CHILD SUPPORT
Shared by: zhouwenjuan
-
Stats
- views:
- 4
- posted:
- 2/10/2012
- language:
- pages:
- 1
Document Sample


Former Adjudication (Tested)
Claim Preclusion (Res Judicata): a party may not assert a COA if following three Issue Preclusion: deals with application of law to facts resolved in prior case
conditions are met Same issue: where issue involves same application of law to facts, issue
1. same claim: COA is same as one previously asserted preclusion will probably be available
2. same parties: parties involved with current cause of action are same as those
involved with prior COA or in privity with them Same party:
3. final judgment: prior COA resulted in final judgment on the merits If Defensive use of issue preclusion: party invokes issue preclusion to fend off
a claim by asserting that same issue has already necessarily been resolved
Same claim: applies to identical COA of prior lawsuit and to other COAs that negatively in earlier suit
were not asserted but that do arise out of same transaction or occurrence - full mutuality not required – party to be precluded must be same as or in
privity with party in earlier case, but irrelevant if defending party is same
Same parties: generally ¶ and Δ must be the same parties in both lawsuits – full as or in privity with party in earlier case
mutuality – same party requirement applies both to party invoking as well as If offensive use of issue preclusion: party asserting a claim seeks to establish
party to be precluded, BUT an issue supporting its claim by pointing out that the issue was resolved
Privity: mutual or successive relationship to the same rights – look for positively in prior case
relationship so close with respect to the right in issue that it is fair to apply NC: requires full mutuality
preclusion to one based on the actions of the other (think successors, Fed: judge’s discretion, may refuse where it seems a party awaited the
trustees, and beneficiaries) outcome of prior case in order to get a free ride on the determination
NOTE: no one can loose an issue without having first litigated the issue
Final judgment on merits: finality and a merits determination themselves (or through a party in privity) Parties sometimes get benefit of a
Finality: judgment is final notwithstanding appeal or other post trial motions win on an issue despite having no involvement, but NO party gets the
– but appeal may provide relief from pending decision of issue harm of loss on an issue without involvement
preclusion
On the merits: any judgment in claimant’s favor awarding relief is on the merits, Actually litigated: the issue must be actually litigated in the prior case – so,
BUT where Δ prevailed must determine whether judgment was procedurally even if issue relates to same transaction or occurrence, the issue is not
based or on the invalidity of the claim itself. precluded unless actually litigated
Statute of Limitations
Defamation: one year from date of publication
Wrongful death: two years from date of death
Three years for (PERSONAL INJURY ACTIONS SURVIVE DEATH OF ¶)
Professional negligence date of last negligence
Products liability (statute of repose causes right of action to cease to exist 6 years from date of initial purchase for use or consumption, irrespective of 3 year SoL)
Fraud/mistake: earlier date of discovery or date that it could have reasonably been discovered
Intentional torts
Negligence: from date of injury
Trespass: from date of original trespass if continuing
Insurance claims
Contracts and conversion: from date of breach
Four years for
UCC contract claims
Unfair deceptive Trade Practices
Person entitled to bring action dies: if before expiration of SoL and if the COA survives THEN an action may be commenced by his representatites after expiration of the SoL
IF filed within one year of the ¶’s/decedent’s death
Get documents about "