Get documents about "pmg_collab_survey_freetextonly.xls - Confluence
Shared by: dandanhuanghuang
-
Stats
- views:
- 1
- posted:
- 3/6/2012
- language:
- pages:
- 6
Document Sample
1 5 6 19 21 34 35 48 49
Submi Products and services used currently: affiliation: OtherText affiliation: collaborative frustrations tools: tools: features: features:
ssion CommentText activities: OtherText CommentTex OtherText CommentTex
Key OtherText t t
17 Metasearch It is difficult to discover the important documents on Diva when new to a project.
It can be hard to locate documents on Diva when you have a specific file in mind.
I have to find the email that gave the location on Diva.
21 was, dpr, melvyl NYU UNT Exlibris DSI Footprints there's Trac
floating
around too
24 That's a monster of a question!&LF;&LF;Here's tools I can think of:&LF;&LF;Wiki DLF Aquifer project Vendors? Hard to schedule meetings and check calendar availability with people outside Trac I love Trac!
&LF;* MoinMoin at CDL&LF;* TikiWiki at CDL&LF;* Confluence at UCSF&LF;* participants, other random UCOP&LF;&LF;Folks here don't manage their calendars well.&LF;&LF;Entourage
Confluence at UCOP&LF;* Confluence at Indiana. U.&LF;* projects (e.g., Sakaibrary, displays incorrect calendar data&LF;&LF;Folks (everywhere) tend to use email
PBwiki.com&LF;&LF;Document Management&LF;* Sharepoint at Zotero) rather than more appropriate tools (feeds, Trac, etc.)&LF;&LF;Diva is slow; Diva
UCLA&LF;&LF;Project Management/Tracking&LF;* ProjectInsight (hosted for doesn't have file locking and check-in/check-out&LF;&LF;Searching Diva is
CDL)&LF;* Trac at CDL&LF;* Footprints (hosted for CDL) &LF;&LF;Shared inaccurate
Document Editing&LF;* Google Docs&LF;&LF;Version Control&LF;* CVS, SVN at
CDL and various&LF;&LF;File Server&LF;* OS X (Diva) at CDL&LF;&LF;LISTSERVs,
Exchange, iSchedule, IM, ReadyTalk at UCOP and various
23 Licensing work group&LF;Alumni/Friends/Donors project&LF;Rights Management vendors Occasional problems with access for non-CDL authorized DIVA users. SharePoint
Group
28 As part of Assessment, I've worked with UC-eLinks, Metasearch, Shared Print, and Keeping track of versions of documents is a pain.
many other projects.
29 Diva, ReadyTalk, InsideCDL, email, UCOP online Directory of campus staff, etc. The biggest complaint used to be that non-CDL staff could not access files on
Diva. This problem has been allievated since the Extranet folder was
implemented on Diva.
31 SFX updates; OCA Tracker; Mark Twain Project; eScholarship Editions 2; Project Internet Archive Sharing data 1. Creating documents collaboratively or sharing documents is frustrating because Webcams,
Planning tool selection there is no collaboration software, so each time, everyone has to decide anew cvs, bug
where to put documents and use filenames to indicate versions.&LF;&LF;2) trackers
Timelags with communication with non-CDL partners can be very
frustrating.&LF;&LF;3) Not having a way for outside entities to deposit data is
difficult.
35 Request, UC-eLinks, systemwide licensed e-content, Vendors for licensed content set up and Incompatible versions of software, e.g.,MS Office 2003 vs MS Office 2007 Web
use of conference
mailing lists
via listserv
37 Resource Liaison Program&LF;Resource Wranglers Team&LF;UC-eLinks vendor product working group, * version control with documents is frustrating, especially when you have to Telephone, bug
Team&LF;mellon grant on web archiving&LF;Metasearch Team&LF;ERMS CDL vendor joint development totally reorganize a document&LF;telephone conferences sometimes feel like web tracking
team&LF;ERMS Systemwide team&LF;CDC task force on news resources&LF;CDL everyone is in space... conferencing systems
collections integration group&LF;Verde product working group&LF;Ex Libris joint
development for Verde
38 OAC&LF;MOAC&LF;JARDA&LF;California Cultures&LF;LHDRP&LF;Archivist's Partners from other cultural This is not really a frustration, but an enhancement request. Perhaps we could
Toolkit&LF;Image Demonstrator&LF;American West Project&LF;DLF Aquifer heritage organizations or introduce video conferencing and/or web cam technology to the UC Libraries and
Collections Group&LF;Mass Digitization -- Google, Microsoft and Internet Archive academic institutions external CDL. I realize this is difficult logistically to manage, but might be worthwhile to
to UC. These include OAC investigate.
members and DLF members.
