India’s growth model by icestar


									                                                                              January 30, 2012 – No 80

                      India’s growth model (and its limitations)

                      This report explores the idea that India’s economic slowdown is primarily
                      explained by the limitations of its growth model and less by the problems
                      caused by the global situation.

                      Focusing too much on services in urban areas, India’s economic growth is
                      “creating” the current deficit (since only a small share of services is
                      exported) and inflation (since the rise in agricultural productivity is low and
                      demand for foodstuffs is high) is intensifying income inequalities (absorption
                      of excess labor in rural areas is very slow) and is nurturing public deficits (the
                      State is trying to offset increased income inequality by establishing aid

                      The domestic financial system also devotes too many resources to finance
                      the public deficit, such that funding for heavy investments (not associated
                      with urban services) is partly limited by the availability of external savings.

                      India’s growth and enormous economic development potential will clearly
                      continue to draw interest from foreign investors over the coming years.

                      It is worth noting the presence of macroeconomic imbalances that could
                      increasingly expose the growth path and performance of financial variables to
                      “stop & go” type movements.

  An economy with high               In recent years, India’s economy has had one of the highest growth rates in the
       growth potential              world, caused by heavy investment by the dynamic private sector. The lengthy
                                     growth cycle that started in the 1990s is the strongest and longest experienced by
                                     the Indian economy (Chart 1).

                                                                              C ha rt 1. India : R e a l G D P gro wt h
                                                                                    (%, 5-year mo ving average)
                                                      10                                                                                      10

                                                      8                                                                                       8

                                                      6                                                                                       6

                                                      4                                                                                       4

                                                      2                                                                                       2

                                                      0                                                                                       0
                                                                                                              Real GDP
                                                                     Source: IM F
                                                                                                              Real GDP per capita
                                                      -2                                                                                      -2
                                                           60   65      70       75      80      85      90       95      00   05        10

                                     More liberal minds put India's success down to the reforms for financial
                                     deregulation and gradual liberalization of foreign investment and trade, introduced
                                     in 1992 as part of a structural program under the supervision of the IMF and World
                                     Bank, which came to the country’s aid during a balance of payments crisis 1 .

                                     The most noteworthy outcome of these reforms was the positive impact of
                                     dismantling the advance authorizations system for investment in industry (“license
                                     Raj”), which protected small industry from risks linked to concentrations of capital
                                     but, which also limited the scope of achieving economies of scale. As the country
                                     opened up trade (joining the WTO in 1995), it entered the global economy,
                                     specializing in IT and business services in the world of international outsourcing.

       “The demographic              Yet a key factor of India’s dynamic economy is its demographics. Since the 1990s,
               dividend”             the ratio of the country’s working-age population has experienced a period of
                                     growth (Chart 2), opening up a window of opportunity that explains the upward
                                     trend in the nation’s savings rate, and hence the availability resources for funding
                                     investment (Table 1).

                                                      90                       C ha rt 2 . D e pe nde nc y ra t io ( %)                       90

                                                                                                                               B razil
                                                      80                                                                                      80
                                                      70                                                                       Russia         70

                                                      60                                                                                      60

                                                      50                                                                                      50

                                                      40                                                                                      40

                                                                     Source: Unit ed Nat ions
                                                      30                                                                                      30
                                                           50   60       70         80    90      00      10      20      30    40       50

    The country was suffering the consequences of the collapse of the USSR (its main trading partner at the time) and the Gulf War, which
  resulted in an oil crisis and a serious loss in earnings from cash transfers by the diaspora of Indians working in the Middle East.

Flash 2012 –80- 2
                                                       Table 1. Savings & investment (% GDP)

                                               1960              1970                   1980                   1990                   2000                2010

Net savings - households                        5,4              8,0                    10,8                    14,9                  20,7                 21,4
Net savings - corporate                         0,6              0,5                     0,8                     0,9                   2,0                 4,8
Net savings - public sector                     0,7              1,1                     1,7                    -2,3                  -4,8                 -0,8

GFCF - total                                    12,9             14,8                   19,7                    25,0                  26,2                 32,9
GFCF - public sector                            6,7              6,1                    10,1                    11,5                   7,5                 9,0
GFCF - households (*)                           1,6              1,2                     1,8                     3,7                   6,7                 11,6
GFCF - corporate                                4,6              7,6                     7,8                     9,7                  12,0                 12,3

Source: Central Statistical Organization
(*) Mainly residential construction

                                           India offers the most promising prospects of all emerging economies in terms of its
                                           "demographic dividend" in the future. Its working-age population (potential savers)
                                           should grow substantially over the coming years (Chart 3).

