HR 3567 To repeal the Defense of Marriage Act

Reviews
Shared by: Ingrid Burke
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
436
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
9/17/2009
language:
English
pages:
0
I 111TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION H. R. 3567 To repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and ensure respect for State regulation of marriage. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SEPTEMBER 15, 2009 Mr. NADLER of New York (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. POLIS of Colorado, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. ENGEL, Ms. KILROY, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. ISRAEL, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. ´ STARK, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. WELCH, Ms. LINDA T. SANCHEZ of California, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. WEINER, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. OLVER, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. MARKEY of Massachusetts, Ms. NORTON, Mr. ´ HODES, Mr. ACKERMAN, Ms. VELAZQUEZ, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. HONDA, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Ms. WATSON, Mrs. LOWEY, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Ms. EDWARDS of Maryland, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. HOLT, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. BECERRA, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. FILNER, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. MURPHY of Connecticut, Mr. PASTOR of Arizona, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. SESTAK, Mr. BERMAN, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey, Mr. KENNEDY, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. TONKO, Ms. TSONGAS, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. MATSUI, Ms. HARMAN, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. HIMES, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. DOYLE, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. FARR, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. MAFFEI, Ms. DELAURO, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Ms. MCCOLLUM, and Mr. WU) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS VerDate Nov 24 2008 00:23 Sep 16, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6652 E:\BILLS\H3567.IH H3567 2 A BILL To repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and ensure respect for State regulation of marriage. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 4 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Respect for Marriage 5 Act of 2009’’. 6 7 8 9 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SECTION ADDED TO TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE, BY SECTION 2 OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT. Section 1738C of title 28, United States Code, is re- 10 pealed, and the table of sections at the beginning of chap11 ter 115 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 12 striking the item relating to that section. 13 14 SEC. 3. MARRIAGE RECOGNITION. Section 7 of title 1, United States Code, is amended 15 to read as follows: 16 ‘‘§ 7. Marriage 17 ‘‘(a) For the purposes of any Federal law in which 18 marital status is a factor, an individual shall be considered 19 married if that individual’s marriage is valid in the State 20 where the marriage was entered into or, in the case of jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS 21 a marriage entered into outside any State, if the marriage •HR 3567 IH VerDate Nov 24 2008 00:23 Sep 16, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3567.IH H3567 3 1 is valid in the place where entered into and the marriage 2 could have been entered into in a State. 3 ‘‘(b) In this section, the term ‘State’ means a State, 4 the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto 5 Rico, or any other territory or possession of the United 6 States.’’. Æ jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS •HR 3567 IH VerDate Nov 24 2008 00:23 Sep 16, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6301 E:\BILLS\H3567.IH H3567

Shared by: Ingrid Burke
Other docs by Ingrid Burke
state v smith
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
respondent v JFS
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
pakistan presidential amnesty ruling
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
Perry v San Francisco
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
ECCC joint crim enterprise 4
Views: 291  |  Downloads: 2
ECCC joint crim enterprise 4
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
Sacribey v Guccione
Views: 277  |  Downloads: 0
al adahi v obama
Views: 313  |  Downloads: 4
Mayfield v US
Views: 341  |  Downloads: 4
S 448
Views: 290  |  Downloads: 3
HR 4173
Views: 16  |  Downloads: 0
Stratechuk v Board of Education
Views: 79  |  Downloads: 1
Office of Fair Trading v Abbey Natl Plc
Views: 322  |  Downloads: 2
Biros v Strickland
Views: 362  |  Downloads: 0
Related docs