Get documents about "ECI_spreadsheet
Document Sample
average satifaction with the
Local Authority of: local community
INDICATOR 1- CITIZEN SATISFACTION WITH THE LOCAL COMMUNITY
Level (%) of citizen satisfaction in general and with regard to specific features in the municipality
sample size
year
total population
Citizens' satisfaction with:
The municipality as a place to live and work number %
very satisfied 0% nd Note
fairly satisfied 0%
fairly dissatisfied 0%
very dissatisfied 0%
no answer (also includes “don’t know” ) 0%
total 0 0%
Standards of housing and its availability and affordability number %
very satisfied 0% nd Note
fairly satisfied 0%
fairly dissatisfied 0%
very dissatisfied 0%
no answer (also includes “don’t know” ) 0%
total 0 0%
Employment opportunities number %
very satisfied 0% nd Note
fairly satisfied 0%
fairly dissatisfied 0%
very dissatisfied 0%
no answer (also includes “don’t know” ) 0%
total 0 0%
number
Quality and amount of natural environment (e.g. green areas, rivers, etc,)%
very satisfied 0% nd Note
fairly satisfied 0%
fairly dissatisfied 0%
very dissatisfied 0%
no answer (also includes “don’t know” ) 0%
total 0 0%
number %
Quality of the built environment (e.g. streets, public spaces, the appearance and cleanliness of buildings)
very satisfied 0% nd Note
fairly satisfied 0%
fairly dissatisfied 0%
very dissatisfied 0%
no answer (also includes “don’t know” ) 0%
total 0 0%
Level of social and health services number %
very satisfied 0% nd Note
fairly satisfied 0%
fairly dissatisfied 0%
very dissatisfied 0%
no answer (also includes “don’t know” ) 0%
total 0 0%
Level of cultural, recreational and leisure services number %
very satisfied 0% nd Note
fairly satisfied 0%
fairly dissatisfied 0%
very dissatisfied 0%
no answer (also includes “don’t know” ) 0%
total 0 0%
Standard of schools number %
very satisfied 0% nd Note
fairly satisfied 0%
fairly dissatisfied 0%
very dissatisfied 0%
no answer (also includes “don’t know” ) 0%
total 0 0%
Level of public transport services number %
very satisfied 0% nd Note
fairly satisfied 0%
fairly dissatisfied 0%
very dissatisfied 0%
no answer (also includes “don’t know” ) 0%
total 0 0%
number %
Opportunities to participate in local planning and decision-making processes
very satisfied 0% nd Note
fairly satisfied 0%
fairly dissatisfied 0%
very dissatisfied 0%
no answer (also includes “don’t know” ) 0%
total 0 0%
Level of personal safety experienced number %
very satisfied 0% nd Note
fairly satisfied 0%
fairly dissatisfied 0%
very dissatisfied 0%
no answer (also includes “don’t know” ) 0%
total 0 0%
total answers
0
General comments on the indicator
average satifaction with the
local community nd
nd
Note
Note
Note
Note
Note
Note
Note
Note
Note
Note
Note
Local Authority of:
INDICATOR 1- CITIZEN SATISFACTION WITH THE LOCAL COMMUNITY
Level (%) of citizen satisfaction in general and with regard to specific features in the municipality
sample size
year
total population
Citizens' satisfaction with:
The municipality as a place to live and work number
very satisfied
fairly satisfied
fairly dissatisfied
very dissatisfied
no answer (also includes “don’t know” )
total 0
Rank the following 6 statements % score
social relations
opportunities to practice hobbies
basic services offered by the municipality
quality of surrounding environment
employment opportunities
opportunities to participate in local planning and decision making
Assign a percentage vote to each statement and rank the two statements you judge as most important in each of the group
a) How frequent is it in your neighbourhood to % score
chat with your neighbours?
chat with people you meet in shops/markets
stop and chat with friends you meet up with in the streets
be in the habit of going to meeting places (pubs, churches, social
centres, green areas, ...)