                                                                          C ha rt 3 . F o re c a s t gro wt h o f la bo r f o rc e
                                                                              (between 201 & 2020, millio ns o f peo ple)




                                                                       B razil
                                                                                                         Source: United Nations forecast s

                                                           -50                   0                  50                    100                150

                                                                                                                                                   Flash 2012 – 80- 3
         A dynamic domestic                                 India’s economy is reliant on the growth of its enormous domestic market.
                                                            Although India abandoned its growth model based on self-sufficiency for one that
                                                            opens up the country to the outside world, its production is still mainly directed at
                                                            the domestic market. In spite of a spectacular leap in its exports to GDP ratio
                                                            (Chart 4), it is still one of Asia’s lowest (Chart 5).

   25                                                                                                25                              250
                                             C ha rt 4 , E xpo rt s                                                                                   Chart 5. Economic growth volatility & openness

                                                                                                          Exports to GDP ratio (%
                                                   (% GDP )
                                                                                                                                     200           CH=China,IN=India,ID=Indo nesia,M Y=M alaisia,
   20                                                                                                20
                                                                                                                                                   P H=P hilippines,SP =Singapo re, TH=Thailand,
    15                                                                                               15

                                                                                                                                     100                                           MY              TH
    10                                                                                               10

    5                                                                                                5                                                                                            PH
                                                                                                                                                          IN                                       Sources: CEIC, IM F
                                                                                Source: CSO                                              0
                                                                                                                                              4                 6             8              10              12           14
    0                                                                                                0
                                                                                                                    Vo latility o f industrial pro d. (stand. dev. o f gro wth o ver a yr., p.p.)
         51   56    61        66        71      76     81    86       91   96      01   06      11

                                                            This characteristic has protected the real economy from the contagious effects of
                                                            global financial and trade shocks following the subprime crisis at end-2008 and
                                                            tensions over European debt in 2011.

                                                            And although the markets have not been spared financial turmoil (Charts 6 & 7)
                                                            with economic activity slowing, India’s economy has still managed to generate one
                                                            of the highest leaps in income per capita over the last three years (Chart 8).

25000              C ha rt 6 a . M um ba i S t o c k E xc ha nge                         25000                    30                                      C ha rt 6 b. M um ba i S t o c k E xc ha nge                    30
                              (Sto ck index - Sensex)                                                                                                                (P rice Earning Ratio )

20000                                                                                    20000
                                                                                                                  25                                                                                                      25

15000                                                                                    15000

                                                                                                                  20                                                                                                      20

10000                                                                                    10000

                                                                                                                     15                                                                                                   15
5000                                                                                     5000

               Source: BSE                                                                                                                          Source: BSE
    0                                                                                    0                           10                                                                                                   10
        00    01   02    03        04    05      06    07    08       09   10     11                                                00        01     02        03   04   05       06    07    08       09    10   11

  Flash 2012 –80- 4
               54                                   C ha rt 7 . E xc ha nge ra t e                                  54
               52                                                                                                   52

               50                                                                                                   50

               48                                                                                                   48

               46                                                                                                   46

               44                                                                                                   44

               42                                                                                                   42

               40                                                                                                   40
                                  Source: BIS
               38                                                                                                   38
                    00     01       02     03        04    05     06    07      08      09       10      11

                         C ha rt 8 . C ha nge in G D P pe r c a pit a , c o ns t a nt pric e s ,
                                        be t we e n Q 4 - 2 0 0 7 & Q 4 - 2 0 11, %



                                     Indo nesia

                                     A rgentina

                                          B razil

                                  So uth Ko rea

                                  Saudi A rabia


                                  So uth A frica


                                      A ustralia

                                         M exico





                                United States

                                          EU 27

                            United Kingdo m
                                                                             Sources: off icial stat istics, Nat ixis
                                            Italy                                          forecast for Q4 2011

              -30           -20             -10             0           10             20             30                40

India’s growth and enormous development potential will clearly continue to draw
interest from foreign investors over the coming years. It is still worth noting the
presence of several macroeconomic imbalances that are not without their risks and
which may put growth (and the performance of financial variables) on a more erratic
path than in the recent past.

                                                                                                                        Flash 2012 – 80- 5
     A service-based growth                         In spite of the uncertainty that continues to burden the global economy, growth has
                   model…                           remained dynamic in India, up 6.9% in a year in the second quarter 2011/12 (July-
                                                    September). This increase, one of the most rapid in emerging Asia, is still the
                                                    country’s lowest for the past eight quarters, accompanied by a marked slowdown in
                                                    manufacturing activity (Charts 9 & 10).

14                    C ha rt 9 . R e a l G D P & c o nt ribut io ns by s e c t o r                               C ha rt 10 . Indus t ria l pro duc t io n inde x ( Y o Y , %)
13                                                                                               20                                                                                    20
                                                (%, Yo Y)
11              GDP - A griculture       GDP - Industry        GDP - Services                    15                                                                                    15
                                                                      Source: CSO                10                                                                                    10
                                                                                                  5                                                                                    5
                                                                                                  0                                                                                    0
2                                                                                                -5                                                                                    -5

                                                                                                                   Source: M OSPI
0                                                                                                -10                                                                                   -10
               2010                                 2011                                               06            07         08         09          10          11             12

                                                    The stagnation in manufacturing activity has raised questions about the “structural”
                                                    constraints on the expansion of India’s industry.

