Document Sample

Singapore Mathematical Society Association of Mathematics Educators Peter Pang 15/2/03 The Constant All circles are similar. C=circumference The relative size of the circumference C R=radius to diameter D will be exactly the same, D=diameter that is, C/D = constant = C = D = 2R The Constant (2) Thus provides the connection between C=circumference two lengths, which are the circumference R=radius and the diameter. D=diameter This same constant connects the circle’s area area and radius. Approximating the Circle The critical idea is to approximate the circle C=circumference with an inscribed regular polygon. radius D=diameter area Approximating the Circle (2) We inscribe a regular pentagon in a circle of radius r. Break up the pentagon into five triangular pieces. r h Each triangle has b base b and height h. The dotted line is called the apothem. Connecting Length and Area Area of each triangle =(base)(height)/2 =bh/2 Area of inscribed pentagon =5(Area of triangle) r h =5(bh/2) b =(h/2)(5b) =(h/2)(Perimeter of inscribed pentagon) Connecting Length and Area (2) Area of inscribed pentagon =(h/2)(Perimeter) What if we choose any other regular polygon? r h b Connecting Length and Area - Hexagon If we inscribe a regular hexagon, then the hexagon will be divided into 6 little triangles. Area of inscribed hexagon r h =6(Area of triangle) b =6(bh/2) =(h/2)(6b) =(h/2)(Perimeter) Connecting Length and Area - Octagon If we inscribe a regular octagon, then the octagon will be divided into 8 little triangles. Area of inscribed octagon =8(Area of triangle) h r b =8(bh/2) =(h/2)(8b) =(h/2)(Perimeter) Inscribing a regular n-gon If we inscribe a regular n-gon, we obtain Area of polygon = (h/2)(Perimeter) If we increase the number of sides from 10 to 10,000 to 10,000,000, what happens? The polygons will gradually “fill up” the circle. Area of circle = lim (Area of regular inscribed polygon) = lim [(h/2)(Perimeter)] Two Questions What happens to the apothem and to the perimeter as the number of polygonal sides increases indefinitely? Clearly h will have as its limit the radius of the circle. The limiting value of the perimeters of the inscribed regular n-gons will be the circle’s circumference. The Connection Between Length and Area Hence Area of circle = lim [(h/2)(Perimeter)] = [(r/2)(C)] = rC/2 = r(2r)/2 = 2r2/2 = r2. Approximating The simplest way to approximate the ratio C/D is to measure the circumference and diameter of a particular circle and divide the former by the latter. However physical measurements introduce inaccuracies and in any case tangible objects like bicycle wheels and coffee cans are not perfect, mathematical circles. Archimedes’ Approximation Requires only algebra and the Pythagorean theorem. Pythagorean theorem: a2+b2=c2. c a b Inscribing a Square Choose radius of circle r =1. A s B Pythagorean theorem tells us that s2+s2=22 s 2 1 2s2=4 s =2 D C Perimeter of the square P =4s=42 Inscribing a Square (2) We get A s B circumfere nce diameter perimeter s 2 1 diameter 4 2 D C 2 2 2 2.828427125 A Better Approximation Improve upon the first estimate by doubling the number of sides of the inscribed polygon to get an octagon and let its perimeter be our next estimate of the circle’s circumference. Double again to get a 16-gon, then a 32-gon, and so on. The major obstacle is how to determine the relationship between the perimeter of one these polygons to the next. Overcoming the Obstacle A Line segment AB of b length a is a side of a C regular inscribed n- a/2 gon. 1 1-x D Segment AC, a side of x a/2 a regular inscribed B 2n-gon is generated. 1 O Overcoming the Obstacle (2) A Pythagorean Theorem b tells us that C 12 =(a/2)2+x2 a/2 =a2/4 + x2 1 1-x D a2 x a/2 x2 1 B 4 a2 1 x 1 O 4 Overcoming the Obstacle (2) A Pythagorean Theorem b tells us that 2 C a a/2 b (1 x ) 2 2 1-x 2 1 D a2 x a/2 1 2x x 2 4 B a 2 a 2 a 2 1 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 O a 2 22 1 4 Overcoming the Obstacle (3) A a2 b b2 2 2 1 4 C a2 a/2 2 4 1 1 1-x 4 D x a/2 2 4 a2 B 1 b 2 4 a 2 . O Back to Approximating - Octagon Apply the above C formula to calculate A s B 1 the side of a regular 2 inscribed octagon as s O b 2 4 a2 2 4 2 2 D C’ 2 42 2 2 Back to Approximating - Octagon (2) We get C A s B circumfere nce 1 diameter 2 perimeter s O diameter 8 2 2 D C’ 2 4 2 2 3.061467459 Back to Approximating - 16-gon Apply the formula C again to calculate