anti_gore by xiagong0815


									Gore isn't quite as green as he's led the world to believe
Updated 12/7/2006 5:45 PM ET
By Peter Schweizer
Correction: In this column that appeared Aug. 10 on the Forum Page, writer Peter Schweizer
inaccurately stated that former vice president Al Gore receives royalties from a zinc mine on his
property in Tennessee despite his environmental advocacy. He no longer does, as the mine was
closed in 2003.

Al Gore has spoken: The world must embrace a "carbon-neutral lifestyle." To do otherwise, he
says, will result in a cataclysmic catastrophe. "Humanity is sitting on a ticking time bomb," warns
the website for his film, An Inconvenient Truth. "We have just 10 years to avert a major
catastrophe that could send our entire planet into a tailspin."

ON DEADLINE: Your thoughts?

Graciously, Gore tells consumers how to change their lives to curb their carbon-gobbling ways:
Switch to compact fluorescent light bulbs, use a clothesline, drive a hybrid, use renewable
energy, dramatically cut back on consumption. Better still, responsible global citizens can follow
Gore's example, because, as he readily points out in his speeches, he lives a "carbon-neutral
lifestyle." But if Al Gore is the world's role model for ecology, the planet is doomed.

For someone who says the sky is falling, he does very little. He says he recycles and drives a
hybrid. And he claims he uses renewable energy credits to offset the pollution he produces when
using a private jet to promote his film. (In reality, Paramount Classics, the film's distributor, pays

Public records reveal that as Gore lectures Americans on excessive consumption, he and his wife
Tipper live in two properties: a 10,000-square-foot, 20-room, eight-bathroom home in Nashville,
and a 4,000-square-foot home in Arlington, Va. (He also has a third home in Carthage, Tenn.) For
someone rallying the planet to pursue a path of extreme personal sacrifice, Gore requires little
from himself.

Then there is the troubling matter of his energy use. In the Washington, D.C., area, utility
companies offer wind energy as an alternative to traditional energy. In Nashville, similar programs
exist. Utility customers must simply pay a few extra pennies per kilowatt hour, and they can
continue living their carbon-neutral lifestyles knowing that they are supporting wind energy. Plenty
of businesses and institutions have signed up. Even the Bush administration is using green
energy for some federal office buildings, as are thousands of area residents.

But according to public records, there is no evidence that Gore has signed up to use green
energy in either of his large residences. When contacted Wednesday, Gore's office confirmed as
much but said the Gores were looking into making the switch at both homes. Talk about
inconvenient truths.

Gore is not alone. Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean has said, "Global
warming is happening, and it threatens our very existence." The DNC website applauds the fact
that Gore has "tried to move people to act." Yet, astoundingly, Gore's persuasive powers have
failed to convince his own party: The DNC has not signed up to pay an additional two pennies a
kilowatt hour to go green. For that matter, neither has the Republican National Committee.

Maybe our very existence isn't threatened.

Gore has held these apocalyptic views about the environment for some time. So why, then, didn't
Gore dump his family's large stock holdings in Occidental (Oxy) Petroleum? As executor of his
family's trust, over the years Gore has controlled hundreds of thousands of dollars in Oxy stock.
Oxy has been mired in controversy over oil drilling in ecologically sensitive areas.

Living carbon-neutral apparently doesn't mean living oil-stock free. Nor does it necessarily mean
giving up a mining royalty either.

Humanity might be "sitting on a ticking time bomb," but Gore's home in Carthage is sitting on a
zinc mine. Gore receives $20,000 a year in royalties from Pasminco Zinc, which operates a zinc
concession on his property. Tennessee has cited the company for adding large quantities of
barium, iron and zinc to the nearby Caney Fork River.

The issue here is not simply Gore's hypocrisy; it's a question of credibility. If he genuinely
believes the apocalyptic vision he has put forth and calls for radical changes in the way other
people live, why hasn't he made any radical change in his life? Giving up the zinc mine or one of
his homes is not asking much, given that he wants the rest of us to radically change our lives.

Peter Schweizer is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution and author of Do As I Say (Not As I
Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy.

To top