                                                    It first reminds us that India’s economy is primarily a services one, with the sector
                                                    being mostly responsible for the country’s dynamic performance since the 1980s
                                                    (Chart 11).

                                                                              5              C ha rt 11. C o nt ribut io n t o G D P gro wt h                            5
                                                                                                  (5-year mo ving average, GDP po ints)

                                                                                                            A griculture
                                                                              4                             Industry                                                     4

                                                                              3                                                                                          3

                                                                              2                                                                                          2

                                                                              1                                                                                          1

                                                                                                                                                     Source: CSO
                                                                              0                                                                                          0
                                                                                  56   61   66         71       76         81   86    91     96      01     06      11

                                                    India’s industry clearly saw great expansion in the 2000s with some Indian
                                                    companies starting to gain international renown, such as the legendary Tata,
                                                    alongside Mittal, Reliance, Mukesh, Anil and Mahindra. Yet the overall size of
                                                    Indian industry, regardless of the huge domestic market, is still on a par with smaller
                                                    countries (Chart 12).

     Flash 2012 –80- 6
                                                          600                                                                          IT=It aly
                                                                                      C ha rt 12 . Indus t ry, G D P
                                                                                              (USD bn., 201 0)                      BR=Brazil
                                                          550                                                                      RU=Russia
                                                          500      Source: IHS GI
                                                                                                                                  FR = France
                                                          450                                                                  KO=South Korea
                                                                                                                                  M X=M exico
                                                          400                                                                        SP=Spain
                                                          350                                                                      TK=Turkey





                                                                   IT     BR        RU    UK       FR     KO      MX      SP     IN       TK

                                       Indian industry is suffering from underdeveloped heavy infrastructure. Such
                                       problems are illustrated by the state of the country’s roads, continued power
                                       outages and limited access to drinking water, which cause bottlenecks and low
                                       elasticity of supply for industrial goods. While improvements are under way,
                                       infrastructure development in India is still a very long process.

                                       The levels of capital accumulated during the 2000s primarily favored the expansion
                                       of businesses in the urban services sector (commerce, finance, Table 2). There
                                       was comparatively less investment in infrastructure in urban areas (inter-city
                                       connectivity, modernization of airports, telecommunications) than in rural areas
                                       (irrigation, electrification, storage), and in infrastructure necessary for industrial
                                       development (energy, access to water, road network).

                                                 Table 2. Progress in investment & infrastructures

                         Heavy & basic                     Rural                           Urban                           Financial                      Human capital

                   Insufficient due to lack of
                                                                                                                                                    Two-tier growth - strong
                     funds, weaknesses in
Overall progress                                   Partial improvement              Gradual improvement                Reasonably strong             in urban segments; but
                     long-term planning &
                                                                                                                                                           weak overall
                      poor implementation

                                                 Improvement in standard
                                                                                                       Banking system in good
                          Telecoms,               of living (e.g. telecoms), Rail links, modernization                                                 Urban institutions -
Strengths                                                                                              health / strong Central
                        petrochemicals            moderate progress with of airports in progress                                                        education, health
                                                   drinking water, health

                                                 Main rural infrastructures
                                                                             No widespread, forward-                                                Sub-optimal mechanism
                     Electricity, highways,         - irrigation, storage,
Weaknesses                                                                    looking urban planning                   Cooperative banks               for implementing
                         mining sector           electrification, education,
                                                                                     program                                                         government programs

                                         Sector dependence on different categories of infrastructures

Agriculture                Average                         High                             Low                          Low/average                            Low
Industry                    High                           Low                              Low                             High                              Average
Services                 Low/average                       Low                              High                            High                               High

                                                                                                                                                   Flash 2012 – 80- 7
                               India’s rural sector is also still underdeveloped (Chart 13). The country has been
                               food self-sufficient since 2000, but around 237 million people (21% of the
                               population) are still undernourished according to FAO data. Some progress has
                               been made under the “Bharat Nirman” program, aimed at developing rural
                               infrastructures (including irrigation and access to drinking water) and providing
                               financial aid to farmers that are heavily in debt.

                                                                   C ha rt 13 . A gric ult ure , G D P pe r c a pit a ( US D )


                                                      Argent ina




                                                  United Stat es


                                                   South Africa                                                              World Bank


                                                                   0              5000             10000             15000                 20000

                               Boosting agricultural productivity is a crucial issue for the country, made even more
                               critical since the population is growing at a rapid pace. But intensive farming using
                               fertilizers is causing environmental problems (soil erosion, water pollution, falling
                               water tables, etc.), casting doubt over the sustainability of Indian agriculture.

