Space Exploration, the Final Frontier
The Lovett School
The creation of NASA and space exploration should continue to be funded. With the start
of the Space Race, the United States got involved with reaching the moon. NASA has always
tried to keep the United States ahead of every other nation when it comes to outer space. In the
beginning, NASA created a rough set of rules and regulations. The price of space exploration can
be more than money sometimes. In some tragic accidents, a few people have lost their lives.
From these accidents, NASA has improved the condition, quality, and design of all of the space
shuttles and equipment created. The International Space Station is a current project of NASA and
many other nations. Funding is needed in order for the United States to do its part with the
fifteen other nations involved in the International Space Station. Currently, President Obama is
stopping all lunar missions, and telling NASA to work on ground missions and experiments. This
is a bad idea and the United States should always continue to explore what is not known in
Space, the final frontier, has been a great mystery for the world. After everyone ran out of
room to explore on Earth, the only other option was to start exploring space. In 1957 the Soviet
Union launched a satellite named Sputnik. A general feeling of fear came over the entire world.
Everyone thought that the Soviets would take over space and then take over the world. The
Soviets then launched another satellite, Barker. (2003, Grinter)This soon turned into a
competition between countries to see who could do the most the fastest, also known as the Space
October 1, 1958, NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, was
created. NASA followed NACA, the National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics. (High Beam
Research 2010) President John F. Kennedy wanted to compete with the Russians. Along with
NASA, President Kennedy urged students nationally to reach a high level of intelligence in order
to catch up with Russian students. The first major mission was getting into space. This cost a lot
of money because nobody really knew what was going to happen. Countless missions and
experiments were done just to create a rocket that would safely go into space and back. The
tough part was putting a man in that rocket. Without the funding placed into the federal budget
this would have never happened. The United States should continue to fund and increase the
budget when it comes to space research and exploration.
In 1961, the Soviets finally put a man, Major Yuri Gagarin, into space. After this,
President Kennedy met with the National Aeronautic and Space Administration, NASA, to figure
out a way to beat the Soviets’ accomplishment. President Kennedy and the nation knew that this
would be an expensive task. The original price that was set for this was 11 billion dollars. (2009.
Emerson) This grew every time a new necessity was brought up. Three main missions were
created to accomplish a lunar landing. These three missions were Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo.
To begin, scientists and NASA workers gathered over 400,000 people to take on this giant task.
People went to train to be astronauts, to investigate space conditions on man, and to design and
build the space ships. Over 20 different job types were created with NASA, and over 10,000 jobs
were given out. (2010, Wilson)
The first missions were the Mercury missions. The three main goals of these missions
were to investigate the affect of space on man, to orbit a manned rocket around Earth, and to
have the manned rocked return safely to Earth. In the beginning, guidelines were set to make
these missions as simple as possible and to ensure the utmost safety for the astronauts. These
guidelines set rules that made engineers use already made technology wherever possible and
choose the simplest design for creating the space shuttles. Safety guidelines required the space
shuttles to be able to land in the water, have manual controls, and a reliable escape plan. The
next step in the Mercury missions was astronaut selection. Originally, seven men were
nominated to be the first astronauts of America. These men were an average sample of American
males. The nominees were slightly healthier physically and mentally. These men were volunteers
with military experience and had past experience outside of Earth’s hemisphere. The rising
popularity of these nominees made the men a new type of celebrity. After four years and eight
months the Mercury missions had successfully come to an end. Six out of six manned flights
went as planned out of a 25 flight program. (Grinter, 2003)
The research of the affect of space on man discovered valuable information for future
NASA workers to use. The research showed that a man could function normally for up to 35
hours as a pilot, engineer, or whatever he needed to be in a weightless area. NASA workers also
learned important lessons in the Mercury missions. Because this was the first major set of flights,
scientists did not know what to expect. Some important things that these workers learned are that
more details in design plans needed to be added, more requirements needed to be added to flight
equipment, testing procedures needed to be more accurate, and the technology used need to be
more responsive. (Grinter, 2003)The Mercury missions were the first major step the United
States took upon entering the space race. Many things were learned and many discoveries were
made. The Mercury missions were concluded to be a success and every goal was accomplished.
The second major group of missions was the Gemini project. After the Mercury missions,
workers at NASA realized that an extra step should be put in between Mercury and Apollo.
