Embed
Email

cbm37_229

Document Sample

Shared by: xiagong0815
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
2/15/2012
language:
pages:
25
China’s Effects on Mexican

Exports

Alejandro M. Werner









October 2004

Index





Mexican exports recent evolution





What explains the behavior of exports?



Sector-level estimation



Subsector-level estimation



Concluding remarks



2

The rapid expansion of Mexican exports to the US following

NAFTA slowed down after 2001. Chinese exports grew fast and

displaced Mexico as the second largest exporter to the US in

2002. Concerns were raised by the breakdown of the Mexico-

US trade linkages.



Non-oil Exports to the US US Total Non-oil Imports Correlation

(billion dollars, monthly) (18-month mobile correlation coefficient)

18 With imports from China With imports from Mexico

0.9

16 Mexico China 0.8

14 0.7

12 0.6



10 0.5



0.4

8

0.3

6

0.2

4 0.1



2 0.0

-0.1

0

Jun-97







Jun-98







Jun-99







Jun-00







Jun-01







Jun-02







Jun-03







Jun-04

Dic-97







Dic-98







Dic-99







Dic-00







Dic-01







Dic-02







Dic-03

Jan-96

Jul-96

Jan-97

Jul-97

Jan-98

Jul-98

Jan-99

Jul-99

Jan-00

Jul-00

Jan-01

Jul-01

Jan-02

Jul-02

Jan-03

Jul-03

Jan-04

Jul-04

 Some observers wondered whether the recent behavior of

Mexican exports were driven by:



 The US recession



 Increased Chinese competition in the US market



 Loss of competitiveness







 The last two effects nurtured the impression that the

Mexico-US trade linkages may have weakened, as the

recovery of Mexican exports did not follow the rebound of

US demand promptly.

Index





Mexican exports recent evolution





What explains the behavior of exports?



Sector-level estimation



Subsector-level estimation



Concluding remarks



5

To disentangle the different effects on exports of manufactures, the

analysis considered 3 sectors or types of goods (SITC classification):

Manufactures, Machinery and Transport Equipment, and Miscelaneous

Manufactures. A series of rolling regressions were estimated for each

sector.



X MX   EU M EU   CH X CH   TCR TCR  



 The variables per sector were (MoM first-differences of logs):

 US imports in 2002 dollars (s.a.)

 Exports of China to the US in 2002 dollars (s.a.)

 US-Mexico bilateral real exchange rate index

 A 36-month rolling sample ending in the date reported was used.

 The equation allows to identify the contribution of each variable to

the growth of exports.

 The error term captured the presence of other factors affecting

exports.

Sector: Manufactures  Chinese exports do not have a

significant negative impact on

China´s Exports (  CH )

Mexican exports.

0.20



0.10  Except for some periods, the real

0.00

exchange rate does not have a

significant effect on exports.

-0.10



-0.20  There is a high positive correlation

-0.30 with US imports. The elasticity is

Jun-99



Jul-99



Jun-00



Jul-00



Jun-01



Jul-01



Jun-02



Jul-02



Jun-03



Jul-03



Jun-04



Jul-04

stable and there is no evidence that

it diminished in 2000-2004.



Real Exchange Rate (  RER ) US Imports (  US )

1.5 1.6

1.0 1.4

0.5 1.2

1.0

0.0

0.8

-0.5

0.6

-1.0 0.4

-1.5 0.2

Jun-99



Jul-99



Jun-00



Jul-00



Jun-01



Jul-01



Jun-02



Jul-02



Jun-03



Jul-03



Jun-04



Jul-04









Jun-99



Jul-99



Jun-00



Jul-00



Jun-01



Jul-01



Jun-02



Jul-02



Jun-03



Jul-03



Jun-04



Jul-04

Sector: Manufactures

 US imports fully explain Mexican exports’ growth for the period

1998-2000. Chinese exports had, in any case, a minor negative

impact.

 In 2000-2003, the fall of US imports accounted for less than half of

the total change in Mexican exports and no negative effect of China

was present.