41 Web Archiving Service: Common Framework, Subversion, Heritrix, Nutch, Media Most of the Sometimes a collaboration item might not be able to be worked on by me until
Server. things I've someone else addresses an area that must be done by them because of their
worked with knowledge, designated workplace responsibility or both.&LF;&LF;Sometimes it
other people on seems like some items that may be important for me or my work to proceed
were part of the might be less important or urgent in the other person's priorities.
web archiving
service, but it's
composed of
many other
services and
software.
42 licensing activities&LF;shared print activities&LF;mass dig activities&LF;collections other universities; vendors hunting through emails to find messages, documents&LF;multiple people editing sharepoint
projects with CDC, JSC, campuses, etc.&LF;can't think of anything that *isn't* the same document, changes need to be reconciled in a single document (for UCLA
collaborative.... search
committee)
43 Web Archiving Service&LF;7train METS framework NYU; UNT; MIT I don't
understand
this question.
1 of 6
1 5 6 19 21 34 35 48 49
Submi Products and services used currently: affiliation: OtherText affiliation: collaborative frustrations tools: tools: features: features:
ssion CommentText activities: OtherText CommentTex OtherText CommentTex
Key OtherText t t
45 eScholarship Editions&LF;STWG&LF;Relvyl&LF;Calisphere&LF;etc. Diva continues to be very frustrating.&LF;Corptime was a much better calendar sourceforge&
server than Outlook comma;
google
groups
47 Costs/benefits of shared print&LF;Digital preservation repo costs&LF;Metrics & key Coordination and synchronization of co-created documents&LF;Coordination of
indicators for CDL/UC Libraries&LF;Space/facilities planning for UC project planning and scheduling&LF;Scheduling systemwide meetings and
Libraries&LF;Strategic planning for Regional Library Facilities&LF;Print/digital conference calls&LF;Lack of tools to build and sustain communities of
collection management practice/interest
48 All DSC programs: Calisphere, OAC, Counting California, I'm starting a partnership with We need ONE place to put stuff that everyone can get to; links to prototypes; Document co-
UC Image Service Alameda County Office of meeting notes, etc creation has
education; I will also be just
working with the Oakland happened via
museum in a scannign project. email; folks
About 30% of OAC/Calisphere using track
content is from non-UC changes.
institutions
50 Mark Twain Project&LF;eScholarship Editions&LF;ETDs&LF;eScholarship Repository bepress, UC Press People keep forgetting passwords for wikis - and forgetting how to create an
integrated page within a wiki that is not orphaned in the larger wiki structure.
We've also run into problems with version control.
53 Melvyl&LF;VDX
58 web archiving NYU, UNT, Just getting in the habit of using the tools available is a challenge. I think ReadyTalk&co
IIPC, Library of ReadyTalk is the best tool we have for working collaboratively; it's really easy to mma;
Congress, NDIIPP set up, and works very well. Trac,
organizations CVS,
SVN
62 Digital Special Collections (Calisphere); Collection Development (licensed Use
resources); Assessment; eScholarship (QA testing on various products); SharePoint at
Bibliographic Services (Melvyl, UC-eLinks, etc.); Users Council; UCLA and
others; UC-OCLC Pilot Project another tool
at OCLC;
Forum for UC-
OCLC project
67 Diva&LF;wiki.cdlib.org&LF;readytalk.com&LF;&LF;or do you Different styles of personal communication
mean&LF;&LF;melweb&LF;Counting California&LF;VDX&LF;OAC / JARDA /
Calisphere
68 Mark Twain Project Online, Google Mass Digitization, Web UC specialists can sometimes be too detailed when providing description. Need to
Archiving Service understand I am just a layman.
71 Calisphere, and Melvyl I have not encountered any frustrations.
73 HOPS (esp UC-eLinks), Aquifer, OCLC steering committee Aquifer (DLF plus partners) Have to use multiple tools. Some members unable, unwilling to learn ReadyTalk&co
tools mma;
Basecamp
76 Melvyl update
80 Licensed content team&LF;CIG team&LF;Project managers team Vendors Listserv Version control of documents
81 Quite a few over the years! Examples include: Melvyl transition to ExLibris, Nothing unexpected - the back and forth of lengthy emails are laborious and
Mark Twain Project, eScholarship digitization of UC Press books, mostly I wish people would pick up the phone!
Calisphere assessment, metasearch assessment, shared print
assessment, UC-eLinks, Web Archiving Service
assessment, etc.
