Docstoc

Notice of Treason

Document Sample
Notice of Treason Powered By Docstoc
					                                          Notice

As a citizen of the United States, I have learned of treasonable offenses that took place on
September 11, 2001. The attacks of that day destroyed the property of the United States
(the Pentagon, Offices of the IRS, FBI, etc.) and were declared an act of war, of by “Al
Qaeda,” by the Commander in Chief of the United States. I have been further informed
that fellow citizens and members of the United States government were complicit in
those attacks, and must therefore be considered traitors under Article III, Section 3 of the
United States Constitution. I have been further informed that other fellow citizens have
engaged in acts designed to conceal the complicity referred to above, and thus are guilty
of Misprision of Treason under 18 USC 2382.

I, the undersigned citizen of the United States, in accordance with 18 US Code 2382,
Misprision of Treason, do hereby notify an official of the government of the treason
committed on September 11, 2001, evidence of which is set out below, and demand that
that such official honor their his or her sworn oath to uphold and protect the Constitution
of the United States.

By:
Date:
Witnessed:
Date:

                     Evidence of Treason & Misprision of Treason

1. Falsification and Coverup by NIST
The National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) erroneously concluded in
their September, 2008, final report to Congress that Building 7 of the World Trade Center
(WTC 7) collapsed due to fire damage. If true, it would have been the first steel-framed
skyscraper in history to collapse due to fire alone. NIST, in dereliction of accepted
forensic procedures, chose (or was ordered) not to look for evidence of explosives or
incendiaries as per National Fire Protection Association’s published guidelines for
investigations of highly destructive fires (see NFPA 921 or www.nfpa.org). The NIST
report failed to explain the absence of large pieces of concrete debris, or the presence of
millions of tons of fine powdered dust over lower Manhattan on 9/11/01. NIST further
engaged in false and fraudulent scientific practices in an apparent effort to conceal the
true cause of the collapse of WTC 7.

Important forensic evidence from the World Trade Center, including most of the steel
from WTC 1, 2 & 7, was hastily and deliberately destroyed or disposed of before it could
be properly examined as would be required in any crime-scene investigation, much less
of such a catastrophic event.

2. NIST failures to explain Free Fall Acceleration in the Collapses and Nanothermite
The conclusions of NIST with regard to all three World Trade Center steel-framed
skyscrapers (WTC 1, 2, & 7) are contradicted by the speed of their collapse and the
amount of energy expended in their destruction. The NIST reports failed to explain
evidence that temperatures attained during the destruction were inconsistent with open
air, carbon-based fires. NIST also failed to explain the smooth and linear acceleration of
all three buildings during portions of their collapses which took place at or close to free-
fall speed. NIST made no relevant reference to the testimonies of more than one hundred
first responders, who reported explosions at or near the towers before and during the
times of the collapses. NIST, though made aware of its presence, made no effort to
explain the fact that a military grade high-tech substance known as nano-thermite,
capable of being engineered as either an explosive or incendiary, was found in significant
quantities in the debris samples of the World Trade Center’s destruction throughout lower
Manhattan. Nano-thermite, a military-grade incendiary or explosive, had been found in
debris, from the WTC, throughout lower Manhattan. Despite having been made aware of
this fact, NIST made no effort to explain it.

3. Explosives and Incendiaries discovered in WTC Debris
Thermite (an extreme high temperature incendiary capable of rapidly cutting steel) and
nano-thermite (a substance which can be engineered to be incendiary or explosive) have
been identified by independent scientific researchers as being present in four separate,
independently collected samples of dust and debris from the vicinity of the World Trade
Center at different times during and shortly after the destruction of the WTC. These
samples contain red and gray chips, indicative of an advanced engineered mixture of
nano-scale aluminothermic composite materials of a highly explosive nature.

4. The U.S. Military is the Only Known Source for Materials Found in Debris Samples
Professor of chemistry at the University of Copenhagen, Dr. Niels Harrit, among others,
after studying this red and gray material, published a peer-reviewed scientific paper
“Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center
Catastrophe” and stated in a published interview in May 2009: “There are no experts on
nano-thermite without connections to the military…. This stuff has only been prepared
under military contracts in the USA and probably in bigger allied countries. This is secret
military research…It was not prepared in a cave in Afghanistan.”

5. 9/11 Commission Counsel Admits the Failure of the 9/11 Commission to Establish the
Truth
Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission, John Farmer, disclosed in his book, The
Ground Truth, “...at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an
agreement not to tell the truth about what happened... I was shocked at how different the
truth was from the way it was described...” The North American Air Defense Command
(NORAD) tapes tell a radically different story from that told to the public for over two
years after the attacks. Historically, whenever aircraft transponder contact is lost, USAF
fighter jets are scrambled to investigate. This has occurred about 100 times per year and
normally takes less than 20 minutes. On the morning of the attacks, after notification of
transponder signal loss and possible hijackings, close to almost two hours passed without
a single Air Force interception.
6. US Government Officials were Forewarned of Impending 9/11 Attacks
There were warnings of the impending attacks, from as many as eleven US allies,
conveyed to US Intelligence. Prior to 9/11/2001, members of the Bush administration
such as Attorney General John Ashcroft, several top military officers, and San Francisco
Mayor Willie Brown, were warned by the Executive Branch of the government not to fly
on commercial flights on September 11th, 2001. Further evidence of foreknowledge of
the impending attack is indicated by glaringly abnormal insider trading of put options
placed on American Airlines and United Airlines stocks, which the Commission
dismissed as being “not connected to al Qaeda” even though no investigation had yet
confirmed “al Qaeda” (“the Database” – the CIA’s term for all Arabic groups which they
had under watch) as the actual culprit for the attacks.

7. Evidence of Al Qaeda Involvement was Fabricated by Government Officials
According to government investigators, evidence offered to implicate the nineteen Arabs
as hijackers of the four commercial flights, consisting of passports, business cards, and
other personal effects, survived the fiery and completely destructive plane impacts,
among many instances of the fabrication of evidence in the attacks. Furthermore, while
several of the alleged hijackers had, at some time, been housed on US military bases, two
lived with an undercover FBI agent, and several others, such as the alleged Ziad Samir
Jarrah who allegedly piloted the hijacked United Flight 93, were brought over to flight
school in Florida by the CIA.

8. Vice President Cheney’s involvement on the day of the attacks
According to the testimony of former Secretary of Transportation, Norman Mineta, Vice
President Cheney issued an order with regard to an aircraft heading toward the Pentagon,
just before the explosions there. It may be deduced that the order Cheney gave allowed
the airplane to proceed, undeterred by American air defenses. In light of the failure to
prevent the attack, the other possibility, that the order was to shoot the plane down, may
be ignored, given the absence of disciplinary action within the military in the aftermath of
the attacks. Vice President Cheney denies that he was in the room at the crucial moment.
< this last statement needs corroboration >

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:3
posted:3/1/2012
language:English
pages:3