b) How safe is to % score
be at home with the door unlocked during the day
be at home with the windows open during the night
walk in main streets at night
walk in public open areas at night
c) Quality of following services % score
sport facilities
theatres and cinemas
museums and exhibitions
cultural associations
libraries
d) Accessibility of following basic services % score
general practitioners
hospitals
social assistance to the underprivileged
council housing
policing
public schools
public transport
e) Quality of the following % score
public parks and gardens and greenery in general
built environment
waste collection and street cleaning
air quality
noise level at night
noise level in the daytime
f) Your opinion on the following % score
professional training opportunities
incentives to start-ups
level of unemployment in your municipality
distribution of wealth within your municipality
local reinvestment of the wealth produced by the municipality
g) Effectiveness of the following in influencing local decision making % score
participating in local (e.g. municipal, district level, …) consultation processes
being a member of an interest group (e.g. environmental and
consumers associations)
submitting direct requests/claims to municipal relation offices
voting in local elections/referendums
organising/participating in spontaneous demonstrations aimed at
raising awareness on specific issues
CALCULATION OF THE AVERAGE RANKING
Please proceed as follows for each item:
a) consider the percentage of people that have assigned the item considered (e.g. "social relations") to each ranking position (from
b) multiply each ranking number (1 for the first position, 2 for the second, …) by the relevant percentage
c) sum the 6 results obtained in step b) to get the average ranking
e.g.: SOCIAL RELATIONS
Ranking 1
Percentage of people (i.e. relative weights) 20%
b) Addenda 0.2
c) Weighed average ranking 2.85
General comments on the indicator
average satifaction with the local
community nd
c features in the municipality
% people % score
0% Note
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1st (% people) av ranking weighed % score
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
atements you judge as most important in each of the groups below
total % of preferences weighed % score
0%
0%
0%
0%
total % of preferences weighed % score
0%
0%
0%
0%
total % of preferences weighed % score
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
total % of preferences weighed % score
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
total % of preferences weighed % score
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
total % of preferences weighed % score
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
total % of preferences weighed % score
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
nsidered (e.g. "social relations") to each ranking position (from 1 to 6)
ond, …) by the relevant percentage
2 3 4 5 6 check
17% 43% 5% 8% 7% 1
0.34 1.29 0.2 0.4 0.42
Local Authority of: per capita CO2 emissions
INDICATOR 2- LOCAL CONTRIBUTION TO GLOBAL CLIMATIC CHANGE
CO2 equivalent emissions (total value and variation)
Year
Total population
1 INPUT
1a Final energy consumption (TJ)
Sector
Residential Tertiary
Electricity
Natural Gas
Gasoline
Gas/Diesel Oil
Kerosene
Fuel Oil
LPG
Petroleum Coke
Refinery Gas
Anthracite
Coal
Energy vector
Lignite
Peat
Gas Coke
Coke Oven Gas
Blast Furnace Gas
Wood
Agricultural Waste
Solar Heating
District Heating Fluid
Total - -
CO2 emission coefficient (ton/TJ):
Listed below are the standard IPCC (local) and AIRES (external) coefficients. In case reliable local data is availab
External
Local (final use of (production/transp
the energy vector) ortation of the
energy vector)
Natural Gas 56.1 3.9
Gasoline 69.3 6.6
Gas/Diesel Oil 74.1 6.6
Kerosene 71.9 6.6
ctor
Fuel Oil 77.4 8.9
LPG 63.1 6.5
Petroleum Coke 100.8 5.5
Refinery Gas 66.7 0.0
Anthracite 98.3 5.3
Coal 94.6 5.3
Energy vector
Lignite 101.2 0.0
Peat 106.0 0.0
Gas Coke 108.2 0.0
Coke Oven Gas 47.7 0.0
Blast Furnace Gas 242.0 0.0
Wood 109.6 -109.6
Agricultural Waste 0.0 0.0
Solar Heating 0.0 0.0
District Heating Fluid 0.0 0.0
1b Electricity data
Electricity supply to each sector Quantity (TJ)
Local production
Residential
Import 0
Local production
Tertiary
Import 0
Local production
Industry
Import 0
Local production
Transportation
Import 0
Local production
Total
Import 0
Electricity export 0
Electricity national mix
1c Waste management data
Quantity (ton)
Waste to landfill
2 OUTPUT
2a CO2 emissions from energy - responsibility principle (ton)
Sector (calculated adding local emission and debt emissions)
Residential Tertiary
Electricity - -
Natural Gas - -
Gasoline - -
Gas/Diesel Oil - -
Kerosene - -
Fuel Oil - -
LPG - -
Petroleum Coke - -
Refinery Gas - -
Anthracite - -
Coal - -
