, /jyy/j/ 9J8?# THUNDER BAY
y
1 ' ' ^ ^0 f** '##237 ^o/^/J ?jWJt\'?Jf?fe ? &U&* VJlf.l-M
^
86 I72O(| 8 61 721 j*(j' 4^ -M—. SjS^S 139311 IZfVIt ?i22^;, ^J'ssi VJP1VJ.9J75W ^75-y? a*ps-ft instl Walt. Well tJTOjV^.tno*t
J703? inoi* Cr j 7^JTy
f -j 0 ''- ,'^ 1
\^\-.^"'^ v '"
V— - ~ ^ -
"4'~" T—————— "" .--a 1 qj.?3Yl - ^J.7032 '
5*7032
?j:'Sft ?j7gf7 ' VAlcon L
^
,^A (x^
9jj"7W
rl l LAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION
. f"**-""', T'-'^^F j^^/A
11010
w*,, w,* . WM. .—— ~~ "-- -?"-l,,;.J' V, "^*T ^ j ?JJJ-L2'\V^8J.*5' ?J.?i23; ffi* f/ 7^yxy 3JJ1X ?Jt9W\9JSf3f
——'.^, ^ .
t ^ * / ' r t" i^A^ ' ^XJ"
THUNDER BAY
4*fct? x ,^5j
L
iRfil 7"^^ 1 ftfi!7 n ? I oS*'
^v^ "tf* ^ ~" ffUllldJ
T" 117^3?
O^yyy^
j i _r
^ :~ : -^^"- ^
. -. Bat l
~ N3- \ " ,
^ , --N, - - V ""^
J^w-* i
^y'7i^^ ^\J
ftfy//. •x-W
1
HSliJ- 1951n \ '"fT/S
op FS- n ' ^ , )'- - yj7ttr 9'*7)9/'
7" tolt, c. few i Z^/r ?^fiiu yjjj27*iM Win 718 1/3,133^ —————— —ii————*———— ——.— MiniStryof Land
crNO^-^
v 'l JR CTATUS
COLTER TWP REFFR TO T^BP PL**N
'--^ {, . ''~ ;--.^~ ^^^ # LINDSLEY T^^^^^7^^ T0
lY
r- \j
TW^^^T^TTA IUS RtF. t
"Tinj^ ^ff^-^1—"—-- - *————"————*x~-^v
T*r^^
tv
P^"\ ^
(. l
ERRINGTON TWP f .n .TA-^ REFER TO -.P PLAN , -,
Natural Management
49 0 45——l
Resources Branch
r
II 10 8 Ontario
87 87 0 00'
Number
Aug.20,1 981
4aE14SE4a*9 2.9429 LAPIERRE LAKE 210 497 67!
G-434
o
o
-f
o
~ ~ ~~ , ^ *\
*" l rf* ' yv ^ i fc^ l x l,
,(*^ Iftfcf 16^ 6fc ! 6" ,*b
862502
863362
-L O -h 00
B.L 0+00
L 4 +00 S
Scale l in - l /2 mile NTS 42 X E X 14
862503
863341
862634
L 24 -1-00 S L 24 -HOG S
P-12
O 862636 862639
P-13
-e— L 32 ± O O S
L 32 400 S
L 40 +00 S W-36 W-42 W-44 W-47 W-49 L 40 +00 S
W-37 W-43 W-45 W-48 W-50
W-46
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
INSTRUMENT EDA OMNI-I/ MAGNETOMETER
D A"!" J M O O
CON^CJR INTERVAL
MAGNETIC LOW
P-64 P-68 P-67
O -O—
L 48 H- 00 S HW-65
L 48-OO S
HW-59 HW-70 HW-68 HW-69
OP-55
W-53
W-54
', r/GR A PH r'
ST
RI/ER
SWAMP
LAKE
P-83 P-80 --O- -O-
O——O - 56
L 56 -H 00 S W-29 W-12 W-15 W-17 W-20 H-22a W-24
W-30 W-13 W-16 w-iaj HW-2 W-22
W-23
W-25
W-14 HW-15 W-l9i W-26
HW-16 W-27
^'AP l
HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION a
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED
TORONTO , ONTARIO______________
L 64 -1-00 S L 64 -f OC
DUMAS LAKE PROJECT
TREPTOW LAKE AREA
GERALDTON DISTRICT
SOUTH GRID/EAST- WEST LINES
LU LLJ
LLJ
O D
O o O o O
o o o SAMPLE LOCATIONS
o
-U
4 -h
o
CM rO o O D o DATE SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
in (D NOV , 1985 GEO-DRAFT
NORTHWEST GEOPHYSICS LTD.
42Ei4SEeees 2.9429 LAPIERRE LAKE sso
863362
J
t l'
l^ \ au-
i -L/
B. L. O H-00
? *V \ ,^ , .i*\
SOUTH GRID
^ \* o o^ o
*a o v/i NJ v*
f\j w\ "Oj iv\ rr\ *\) Nl
L 4 +00 S
NTS 42 /E X 14
Scale l in s l /2 mile
L 8 -l- 00 S L 8 +00 S
j L 16 +00 S L 16 -h OO S
L 24H-OO S
L 24 +00 S
L 32 -1-00 S L 32-HO O S
L 40 -1-00 S L 40 f OO S
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
INSTRUMENT EDA OMNI-IV MAGNETOMETER
DATUM O O
CONTOUR INTERVAL SO
MAGNETIC LOW
L 48^00 S
L 48 + OO S
r OFOGRAPHY
CLAIM POST
LAKESHORE
RIVER
SWAMP
L 56 ^00 S
L 56 -1-00 S
MAP
HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION 8
^ DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED
\ TORONTO , ONTARIO -——-^^—
L 64 +OC S
L 64 -f OO S
DUMAS LAKE PROJECT
BG2. 629 TREPTOW LAKE AREA
GERALDTON DISTRICT
LU LLl
SOUTH GRID- NORTH-SOUTH/EAST-WEST LINES
LLl
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
O O O
O O o
4-
O D O DATE SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
in NOV . 1985 l" - 200' GEO-DRAFT
NORTHWEST GEOPHYSICS LTD.
