Factors Influencing Proportional Reasoning by n4qH8k

VIEWS: 12 PAGES: 3

									EMAT 8990 Geometry                      Jackie Ruff                                           1


                        Factors Influencing Proportional Reasoning



Research question: What types of geometry investigations strengthen and add to a

student’s conceptual understanding of proportionality?

There are many ways to approach the teaching of proportionality. One is to provide

problems to solve involving rates, unit rates, and multiplicative comparisons. Another is

by work with similar triangles and other polygons. All of these methods may be made

more dynamic so that students are able to see a constant ratio as specific values for the

two things being compared change. When considering a problem and creating pairs of

numbers that maintain a certain ratio, students can visualize the constant rate by creating

a graph. Through the graph we can see the change of the individual coordinates and the

invariance of the ratio. When working with geometric figures using software, such as

Geometer’s Sketchpad, students can see the lengths of the individual segments change, as

the ratio of the two does not.

The Georgia Performance Standards reserve emphasis on this topic until middle school.

But certainly proportional reasoning is not completely developed at the entrance to

secondary school. In fact, in a paper by Judith Sowder and others (1998), the authors

point out that even many pre-service teachers, who would have completed a sequence of

high school courses and at least one course in college level mathematics, still do not have

the complete understanding of this topic necessary to teach it. The problem solving

experiences used to teach this concept should involve more than finding a missing

number in a proportion.
EMAT 8990 Geometry                        Jackie Ruff                                             2




The authors make the following recommendation for pre-service teachers: “Teachers

should be exposed to situations that allow them to reframe proportionality from the traditional

focus on the solution of missing-value problems by rote symbolic procedures to a broad, complex

reasoning process that evolves over a long period of time” (p. 141).

Pre-service teachers responding to training received in a study by Ben-Chaim and others

(2007) said they did not realize before how much there was about ratio and proportion

that they had not understood. Clearly other more successful methods than current

practice need to be explored.

A two year experiment, carried out in 2007 by Adjiage and Pluvinage, compared methods

of two groups of middle grade students, one, taught by traditional pencil and paper

methods, the other, using a specific computer environment. Their results showed that the

experimental group seemed to recognize a “unique underlying mathematical structure,”

(p. 19) when confronted by problems to be solved by proportional reasoning, a

characteristic not seen in the control group. Though their method showed promise, the

examples given of the computer work seemed to be static illustrations rather than

something to be manipulated and moved by the student.

A study measuring the effect of making ratios dynamically visual for students needs to be

conducted. Perhaps a long-term measure of the effectiveness would be a student’s ability

to apply their proportional reasoning notions to the slope ratio for a line or to their use of

trigonometric ratios.
EMAT 8990 Geometry                     Jackie Ruff                                       3


References:

Adjiage, R., Pluvinage, F., (2007). An experiment in teaching ratio and proportion,

       Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(2): 149 - 175.



Ben-Chaim, D., Keret, Y., Bat-Sheva, I. (2007). Designing and implementing authentic

       investigative proportional reasoning tasks: the impact on pre-service mathematics

       teachers’ content and pedagogical knowledge and attitudes, Journal of

       Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4-6): 333-340.



Sowder, J., Armstrong, B., Lamon, S., Simon, M., Sowder, L., Thompson, A. (1998).

       Educating teachers to teach multiplicative structures in the middle grades, Journal

       of Mathematics Teacher Education. 1:127–155.

								
To top