Energy vector
Lignite - -
Peat - -
Gas Coke - -
Coke Oven Gas - -
Blast Furnace Gas - -
Wood - -
Agricultural Waste - -
Solar Heating - -
District Heating Fluid - -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
Total - -
CO2 equivalent emissions from waste - responsibility principle (ton)
-
2b Total CO2 equivalent emission value (ton)
0
Residential -
Tertiary -
Industry -
Transport -
Energy export credit -
Waste -
Total -
General comments on the indicator
0
Sector
Industry Transport Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
- - -
S (external) coefficients. In case reliable local data is available, please fill in real coefficients
CO2 emission coefficient (ton/TJ)
Import
External coefficient
(production of
for local production
Local (production of electricity and
(production-
electricity) production-
transportation of the
transportation of
primary fuels)
the primary fuels)
0.0
0.0 0.0
CH4 emission
coefficient (kg/ton)
calculated adding local emission and debt emissions) Energy export Total (calculated
credit (calculated subtracting credit
Industry Transport with respect to emissions from
the national mix) sector emissions)
- - 0.0 -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - - -
- responsibility principle (ton)
-
2c Per capita CO2 equivalent emission value (ton)
0
Per capita -
percentage of trips by motorized
Local Authority of: private transport 0.00%
INDICATOR 3- LOCAL MOBILITY AND PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION
a) Number of daily trips and time taken per capita by type of trip and by mode of transport
b) Total average daily distance covered per capita by type of trip and by mode of transport
Sample size
Total population av. time 0.00
0% av. distance 0.00
IF DATA IS UNAVAILABLE PLEASE LEAVE THE RELEVANT CELL BLANK (OTHERWISE, IF YOU INPUT A ZERO VALUE, THIS WILL BE
CONSIDERED IN THE CALCULATION OF THE AVERAGE, GIVING A WRONG RESULT)
Number of trips (total)
Walking Cycling Motorcycle Car Taxi Collective Combined (park&ride)
School
Work
Recreation
Shopping
Return trip
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Quality of trips to/from work/school
Walking Cycling Motorcycle Car Taxi Collective Combined (park&ride)
Length/Duration
Comfort
Overall quality 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Per capita number of trips
Walking Cycling Motorcycle Car Taxi Collective Combined (park&ride)
School 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Work 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Recreation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Shopping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Return trip 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average time per trip (min)
Walking Cycling Motorcycle Car Taxi Collective Combined (park&ride)
School
Work
Recreation
Shopping
Return trip
Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average distance per trip (km)
Walking Cycling Motorcycle Car Taxi Collective Combined (park&ride)
School
Work
Recreation
Shopping
Return trip
Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 4
persons 3 persons persons 5 persons
Moving by car: on board number only the (including (including (including (including
of persons driver the driver) the driver) the driver) the driver) no answer % only the driver
School 0%
Work 0%
Recreation 0%
Shopping 0%
Return trip 0%
0%
public
free private parking % of free % of private % of public
Moving by car: parking place parking parking (paid) no answer parking parking parking (paid)
School 0% 0% 0%
Work 0% 0% 0%
Recreation 0% 0% 0%
Shopping 0% 0% 0%
Return trip 0% 0% 0%
0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
absence
of unfavoura
Moving by car: reasons why the higher higher alternative ble other/no
car was chosen speed comfort low costs s weather answer % higher speed
School 0%
Work 0%
Recreation 0%
Shopping 0%
Return trip 0%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
0%
General comments on the indicator
T A ZERO VALUE, THIS WILL BE
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
Combined (park&ride)
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Average
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Average
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
% 2 persons
(including the
driver)
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
% no answer
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
% higher
comfort
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Non motorized Motorized
private transportpublic transport
systematic 0.00 0.00 0.00
unsystematic 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non motorized Motorized
private transportpublic transport
systematic 0.00 0.00 0.00
unsystematic 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non motorized Motorized
