Health Care Reform in the U.S

Document Sample
Health Care Reform in the U.S Powered By Docstoc
					Health Care Reform in the U.S

          Professor Kate Bundorf
            Associate Professor,
   Stanford University School of Medicine
            Fulbright Lecturer,
  Fudan University School of Public Health
   U.S. Health Care System: Coverage Problems

• Many people are uninsured and many of the insured
  worry about the stability of their coverage.
   – About 15% of the population and 20% of working age adults are
     uninsured at a given point in time.


• Health care costs are high and growth in health care
  spending consistently exceeds that of the economy as a
  whole.
   – Health care spending per capita in the U.S. was $7,680 in 2008
     representing 16.2% of GDP.
 Sources of Insurance Coverage: Public Programs

• The major public programs in the U.S. (Medicare and
  Medicaid) cover most older adults (94%), a large portion
  of children (33%), and relatively few working-age adults
  (14%).
• Both are tax-financed, government-run, single payer
  insurance programs which contract with private
  providers.
• Public programs cover less than one-third of the U.S.
  population but finance about one-half of U.S health
  expenditures.
  Sources of Insurance Coverage: Private Market

• The majority of workers and their dependents have
  private, employer-sponsored coverage.
• It is voluntary, not mandatory for employers to offer
  workers health insurance, although tax law creates
  strong incentives for employers to do so.
   – Employer-sponsored health insurance is not universal among the
     employed.
• An important weakness of employer-sponsored coverage
  is that it is not transportable across jobs and periods of
  unemployment.
• Individual primary coverage is currently a residual
  market.
      Source of Insurance Coverage: Uninsured

• Public programs currently cover only a subset of low-
  income people.
   – 45% of families with income below the poverty level and 27% of
     families with income of 1 to <2 times poverty level had public
     coverage in 2007.
• People at all levels of income are uninsured.
   – 37% of the uninsured are in families with income below poverty
     level.
   – 53% of the uninsured are in families with income 1 to <4 times
     poverty level.
   – 10% of the uninsured are in families with income 4 times poverty
     level.
              Reform Challenges: Insurance Coverage

 • The majority of the population has insurance which they
   generally like.
       – 90% of insured Americans rate their coverage as “excellent”
         (36%) or good (54%).
       – Any dramatic change to that coverage generates opposition to
         reform among the public.
 • Because the uninsured are heterogeneous, achieving
   universal coverage requires:
       – Redistributive policies to make health insurance accessible for
         those who cannot afford it;
       – Compulsory policies to expand coverage among those who can
         afford it; and
       – Normative judgments to distinguish between the two.
Polling data from Kaiser Family Foundation, Kaiser Public Opinion Data Note: Americans’ Satisfaction
with Insurance coverage, September 2009, http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/7979.pdf
                                 Cost Growth

• Per capita spending has risen more quickly than inflation
  for both public and private payers.
• Increased utilization is the primary driver of cost growth
  for both public and private insurance (not aging of the
  population or prices of services).
                                        Percentage point difference
                                    between growth in per capita health
                Payer
                                           expenditures and GDP
                                      Overall and by Payer, 1975-2005
              Medicare                                    2.4
              Medicaid                                    2.2
              All Other                                   2.0
                Total                                     2.1
      Source: U.S. Congressional Budget Office, The Long Term Outlook for Health
      Care Spending, November 2007.
      Health Care Spending: Cost versus Value

• For certain clinical conditions, increases in aggregate
  spending have resulted in dramatic improvements in
  mortality and quality of life (Cutler 2004).
   – Examples include care for heart attack patients, low birth weight
     infants, and people with mental health conditions.
• However, research has also demonstrated significant
  waste in spending on the margin.
   – Per capita spending varies significantly across geographic areas
     and there is no evidence that higher spending areas achieve
     better outcomes.
   – If high spending areas reduced their utilization to the level of low
     spending areas, we could reduce health care spending in the U.S.
     by about 30%.
           Reform Challenges: Cost Growth

• Determining how to control spending in ways that
  maintain or increase spending in areas in which it is
  beneficial, and reduce spending in areas in which it is
  not
• One person’s wasteful spending is another person’s
  income.
                 U.S. Health Care Reform

• President Obama sign the Patient Protection and
  Affordable Care Act on March 23, 2010 and the Health
  Care and Education Affordability Act on March 30, 2010.