            …that creates      From a macroeconomic standpoint, this primarily service-driven growth together
           macroeconomic       with only moderate expansion in the agricultural and manufacturing sectors, poses
             imabalances       numerous challenges which are examined below.

      i) Income inequality     First of all, this growth imbalance produces income disparities between the rural
           and “structural”    and urban sectors (Chart 14). While poverty has certainly declined (from 45% in the
                   inflation   1990s to 38% in 2010, based on official figures), serious inequalities remain and are
                               even intensifying, as confirmed by the Gini Index which shifted from 0.32 in 2000 to
                               0.36 in 2006 (based on World Bank data).

                                                                        C ha rt 14 . Urba n & rura l wa ge s
                                                                              (average, rupees per day)

                                                               in co untryside
                                                               in cities
                                           250       Sources: NSSO Survey, BIS





                                                          2000/01               2004/05              2008/09                 0/1
                                                                                                                          201 1

Flash 2012 –80- 8
                                                       The pro-urban and pro-services bias of India’s growth produces a problem of
                                                       “structural” inflation, i.e. separate from the policy mix (whether expansionary or
                                                       restrictive in nature). The surge of the middle classes (2.7% of households in 1995
                                                       compared to 12.8% in 2010) in cities is substantially boosting demand for foodstuffs
                                                       that were previously reserved for a select few (milk, meat, eggs), while agricultural
                                                       output is only growing very slowly. And considering the country’s food distribution
                                                       system, whose level of efficiency is questionable, this dynamic is a key cause of
                                                       highly inflated and very volatile food prices (Charts 15a/b), especially when
                                                       harvests are not blessed with a generous monsoon. Lastly, food inflation tends to
                                                       be self-perpetuating. When high, inflation spreads to manufactured products and
                                                       services, with wage-related second-round effects, while around 40% of consumer
                                                       spending is on foodstuffs.

25                                                                                            25
                              C ha rt 15 a . Inf la t io n ( Y o Y , %)                                                   C ha rt 15 b. F o o d inf la t io n ( Y o Y , %)
                         WP I -To tal                                                              50                                                                                             50
                                                                                                                            M ilk                                    Eggs
20                       Fuel & po wer                                                        20                            Chicken                                  Rice
                         M anufactured pro ds.
                                                                                                   40                       Fruit & vegetables                                                    40
                         Fo o d
15                       Fo o d (pro cessed)                                                  15
                                                                                                   30                                                                                             30

10                                                                                            10
                                                                                                   20                                                                                             20

 5                                                                                            5
                                                                                                   10                                                                                             10

 0                                                                                            0     0                                                                                             0
                Source: M inist ry of Commerce and Industry                                                        Source: M inist ry of Commerce and Industry
-5                                                                                            -5   -10                                                                                            -10
     06             07              08            09            10             11                        06          07             08            09                10            11

 ii) A perpetual budget                                Such growth imbalances cause a deterioration in public finances and, although the
                  deficit                              2003 Law on budgetary management and responsibility has helped to streamline
                                                       public finances considerably, the deficit deepened in 2008/09 and in 2011/12 (Chart

3000                                                                                      3000
                    C ha rt 16 a . C e nt ra l G o v t . budge t ba la nc e                                                C ha rt 16 b. P ublic f ina nc e s (% GDP )
                                                                                                    2                                                                                             2
                                (rupees billio ns, cumulative)
2000                                                                                      2000

                                                                                                    0                                                                                             0
 1000                                                                                     1000
                                                                                                                       B udget balance (Centr. Go vt.)
                                                                                                                       Co nso lidated budget balance
      0                                                                                   0        -2                                                                                             -2

-1000                                                                                     -1000
                                                                                                   -4                                                                                             -4

-2000                                                                                     -2000
                                                                                                   -6                                                                                             -6
                              B udget balance
-3000                                                                                     -3000
                              P rimary balance
                                                                                                   -8                                                                                             -8
-4000                                                                                     -4000
                Source: qdsf qsdf                                                                                               Sources: IM F, Indian Budget
-5000                                                                                     -5000    -10                                                                                            -10
          01   02        03    04     05     06     07     08     09      10    11   12                  01   02      03       04     05     06        07      08        09     10     11    12

                                                                                                                                                                              Flash 2012 – 80- 9
                     Effective tax collection is being widely addressed via measures such as tax relief for
                     major special economic zones (manufacturing production destined for export (Box
                     1)), but India’s public finances are suffering from a rising need for government aid in
                     less-privileged areas. The Government has embarked on programs such as the
                     National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (Box 2). It has also introduced a
                     debt relief program for small-scale farmers. And to tackle the surge in oil prices in
                     2008 and 2010, the Government decided to cushion the impact on domestic prices
                     by raising subsidies, amounting to 2.2% of GDP in 2011/12 versus 1.3% in 2005/06.
                     Lastly, in 2009, the Commission entrusted with reviewing public service wages
                     every ten years recommended increases of around 40% with sizable adjustments.
                     All of these factors (particularly rural aid) continue to burden public spending, while
                     capital expenditure, which could raise elasticity of supply, is limited by the
                     Government’s low revenue performance.