private transportpublic transport
systematic 0.00 0.00 0.00
unsystematic 0.00 0.00 0.00
% 3 persons % 4 persons % 5 persons
(including the (including the (including the
driver) driver) driver) % no answer
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% test
0% 0% 0% 0% error
test
error
%
% absence of unfavourable % other/no
% low costs alternatives weather answer
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% test
error
Local Authority of: % of citizens living within 300m from POA > 5.000 m2
INDICATOR 4- AVAILABILITY OF LOCAL PUBLIC OPEN AREAS AND SERVICES
Number of inhabitants living within 300 m from open areas or services
Public Open Areas
number of inhabitants %
Public open areas of any size 0% note:
Parks, gardens, open spaces 0% note:
Sports facilities 0% note:
Private areas 0% note:
2
Public open areas > 5.000 m 0% note:
number
Total population note:
School population
Year note:
Basic Services
number of inhabitants %
Health services 0% note:
Public transports 0% note:
Schools_I 0% note:
Schools_II 0% note:
Recycling facilities 0% note:
Bakeries and greengroceries 0% note:
General comments on the indicator
% of citizens living within 300m from POA > 5.000 m2 0%
ote:
ote:
ote:
ote:
ote:
ote:
ote:
ote:
ote:
ote:
ote:
ote:
ote:
Local Authority of: PM10 Net Overcomings
INDICATOR 5- QUALITY OF LOCAL AMBIENT AIR
a) Number of times that the limit values for selected air pollutants are exceeded
b) Existence and level of implementation of air quality management plan
IF DATA IS UNAVAILABLE PLEASE LEAVE THE RELEVANT CELL BLANK (OTHERWISE, IF YOU INPUT A HYPHEN, THIS WILL B
Pollutants EU level Averagin EU Overcomings (total number)
g period admitted
overcomings
SO2 125 µg/m3 24h 3
NO2 200 µg/m3 1h 18
PM10 50 µg/m3 24h 35
CO 10 mg/m3 8h none
Ozone 120 µg/m3 8h 25
Air quality management plan note:
Level of implementation (%) note:
Only in case you are not able to report the overcomings of EU levels, please fill in the following table:
Pollutants National level Averagin National Overcomings (total number)
g period admitted
overcomings
SO2
NO2
PM10
CO
Ozone
General comments on the indicator
0
(OTHERWISE, IF YOU INPUT A HYPHEN, THIS WILL BIAS THE RESULT)
Overcomings (net Year
value)
0 note:
0 note:
0 note:
0 note:
0 note:
se fill in the following table:
Overcomings (net Year
value)
0
0
0
0
0
% of children going to school
Local Authority of: by car 0%
INDICATOR 6- CHILDREN’S JOURNEYS TO AND FROM SCHOOL
Mode of transport used by children to travel between home and school
PLEASE REMEMBER: This indicator refers only to children younger than the age when they are allowed to drive scooters
The questionnaire has been administered in class, on one day of the year, asking "How did you come to school?"
The questionnaire has been administered on different days, asking "How do you usually come to school?"
The questionnaire has been included in the general survey for indicator 1, 3, 6, and 10
Mode of Transport
number % specify:
Walking 0%
Cycling 0%
Collective transport 0% specify:
Private car 0%
Other 0% specify:
Sample size
Year
Why use a car?
number %
No other form of transport available 0%
Length of journey to school/Lack of time available 0%
Unfavourable weather conditions 0%
Greater safety 0%
Other 0%
Sample size
General comments on the indicator
younger than the age when they are allowed to drive scooters
the year, asking "How did you come to school?"
ng "How do you usually come to school?"
dicator 1, 3, 6, and 10
% of environmental certific
Local Authority of: total enterprises
INDICATOR 7- SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY AND LOCAL BUSINESSES
Share of public and private organisations (large enterprises and SMEs) adopting and using environmental and social managem
If data are not broken down to enterprise size, please fill in table c "Total enterpris
a) Large enterprises
Nace rev Environm Social
1,1 ental
Total 0 0
A Agriculture, hunting and forestry
B Fishing
C Mining and quarrying 0 0
CA Mining and quarrying of energy producing materials
CB Mining and quarrying, except of energy producing materials
D Manufacturing 0 0
DA Manufacture of food products, beverages and tobacco
DB Manufacture of textiles and textile products
DC Manufacture of leather and leather products
DD Manufacture of wood and wood products
DE Manufacture of pulp, paper and paper products; publishing and printing
DF Manufacture of coke, refined petroleum products and nuclear fuel
DG Manufacture of chemicals, chemical products and man-made fibres
DH Manufacture of rubber and plastic products
DI Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products
DJ Manufacture of basic metals and fabricated metal products
DK Manufacture of machinery and equipment n.e.c.
DL Manufacture of electrical and optical equipment
DM Manufacture of transport equipment
DN Manufacturing n.e.c.