• The process used to pass the legislation, called “budget
  reconciliation”, required that the proposed legislation
  reduce the U.S. government budget deficit.
   – Any increases in government spending had to be offset by
     reductions in government spending or increases in taxes.
     Main Features of U.S. Health Care Reform

• Requirement that people have health insurance
  (individual mandate).
• Insurance market restructuring and regulation intended
  to make it easier to obtain health insurance.
• Subsidized coverage for low- and middle-income families
  to make health insurance more affordable.
• Subsidies and penalties for employers to promote
  employment-based coverage.
• Mechanisms to promote and evaluate new ways of paying
  health care providers.
                     Individual Mandate

• Requirement that all U.S citizens and legal residents
  have qualifying health care coverage.
• Creates a financial penalty for those without coverage.
   – Magnitude of the penalty linked to income
   – Exemption for those for whom the lowest cost plan exceeds 8% of
     income.
  Insurance Market Restructuring and Regulation

• Create state-based health insurance exchanges where
  individuals and small businesses can purchase health
  insurance.
• Greater regulation of private health insurance sold both
  in and out of the exchange.
   – Require guaranteed issue (insurers must offer a plan to everyone
     who wants to buy one) and guaranteed renewability (an insurer
     must be willing to renew the coverage of everyone who has it at
     class average rates) of insurance coverage.
   – Require coverage of preexisting conditions.
   – Allow rating variation based only on age (limited to a 3:1 ratio),
     geographic area, family composition and tobacco use (1.5:1).
   – Prohibit lifetime limits on the dollar value of coverage.
   – Minimum loss ratio requirements.
          Subsidized Coverage for Individuals

• Extend state-based Medicaid coverage to all low-income
  people.
   – All people with incomes up to 133% of federal poverty level will
     be eligible for Medicaid with expanded role of federal financing
     for the newly eligible.
• Provide premium and cost-sharing subsidies for coverage
  purchased through the exchange for low and middle
  income families.
   – Refundable and advanceable premium credits for eligible families
     with income between133% to 400% of FPL.
   – Limited to employees who are not offered coverage from an
     employer unless the employer’s plan is insufficiently generous or
     the employee contribution is too high relative to income.
        Promote Employment-based Coverage

• Employer subsidies
   – Provide a tax credit for small employers (<25 employees) with
     low wage workers (<$50,000 average annual wages) who purchase
     health insurance for employees.
   – Create a temporary reinsurnace program for employers providing
     health insurance coverage to retirees over age 55 who are not
     eligible for Medicare.
• Employer penalties
   – Require medium to large employers (> 50 employees) to pay fines
     if employees receive tax credits.
   – Require employers to contribute to coverage purchased by
     employees in the exchange if the employer contribution is
     relatively high.
    Increase Efficiency of Health Care Delivery:
                      Medicare
• Create an innovation center to test, evaluate and expand
  different payment structures and methodologies to
  reduce program expenditures while maintaining or
  improving quality of care.
• Promote “Accountable Care Organizations” (ACOs) by
  allowing them to share in any cost savings they generate.
• Establish a pilot program for Medicare bundled
  payments.
• Establish an advisory board to submit legislative
  proposals containing recommendations to reduce the per
  capita rate of growth in Medicare spending if it exceeds a
  target growth rate.
 Increasing the Efficiency of Health Care Delivery

• Support comparative effectiveness research by
  establishing a non-profit patient-centered outcomes
  research institute to identify research priorities and
  conduct research that compares the clinical
  effectiveness of medical treatments.
                 Financing: Tax Increases

• Tax increases for high income families
   – Increase Medicare Part A tax rate on wages from 1.45% to 2.34%
     on earnings over $200,000 for individual taxpayers and $250,000
     for married couples.
   – Impose a 3.8% tax on unearned income for high income tax
     payers.
• Tax on “Cadillac coverage”
   – Excise tax on insurers of employer-sponsored plans with
     aggregate value that exceed $10,200 for individual coverage and
     $27,500 for family coverage. Amount of the tax is 40% of the
     value of the plan that exceeds the threshold.
• Annual fees on pharmaceutical manufacturing and health
  insurance sectors.
 Financing: Reducing Medicare Provider Payment
                     Rates
• Reduce annual market basket update for Medicare
  providers.
   – But increase payment rates to primary care providers.
• Reduce payments to private plans participating in
  Medicare.
   – But increase payments rates for high quality plans.
   • Also increase payments by high income beneficiaries
     for Medicare coverage.
                   Likely Effects of Reform

• Insured share of the population expected to increase
  from 81% to 92% in 2018.
• Coverage expansions estimated to cost about $900 billion
  over ten years.
   – Public insurance expansion: $434 billion
   – Subsidized coverage through exchanges: $358 billion
   – Employer reinsurance and other: $106 billion
• Primary sources of financing include:
   – Reductions in Medicare provider fees: $455 billion
   – New revenues (taxes): $525 billion



 Source: U.S Congressional Budget Office, March 20, 2010
                  Implications of Reform

• Current proposals significantly expand insurance
  coverage but do not address the underlying cost
  problem.
• Because expanded coverage relies heavily on government
  financing, it will ultimately strain government budgets.
• Future administrations will be faced with a choice of
  either:
   – Scaling back government subsidized coverage,
   – Increasing taxes, or
   – Finding ways to reduce health care spending.

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:8
posted:2/26/2012
language:English
pages:21