                     At a time when public funds needed to develop infrastructures are inadequate
                     (central Government revenues account for just 9% of GDP), reforms still seem
                     necessary to sustain investment.

                     The problem for the public deficit is less its financing (bank regulations require
                     banks to invest 24% of their assets in treasury bonds) and more the fact that it
                     causes a “crowding-out effect” which reduces the funds available to invest in
                     infrastructure development.

                                               Box 1. Special economic zones

                     One of the factors of the expansion of India’s industry has been the take-off of
                     special economic zones (SEZ) since 2006, the year the Law on ZES entered into
                     force. The objective is essentially to create free-trade zones for the export industry
                     to help overcome India’s many traditional obstacles to growth. ZES are exempt from
                     all customs duties and they also enjoy some tax relief measures for the first ten
                     years. A one-stop shop system allows companies to avoid costly administrative
                     formalities. Over the space of five years, exports from ZES have multiplied 15-fold
                     and today account for almost a quarter of all goods and services exported,
                     according to statistics from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry.

                                Box 2. The National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme

                     The aim of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS)
                     introduced in 2006 is to provide a safety net for people in rural areas and to
                     promote development via funding for small-scale farming and infrastructure
                     projects. This plan guarantees a minimum of one hundred days of employment per
                     year for any member of a rural household wishing to participate, in return for a fixed
                     wage paid by the central Government. Participants can join or leave the scheme
                     depending on their current situation and most opportunities are for unskilled manual
                     labor. Most of the projects involve work on local infrastructures, such as roads and
                     irrigation, and the prevention of flooding and soil erosion.

                     Public funds, mainly from the central Government, cover wages and materials
                     costs. In 2010, the total cost of the program was 0.6% of GDP, with wages
                     accounting for two-thirds. According to official sources, more than 52 million
                     households took part in the program in 2010, compared to 45 million in 2009.

                     In 2011, the Government announced its intention to index the pay of agricultural
                     workers to the CPI, which implies a 22% hike in the NREGS wage, taking it above
                     the legal minimum wage offered in a number of States.

Flash 2012 –80- 10
iii) the structural deficit of   Lastly, India’s pro-services growth path is also at the root of a persistent current-
        the current account      account deficit.
                                 India is clearly a major exporter of IT services and services for business that are at
                                 the root of the surplus of services and it receives a substantial amount of money
                                 transfers from migrant workers. However, these flows are not sufficient to offset the
                                 goods trade deficit (Chart 17).

                                                        C ha rt 17 . C urre nt - a c c o unt ba la nc e
                                  20                          ( US D bn., qua rt e rly da t a )                              20

                                   10                                                                                        10

                                   0                                                                                         0

                                  -10                                                                                        -10
                                                                Current balance
                                  -20                           B alance o f go o ds                                         -20
                                                                B alance - IT services
                                  -30                           B alance - transfers                                         -30
                                                                B alance - revenues

                                  -40                                                                                        -40
                                          Source: BIS

                                  -50                                                                                        -50
                                                                                                     0 1
                                        90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 1 1

                                 The root cause of the current-account deficit (around 3% of GDP) is justifiably linked to
                                 the performance of goods imports and exports: rising demand leads to a sharp
                                 increase in imports (particularly energy imports) while exports, which are very dynamic,
                                 are growing at a slower pace (Chart 18).
                                                          50                             C ha rt 18 . F o re ign t ra de                          50
                                                                                       (go o ds, mo nthly data, USD bn.)

                                                                                       Expo rts
                                                          40                                                                                      40
                                                                                       Impo rts
                                                                                       Impo rts - o il

                                                          30                                                                                      30

                                                          20                                                                                      20

                                                           10                                                                                     10

                                                                                                       Source: M inistry of Commerce & Industry
                                                           0                                                                                      0
                                                                07            08                  09                10              11

   India’s macroeconomy          We believe that the current slowdown in India’s economy is primarily explained by
         adjusts to reality      the limitations of its growth model and less so by the global economic downturn
                                 which still accompanies this trend.

                                                                                                                                                  Flash 2012 – 80- 11
                                                          The second half of 2011 was actually the period in which the main economic and
                                                          financial variables began to balance themselves out (still only partially).

                                                                   The monetary tightening policy recommended in early 2011 by the BIS due
                                                                    to the surge of inflation (Chart 15 above and Chart 19 below), is reducing
                                                                    demand for durable goods financed by credit (such as automobiles, Chart
                                                                    20) and explains the economic slowdown.