E Electricity, gas and water supply
F Construction
G Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles, motorcycles and personal and household goods
H Hotels and restaurants
I Transport, storage and communication
J Financial intermediation
K Real estate, renting and business activities
L Public administration and defence; compulsory social security
M Education
N Health and social work
O Other community, social and personal service activities
P Activities of households
Q Extra-territorial organizations and bodies
Small/medium ent. (number of employees) 0 0
Micro-enterprises (1-9 employees)
Small enterprises (10-49 employees)
Medium enterprises (50-249 employees)
Public organisations
Non-government organisations 0 0
NGOs
Charities
Other associations
General comments on the indicator
% of environmental certifications on
otal enterprises 0.00%
mental and social management procedures
n table c "Total enterprises"
b) Small/medium ent.
Both Total Total % total % environmental Environm
certified registered ental
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
d household goods 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% note:
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00% note:
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% note:
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
b) Small/medium ent. c) Total enterprises
Social Both Total Total % total % Environm Social
certified registered environme ental
0 0 0 0 0.00% ntal 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0
Both Total Total % total %
certified registered environme
0 0 0 0.00% ntal 0.00% note:
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
% of people exposed to annoying
Local Authority of: levels of noise at night
INDICATOR 8 - NOISE POLLUTION
a) Share of population exposed to long-term high level of environmental noise.
b) Noise levels in selected areas of the municipality (to be used instead of a) where data for a) cannot be obtained).
c) Existence and level of implementation of a noise action plan.
total population
a1) Lden In case you did not use the Lden formula indicated in 2002/49/CE , please specifify the calculatio
Number of people exposed (day and night)
noise type 55-59 dB(A) 60-64 dB(A) 65-69 dB(A) 70-74 dB(A) >=75
Road traffic
Rail traffic
Air Traffic
Industrial Services
a2) Lnight
Number of people exposed (night)
noise type 45-49 dB(A) 50-54 dB(A) 55-59 dB(A) 60-64 dB(A) 65-69 dB(A)
Road traffic
Rail traffic
Air Traffic
Industrial Services
b) number of measurements
45-49 dB(A) 50-54 dB(A) 55-59 dB(A) 60-64 dB(A) 65-69 dB(A)
Lden
Lnight
Other (specify):
c) Percentage implementation for each single measure/action identified in the action plan/programme:
Measure/action (brief description) Level of implementation (%)
1
2
3
4
5
1 æ ö
Lday Levening +5 Lnight +10
ç 10 10 10 ÷
Lden formula according to the Directive 2002/49/CE
1 æ ö
day L Levening +5 Lnight +10
Lden = 10 lg ç12 * 10 + 4 * 10
10 10
+ 8 * 10 10 ÷
24 ç
è
÷
ø
General comments on the indicator
0
f a) where data for a) cannot be obtained).
cated in 2002/49/CE , please specifify the calculation formula used:
eople exposed (night) % of people exposed (nigh
Total number
of people
exposed to
"annoying"
>=70 noise levels 45-49 dB(A) 50-54 dB(A)
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0 0.00% 0.00%
0
Total
measure
70-74 dB(A) >= 75 dB(A) number 45-49 dB(A) 50-54 dB(A)
0 0%
0 0% 0%
0% 0%
fied in the action plan/programme:
Level of implementation (%)
Lnight +10
ö
10 ÷
Lnight +10
ö
0 10 ÷
÷
ø
% of people exposed (day and night)
55-59 dB(A) 60-64 dB(A) 65-69 dB(A) 70-74 dB(A)>= 75 dB(A)
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
% of people exposed (night)
55-59 dB(A) 60-64 dB(A) 65-69 dB(A) >= 75 dB(A) Total
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
55-59 dB(A) 60-64 dB(A) 65-69 dB(A) 70-74 dB(A) >= 75 dB(A)
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Local Authority of: Percentage of protect
INDICATOR 9- SUSTAINABLE LAND USE
a) Artificial areas: artificial surfaces as a percentage of the total municipal area
b) Derelict and contaminated land: extent of derelict land and contaminated land
c) Intensity of Use: number of inhabitants per Km 2 of “urbanized land” area
d) New development: quota of new edification taking place on virgin area (greenfield) and quota taking place on derelict and co
e) Restoration of urban land
e1) Renovation, conversion of derelict buildings (floor surface)
e2) Redevelopment of derelict land for new urban uses - including public green spaces
e3) Cleansing of contaminated land
f) Protected areas as a percentage of total municipal area
year
Artificial surface (ha) 0.00%
Total municipal area (ha)
Population (n. inh.)