Accumulated Variation 1998-2000 Accumulated Variation 2000-2003

(Million dollars of 2002) (Million dollars of 2002)



1,330.9 12.3 1,298.1 30 14.3

1,350

-18.9 -20

1,150

-70 -351.7

950

-120 9.7

750

-170 -161.7

550 -220

350 -270

-320

150 -214.0

-26.2

-370

-50

X China M US RER Error Total X China M US RER Error Total

Sector: Machinery and  Chinese exports appear to have a

Transport Equipment negative effect on Mexican exports as

China´s Exports (  )

the rolling sample enters 2002. This

CH

negative effect increases steadily and

0.3 stabilizes by the end of the sample.

0.2

0.1  The real exchange rate had a positive

0.0 impact on exports, which is

-0.1 statistically significant for the sample

-0.2 ending in early 2003.

-0.3

-0.4  The elasticity with respect to US

Jun-99



Jul-99



Jun-00



Jul-00



Jun-01



Jul-01



Jun-02



Jul-02



Jun-03



Jul-03



Jun-04



Jul-04

imports is strong and relatively stable,

but starts to diminish in late 2003.

Real Exchange Rate (  RER) US Imports (  US )

2.0 1.4

1.5

1.2

1.0

1.0

0.5

0.8

0.0

0.6

-0.5

0.4

-1.0

0.2

Jun-99



Jul-99



Jun-00



Jul-00



Jun-01



Jul-01



Jun-02



Jul-02



Jun-03



Jul-03



Jun-04



Jul-04









Jun-99



Jul-99



Jun-00



Jul-00



Jun-01



Jul-01



Jun-02



Jul-02



Jun-03



Jul-03



Jun-04



Jul-04

Sector: Machinery and Transport Equipment

 In 1998-2000, shifts in US imports accounted for most of the changes in

Mexican exports growth. China and the real exchange rate played a minor

role.

 In 2000-2003, Chinese exports displaced a larger amount of Mexican

products. However, most of the reduction is captured by the error term,

which is followed by the negative impact of the fall of US imports.



Accumulated Variation 1998-2000 Accumulated Variation 2000-2003

(Million dollars of 2002) (Million dollars of 2002)



24,800 6,689.9 22,785.1

0

-660.3

19,800

-2,000

16,483.7 533.5

14,800 -217.5

-4,000 -3,165.2



9,800 -6,000





4,800 -8,000

-5,566.5

-171.0

-10,000 -8,858.5

-200

X China M US RER Error Total X China M US RER Error Total

Sector: Other Manufactures  This sector displays the most

negative elasticity with respect to

China´s Exports (  CH ) Chinese exports growth. This effect

0.1

0.0

has increased throughout most of the

-0.1 sample.

-0.2

-0.3

-0.4  The real exchange rate does not have

-0.5

-0.6

a significant impact on exports.

-0.7

-0.8  The positive elasticity with respect to

-0.9

US imports is high but experienced

Jun-99



Jul-99



Jun-00



Jul-00



Jun-01



Jul-01



Jun-02



Jul-02



Jun-03



Jul-03



Jun-04



Jul-04

slight a decline in early 2003.



Real Exchange Rate (  RER ) Total US Imports (  US )

2.0

2.0

1.5 1.8

1.0 1.6

0.5 1.4

0.0 1.2

-0.5 1.0

-1.0 0.8

0.6

-1.5

0.4

-2.0

0.2

Jun-99



Jul-99



Jun-00



Jul-00



Jun-01



Jul-01



Jun-02



Jul-02



Jun-03



Jul-03



Jun-04



Jul-04









Jun-99



Jul-99



Jun-00



Jul-00



Jun-01



Jul-01



Jun-02



Jul-02



Jun-03



Jul-03



Jun-04



Jul-04

Sector: Other Manufactures

 In 1998-2000, Chinese exports had a minor negative impact on Mexican

exports growth, which is explained almost entirely by growing US imports.

 In turn, Chinese exports affected Mexican exports considerably in the

period 2000-2003. This effect was worsened by a reduction of US imports.

Both effects were compensated by positive effects not captured by the

control variables.