                                                                   Periods of heightened risk aversion worldwide are reflected by fewer
                                                                    resources available to fund the external deficit, causing a sharp
                                                                    depreciation in the Indian rupee and the recent decline in currency reserves
                                                                    (Chart 7 above and Chart 21 below). Depreciation will eventually weaken
                                                                    the performance of imports and help to reabsorb the current account

                                                                   The Mumbai stock exchange (see Chart 7, Asia’s biggest loss-maker in
                                                                    2011) shows an adjustment in growth forecasts.

20                                                                                         20              80                                                                               80
                          C ha rt 19 . Int e re s t ra t e s ( %)                                                                            C ha rt 2 0 . A ut o s a le s
                                                                                                                                               ( v o lum e , Y o Y , %)
18                                                                                         18
                                                                                                           60                                                                               60
16                                   Reverse repo                                          16
14                                   O/N interbank        MSF rate                         14                         Source: Societ y of
                                     M SF                                                                  40         Indian Aut omobile                                                    40
12                                                                                         12                         Producers

10                                                                                         10              20                                                                               20

8                                                                        Target            8
6                                                                                          6                 0                                                                              0

4                                                                                          4
      Source : RBI
                                                                                                           -20                                                                              -20
2                                                                                          2
     08              09            10                11             12                                           06             07           08              09             10         11

                                                                              350                                                                                                350
                                                                                                    C ha rt 2 1. Int e rna t io na l re s e rv e s ( US D bn.)

                                                                              300                                                                                                300

                                                                              250                                                                                                250

                                                                              200                                                                                                200

                                                                              150                                                                                                150
                                                                                           Source: BIS
                                                                              100                                                                                                100

                                                                                                                           Currency reserves (incl. go ld & SDR)
                                                                              50                                                                                                 50
                                                                                                                           Fo reign currency reserves

                                                                                  0                                                                                              0
                                                                                      00       01   02    03      04      05    06    07    08    09    10        11   12

          Flash 2012 –80- 12
With no new wave of reforms that encourage investment in heavy infrastructure
(including reforms on tax collection, and with a view to improving efficiency in public
spending, providing administrations with more resources), the current growth model
could be stretched to its limits.

As things are, there is a growing risk that India’s growth will be increasingly
exposed to stop-and-go movements: phases of high growth and high global liquidity
leading to overheating and accelerated inflation, followed by periods of slowdown
(as is the case now) with a depreciating exchange rate and re-absorption of the
current deficit, necessary to re-establish the conditions that will allow growth to start
up again.

