Reading Assessment
Document Sample


Reading Assessment
Intensive English Language Institute
December 7, 2006, IELI faculty assessed level 4 students to determine whether they were
meeting program exit criteria for reading.
Procedures
Sixteen students enrolled in IELI 2460—Reading from Academic Sources--during the Fall
Semester 2006 participated in the reading assessment. Students received a photocopy of a
chapter from a basic college business text and were instructed to take it home and study it as they
would if they expected to be tested on it. They were informed that on the next class session they
would be tested on the material. When the class met again two days later, students completed a
50-minute written assessment task designed to sample IELI Program Reading Goals as listed in
Table 1.
Table 1
IELI Program Reading Goals—(Assessed goals appear in bold font.)
Uses university on-line catalog and databases to identify texts for academic purposes
Uses library record (location & call number) to locate books and journals
Distinguishes among several common text genres (e.g., essay, textbook, article from popular
magazine, newspaper)
Reads several academically relevant text types (e.g., essay, textbook, article from popular
magazine, newspaper)
Adjusts reading strategies to purpose for reading
Surveys & skims text for overview of structure & content
Scans text for specific information when appropriate
Distinguishes main ideas and supporting details
Identifies basic purpose(s) of a text
Distinguishes between facts and opinions in a text
Guesses meaning of unknown words from context where possible
Makes effective use of a dictionary when necessary
Uses one of several methods for depicting text structure & content to be learned (e.g.,
outlining, concept-mapping, clustering)
Responds to text in a variety of ways (e.g., writes summaries, selects and responds to specific
ideas, synthesizes information from multiple texts)
Faculty worked in pairs and rated each student’s performance for evidence of goal achievement,
assigning a numerical score according to the rating scale shown in Table 2.
Table 2
Rating Scale for Goal Achievement
Rating Explanation
2 Both faculty members agreed that the student met the goal.
1 The two faculty members disagreed as to whether the goal was met.
0 Both faculty members agreed that the goal was not met.
Outcomes
Outcomes for each of the five assessed criteria are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3
Number of Students at each Rating for Five Assessed Criteria
Rating 2 1 0
Can distinguish several common text genres 11 0 5
Can identify basic purpose(s) of a text 9 1 6
Can make effective use of a dictionary when necessary 12 2 2
Can distinguish main ideas and supporting details 10 6 0
Can use one of several methods for depicting text structure & content to be 9 6 1
learned
Among the five criteria listed, the ability to depict text structure and content to be learned has
important practical implications for the university-bound reader, and overall level 4 students’
performance with regard to this goal was encouraging. Among other higher order academic
reading skills deemed by IELI faculty to be particularly crucial for academic success are: 1) the
ability to distinguish the main ideas and supporting details of a text, and 2) the ability to
summarize a text. Unfortunately, the form used this semester did not include an item for
assessing their ability to summarize a text. A majority of students assessed satisfied these
criteria although there were some cases in which raters disagreed as to whether a student’s
performance on the assessment task demonstrated goal achievement.
Table 4
Number of Students Judged by at Least Two Raters to Have Satisfied Various Criteria.
Ability to: Number of students
Use a dictionary 12
Distinguish several common text genres 11
Distinguish main ideas and supporting details 10
Identify basic purpose(s) of a text 9
Represent text structure and content 9
The assessment suggests that the reading goals deemed most important by IELI faculty (i.e., the
ability to distinguish main ideas from details and facility in summarizing a text are also the most
difficult for students.
Table 5
Students overall ability to meet all criteria
Percentage met Number of students
100 % 2
90% 4
80% 2
70% 2
60% 4
40% 1
30% 1
Related docs
Other docs by kpdAfJX
mathematics gloucestershire ‘Everybody Counts’ Welcome to the Summer Primary Mathematics Newsletter – sharing go
Views: 1 | Downloads: 0
Get documents about "