Similar to the Mercury missions, Gemini project had a set of goals that needed to be
accomplished in order for the United States to continue in hopes of a lunar landing. These three
main goals were to have equipment last two weeks in space, to be able to connect and maneuver
vehicles, and to perfect the return landing of the space shuttle to Earth (Grinter, 2003). The
Gemini project was considered especially successful. The project accomplished its main goals as
well as many others. The one goal that was not fully accomplished was the landing goal. The
overall goal of being able to control the aircraft when landing it was accomplished, but the actual
land landing was canceled. The Gemini project focused on manned flights testing out all of the
necessary equipment. The equipment was tested for response time, maneuverability, and
compatibility. The project was successful just like the Mercury missions. The United States was
then only one set of missions away from an actual lunar landing.
The last sets of missions were the Apollo missions. These missions include some of the
most famous missions ever. Just like the previous sets of missions, the Apollo missions had
certain goals to accomplish. Technology was to be created that concerned other space interests,
achieve superiority in space, start a program for scientific exploration of the Moon, and to further
the ability that man has to work in space. (Grinter, 2003) Apollo 11 was the most memorable and
famous of the Apollo missions. This was the mission that the United States landed on the Moon
and had humans walk around on it. Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins were the
three astronauts who manned Apollo 11. “One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind”
(Armstrong, 1969). The landing on the moon was a major step in continuing space exploration.
This moon landing proved that if America set its mind to something, it could do anything. Now,
thoughts of what else could be done came into everybody’s minds. “We’re number one on the
runway” (Aldrin, 1969). The United States were the first country to reach the moon. When the
astronauts were up there, nobody else was there competing or trying to win the space race
because the United States had already won.
Space exploration has had a big price sometimes. Three historic NASA missions were
Apollo 1, Challenger, and Columbia. On January 27, 1967, during a test run for the Apollo 1
mission, the three astronauts Virgil “Gus” Grissom, Edward H. White, and Roger B. Chaffee
were sitting inside of the Apollo capsule when a fire broke out. The three tried to escape, but the
hatch was stuck and would not open. Being the first of the Apollo missions, this did not look
well for NASA’s plans of getting to the moon. This tragedy was a wake up call for the designers,
and new requirements were set to ensure an accident like this would never happen again. Now
escape hatches are put into the capsules in case this should ever happen again.
Another tragic accident was the Challenger. The Challenger was the second aircraft in a
line of reusable shuttles. Normally a shuttle would be discarded, but the Challenger had flown in
nine other missions before this one. January 28, 1986, just 73 seconds after the launch, the
shuttle fuel tanks exploded. On that flight were seven people including Francis R. Scobee,
Michael J. Smith, Ronald E. McNair, Ellison S. Onizuka, Judith A Resnik, Gregory B. Jarvis,
and Sharon Christa McAuliffe. Sharon McAuliffe was the first person to ever fly in the Teachers
in Space Program, TISP. She was chosen from over 11,000 applicants. President Ronald Reagan
issued a special commission to investigate why the Challenger exploded. The investigators found
out that one of the seals on a rocket fuel tank was faulty, and because of how cold it was that
day, gas leaked through the seal (Greene). When it came time to throttle up, the booster rocket’s
flames were unable to pass through the faulty seal. This caused the flames to burn through the
supports that attached it to the shuttle and a fuel tank. When the booster broke loose, it collided
with a liquid nitrogen and liquid oxygen tank which when mixed with the open fuel tank, ignited.
The cause of this was only the faulty seal, but NASA officials still allowed the launch despite
warnings from other NASA engineers (Greene). This all could have been prevented with stricter
regulations for shuttle inspections. Now the regulations for safety and quality of the shuttle are
The most recent of these tragic events was the Columbia mission. The crew was only 16
minuets away from landing back home when the orbiter started coming apart. On February 1,
2003, the Columbia was on its way back into the atmosphere when Mission Control lost all
contact. During the launch a piece of foam had fallen of one of the shuttle wings. NASA had no
idea what an impact this would make. Upon re-entering the atmosphere the orbiter broke apart
because there was a whole from where the foam had fallen off. Once again, designs were looked
at more carefully and inspections were more particular as a result.
“Remember them not how they died, but what they lived for” (2010, NASA.) All of these
astronauts knew the risks of doing what they were doing. These people had unbelievable courage
but still did what they did to further the exploration of space, the moon, and the other planets.