Accumulated Variation 1998-2000 Accumulated Variation 2000-2003

(Million dollars of 2002) (Million dollars of 2002)

5,000

0

4,130.7 752.0

4,000 3,686.1 -68.6

-75.2 -200

-245.5

3,000

-400



2,000

-600

1,000

-800 -723.5 -51.2

-123.9

0

-148.3

X China M US RER Error Total -1,000

-1,000 X China M US RER Error Total

Total Variation of Exports of Manufactures



 Fast growing US imports of manufactures account for the expansion

of Mexican exports in 1998-2000.

 In 2000-2003, the main causes for the low performance of Mexican

exports were US imports and other factors captured by the error.



Accumulated Variation 1998-2000 Accumulated Variation 2000-2003

(Million dollars of 2002) (Million dollars of 2002)



30,000 6,425.5 0

-1,000 -9,278.8

25,000

21,945.2 -2,000 -1,369.5

20,000 -280.5 -3,000

-4,000 594.3

15,000

-5,000

-3,475.1

10,000 -6,000

27,769.1

-7,000

5,000

-8,000

-321.1

0 -9,000

X China M US RER Error Total -10,000 -5,028.5

-5,000 X China M US RER Error Total

 The results help to answer two questions:

1. What proportion of the yearly average fall of exports of

manufactures in 2000-2003 is explained by each factor?

2. What proportion of the yearly average change in exports of

manufactures is explained by each factor, if we compare 1998-

2000 and 2000-2003?

Decomposition of the Yearly Average

Decomposition of the Yearly Average

Change in Exports Growth

Fall of Exports 2000-2003

1998-2000 vs. 2000-2003

(Percent)

(Percent)

0 0

-10 -10 -1.7 % -100.0 %

-20 -14.8 -100.0 -20

-30 -30

-40 6.3 -40

-50 -50

-60 -36.9 -60

2.0 % -28.8 %

-70 -70



-80 -80 -71.5 %

-90 -90

-53.4

-100 -100

X China M US RER Error Total

X China M US RER Error Total

Exports Recovery in 2004

 In 2004, the negative effects of Chinese expansion continued. However,

the rebound of US imports had a strong positive impact on Mexican

exports.

 However, the accumulated effects of Chinese expansion since 2000,

along with other factors that have affected exports growth, have not

been compensated by the recovery observed in 2004.

Accumulated Variation 2004 Accumulated Variation 2000-2004

(Million dollars of 2002) (Million dollars of 2002)

5,000

0

1,419.6

-5,028.1

4,000

-1,000

576.2

3,000 3,701.9 107.1 226.8

-2,000



2,000 -2,369.1

-3,000



1,000 4,250.7 -4,000

-978.0

0 -5,000

-3,462.1

-1,000 -6,000

X China M US RER Error Total X China M US RER Error Total

Index





Mexican exports recent evolution





What explains the behavior of exports?



Sector-level estimation



Subsector-level estimation



Concluding remarks



16

Sub-Sector Level Estimation Summary

China X RER US M

98-00 00-03 04 98-00 00-03 04 98-00 00-03 04

MANUFACTURES:

Leather, Leather Manufactures - - - + + + + +

Rubber Manufactures - - - + + + + +

Cork And Wood Manufactures - + + + + + +

Paper, Paperboard, and related Articles - - - + + + + +

Textile Yarn, Fabrics, Made-up Articles - - - + + + +

Nonmetallic Mineral Manufactures - - - + + + + + +

Iron and Steel - - + + + + + +

Nonferrous Metals - + + + - - + + +

Manufactures Of Metals - - - + + + + + +

MACHINERY AND TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT:

Power Generating Machinery and Equipment - - + + + + + +

Machinery Specialized For Particular Industries - - + + + + + + +

Metalworking Machiner - - + + + + + +

General Industrial Machinery And Equipment - - - + + + + +

Office Machines and Data Processing Machines - - - + + + + + +

Telecomm Sound Recording And Reproducing - - - + + + + +

Electrical Machinery - - - + + + + + +

Road Vehicles - - - + + + +

Transport Equipment - - + + + - -

OTHER MANUFACTURES:

Prefabricated bldgs, plumbing, heat & lighting - - - + + - + + +

Furniture and parts thereof - - - + + + + + +

Travel goods, handbags and similar containers - - - - + + +

Articles of apparel and clothing accessories - - - + + + + +

Footwear - - - + + + + +

Professional, scientific and control instruments - - - + + + + + +

Photographic apparatus, equipment and supplies - - - + + + + + +

Miscellaneous manufactured articles - - - + + + +

●: Close to zero.