the A s B 1 side of a regular 2 inscribed 16-gon as s O b 2 4 a2 2 4 2 2 2 D C’ 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 Back to Approximating - 16-gon (2) We get C A s B circumfere nce 1 diameter 2 perimeter s O diameter 16 2 2 2 D C’ 2 8 2 2 2 3.121445153 Back to Approximating - 32-gon Another doubling and C application of the formula A s B 1 yields the perimeter of a 2 regular inscribed 32-gon as s 32 2 2 2 2 O Now we get D C’ perimeter diameter 16 2 2 2 2 3.136548491 Estimate of We double seven more times, to a 64-gon, a 128-gon, a 256-gon, a 512-gon, a 1024-gon, a 2048-gon and a 4096-gon. The 4096-gon yields an estimate of perimeter diameter 3.141594618 Estimate of (2) Thus can be approximated as closely as we wish. This basic approach dates back 22 centuries to Archimedes. It however has one liability: the need to calculate square roots of square roots. Archimedes pushed through the calculations with bare hands, without the benefit of the decimal notation, up to the 96-gon. Methodologies highlighted Iterative process Limiting process Computation of √2 It is well-known that 2 is irrational, i.e., it has an infinite non-repeating decimal expansion. The following algorithm appeared in the Jiuzhang Suanshu for obtaining this decimal expansion. An Iterative Approach First, it is clear that the integer part of the decimal expansion is 1, i.e., the decimal expansion is of the form 1.abc…. We shall refer to a as the first decimal digit, b as the second decimal digit, etc. The strategy is to obtain one decimal digit at a time. Write 2 as 1 + x. Then, 2 (1 x) 1 2 x x 2 2 2 x x 1. 2 Find an x that has only 1 decimal digit, i.e., x = 0.a, such that 2x + x2 is as close to 1 as possible but without exceeding 1 (note that this x is not a solution to the equation above). When you carry this out, you will find the answer to be a = 4, or x = 0.4. Indeed (1.4)2 is less than 2, but (1.5)2 exceeds 2. Thus, the decimal expansion is of the form 1.4bc…, and our next step is to find the decimal digit b. Now, given that the integer part is 1 and the first decimal digit is 4, we write 2 as 1.4 + x. Then, 2 (1.4 x) 1.4 21.4x x 2 2 2 2(1.4) x x 2 2 (1.4) 2 . We now seek a number x = 0.0b, i.e., only the second decimal digit is possibly non-zero, such that 2(1.4)x + x2 is as close to 2 (1.4)2 as possible but without exceeding it. We will get b = 1. Squaring the Circle: The Transcendence of Let us start with a straightedge of unit length. Obviously, by putting line segments drawn using such a straightedge together, one can make line segments of any (positive) integer length. Now, suppose we have two such line segments of lengths x and y (x and y being positive whole numbers), what are all the possible lengths of new segments we can construct using the straightedge and compass only? Here are five possibilities: It is possible to make a segment length x+y by lying the two next to each other. Likewise, drawing segment x starting at the right end of y and heading left, the distance from the left endpoint of y to the left endpoint of x is x y. Through a more sophisticated construction, one can make segments of length xy, x/y, and the square root of x or y . Addition: y x x+ y Subtraction: x-y y x Multiplication: xy y 1 x Division: y y/x 1 x Square Root: a 1 a Thus we can add, subtract, multiply, divide, and/or take square roots to obtain any line segment whose length is the sum, difference, product and/or quotient of any (positive) rational number and/or square root of rational number. At the same time, using a straightedge and compass, we can construct two perpendicular lines on which a scale of length is imposed. This of course is nothing else but a (2-dimensional) Cartesian coordinate system, sometimes also known as the x-y plane. Thus, using addition, subtraction, multiplication, division and the extraction of square roots, we can construct geometrically points on the plane whose coordinates are sum/difference/product/quotient of any (positive) rational number and/or their square roots. Geometric Constructions (Using Compass and Straightedge Only) The five constructions above cover five powerful operations on the coordinates of points in the plane. But are any additional operations possible by geometric construction? The answer is no. To see this, let us scrutinize what we can do using a straightedge or a compass. Since the only shapes one can draw with a straightedge or a compass are line segments and circles (or portions thereof), the following is an exhaustive list of techniques for constructing new points out of old ones: 1. Draw a line segment through two points. 