2 of 6
1 5 6 19 21 34 35 48 49
Submi Products and services used currently: affiliation: OtherText affiliation: collaborative frustrations tools: tools: features: features:
ssion CommentText activities: OtherText CommentTex OtherText CommentTex
Key OtherText t t
82 Mass Digitization projects; picklist creation; RLF scanning sites; campus collections Internet Archive,
Microsoft
3 of 6
50 51 64 65 78 79 80 81 82
Submi satisfaction with satisfaction future: future: learn about: learn about: talk about talk about anything to add about collaboration tools or activities?
ssion the collaboration commentText OtherText CommentTex OtherText CommentTex your your
Key tools you have t t experience experience
used. Name: Unit:
17 Somewhat
dissatisfied
21 Somewhat
satisfied
24 Neither satisfied Forgot to Steve Toub Bib Services
nor dissatisfied mention: I
hate how
scheduling
401/411 is
separate
from
scheduling
446
23 Somewhat Curtis Lavery Licensing
satisfied
28 Somewhat Jane Lee Assessment
dissatisfied
29 Somewhat Jayne Information
satisfied Dickson Services
31 Somewhat source code Lisa Schiff Publishing CDL really needs collaboration software so that we
satisfied development can more efficiently create and share documents.
35 Somewhat
satisfied
37 Somewhat video Heather Bibliographic Thanks for doing this
satisfied conferencing, Christenson Services/Data
tools to share (how'd you Acquistions
visual guess!?)
information
38 Very satisfied Robin Data
Chandler Acquisitions
41 Somewhat Scott Fisher Digital
satisfied Preservation
42 Somewhat licensed content staff are investigating use of a wiki to
satisfied manage group work - we think this will help with
project tracking among other things
43 depends on Erik Hetzner Preservation My notes are largely specific to collaborative software
the tool development.&LF;&LF;Our mailing list software is
outdated and frustrating. Mailing lists&LF;are the
bread & butter of collaborative software development.
It is my&LF;opinion that mailing list use should be
expanded, rather than replaced&LF;with
anything else; but new mailing list software might be
in order.&LF;Online forum systems,
are, in my opinion, a poor
substitute.&LF;&LF;CVS is an obsolete version control
system; we are beginning to use&LF;subversion in
Web Archiving but CDL ought to consider moving
all&LF;projects forward to subversion or another
version control system.&LF;&LF;Diva is difficult to use.
It has no versioning capabilities. I&LF;personally
would rather get or send a document in email than
diva. At&LF;least in email I am assured that it will
stick around (since I keep&LF;all my email), I
have the context for the document's
creation, I can&LF;search my email for
documents, I have basic versioning based on
the&LF;date the message was sent, and I
can send a document to somebody&LF;outside CDL
without a lot of hassle.&LF;&LF;We have been using
4 of 6
50 51 64 65 78 79 80 81 82
Submi satisfaction with satisfaction future: future: learn about: learn about: talk about talk about anything to add about collaboration tools or activities?
ssion the collaboration commentText OtherText CommentTex OtherText CommentTex your your
Key tools you have t t experience experience
used. Name: Unit:
45 Somewhat
satisfied
47 Somewhat Gary Systemwide
dissatisfied Lawrence Library
Planning
48 Somewhat I only Rosalie Lack DSC
dissatisfied checked the
items above
that I do NOT
use now but
would like to
use-- if we
had them.
Assume that
the ones I
checked on
the first
page&comma
; i will
continue to
use. (clear as
mud??)
50 Somewhat Catherine eScholarship
satisfied Mitchell Publishing
Services
53 Very satisfied
58 Very satisfied I'd like to use Tracy Seneca DPG
ReadyTalk to
do a webinar
training
session&com
ma; use the
capture tool
to capture
it,
then edit the
result to
provide
asyncronous
online
training.
62 SharePoint at Ellen Meltzer Info Services Can share info about SharePoint @UCLA
UCLA is
pretty good;
OCLC tool not
so good
67 Somewhat
satisfied
68 Somewhat Need standard org-wide instant messaging,
satisfied like Lotus Sametime or Microsoft Messenger.
71 Neither satisfied I am relatively new to CDL and have not fully used all
nor dissatisfied of the collaboration tools that are currently available.
For the level of my project participation at
CDL, email, occasional
meetings, and cubicle conversations have
been sufficient to get the job done.
73 Neither satisfied Need to know Tools should be easy to set up and use. Would like
nor dissatisfied more about better idea of best fit for purpose
above if they
are part of a
new tool
76 Somewhat
satisfied
80 Somewhat Need more Wendy Licensed
dissatisfied image-based Parfrey content
tools
81 Somewhat Thanks for the survey! ~ Felicia
satisfied
5 of 6
50 51 64 65 78 79 80 81 82
Submi satisfaction with satisfaction future: future: learn about: learn about: talk about talk about anything to add about collaboration tools or activities?
ssion the collaboration commentText OtherText CommentTex OtherText CommentTex your your
Key tools you have t t experience experience
used. Name: Unit:
82 Very satisfied
6 of 6
