American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma
Document Sample


American College of
Surgeons
Committee on Trauma
Trauma Quality Improvement
Program (TQIP)
TQIP principles
The goal of TQIP is to improve the quality of
care of trauma patients
Leads to lower mortality
Fewer complications
Lower costs
Uses existing trauma center staff and data
collection infrastructure
Based on the National Trauma Data Standard
Relies on collective expertise of COT sub-
committees
Training
In person training for registrars
Online course continuously available
Quarterly case studies to improve coding
Web conferences
Online registrar community
Standard/Validated Data Collection
Based on National Trauma Data Standard
Automated validation
Quarterly data submission for ongoing
validation
External validation to improve coding at
your site through site visits
Risk Adjusted Benchmarking
Your
Center Identifies how
your center
performs
compared to
others
NTDB vs TQIP Benchmarking
NTDB TQIP
Compares to trauma Uses patient cohorts to
centers of similar size standardize comparisons
and level across centers
Raw data on patient Includes Level I and II
characteristics centers, adult patients
Crude mortality does not Risk adjusted outcomes,
take into account data including mortality and
quality and injury severity complications
Patient Cohorts
Blunt multisystem injury
Blunttrauma with severe injuries (AIS>3) in at least
two body regions
Penetrating truncal injury
Severe torso trauma due to GSW/stab/impalement
Blunt single system injury
Blunttrauma with a severe injury limited to a single
body region
Patient Cohorts
Each cohort challenges different aspects of
clinical care
Prompt assessment & surgical intervention
Multidisciplinary coordination
Each population might be differently represented
at any single trauma center
Differential outcomes across the cohorts for a
particular center– better focus PI efforts
Measuring Processes of Care
What practices are associated with better
outcomes?
Fields in NTDS lack detail to capture
specific processes
TQIP Process Measures
Indicator Measure
Traumatic ICP monitoring in severe % of cohort with ICP monitoring
brain injury TBI within 8 hrs of ED w/in 8 hrs of arrival
arrival
Hemorrhage Time to hemorrhage % of patients in whom
control control hemorrhage control initiated
within 2 hrs of arrival
VTE Pharmacologic VTE % with pharmacologic
prophylaxis prophylaxis on or before prophylaxis by day 3
day 3
Fracture Rx Time to operative Time to 1st/last definitive
fixation fixation
Time to irrigation and Time to first I&D
debridement of long
bone fractures (open
only)
Improved Outcomes
Hospital mortality rates
Hospital complication rates
Utilization of resources compared to other
trauma centers
Hospital Length of Stay
ICU Length of Stay
Ventilator Days
Cost & Benefits
Potential for cost sharing across several services
e.g. Trauma (Gen Surg), Neurosurgery, Orthopedics
Registrar training to ensure more accurate injury, complication &
comorbidity coding
Eliminate significant under-billing
Demonstrates commitment to performance improvement
May help contracting with third-party payers and employers
Implementation of best practices leads to lower complications
Potentially higher reimbursement in the emerging “P4P” environment
Competitive edge in the emerging era of "public reporting"
Co-Morbid Conditions
Each co-morbid condition documented
and submitted may increase your
reimbursement by $700 - $10,000
Decrease Complications
Benchmarking complications with
comparisons to other centers will help
those with higher complications rates to
learn from higher performing centers and
reduce complications.
Decrease Lengths of Stay
Active Care Coordination
Early discharge planning
Active social work
Rapid radiology final reads
Early spine clearance
Get documents about "