Press Release - Get as DOC

Shared by: 32K80tw
Categories
Tags
-
Stats
views:
3
posted:
3/16/2012
language:
English
pages:
1
Document Sample
scope of work template
							Greg T. Ackerman
Joyce L. Ackerman
556 Shadowlawn Ave.
Dayton, Ohio 45419
937-293-4267

RE: Press Release: www.constitutionrescue.org and www.badfaith.info

    Please find the enclosed web sites per The Supreme Court of Ohio case number 2009-1794,
and the Plaintiff’s (People’s) denied access, privilege and “inviolate” right to a “trial by jury” on the
genuine legal issue of material facts in the state(s) court sovereignty cases, and proper regulation
of the "business of insurance". (breach of contract, bad faith with malice, and performance of
"fraud on the American courts".

Citation of Authority:
1) United States Constitution; Bill of Rights Seventh Amendment

2) Ohio Constitution Article I; Bill of Rights, Section 5

3) 15 U.S.C. 6701 (a) ~ Operation of State Law
(a) State regulation of the business of insurance
["The Act entitled “An Act to express the intent of Congress with reference to the regulation of the
business of insurance” and approved March 9, 1945 (15 U.S.C. 1011 et seq.) (commonly referred
to as the “McCarran-Ferguson Act”) remains the law of the United States.]
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/usc_sec_15_00006701----000-.html

4) Insurance “company” fraud, (Ohio Revised Code: 2913.47 Insurance fraud) (Breach of
contract, bad faith with malice, and performance of "fraud on the American courts".)

  Currently See: Notification to the Supreme Court of Ohio to a “Claim of Unconstitutionality”,
and therefore 28 U.S.C § 2403 (a) and (b) as prescribed by law, does for apply, for general State
and U.S. Constitutional protection to a “trial by jury“ on all genuine legal issues of material fact for
public and great general interest, filed 03/16/10. www.constitutionrescue.org

    The Plaintiff's have patiently waited now for 6+ months for the Supreme Court of Ohio to
perform and "certify" the Plaintiff's good merit claim of "Unconstitutionality", to a defect in the
"mechanical operations" of the State(s)(Ohio) and U.S. courts to their substantial access,
privilege and "inviolate" right to a trial by jury" in a court of law.

    This case represents bad case law (www.badfaith.info), via Defendant’s performed actions to
willfully conspire to forge; fabricate and perpetrate false statements and false claims of a term
called “Employee Retirement Income Security Act”, “ERISA”, upon the Plaintiff’s state law claims
and their legally binding 100% vested / voluntary Long Term Disability contract beneficiary policy
without consent or valid merit, thus generating “fraud on the court”, and now with the Plaintiff’s
claim of “Claim of Unconstitutionality” to a 10 year case alleging insurance “company” fraud,
(Ohio Revised Code: 2913.47 Insurance fraud) while without court action to a “jury demand
endorsed hereon”.

I look forward to your call today in support and assistance to rescue the States and U.S.
Constitutions and the integrity of the American Judicial Courts.

Thank you for your services to the State of Ohio and the United States of America.

						
Related docs
Other docs by 32K80tw
ATENCI�N PRIMARIA DE SALUD
Views: 30  |  Downloads: 0
Name of Department
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Ropewalk May 2011 147102413
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
prospetto generale grammatica
Views: 237  |  Downloads: 0
COMPANY PROFILE PRESENTATION FULL export
Views: 132  |  Downloads: 0
OGC Mandatory Development Proposal
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
How He Loves John Mark McMillan
Views: 19  |  Downloads: 0