                                                                          Flash 2012 – 80- 13
                                                                         AVERTISSEMENT / DISCLAIMER

     Ce document et toutes les pièces jointes sont strictement confidentiels et établis à l’attention exclusive de ses destinataires. Ils ne sauraient être transmis à quiconque sans l’accord préalable
     écrit de Natixis. Si vous recevez ce document et/ou toute pièce jointe par erreur, merci de le(s) détruire et de le signaler immédiatement à l’expéditeur.
     Ce document a été préparé par nos économistes. Il ne constitue pas un rapport de recherche indépendant et n’a pas été élaboré conformément aux dispositions légales arrêtées
     pour promouvoir l’indépendance de la recherche en investissement. En conséquence, sa diffusion n’est soumise à aucune interdiction prohibant l’exécution de transactions
     avant sa publication.
     La distribution, possession ou la remise de ce document dans ou à partir de certaines juridictions peut être limitée ou interdite par la loi. Il est demandé aux personnes recevant ce document
     de s’informer sur l’existence de telles limitations ou interdictions et de s’y conformer. Ni Natixis, ni ses affiliés, directeurs, administrateurs, employés, agents ou conseils, ni toute autre
     personne accepte d’être responsable à l’encontre de toute personne du fait de la distribution, possession ou remise de ce document dans ou à partir de toute juridiction.
     Ce document et toutes les pièces jointes sont communiqués à chaque destinataire à titre d’information uniquement et ne constituent pas une recommandation personnalisée d’investissement.
     Ils sont destinés à être diffusés indifféremment à chaque destinataire et les produits ou services visés ne prennent en compte aucun objectif d’investissement, situation financière ou besoin
     spécifique à un destinataire en particulier. Ce document et toutes les pièces jointes ne constituent pas une offre, ni une sollicitation d’achat, de vente ou de souscription. Ce document ne peut
     en aucune circonstance être considéré comme une confirmation officielle d'une transaction adressée à une personne ou une entité et aucune garantie ne peut être donnée sur le fait que cette
     transaction sera conclue sur la base des termes et conditions qui figurent dans ce document ou sur la base d’autres conditions. Ce document et toutes les pièces jointes sont fondés sur des
     informations publiques et ne peuvent en aucune circonstance être utilisés ou considérés comme un engagement de Natixis, tout engagement devant notamment être soumis à une procédure
     d'approbation de Natixis conformément aux règles internes qui lui sont applicables.
     Natixis n’a ni vérifié ni conduit une analyse indépendante des informations figurant dans ce document. Par conséquent, Natixis ne fait aucune déclaration ou garantie ni ne prend aucun
     engagement envers les lecteurs de ce document, de quelque manière que ce soit (expresse ou implicite) au titre de la pertinence, de l’exactitude ou de l’exhaustivité des informations qui y
     figurent ou de la pertinence des hypothèses auxquelles elle fait référence. En effet, les informations figurant dans ce document ne tiennent pas compte des règles comptables ou fiscales
     particulières qui s’appliqueraient aux contreparties, clients ou clients potentiels de Natixis. Natixis ne saurait donc être tenu responsable des éventuelles différences de valorisation entre ses
     propres données et celles de tiers, ces différences pouvant notamment résulter de considérations sur l’application de règles comptables, fiscales ou relatives à des modèles de valorisation.
     De plus, les avis, opinions et toute autre information figurant dans ce document sont indicatifs et peuvent être modifiés ou retirés par Natixis à tout moment sans préavis.
    Les informations sur les prix ou marges sont indicatives et sont susceptibles d’évolution à tout moment et sans préavis, notamment en fonction des conditions de marché. Les performances
    passées et les simulations de performances passées ne sont pas un indicateur fiable et ne préjugent donc pas des performances futures. Les informations contenues dans ce document
    peuvent inclure des résultats d’analyses issues d’un modèle quantitatif qui représentent des évènements futurs potentiels, qui pourront ou non se réaliser, et elles ne constituent pas une
    analyse complète de tous les faits substantiels qui déterminent un produit. Natixis se réserve le droit de modifier ou de retirer ces informations à tout moment sans préavis. Plus généralement,
    Natixis, ses sociétés mères, ses filiales, ses actionnaires de référence ainsi que leurs directeurs, administrateurs, associés, agents, représentants, salariés ou conseils respectifs rejettent toute
    responsabilité à l’égard des lecteurs de ce document ou de leurs conseils concernant les caractéristiques de ces informations. Les opinions, avis ou prévisions figurant dans ce document
    reflètent, sauf indication contraire, celles de son ou ses auteur(s) et ne reflètent pas les opinions de toute autre personne ou de Natixis.
     Les informations figurant dans ce document n’ont pas vocation à faire l’objet d’une mise à jour après la date apposée en première page. Par ailleurs, la remise de ce document n’entraîne en
     aucune manière une obligation implicite de quiconque de mise à jour des informations qui y figurent.
     Natixis ne saurait être tenu pour responsable des pertes financières ou d’une quelconque décision prise sur le fondement des informations figurant dans la présentation et n’assume aucune
     prestation de conseil, notamment en matière de services d’investissement. En tout état de cause, il vous appartient de recueillir les avis internes et externes que vous estimez nécessaires ou
     souhaitables, y compris de la part de juristes, fiscalistes, comptables, conseillers financiers, ou tous autres spécialistes, pour vérifier notamment l’adéquation de la transaction qui vous est
     présentée avec vos objectifs et vos contraintes et pour procéder à une évaluation indépendante de la transaction afin d’en apprécier les mérites et les facteurs de risques.
     Natixis est agréée par l’Autorité de contrôle prudentiel (ACP) en France en qualité de Banque – prestataire de services d’investissements et soumise à sa supervision. Natixis est réglementée
     par l’AMF (Autorité des Marchés Financiers) pour l’exercice des services d’investissements pour lesquels elle est agréée.
     Natixis est agréée par l’ACP en France et soumise à l’autorité limitée du Financial Services Authority au Royaume Uni. Les détails concernant la supervision de nos activités par le Financial
     Services Authority sont disponibles sur demande.
     Natixis est agréée par l’ACP et régulée par la BaFin (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) pour l’exercice en libre établissement de ses activités en Allemagne. Le transfert /
     distribution de ce document en Allemagne est fait(e) sous la responsabilité de NATIXIS Zweigniederlassung Deutschland.
     Natixis est agréée par l’ACP et régulée par la Banque d’Espagne (Bank of Spain) et la CNMV pour l’exercice en libre établissement de ses activités en Espagne.
     Natixis est agréée par l’ACP et régulée par la Banque d’Italie et la CONSOB (Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa) pour l’exercice en libre établissement de ses activités en Italie.
     Natixis ne destine la diffusion aux Etats-Unis de cette publication qu’aux « major U.S. institutional investors », définis comme tels selon la Rule 15(a) (6). Cette publication a été élaborée et
     vérifiée par les économistes de Natixis (Paris). Ces économistes n'ont pas fait l'objet d'un enregistrement professionnel en tant qu'économiste auprès du NYSE et/ou du NASD et ne sont donc
     pas soumis aux règles édictées par la FINRA.

