Thickness Choice
Shared by: xiagong0815
-
Stats
- views:
- 0
- posted:
- 2/16/2012
- language:
- pages:
- 24
Document Sample


Thickness Choice
Operating Conditions &
Fabrication
T. Bowcock
25 January, 2005
Qualification Data
All data available on db – see GDP’s talk for more
detail
Public (non-Liverpool) access hampered by firewall issues. To
be addressed
Comments
Thickness
Currents to 150V
QA and Technical specification web pages
http://hep.ph.liv.ac.uk/lhcb/Documents/documents.html
http://hep.ph.liv.ac.uk/lhcb/QA_Home/qa_home.html
http://hep.ph.liv.ac.uk/lhcb/Programme/Hardware/Sensors/Specific
ation/specification.html
See later
Curvature
Bad strips
Thickness
Current
Data to 150V
Sensor Thickness(um) 300 200
I(microA) I(microA)
5.8 0.8
1.0 3.2
1.5 4.4
1.8 6.8
1.4
0.9
Average 2.5 2.9
Specifications
Technical Specs QA documentation
Initial Depletion Voltage: Leakage current at 150V(330V)
Vdepletion< 150V for 200 bias for 200(300) micron sensors.
micron thick detector Ramp time 60s/10V V and 1m
settling. Data provided at 1OV
Initial leakage current at 20 steps.
oC: < 10 A at 100 V (and Voltage where breakdown sets
<20 A at 150 V to be verified in. (current >100 microA)
by contractor) at 50% `TEST IS SUSPENDED PENDING REVIEW
humidity or less.
Breakdown must occur at
>280V for a 200micron sensor
and 500V for a 300micron
thick sensor. Breakdown will
deemed to be a current
greater than 100 A
Leakage Current Stability:
Current to increase by no
more than 5A, at full
depletion during 72 hours in
vacuum. This test need only
be performed on a batch
basis.
Curvature
Curvature
Note 50% of the 200 micron sensors FAIL
the 200 micron curvature limit in TS
Curvature
25
20
200 Micron (R-Mech)
15
Freq.
200 Micron (Phi-Mech)
200 Micron
10
300 micron
5
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Microns
Brittleness
Note how curved the mechanicals are
Cut Quality
Marconi CO2
All results shown tuned
fs laser Micron: “UV laser is as good as the fs laser
UV laser
Laserod
Micron
Cut quality may be quantified
See GDP’s talk
Residuals
Histogram
120
100
80
Count
60
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Residual RMS / Edge (microns)
Bin Center vs Count
Cut
We believe cutting is under control and
will meet our specifications
Rms ~ 3 microns
Understand angle with edge
80 microns
Cut
As well as visual on Smartscope
understood RMS >10 micron edges
16
14
12
10 200 micron
Wafers
8 300 micron
6 Mechanicals (200micron)
4
2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Number Edges
inspection
Bad Strips
300 sensors seem a little better
Bad Strips 300r 300phi 200r 200phi
Det1 16 12 33 65
Det2 3 0 22
Det3 1 7
Operating Conditions
Temp
Voltage
All after 3 years of LHC operation
Radiation effects at 23C (non ideal)
Operating Conditions
0.7
0.6
200micron/350V+rad
0.5
250micron/500V+rad
Heating(W)
0.4 300micron/500V+rad
radiation
0.3 200micron/350V
200micron/500V
0.2
300micron/500V
0.1
0
-20 -10 0 10 20
Tcool
Si Temperature
5
4.5
4
3.5 200
micron/350V
3
200
DT
2.5
micron/500V
2
300
1.5 micron/500V
1
0.5
0
-20 -10 0 10 20
Tcool
Currents
1000
900
800
200
Iblkp
700
micron/250V
600
200
500
micron/500V
400
300
300 micron/500V
200
100
0
-20 -10 0 10 20
Tcool
Currents
Effects of currents negligible in terms of
noise
Depletion Voltage
1000
900
800
700 200
micron/350V
600
Vdep
200
500
micron/500V
400
300
300 micron/500V
200
100
0
-20 -10 0 10 20
Tcool
Operating Conditions
300 better for temp control and handling
200 full depletion voltage is only ~200V
Vacuum Performance
From Micron Semiconductor
“Micron will not qualify sensors for operation
above 200V in high vacuum”.
10 days problems set in
Field plates
polysilicon
Wojtek K.
Data being made available from Micron and
NASA/Goddard on 10-6b operation (same
processing) AND LHCb tests.(????????)
Production
Processing
6 weeks -8 weeks extra for 300 micron to
be brought to 200 status
Voltage tests in vacuum are their only
concern
Summary
Either seem OK
Important
Operation of irradiated (type inverted) 300
micron sensors at 200 micron thick voltages is
a real option
Get documents about "