The lives of these people resulted in making NASA have stronger designs, regulations, and
technology. Without these events critical designs might have never been drawn and important
lessons would have never been learned by the NASA crew. These people lived for the
exploration, research, and thrill of outer space.
After the moon had been reached, NASA needed something else as a goal. In the 90’s,
the International Space Station started being worked on. There are currently 15 nations working
on the construction of the Space Station. The Station is assembled by separately sending parts
into space and having astronauts connect them there. Eight cylinder shaped modules are
supposed to be on the completed station. Eight solar panels will supply all of the power for the
station. That will be more than 100 kilowatts to the station. The first parts of the International
Space Station were launched in 1998 with two Russian astronauts and one American astronaut
(Dunbar, 2007). This station is helping achieve International Diplomacy because each nation
working on this has to cooperate and compromise. NASA has gone over $5 billion over the
initial budget, and because of this the plan of enlarging the crew had to be stopped (Scolese).The
International Space Station provides a full time low gravity science lab. Some experiments
cannot be done on Earth because it is impossible to recreate the aspects of space. (NASA, 2003)
The budget request for 2010 is $18.686 billion (Scolese).This request is to help fund
everything that NASA hopes to accomplish this year. This includes more lunar missions and
more work on the International Space Station. Obama plans to approve part of this budget
request. President Obama believes that NASA should stop all lunar missions and completely stop
the Constellation Program. Obama wants NASA to continue research on global climate change,
because of the record changes happening today.
After the Columbia accident in 2003, NASA needed to regroup. Meetings and gatherings
were held to redo what NASA was doing. After these meetings new goals were set and the
program assigned to carry out these goals was named the Constellation Program. The goals were
to continue on with existing requirements, return to the moon, and prepare to venture further than
Mars and the asteroids. The Constellation Program focused on the future of the moon. After
astronauts were supposed to return, a moon colony was being looked at. The moon was also
being considered as a source for water. Billions of dollars were put into the Constellation
Program and it has been one of the top priorities of NASA.
Obama and others believe that the Constellation Program is a waste of time and money.
The program is said to be behind schedule, and time is of the essence. Obama’s plan would be to
start fresh with a new program. That would allow for NASA to catch up on deadlines and get
back on track. The new program would allow for the United States to “get back to the moon
more efficiently” (Freidman). Cutting the Constellation Program would leave a lot of loose ends.
Billions of dollars has already been spent on the program. “Some of the things they are working
on could be used regardless of the program” (Pike, 2010) In space exploration, most of the
equipment is versatile. A spaceship for one program could easily be tweaked to work in another
program, but some of the space equipment cannot be used in another program. A rocket designed
to fly to the moon would not be able to just be switched to fly to mars. Some of the money spent
on this program is just going to be wasted. Currently over 10 billion dollars has been put into the
Constellation Program, but the question is how much of that is NASA going to get back.
Some of the technology that NASA has created has made a huge impact on life on Earth.
The Apollo missions gave humans kidney dialysis. Kidneys naturally are supposed to filter and
get rid of waste from the blood. Some people’s kidneys are dysfunctional though, and so this
process does not happen as naturally for them. The Apollo missions helped out with kidney
dialysis because the space shuttles also had to drain out waste and doctors modified the
technology to work in a human body. (Nordqvist, 2009)PA new artificial heart came from
devices made for the Space Shuttle, and NASA has developed insulin pumps that eliminate the
need for diabetic shots. These things have become essential in some people’s lives and would
have never been invented without NASA and space exploration.
With the cancellation of this project, Obama says he will invest in longer term programs
and projects to get the United States to Mars and other new planets. He is encouraging private
investors to transport people into space. Because private companies taking over space
exploration, “government spending is unnecessary and wasteful” (MsMaken 2010). Considering
the tough economic times and Obama trying to pass this new health care, the more money the
government can save the better. Private companies are not federally funded. If private companies
took over space exploration, the government could cut it out of the budget. One of the private
companies Obama is looking at is Virgin Galactic.