Note: Shaded signs are significant at 90%.

Dollar amounts (millions) China X RER US M Others

00-03 04 00-03 04 00-03 04 00-03 04

MANUFACTURES:

Leather, Leather Manufactures -2.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 -12.4 0.0 3.1 -7.2

Rubber Manufactures -12.5 -7.0 -2.3 1.7 -29.7 9.7 86.5 67.5

Cork And Wood Manufactures 2.1 -0.1 -0.5 -0.1 -11.2 4.2 -60.8 13.1

Paper, Paperboard, and related Articles -1.6 0.2 0.6 1.8 1.8 19.8 64.1 16.9

Textile Yarn, Fabrics, Made-up Articles -52.2 -16.7 -4.2 -0.1 -96.0 27.8 68.2 22.9

Nonmetallic Mineral Manufactures -1.7 0.8 -1.1 -0.2 -9.9 33.4 -61.0 45.4

Iron and Steel -10.8 -0.3 -1.3 4.8 -231.1 111.5 236.2 367.0

Nonferrous Metals 9.6 6.1 -8.8 -6.5 -14.2 20.1 -227.2 154.9

Manufactures Of Metals -12.1 -28.1 11.7 0.0 20.5 98.6 7.9 163.3

MACHINERY AND TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT:

Power Generating Machinery and Equipment -45.3 -53.0 -0.9 10.4 -494.1 20.4 458.4 553.6

Machinery Specialized For Particular Industries -10.7 0.6 3.2 0.4 -4.6 4.4 22.7 126.7

Metalworking Machiner -1.2 -0.9 1.8 0.2 1.7 0.1 22.6 11.6

General Industrial Machinery And Equipment -28.5 -10.9 -16.8 36.9 34.6 51.3 364.6 264.2

Office Machines and Data Processing Machines -83.7 -48.3 48.2 -0.5 -204.2 13.5 -1,560.3 -53.1

Telecomm Sound Recording And Reproducing -46.8 -89.3 6.1 0.0 -598.1 -10.2 -2,614.8 1,753.1

Electrical Machinery -33.4 47.3 -27.0 7.8 -1,965.6 74.7 370.4 540.2

Road Vehicles -74.0 -6.3 157.7 4.7 -396.0 -68.7 -1,741.2 -6.1

Transport Equipment -11.2 -0.1 9.7 -0.3 19.2 -0.1 -420.9 -8.7

OTHER MANUFACTURES:

Prefabricated bldgs, plumbing, heat & lighting -96.3 -29.8 2.4 -2.7 132.8 50.0 105.3 11.4

Furniture and parts thereof -125.8 -8.6 1.3 -1.3 69.1 -23.2 800.0 91.8

Travel goods, handbags and similar containers -6.3 -2.4 -0.9 0.0 7.8 5.1 -73.7 -6.6

Articles of apparel and clothing accessories -479.4 -178.1 8.6 -8.5 -81.8 292.0 -1,287.7 -483.2

Footwear -22.3 -33.4 1.2 1.6 14.5 17.2 -84.7 -5.3

Professional, scientific and control instruments -55.2 20.3 -3.9 10.7 64.6 54.8 1,044.2 -123.7

Photographic apparatus, equipment and supplies -0.1 -2.5 -1.5 1.2 -30.4 3.6 -238.8 101.6

Miscellaneous manufactured articles -108.8 -36.6 -16.0 2.0 234.2 92.3 159.0 94.2

Main Results

 The largest negative effect of Chinese exports (in dollar terms)

concentrated in the following sectors:

Textiles, office and data processing machines, telecomm

and audio equipment, furniture, apparel, clothing, and

footwear.



