Embed
Email

wipo_accec_mmp_04_www_33249

Document Sample

Shared by: xiagong0815
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
2/16/2012
language:
pages:
24
Conference on the Accession of the

European Community to the

Madrid Protocol



The Accession of the European Community to the Madrid

Protocol



- the long and winding road

Part II

- Council Regulation No 1992/2003 of 27.10.2003

(Amendment CTMR)



- Council Decision No 793/2003 of 27.10.2003

(Approving the Accession)



- Commission Regulation No 781/2004 of 26.4.2004

(Amending the fees)



- Commission Regulation No 782/2004 of 26.4.2004

(Amending the Implementing Rules)

- Council Regulation No 1992/2003 of 27.10.2003

(Amendment CTMR)



- Council Decision No 793/2003 of 27.10.2003

(Approving the Accession)



- Commission Regulation No 781/2004 of 26.4.2004

(Amending the fees)



- Commission Regulation No 782/2004 of 26.4.2004

(Amending the Implementing Rules)

Talking about perspectives



• Advantages vs. Risks

• For OHIM and for Industry

Advantages for the OHIM

(Madrid route, compared to direct route)

Madrid route compared to direct route



1. Data capture

Data capture:

Physical receipt of application documents

- Entry of data in our database (key-in)

- Mail dispatch



Replaced by:

• Receipt of electronic data by WIPO



Advantage for OHIM:

 Less cost

 Less time

 Less error (key-in errors)

Advantages for the OHIM



2. Formalities

Formalities

- filing date check

- filing fee check

- Names, addresses, signature

- Proper representation of mark

- Priority documents



Replaced by

• Receipt of electronic data

• Automatic parsing of second language



Still required:

 seniority examination

 intervention if second language is missing

 check Regulations of use for collective marks

Advantages for the OHIM:



3. Classification

Classification:

- Done by WIPO



- Accepted by OHIM



- Uniform approach to class headings, retail services, “vagueness”



Replaced by



• Internal quality checks to secure harmony between OHIM

practice and WIPO practice

4. Publication, translation

Publication and translation



- Full publication of mark incl. list of goods and services

- Full translation of list of goods and services into 18/19 other languages



Replaced by



• Republication of bibliographic data + class numbers

• without actual goods + services, so no translation

• Integration into CTM-Online with link to WIPO publication



Advantages for OHIM



 Translation costs

5. Renewal,

changes of name of owner

Renewal, Changes of name

- Renewal procedure: request+fee

- Name changes: requests, correction of data



Replaced by

• Centralized renewal by WIPO

• Centralized keeping of register by WIPO



Still required

 Record of OHIM representatives and changes

 Certain acts concerning transfers and licensing

(Albeit limited)

Summary of savings for OHIM

1. Data capture

2. Formalities

3. Classification

4. Publication, translation

5. Renewal, changes

Advantages for industry:



1. Data capture:

- Avoid multiple data entry+reentry

- One single data set across countries

- Fewer data capture mistakes

Advantages for Industry



2. Formalities

- One single set of formality requirements

around the world

- Less objections … less cost

Advantages for industry:



3. Classification

- One single examination

- Forces designated Offices towards

harmonised practice

- Less objections… less cost

Advantages for industry



4. Publication, translation:

- Publication advantages less apparent

(mix between WIPO Gazette and OHIM

Bulletin)

- Makes Madrid route cheaper

(200 € discount)

- Reduces languages

(3 at WIPO)

Advantages for industry



5. Renewal, changes

- Allows centralized TM portfolio strategy

- Less risk for loss of rights

(inadvertent non-renewal, lack of registration

of transfers)

- 200 € discount for renewal at OHIM

Advantages for industry:



6. Summary of cost advantages

- Discount for individual fee

- 200 € for filing

- 200 € for renewal

- Representative at OHIM only in case of

incidence

(refusal, opposition)

- No OHIM representative for renewals and

changes

Comparison CTM Direct vs.

via Madrid Protocol Risks for industry:



- Basic mark still required

(in “country of origin”)

- Central attack

- In particular, regarding US

- US classification practice

- Advantages may vanish if designated offices

keep their own approach

- (OHIM does not want to do that)

Conference on the Accession of the

European Community to the

Madrid Protocol









THANK YOU!!!


Other docs by xiagong0815
ENUS108358
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Fastener 3
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
2.2.3
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
dartford_e_performance_summary
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
bscdeanslist
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
efiworkshopzschockejansky_abstract
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
pp_chapter_06b
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
2011-General Instructions-fr-ExecSec
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Review 2010 Russia
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Replacing an existing network printer
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!