Modernizing Micro-environmental Control to Enhance Animal Well ... - PowerPoint
Document Sample


Study I: Energy-efficient 175W Heat Lamp vs.
Conventional 250W Heat Lamp
Benefits of using the energy-efficient lamp:
Annual energy saving of $36 per crate or
$5,500 per 1,000 sows
Improved piglet livability, 284 extra pigs
weaned per 1,000 sows per year
Reduced lamp failure rate by 50%
Slightly higher weight gain of piglets
More uniform resting pattern of piglets under
the heat lamp
Publication: Comparison of energy use and piglet
performance between the conventional and an
energy-efficient heat lamp. Applied Engineering in
Agriculture 13(1): 95-99.
175W 250W
Funded by: Iowa Energy Center Testing facility
Study II: Constant Output (175W) vs. Variable Output (175-
100W) Heat Lamp with Clear or Red Color
VO heat lamp better meets the dynamic
thermal needs of piglets.
VO heat lamp yields an annual energy
saving of $29 per unit.
Heat lamp color of clear or red has no
effects on piglets.
Air temperature of 27C (80F) reduces
piglet heat lamp needs & weight gain
compared with 18C (65 F).
Publication: Responses of piglets to variable vs.
constant output heat lamp with clear vs. red color.
Applied Engineering in Agriculture 15(4): 327-330
Testing facility
Funded by: Iowa Energy Center
Study III: Electrical Heat Mat as an Energy-efficient Creep Heat
Source - Part 1: Preference Test of Lamp vs. Mat
Flooring
Spring
Bushing
Micro-switch
Younger piglets (<1.8 kg) tend to prefer
lamp heat to mat heat, especially under
drafty conditions.
Larger piglets generally prefer mat heat.
Publication: Preference of heat lamp or heat mat
by neonatal pigs at cool and warm ambient
temperatures with low to high drafts. Applied
Engineering in Agriculture 15(5): 547-551.
Funded by: Iowa Energy Center
Study III: Electrical Heat Mat as an Energy-efficient Creep Heat
Source - Part 2: Surface Temperature Uniformity
o
Four commercially available heat mats were F
tested under static conditions (air temperature
= 21 oC or 70 oF & free of drafts) without
presence of pigs.
Mat A
Large variations exist among heat mats
in temperature uniformity.
Hot spots on heat mat reduce effective
heating area for piglets.
Mat B
Publication: Surface temperature distribution
of commercial heat mats for swine creep
heating. ISU Annual Swine Research Report.
ASL-R1582. ISU Extension, Ames, Iowa. Mat C
Funded by: Iowa Energy Center
Study III: Electrical Heat Mat as an Energy-efficient Creep Heat
Source - Part 3: In-crate Test of the Heat Mat
Embedded mat temperature sensors
enhance maintenance of desired mat
temperature setpoint.
Occupied & open mat areas differ in
temperature by 7-12oC (13-22oF).
Consider a single-mat size of 0.6 m2 (6
ft2) to better accommodate area need.
Publication: Static and dynamic
temperature distribution of heat mats for
swine farrowing creep heating. Applied
Engineering in Agriculture (In review)
Thermographs of 6-day-old pigs on (top) &
Funded by: Iowa Energy Center & just off (bottom) the 2 x 4 ft heat mat .
the ARDI Program of Manitoba
Study III: Electrical Heat Mat as an Energy-efficient Creep Heat
Source - Part 4: Modeling of Heat Mat Operation
400 400
15°C
350 350 0.30 m/s
Air velocity = 0.15 m/s Air temperature = 21oC (70oF)
300 300
Power input, W/m2
Power input, W/m2
20°C 0.15
250 250
200 200 0.05
25°C 150
150
100 100
50 30°C 50
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Live weight, kg Live weight, kg
Power input requirement to maintain thermoneutral environment for the piglets at
different air temperature and velocity conditions.
Publication: Modeling of heat mat operation Funded by: Iowa Energy Center &
for piglet creep heating. Transactions of the
the ARDI Program of Manitoba
ASAE (In review)
Related docs
Other docs by kpdAfJX
mathematics gloucestershire ‘Everybody Counts’ Welcome to the Summer Primary Mathematics Newsletter – sharing go
Views: 1 | Downloads: 0
Get documents about "