Docstoc

Higher Education Reaffirmation of Accreditation by SACS Commission on Colleges Why Are

Document Sample
Higher Education Reaffirmation of Accreditation by SACS Commission on Colleges Why Are Powered By Docstoc
					Reaffirmation of
Accreditation by SACS
Commission on Colleges
Why Are We Accredited?
   Critical Benefits
     – Reputation of University
     – Opportunity for Review of Our Quality
     – Acceptance of Credit for UTSA
       Coursework
     – Qualification for Federal Student Financial
       Aid
   Required by State Law
   Meets Requirements of Federal Law
2 Components of
Reaccreditation
   Compliance with SACS/COC and Federal
    Requirements and Standards
    – Ability to Meet University Mission
    – Documentation of Ongoing Activity Directed at
      Meeting University Mission
    – Documentation of Continuous Improvement in
      Meeting Mission
   Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP)
    – Developed with Broad University Involvement
    – Goal: Meet Need for Improvement in Student
      Learning Outcomes
Reaccreditation Budget
2009-2010

Staff:
3 Office Assistants I - Maintain Data     $36,067.35

Web Assistant – Maintain Web Sites        $11,401.00
Technical Writer/Editor - QEP/Follow-up
  Reports                                   $10,000

Summer Supplement for QEP Coordinator       $10,000

     Total Staff                            $67,468
Reaccreditation Budget
2009-2010 (continued)
M&O:
Hardware/Software License Renewals            $2,000
TracDat/Insight/FAIR Software Maintenance    $19,800
Printing Services - Responses & QEP           $8,000
Equipment Maintenance/Use Costs               $3,000
Office Supplies                               $4,000
Facilities Services - Visiting Team Set-Up     $500
QEP Marketing/Publicity                      $10,000
SACS charge to UTSA for visit (estimate)     $35,000
Substantive Change Program Review             $1,800
QEP Consultants                               $4,000
    Total M&O                                $88,100
Reaccreditation Budget
2009-2010 (continued)
Travel:
SACS Annual Meeting, Atlanta,
  December 5-8, 2009 (6)                    $7,200
SACS Annual Meeting Registration (6)        $3,600
2010 Institute Travel - QEP Coordinator     $1,500
2010 Institute Registration - QEP
  Coordinator                               $1,400
Team On-Site Visit - Estimate              $20,000
SACS VP UTSA Liaison Visit                  $2,000
     Total Travel                          $35,700
Total AY 2009-2010                        $191,268
Reaccreditation Activities
Fall 2009
   Submit Certification of Compliance
    Report to SACS/COC (Multiple Copies)
   External Consultants Review QEP
    – Experts in Topic and Implementation
    – Fresh Viewpoint
    – Suggestions for Improvement
Reaccreditation Activities
Fall 2009
   Receive SACS/COC Evaluation of
    Compliance Report
   Write Focused Report
   Host Visit of SACS/COC UTSA Liaison
   Publicity Campaign Finalization
Reaccreditation Activities
Spring 2010
   Launch QEP Publicity Campaign
   Host On-Campus Visiting Team
     – 10 Members with Specific Expertise
         Review our Operations

         Focused Report Responses

         Review QEP (and Campus
          Knowledge of It)
Reaccreditation Activities
Summer – Fall 2010
   Respond to On-Campus Visiting Team
    Report
   Attend Institute for Quality for
    Enhancement and Accreditation
   Further Responses
   Attend December Annual Meeting –
    Accreditation Decision Will Be
    Announced
QEP Topic and Focus

   “Quantitative Scholarship – From Literacy to
    Mastery”
    – Math Skills Across Curriculum
    – Mathematical Information Interpretation Skills
      Across Curriculum
    – Communication/Analysis Skills Across Curriculum
   Plan Must Be Sufficient in Scope But Doable
   Both Goals and Plan Progress Must Be
    Assessed
QEP Budget

   5-Year Budget - $3.8 Million
    – 86% for Faculty, Students, and Student
      Support Activities
    – Mid-Range for Large University
    – $500,000 in First Year
   QEP Cannot Be Approved Without Firm
    Financial Commitment
UTSA Compact with UT
System
UTSA University Compact
Overview
   Rolling 2-Year Document
   Updated Annually
   Identifies Goals/Indicators for
    University
    – Mapped from UT System and UTSA
      Strategic Plans
    – Chosen by both UT System and UTSA
   Reports and Explains Outcomes
   Due to UT System June 1st
UT System Foci

   UT System-Chosen Performance
    Indicators
    – Persistence Rates
    – 4-Year Graduation Rates
    – 6-Year Graduation Rates
   Enrollment Management Plan
   Financial Management Plan
UT System Foci

   Information Security Plan
   System Contributions
   New Faculty Positions Projection
   Status of UTSA Strategic Plan
   Compact Development Description
UTSA’s Input Into
Performance Indicators
   UTSA-Chosen Performance Indicators
    (Reflect Strategic Plan Initiatives)
    – Total Enrollment
    – Net Assignable Space Deficit Reduction
    – Number of New Tenured/Tenure-Track
      Positions
    – Total Annual Research Expenditures
    – Number of Doctoral Degrees Awarded
UTSA’s Compact
Initiatives
   Map to Strategic Plan
   Three Categories
    – Completed Initiatives
    – Ongoing Initiatives (top 5 prioritized)
    – New Initiatives (not required)
Information Reported
About UTSA’s Initiatives
   For Each Category:
     – Strategic Initiative Area
     – Metric(s)
     – Analysis of Results for Year
     – Goal
     – Evaluation of success (Completed) or
     – Identification of Next Steps

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:5
posted:2/23/2012
language:
pages:19