The recent changes in the federal budget have caused a bunch of different reactions
among the public. One of the most shocking reactions was when former NASA astronauts got
together to write a letter to President Obama regarding disagreement in his idea. Neil Armstrong,
James Lovell, and Eugene Cernan wrote an open letter to Obama. The main concern of the
astronauts is the Constellation Program. That letter described humongous disagreement to the
decision that President Obama is making. All of the astronauts were former commanders in the
Apollo missions and are concerned about what will happen to the 10 billion already spent on the
Constellation Program. (Dennis, 2010)
The United States needs to keep the lead in space. Cancelling NASA programs is a sure
way to put that lead in jeopardy. The cancellation means that big commercial space ships will not
be available for awhile and the United States may have to rely on Russia for transportation. The
astronauts up in the International Space Station will be “hostages of Russia” (Orient, 2010). The
United States will have to pay to get the astronauts into orbit and to get them back. Some may
say that the race ended a long time ago when America reached the moon first, but deep down
there is always a competition between countries to see who can do what, and asking for help is a
major setback for the United States. Russia was the reason the United States took such a big
interest in space exploration. Russia was the reason NASA was created. Russia was the reason
that America has come so far in space. And now, it has come full circle and the United States is
asking Russia for help.
The economy is not doing too well, the unemployment rate is through the roof, the
United States is involved with two pretty serious wars, and relief is still being sent to Haiti and
Chile. The United States is going through a rough patch. The last thing that needs to happen is
for America to lose the lead in space. This major setback makes the lead vulnerable for enemy
countries, such as, China. The Chinese have just recently popped up into the world. China is
close to getting to the moon. Because the Constellation project was cancelled, the Chinese are
said to reach the moon before we have a chance to again. With the Chinese furthering their
knowledge of space, another space scare could happen similar to the one in the 50s.
The whole concept that Obama is trying to pass for NASA needs to be stopped. Private
companies should not run the national space program, programs should not be cut after countless
time and money have been spent on them, the country should not have to start relying on other
countries for rides into space, and the country should not put all hope into somewhat achievable
possibilities. Asking private companies to take over national space exploration is just asking for
problems. Relying on other countries makes the United States vulnerable and seem weaker to the
other countries out there. The United States needs to continue funding for NASA and space
One of the most important reasons to explore space is because the opportunity is there.
“The society that stops exploring and starts to stagnate begins to die.” (Culp, 1999) Exploring
space keeps NASA and basically everyone on their toes. The questioning and wondering that
space exploration brings to many people’s minds is extraordinary. Constant work keeps the mind
sharp and quick thinking. (Culp, 2010) Space can be said to be humans’ final limitation, the last
conquest for the world, the final frontier. This should be the only reason needed to continue
The human population on Earth is increasing at an unbelievably fast rate. In the year
1960 the world had approximately 3 billion people. 40 years later, in 2000, the population
doubled to 6 billion people. In the year 2045 the earth is supposed to have around 9 billion
people. (US Census Bureau, 2010) With the rapid population growth rate, sooner or later the
Earth is going to run out of room. The Constellation Program was working on finding a place on
the moon to create and test out a moon colony. A crater near the volcanic Marius Hills was being
scoped out by NASA. The crater was just big enough to fit a colony, and had all the right
requirements. A thin layer of lava protected the crater from harsh temperatures and any disasters
that may happen because of meteors. (CNN, 2010) Now plans for this moon colony have been
moved to start up again in 2020. NASA is going to work on terraforming, or altering, the moon
so that humans could live on it. (Culp, 1999)When the Earth runs out of room or becomes
overcrowded, it would be handy to have a place to move to. The population is not going to slow
down anytime soon and NASA needs to get to work on building moon bases and colonies.
Along with the increase in population and the decrease of room on planet Earth, natural
resources are running out. The moon has some of the resources that humans need. Water was just
recently discovered. (O’Neill, 2010) Many more resources may be out there if space exploration
continues. If nobody is out there looking for resources then new resources will never be found.
In 1960, NASA released the Corona series. This series were a series of satellites sent out
to spy on China and the Soviet Union. This was the time of the Cold War. The satellites took
photographs that could track what both countries were doing. One photograph was a shot of a
Russian air force base. Satellites help protect the national security of the United States. Without
funding NASA will not be able to produce satellites. (Tara, 1997)Space exploration would
advance the research and development of satellites and other equipment. Google Earth is just one
of the examples of how detailed satellite pictures can get. Telestar I was the first satellite to send
transcontinental black and white color. Telestar I was created and sent up to orbit in 1962. (Tara,
1997) Nowadays, satellites can transmit colored television shows to almost every country in the
world. Satellites would have never come this far if NASA had lost the funding. If funding is cut
the world will never know how much more satellites can do.
