assignment 9 by dandanhuanghuang


									                                                                                         Gardner 1

Elizabeth Gardner

Tessmer MWF 12:00-12:50

19 October 2010

      Assignment 9: An Essay on Language Focusing on 18th-Century Writing Conventions

       A Modern Proposal, written in 1729 during the Late Modern English period, resembles

Present- Day English but includes many fundamental differences. One of the most noticeable

variances between the text and the way English is written now is that A Modest Proposal has far

more capitalizations. Swift used capitalization for a great deal of nouns that today would be

considered common nouns and thus not be capitalized.

       Another major aspect of Swift’s work is the frequent usage of italicized phrases. In

Present-Day English, italicized words are used most commonly for describing certain

publications and emphasized words. Swift, however, used italics much more liberally and

emphasized words or phrases in almost every sentence.

       Spelling differences are also evident when looking at the text. Simply glancing at the

first sentence one can see that double letters were more common in the spelling of Late Modern

English texts. The doubled l in melancholly would be considered misspelled today and Cabbin

would be spelled cabin. Other spelling differences are shown in the words publick and dropt.

Over time, the k in publick was eliminated and the t in dropt was converted into the morpheme –


       In addition to spelling changes, A Modest Proposal was written with a different

grammatical style as well. Consider the following sentence:
                                                                                            Gardner 2

       “As to my own part, having turned my thoughts, for many Years, upon this important

       Subject, and maturely weighed the several Schemes of other Projectors, I have always

       found them grossly mistaken in their computation.”

To a speaker of Present-Day English, this sentence likely seems to be overly punctuated with

commas. If this sentence were to be grammatically formatted to fit present-day English

standards it would look like this:

       As to my own part, having turned my thoughts for many Years upon this important

       Subject and maturely weighted the several Schemes of other Projectors, I have always

       found them grossly mistaken in their computation.

This version of the same sentence has two commas instead of the original five. It can be

concluded that Late Modern English was more heavily punctuated than it is now.

       A comparison of the “Committee of Five” draft and the final draft of the Declaration of

Independence display a series of fundamental changes in style. The “Committee of Five” draft

contains very little capitalization, whereas the final draft contains frequent capitalization of a

large sum of the nouns in the text. One of the most striking examples is the lack of the

capitalization in the word god in the first draft. Though the capitalization in the first draft more

closely resembles Present-Day English due to its lack of capitalization of common nouns, the

word God is considered a proper noun even in today’s language and thus would be capitalized.

       Another factor that sets the two drafts apart is the lack of punctuation in the “Committee

of Five” draft. The first sentence in the “Committee of Five” draft contains merely one comma

but the final draft contains four. In terms of punctuation, the “Committee of Five” draft is more

like present-day English and the final draft is closer to the traditional Late Modern English
                                                                                             Gardner 3

example from A Modest Proposal because Present-Day English does not use punctuation as

copiously as shown in the final draft.

       The possessive form of the word it undergoes a change from the first to the final draft. In

the original “Committee of Five” draft, the possessive it is spelled it’s. Present-Day English

would not allow for this punctuation, as it’s is only recognized as a conjunction of it is, not a

possessive form. The more correct version by present-day standards is in the final draft, where

its is used without an apostrophe.

       A minor detail that changed between the two drafts was the shift from the symbol & in

the “Committee of Five” draft to the actual word and in the final draft. In today’s language, the

written form of and is considered more formal and perhaps this is why the change was made in

these drafts as well.

       Finally, one last major difference between the two drafts should be noted: the final draft

is significantly longer than the “Committee of Five” draft. However, it appears that this is not

due to a linguistic style change, but rather the desire to provide additional information.

       Stylistically speaking, the final draft of the Declaration of Independence is generally

more like Jonathon Swift’s A Modest Proposal than it is to the “Committee of Five” draft. Both

the final draft and A Modest Proposal have frequent punctuation and capitalization. In contrast,

the “Committee of Five” draft is generally more like Present-Day English because it uses

punctuation and capitalization more sparingly. By taking these documents into account, it can be

deduced that language becomes more informal over time and it is difficult to bind a language to a

specific set of rules as Jonathan Swift wanted to. In general, the less formal “Committee of

Five” draft is the writing style that managed to survive in the English language, proving that the
                                                                                            Gardner 4

style that is accepted by the general public is the style that will survive in a language, not the

style prescribed by the language elites.

To top