 The US import slowdown translated into lower exports (in dollar

terms) in the follwing sectors:

Iron and steel, office and data processing machines,

telecomm and audio equipment, electrical machinery, and

road vehicles.

The last four sectors were also affected considerably by other

factors.



 These four sectors account for 94% of the reduction in exports

of manufactures in 2000-2003.

Road Vehicles explain a large fraction of the exports fall in

2000-2003. This fall was caused by lower US imports and other

factors. One of these factors was a shift in US demand away

from GM, Ford, Chrysler vehicles. The majority of Mexican car

exports are mainly from such brands.





Cars and Light Trucks Sold in the US US Market Share

(Millions of units) (Percent, GM and Ford on the left axis)

18.0 24

17.8

23

17.8

22

17.6 17.5 21

20

17.4

19

17.4

17.2 17.1 18

General Motors 17

17.0 17.0 16

Ford

DaimierChrysler 15

16.8

14

16.6 27 13

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Index





Mexican exports recent evolution





What explains the behavior of exports?



Sector-level estimation



Subsector-level estimation



Concluding remarks



21

In 2004, manufacturing and maquila exports have reflected

mainly the recovery of US imports. Also, imports of intermediate

goods anticipate future growth of industrial activity.







Exports Imports

(SA data) (SA data)

13.8









intermediate (billions of dlls) .

13.0

manuf. exp. (billions of dlls) .









7.6









maq. exp. (billions of dlls) .

6.0









maquila (billions of dlls) .

Manufacturing Intermediate

13.4 7.4 12.5

Exports Goods 5.8

13.0 Maquila 7.2 12.0 Maquila 5.6

Exports

12.6 7.0 5.4

11.5

6.8 5.2

12.2 11.0

6.6 5.0

11.8 10.5 4.8

6.4

10.0 4.6

11.4 6.2

A-02









A-03







A-04

O-02







O-03

J-02



J-02



J-03



J-03



J-04



J-04

A-02









A-03









A-04

O-02









O-03

J-02



J-02



J-03



J-03



J-04



J-04









Source: INEGI 22

Source: INEGI

The recovery of the manufacturing sector complements the

dynamism of other industrial and non-industrial activities. In

2004.II, GDP grew 3.9% in real annual terms and 1.2% over the

previous quarter.



Mexico: GDP

GDP Growth by Sectors (Real annual % change)



Annual 9.6 Manufacturing GDP

(%) Non Manufacturing GDP

Q1.2004 Q2.2004

5.8

GDP 3.7 3.9

Agriculture 4.6 5.1

Industrial 3.2 3.8 2.0

Mining 6.4 2.4

Manufacturing 2.8 4.0 -1.8

Construction 4.9 4.4

Elec., gas & water 1.4 0.8 -5.6

Services 4.1 4.1 I II IIIIV I II IIIIV I II IIIIV I II IIIIV I II IIIIV I II

Source: INEGI 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Source: INEGI. 23

Final Remarks



 Lower exports in 2000-2003 are explained by the fall in US

imports and other factors not captured by the analysis.

Among these, there may be shifts in demand for Mexican

products and competitiveness losses in some sectors.





 The negative effects of lower US imports and other factors

concentrated in four sectors (office and data processing

machines, telecomm and audio equipment, electrical

machinery, and road vehicles). These sectors account for 94%

of the fall of exports in 2000-2003.





 Chinese exports had a second-order effect. However,

increased competition from China has become a permanent

and growing challenge for Mexican exports.

China’s Effects on Mexican

Exports

Alejandro M. Werner









October 2004


Other docs by xiagong0815
ENUS108358
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Fastener 3
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
2.2.3
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
dartford_e_performance_summary
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
bscdeanslist
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
efiworkshopzschockejansky_abstract
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
pp_chapter_06b
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
2011-General Instructions-fr-ExecSec
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Review 2010 Russia
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Replacing an existing network printer
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!