Also, the United States should continue work on the International Space Station. The
United States and Russia are the two main countries who work on space exploration. The United
States builds more effective space transportation and Russia builds better space satellites. (Gray,
2010) To get the best research and results both countries need to both be interested and active in
the development of the station. Space exploration is a universal concept. The International Space
Station helps keep peace between the United States, Russia, and all of the other countries
involved. To stop participating in the development of the space station may cause unwanted and
unintentional tensions between Russia and the United States. International Diplomacy is one of
the main reasons that the United States went into space in the first place. The space race against
Russia showed that the United States was able to do whatever is needed to get what the country
wants done. The International Space Station is the epitome of international diplomacy. A group
of countries are coming together to work on the advancement of space research and exploration.
“A creative conquest of space will serve as a wonderful substitute for war,” James McDonnell.
Exploring space will keep the minds of people busy with thoughts of greater possibilities and not
the harsh thoughts of war. Space should not be something to fight about, but something to
“What was most significant about the lunar voyage was not that man set foot on the
Moon but they set eye on the earth” (Cousins, 1979) The Earth was always a great wonder to the
world. With the inventions of satellites and the trips to outer space, people have learned so much
more about planet earth. Satellites can track weather, ocean patterns, and much more. Also,
telescopes, such as the Hubble, can see far out in to the unknown and can discover new planets,
galaxies, and stars. NASA created probes and rovers that can explore multiple planets. NASA is
also working on creating probes that can get further out into space to planets like Mars, Saturn,
and Jupiter. Research capabilities increased dramatically when humans went up into space.
“We came all this way to explore the moon, and the most important thing is that we
discovered the earth” (Anders,). Space exploration can uncover new and exciting things. Space
exploration can bring new technologies, satellites, and maybe even new life forms. Space
explorations can keep humans’ minds in tip top shape. Space exploration can do all these things,
but exploring can also show what the earth already has and the many blessings on it. Going into
space and looking back down on earth was an emotional time for most astronauts, some even
cried. NASA should continue to be funded and should not postpone returning to the moon. The
United States should keep and embrace the lead in space. The International Space Station is close
to being completed, and countries are beginning to work together for one common purpose. To
just stop plans to go back to the moon would devastatingly hurt the United States of America.
Block, R., & Matthews, M. K. (2010, January 27). Obama aims ax at moon mission.
In Orlando Sentinel. Retrieved January 30, 2010, from Orlando Sentinel
Culp, R. (1999). Top ten reasons for going into space. In A serious look at
space exploration. Retrieved November 5, 2009, from http://my.execpc.com/
Dave. (2008). Eyes turned skyward looking at the Earth. Retrieved April 26,
2010, from Spacce Quote Database.
Dennis, F. (2010). Neil Armstrong's letter to Obama. Retrieved April 18, 2010,
from The Week website: http://theweek.com/article/index/201950/
Dunbar, B. (2007, November 29). International Space Station. In NASA Worldbook.
Retrieved January 31, 2010, from NASA website: http://www.nasa.gov/
Dunbar, B. (2010, May 3). Latest news. In International Space Station. Retrieved
May 1, 2010, from NASA website: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/
Emerson, A. (2009, July 16). The cost of putting a man on the moon. Retrieved
November 1, 2009, from US Infrastructure website:
Gray, W. (2010, April 26). Huntsville space camp. Lecture presented at Space
camP, Huntsville, AL.
Greene, N. (n.d.). The launch and disaster. In Challenger disaster- a NASA
tragedy. Retrieved January 31, 2010, from The New York Times Company
Grinter, K., & Malone, L. A. (n.d.). The Apollo Program. Retrieved January 30,
2010, from Kennedy Space Center website: http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/
Grinter, K., & Morgan, J. H. (2003, April 24). THe Gemini Project. Retrieved January 30,
2010, from Kennedy Space Center website: http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/
Grinter, K., & Morgan, J. H. (2003, April 24). The Mercury Project. Retrieved
January 29, 2010, from Kennedy Space Center website:
Kulger, J. (n.d.). No liftoff: Obama's plan grounds NASA. Retrieved March 10,
2010, from Time website: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/
M, T. (1997, May 19). Satellites during the Cold War. In Development of
satellites. Retrieved May 3, 2010, from Physics 336 website:
McMaken, R. W. (2010, April 13). Obama does one decent thing: Cuts space budget
[Web log post]. Retrieved from The LRC Blog: http://www.lewrockwell.com/
Scolese, C. J. (n.d.). NASA FY budget summary request [Data file]. Retrieved