Document Sample

SCIENTIA Series A: Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 15 (2007), 17–22 e Universidad T´cnica Federico Santa Mar´ıa Valpara´ıso, Chile ISSN 0716-8446 c Universidad T´cnica Federico Santa Mar´ 2007 e ıa Maximum Principles For Some Elliptic Problems M.M. Al-Mahameed Abstract. In this paper we introduce a maximum principle for some semilinear elliptic equations subject to mixed boundary conditions which may be used to deduce bounds on important quantities in physical problems of iterest. 1. Introduction 2 In [6],maximum principles for the functions p = g(u) | u| + h(u) and u 2 q = g(u) | u| + c f (s)g(s)ds, c ∈ R, which are deﬁned on solutions of the 0 semilinear partial diﬀerential equation ∆u + f (u) = 0 in some region Ω ⊂ Rn are found using the classical maximum principle [3]. In [7], a maximum principle for the function q at a critical point of u under some conditions on ∂Ω is introduced. In [2], the following result is proved : Let u ∈ C 3 (Ω) be a solution of ∆u + f (u) = 0 in Ω ⊂ Rn , u=0 on ∂Ω. If the boudary ∂Ω has a nonnegative mean curvature, then the function u 2 Φ = | u| + 2 f (s)g(s)ds 0 assumes its maximum at a point where u = 0. In [3], maximum principles are derived for certain functions deﬁned for solutions of the equation ∆u + λρ(x)f (u) = 0 2000 Mathematics Subject Classiﬁcation. Primary 35B50, 35J60. Key words and phrases. Maximum Principles, elliptic equations. 17 18 M.M. AL-MAHAMEED in some region Ω ⊂ R2 subject to a mixed boundary condition. In this paper we derive maximum principles for functions deﬁned for solutions of the semilinear equation (1.1) ∆u + f (x, u) = 0 in some region Ω ⊂ Rn subject to a mixed boudary condition. In order to motivate our work, let us ﬁrst look at the one dimensional problem (1.2) uxx + f (x, u) = 0. If we multiply (1.2) by ux we get 1 2 (u )x + f (x, u)ux = 0, 2 x that is u 1 2 (1.3) u + f (x, s)ds − H(x, u) = constant, 2 x 0 where H(x, u) satisﬁes: u Hx (x, u) = fx (x, s)ds. 0 Thus we conclude that the function u (1.4) p = u2 + 2 x f (x, s)ds − 2H(x, u) 0 is a constant, where u is a solution of (1.2). It is obvious that p satisﬁes a maximum principle. Let u be a solution of (1.1) . We look for a function p of the form u 2 (1.5) p = | u| + 2 f (x, s)ds − 2H(x, u), 0 where H(x, u) satisﬁes: u H,i(x,u) = f,i (x, s)ds. 0 MAXIMUM PRINCIPLES FOR SOME ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS 19 Our goal is to ﬁnd conditions such that (1.5) satisﬁes a maximum principle. Let us ﬁrst give the following lemma. Lemma. Let u be a C 3 (Ω) solution of (1.1) with f ∈ C 1 (Ω × R), Ω ⊂ Rn , n 2.Then the function p deﬁned by (1.5) takes its maximum either on ∂Ω or at a critical point of u. Proof. By diﬀerentiating (1.5) we obtain (1.6) p,i = 2u,j u,ij + 2f u,i (1.7) ∆p = p,ii = 2u,ij u,ij + 2u,j u,iij + 2f ∆u + 2f,i u,i . Now we have (1.8) ∆u = −f, (1.9) u,iij = −f,j . This allows us to rewrite (1.7) as (1.10) ∆p = 2u,ij u,ij − 2f 2 . From (1.6) and Schwarz’s inequality, it follows that 2 (1.11) (p,i − 2f u,i )(p,i − 2f u,i ) = 4u,ji u,j u,ki u,k 4u,ij u,ij | u| . Consequently, by (1.10) and (1.11) , we can write Lk p,k (1.12) ∆p + 2 0, | u| where 1 Lk = 2f u,k − p,k . 2 Hopf’s ﬁrst maximum principle [4] implies the lemma. 2. The Result and its Proof We give our result by the following theorem. Theorem. Let u be a C 3 (Ω) solution of the problem ∆u + f (x, u) = 0 in Ω , ∂u u=0 on Γ1 , ∂n = 0 , on Γ2 , Γ1 ∪ Γ2 = ∂Ω , 20 M.M. AL-MAHAMEED ∂u where f ∈ C 1 (Ω ×R), Ω is a convex domain in R2 and ∂n denotes the outward normal derivative. Then the function p deﬁned by (1.5) takes its maximum at a critical point of u. Proof. We will show that p cannot attain its maximum on ∂Ω unless it is attained at a critical point of u which is on Γ2 . Suppose that p takes its maximum at a point M ∈ Γ1 . Then M cant be a critical ∂u point of u. Since u = 0 on Γ1 , we have| u| = ∂n and ∂p (2.1) = 2un unn + 2f un , ∂n Where un denotes the outward normal derivative.By introducing normal coordinates in the neighbourhood of the boundary , we can write (2.2) ∆u = unn + kun = −f, where k denotes the curvature of the boundary.Thus it follows that ∂p (2.3) = −2ku2 , n ∂n ∂p and since Ω is convex , ∂n 0 at M . This contradicts Hopf’s second maximum principle [5]. We now suppose that p takes its maximum at M ∈ Γ2 and that M is not a critical point of u. Since ∂n = 0 on Γ2 , we have | u| = ∂u and ∂u ∂t ∂p (2.4) = 2ut utn , ∂n where ut denotes the tangential derivative of u. In terms of normal coordinates in the neighbourhood of the boundary , we have (2.5) utn = unt − kut , so that ∂p = −2ku2 on Γ2 . t ∂n Thus we again have a contradiction of the second maximum principle when Ω is convex. The lemma, and our calculations , gives the theorem. Example. Let u ∈ C 3 (Ω) be a positive solution of the problem ∆u + 4u − (x2 + x2 ) exp(α2 − x2 − x2 ) = 0 1 2 1 2 inΩ, u=0 on ∂Ω, MAXIMUM PRINCIPLES FOR SOME ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS 21 where Ω = {x = (x1 , x2 )\ |x| < α} and f (x, u) = 4u − (x2 + x2 ) exp(α2 − x2 − x2 ), 1 2 1 2 it follows from the theorem (2.1) that u 2 | u| + 2 4s − (x2 + x2 ) exp(α2 − x2 − x2 )ds − 2H(x, u) 1 2 1 2 0 u max 2 4s − (x2 + x2 ) exp(α2 − x2 − x2 )ds − 2H(x, u) 1 2 1 2 Ω∪ ∂Ω 0 or 2 | u| max 4u2 − 2(x2 + x2 ) exp(α2 − x2 − x2 )u 1 2 1 2 Ω∪ ∂Ω − 4u2 − 2(x2 + x2 ) exp(α2 − x2 − x2 )u 1 2 1 2 . From the above inequality , we get 2 2 | u| 4(u2 − u2 ) + 2α2 eα uM , M where uM is the maximum of u in Ω ∪ ∂Ω. 3. Concluding Remarks 1. One can prove the result of the lemma for the function u 2 p = g(u) | u| + 2 f (x, s)g(s)ds − 2H(x, u) with suitable assumptions on g(u) 0 as in [5]. 2. Theorem 2.1 is also valid for n > 2, [5]. 3.One may give an extention of the maximum principle for a uniformly elliptic equation Lu + f (x, u) = 0 under suitable assumptions, [5]. 22 M.M. AL-MAHAMEED References [1] A. Greco,A Maximum principle for some second order elliptic semilinear equations.Rend. Sem. Fac. Sci. Univ. Cagliari. 59(2)(1989), 147-154. [2] L.E. Payne and I.Stakgold, Nonlinear problems in nuclear reactor analysis.Lecture Notes in math. 322(1972) 298-307. [3] P.w.Schaefer and R.P. Sperb.Maximum principles and bounds in some inhomogeneous elliptic boundary value problems.SIAM J.Math. Anal.8(1977), 871-878. [4] M.H.Protter and Weinberger, Maximum principles in diﬀefential equations, Prentice- Hall,Englewood Cliﬀs, N.J.,1984. [5] M.H.Protter and Weinberger, Maximum principles in diﬀefential equations, Prentice- Hall,Englewood Cliﬀs, N.J.,1984. [6] M.M.Al-Mahameed, Maximum principles for semilinear elliptic partial diﬀerential equations, Far East. j. applied Math.3(3)(1999), 287-292. [7] M.M.Al-Mahameed ,A maximum principle for the P-function at a point where grad u = 0 in some region Ω ⊂ Rn .J .Ins.Math.and Comp.Sci..14(1)(2001), 65-71. Received 28 06 2006, revised 06 03 2007 Department of Mathematics, Irbid National University, P.O.Box 2600,Irbid, Jordan E-mail address: al mahameed2000@yahoo.com

DOCUMENT INFO

Shared By:

Categories:

Tags:

Stats:

views: | 6 |

posted: | 2/23/2012 |

language: | |

pages: | 6 |

OTHER DOCS BY lanyuehua

How are you planning on using Docstoc?
BUSINESS
PERSONAL

By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy and
terms of service, and to receive content and offer notifications.

Docstoc is the premier online destination to start and grow small businesses. It hosts the best quality and widest selection of professional documents (over 20 million) and resources including expert videos, articles and productivity tools to make every small business better.

Search or Browse for any specific document or resource you need for your business. Or explore our curated resources for Starting a Business, Growing a Business or for Professional Development.

Feel free to Contact Us with any questions you might have.