Inhabitants/ha of artificial surface 0.00
Derelict land (m2) 0.00%
Contaminated land (m2) 0.00%
New developments on derelict and contaminated year (m 2) the
virgin land during the past land during 0.00%
2
past year (m ) 0.00%
Total new developments (m2)
Renovation/conversion of derelict buildings (total number)
Renovation/conversion of derelict buildings (m 2)
Redevelopment of derelict land (m 2) 0.00%
Cleansing of contaminated land (m 2) 0.00%
Cleansing (Euro of public expenditure)
Protected area (ha) 0.00%
General comments on the indicator
Percentage of protected areas 0%
ng place on derelict and contaminated land (brownfield in total area as soil projection) in % per year
note:
note:
note:
note:
note:
note:
note:
note:
note:
note:
note:
note:
Local Authority of: % of people buying "sustainable products"
INDICATOR 10- PRODUCTS PROMOTING SUSTAINABILITY
a1) Percentage of people buying sustainable products in general
a2) Share of eco-labelled, organic, energy-efficient, fair-trade, FSC certified timber products in total consumption.
b) Availability and market supply of eco-labelled, organic, energy-efficient, fair-trade, FSC certified timber products.
Number of people surveyed
Number of respondents
Total Population
a) Consumption
People interested in sustainable products
Number Percentage
yes no yes
0%
People buying sustainable products
Number Percentage
yes no yes
0%
People surveyed buying "sustainable products" by category
Number
Usually Rarely Never
Eco labelled
Organic
Energy efficient
Fair trade
FSC certified timber
Total 0 0
Percentage 0% 0%
Quota of "usually" out of all products bought 0%
Percentage of people usually buying
"sustainable products" 0%
People surveyed buying the following "sustainable products"
Product Number
Type Usually Rarely
Washing machines
Refrigerators
Light-bulbs
Washing/cleaning detergent
Toilet/household paper
Coffee/tea
Cocoa/chocolate
Fruit Juices
Fruit/vegetables
Milk
Wood products
other (specify):
b) Availability of sustainable products and market supply
Hypermarket Supermarket Retail
Number of retail outlets offering sustainable products
Consumers served (number per month)
Type of retail outlet
Sales
Hypermarket Supermarket
certified products total products certified products
Washing machines
Refrigerators
Light-bulbs
Washing/cleaning detergent
Toilet/household paper
Coffee/tea
Cocoa/chocolate
Fruit Juices
Fruit/vegetables
Milk
Total 0 0 0
Number S
Year of reference tores per 10.000 inh
Fair trade stores 0.000
Organic Food stores 0.000
Other (please, specify) 0.000
c) Green Purchasing
Do the procedures of purchase of your local authority have specific requirements that encourage purchases of:
1=yes 0=no
energy efficient electric/electronic appliances
ecolabelled products
fair trade products
During the past year did canteens managed by your local authority offer organic food?
During the past year, recyled paper (rp) has been used in the offices of your local authority:
please, fill in "1" in the relevant cell
exclusively (90%<rp<=100%)
prevailingly (50%<rp<=90%)
partly (10%<rp<=50%)
in minimum part (0%<rp<=10%)
not at all
% of people buying "sustainable products" 0%
ber products in total consumption.
rade, FSC certified timber products.
If NOT, why?
in sustainable products Number Percentage
Percentage Don't know enough 0%
no Don't attribute any value 0%
0%
sustainable products
Percentage If NOT, why?
no Number Percentage
0% High costs 0%
Difficult to find 0%
Different habits 0%
Don't trust them 0%
Frequency distribution per market
Percentage
Usually Rarely Never
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
buying the following "sustainable products" Frequency distribution per market
Number Percentage
Never Don't buy/eat at all Usually Rarely Never TOTAL
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
Type of retail outlet Type of retail outlet
Sales Sales
Supermarket Retail Hypermarket Supermarket Retail
total products certified products total products % of certified products on total
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0 0 0 0% 0% 0%
Stores per 10.000 inh
ts that encourage purchases of:
If yes, please specify the % on the relevant total:
1=yes 0=no