•42EHSE0ee9 2 9429 LAPIERRE LAKE 230
NORTH GRID
*' i
SOUTH GRID
Scale l in - l /2 mile NTS 42 /E /I4
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
INS T RUMENT EDA OMNI -IV MAGNETOMETER
DATUM O O
CONTOUR INTERVAL SO
MAGNETIC LOW
TOPOGRAPHY
CLAIM POST
LAKESHORE
RIVER
SWAMP
HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION 8
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED
TORONTO , ONTARIO
DUMAS LAKE PROJECT
TREPTOW LAKE AREA
GERALDTON DISTRICT
NORTH GRID
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
SCALE DRAWN BY
" = 200 ' GEO-DRAFT
NORTHWEST GEOPHYSICS LTD.
42E14SE8*69 a.9429 LAP1ERRE LAKE 240
K
1
* ? ? *^-*il * ri n) •0
^
m
^-
f
t
n
j
t
fi
-f
t.
00
Ul -" \
\^ 0 oOi o -* j. J
2 J" •o
fV m .o
*st W ^ ^^*^^ Q (*5 QQ -^ ' -Q
- -. -, — iy^ ^ n N
i
"l
1
ry
i
M
, i
V**0
X*'**
^^"
1-
" J, ~
t i
- ^
~ *
C ^
* T" *- ;
O
o
OD
in en
O
(^
O O
4-
*
o O
CM
\
\
l
-1. -t-oo s
30 + 00 S
-s
-s
-1
•r-4-
INSTRUMENT GEONICS EM" 16
STATION N AA, FACING NORTH
40 -+00 S
40 +00 S
EM CONDUCTORS
CONDUCTIVE 'FRACTURE' VLF
MAGNETIC CONTOURS
50 -HOO S TOPOGRAPHY
50 +00 S
- — D -— CLAIM POST
LAKESHORE
RIVER
SWAMP
O DDH
41 PI ON JAR SAMPLE Au ppb
862703 If 1 25 PIT or WINKLE SAMPLE Au ppb
O NUMBER OF COLOURS GOLD/30 Kg.
60 -l-00 S
60-1-00 S
MAP
HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION a
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED
TORONTO . ONTARIO
L 64-1-00 S
DUMAS LAKE PROJECT
TREPTOW LAKE AREA
______GERALDTON DISTRICT^^^^^^^
862704
NAL ANOMALY 'SOUTH GRID/NORTH -SOUTH LINES
y////////////////////////////////////, ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY WITH HIGHLIGHTS OF MAGNETIC
SURVEY, INTERPRETATION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY
AND RESULTS OF OVERBURDEN SAMPLING
DRAWN
GEO-DRAFT
42E14SE0M9 2.9439 LAPIBWE LAKE 250
8625OI
INSTRUMENT : 6EONICS EM - 16
STATION 'NAA,CUTLER, MAINE
f
-2.0*,-
-3
X'
-4 '
— i*
-vi *oT VMMfe
MAP
HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION a
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED
B.L. 0^00 DUMAS LAKE PROJECT
862503
TREPTOW LAKE AREA G-434
40400W NTS 42 E 14
NORTH GRID
ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY
DATE SCALE SURVEY B DWG BY
April 1986 l "a 200' 0DOU00S
B.L.4400S
42E14SEMQ9 2.9429 LAPISJRE LAKE 260
o o O o O o
o O o o o o
4
M CO o CM
ID
01 (O (0
0400
862514
862515
- 20*008
-40 + 008
W
8626W
-60+00 S
-80+OOS
h 100*00 S
INSTRUMENT' GEONIC8 EM-16
STATION'NAA,FACINO NORTH
-3
or-
4-7
or
MAP 6
HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITEI
DUMAS LAKE PROJECT
LAPIERRE LAKE AREA t-6*
NTS 4BEI4
WEST GRID/NORTH-SOUTH LINI
ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY
DATE SCALE SURVEY BY f DWG BY
APRIL 198 6 - 200* l JKono. Q-DouQlo*
,.. —— . .. .•^••••ii n i mm l
42EMSEHM 8.9489 LAPIERRE LAKE
270
<
4-
o
o
CO
L 32+00 S
INSTRUMENT, OCONlCS EM-l*
STATIC*: NS5, MCIW9 WOTTM NOHTHtAST
L 40 +OO S L 4O+OO S
i j-- te vtMtsc
r "r-
L 48 *00 S
TOPOGRAPHY
CLAIM POST
LAKESHORE
RIVER
SWAMP
L 56 + 00 S
MAP
HUDSON BAY EXPLORATION 8
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED
___________ TORONTO , ONTARIO
L 64 + OOS L 64+00 S
DUMAS LAKE PROJECT
TREPTOW LAKE AREA
GERALDTON DISTRICT
UJ UJ UJ
SOUTH GRID /EAST - WEST LINES
LJ UJ
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
o
o
o ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY
o O o DATE SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ro o
CM in CD NOV. . 1985 l" s 2OO' GEO-DRAFT
\
42E14SECM9 2.9439 LAPIBWE LAKE 280