    This document (including any attachments thereto) is confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). It should not be transmitted to any person(s) other than the original
    addressee(s) without the prior written consent of Natixis. If you receive this document in error, please delete or destroy it and notify the sender immediately.
    This document has been prepared by our economists. It does not constitute an independent investment research and has not been prepared in accordance with the legal
    requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Accordingly there are no prohibitions on dealing ahead of its dissemination.
    The distribution, possession or delivery of this document in, to or from certain jurisdictions may be restricted or prohibited by law. Recipients of this document are therefore required to ensure
    that they are aware of, and comply with, such restrictions or prohibitions. Neither Natixis, nor any of its affiliates, directors, employees, agents or advisers nor any other person accept any
    liability to anyone in relation to the distribution, possession or delivery of this document in, to or from any jurisdiction.
    This document (including any attachments thereto) are communicated to each recipient for information purposes only and do not constitute a personalised recommendation. It is intended for
    general distribution and the products or services described therein do not take into account any specific investment objective, financial situation or particular need of any recipient. It should not
    be construed as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase, sale or subscription of any interest or security or as an undertaking by Natixis to complete a transaction subject to the
    terms and conditions described in this document or any other terms and conditions. Any undertaking or commitment shall be subject to Natixis prior approval and formal written confirmation in
    accordance with its current internal procedures. This document and any attachments thereto are based on public information.
    Natixis has neither verified nor independently analysed the information contained in this document. Accordingly, no representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, is made to the
    recipients of this document as to or in relation to the accuracy or completeness or otherwise of this document or as to the reasonableness of any assumption contained in this document. The
    information contained in this document does not take into account specific tax rules or accounting methods applicable to counterparties, clients or potential clients of Natixis. Therefore, Natixis
    shall not be liable for differences, if any, between its own valuations and those valuations provided by third parties; as such differences may arise as a result of the application and
    implementation of alternative accounting methods, tax rules or valuation models. In addition, any view, opinion or other information provided herein is indicative only and subject to change or
    withdrawal by Natixis at any time without notice.
    Prices and margins are indicative only and are subject to changes at any time without notice depending on inter alia market conditions. Past performances and simulations of past
    performances are not a reliable indicator and therefore do not predict future results. The information contained in this document may include the results of analysis derived from a quantitative
    model, which represent potential future events, that may or may not be realised, and is not a complete analysis of every material fact representing any product. The information may be
    amended or withdrawn by Natixis at any time without notice. More generally, no responsibility is accepted by Natixis, nor any of its holding companies, subsidiaries, associated undertakings or
    controlling persons, nor any of their respective directors, officers, partners, employees, agents, representatives or advisors as to or in relation to the characteristics of this information. The
    opinions, views and forecasts expressed in this document (including any attachments thereto) reflect the personal views of the author(s) and do not reflect the views of any other person or
    Natixis unless otherwise mentioned.
    It should not be assumed that the information contained in this document will have been updated subsequent to date stated on the first page of this document. In addition, the delivery of this
    document does not imply in any way an obligation on anyone to update such information at any time.
    Natixis shall not be liable for any financial loss or any decision taken on the basis of the information contained in this document and Natixis does not hold itself out as providing any advice,
    particularly in relation to investment services. In any event, you should request for any internal and/or external advice that you consider necessary or desirable to obtain, including from any
    financial, legal, tax or accounting advisor, or any other specialist advice, in order to verify in particular that the investment(s) described in this document meets your investment objectives and
    constraints and to obtain an independent valuation of such investment(s), its risks factors and rewards.
    Natixis is authorised in France by the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel (ACP) as a Bank –Investment Services providers and subject to its supervision. Natixis is regulated by the AMF in respect
    of its investment services activities.
    Natixis is authorised by the ACP in France and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Services Authority in the United Kingdom. Details on the extent of our regulation by the Financial
    Services Authority are available from us on request.
    Natixis is authorised by the ACP and regulated by the BaFin (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) for the conduct of its business in Germany. The transfer / distribution of this
    document in Germany is done by / under the responsibility of NATIXIS Zweigniederlassung Deutschland.
    Natixis is authorised by the ACP and regulated by Bank of Spain and the CNMV for the conduct of its business in Spain.
    Natixis is authorised by the ACP and regulated by Bank of Italy and the CONSOB (Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa) for the conduct of its business in Italy.
    This research report is solely available for distribution in the United States to major U.S. institutional investors as defined by SEC Rule 15(a)(6). This research report has been prepared and
    reviewed by research economists employed by Natixis (Paris). These economists are not registered or qualified as research economists with the NYSE and/or the NASD, and are not subject
    to the rules of the FINRA

Flash 2012 –80- 14

To top