2. Find the intersection point of two (non-parallel) lines. 3. Draw a circle of a given radius with a given centre, or equivalently, draw a circle with a given centre through another given point. 4. Find the intersection points of a circle with another circle or line. We have already seen that geometric construction allows us to reach all points with rational coordinates. Starting with points with rational coordinates, and using 1 – 4 above, what points can we reach? If two points have rational coordinates (a, b) and (c, d), i.e., a, b, c, d are rational numbers (below, as an abbreviation, we shall simply call such points rational points), then points on the line segment between them satisfy the equation x(bd) y(ac) = (bcad), which is of the form jx+ky = m where j, k, m are rational numbers. Given two non-parallel lines of this form: jx+ky = m and nx+py = q where j, k, m, n, p, q rational, the lines intersect at the unique point x = (mp-kq) / (jp-kn), y = (jq-mn) / (jp-kn), which again has rational coordinates. Thus 1 and 2 do not give any additional points. Next, points on a circle with rational centre (a, b) through a rational point (c, d) satisfy the equation (xa)2+(yb)2 = (ca)2+(db)2 which is of the form x2+y2+jx+ky = m where j, k, m are rational numbers. Given a circle of this form and the line nx+py=q where n, p, q are rational numbers, their intersection points will be solutions of the quadratic equation n2 2 2nq nk q 2 kq 2 1 x j 2 x 2 m 0 p p p p p or p2 2 2 pq pj q 2 jq 2 1 y k 2 y 2 m 0, n n n n n which are of the form () a b c , d e f where a, b, c, d, e, f are rational. Similarly, we see that coordinates of points of intersection of two circles are again solutions of quadratic equations and hence also of the form (). Finally, it remains to examine points constructed from 1 – 4 starting with points whose coordinates are of the form (). It is not hard to see that coordinates of such points are again combinations of sum/difference/product/ quotient of rational numbers and their square roots. After knowing exactly which numbers are "geometrically constructible", the important point really is this: Since a "geometrically constructible" number is obtainable from the rationals using only addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and the taking of square roots, such a number must be a solution to some polynomial equation with rational coefficients. For example, take x = 6+2. Then x 6=2, or (x6)2 2=0. Thus, x is a solution of the equation x2 12x + 34 = 0. In fact, more is true: If one factors the polynomial until one gets down to an "irreducible" polynomial equation (one that cannot be factored any further and still has rational coefficients), the degree of this polynomial will always be a power of 2. In the previous example, we have seen that since x contains a square root, we need to square x in order to arrive at a polynomial equation satisfied by x. Now, intuitively speaking, every additional square root that appears in the number requires you to double the degree of the polynomial equation satisfied by that number. Thus, a number obtained by taking a square root twice is typically the root of an irreducible 4th degree polynomial; a number obtained by taking a square root thrice is typically the root of an irreducible 8th degree polynomial, etc.

DOCUMENT INFO

Shared By:

Categories:

Tags:

Stats:

views: | 5 |

posted: | 2/26/2012 |

language: | |

pages: | 53 |

OTHER DOCS BY gegeshandong

How are you planning on using Docstoc?
BUSINESS
PERSONAL

By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy and
terms of service, and to receive content and offer notifications.

Docstoc is the premier online destination to start and grow small businesses. It hosts the best quality and widest selection of professional documents (over 20 million) and resources including expert videos, articles and productivity tools to make every small business better.

Search or Browse for any specific document or resource you need for your business. Or explore our curated resources for Starting a Business, Growing a Business or for Professional Development.

Feel free to Contact Us with any questions you might have.