DICIB Fraud Investigations
Shared by: HC120207095034
-
Stats
- views:
- 28
- posted:
- 2/7/2012
- language:
- Latin
- pages:
- 29
Document Sample


DICIB Fraud Investigations
Susan Marbach, Special Agent
DFAS Internal Review, Criminal Investigation
Branch (DICIB)
317/212-4352
Susan.Marbach@dfas.mil
Integrity - Service - Innovation
“It’s strange that men
should take up crime when
there are so many legal
ways to be dishonest.”
Author Unknown
Integrity - Service - Innovation
Who Said?
“Nothing matters but the facts.
Without them the science of
criminal investigation is nothing
more than a guessing game.”
Integrity - Service - Innovation
Inspector Clouseau from the
movie “A Shot in the Dark.”
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 4
DICIB
Overview
Who Are We
Investigative Focus
Investigative Mission
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 5
DICIB
Who are we?
Stood up on February 5, 2007
Small cadre of experienced investigators (special agents),
currently 8 personnel
Came from AFOSI, DoC-OIG, USACIDC, USSS, USPIS,
and USDA-OIG
Future growth will hopefully reach upwards of about 20
personnel
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 6
DICIB
Investigative Focus
Violations of US Codes
Federal Prosecution, Monetary Recoveries and
Restitutions
Violations of DoD, DFAS or Military Service
Instructions, Regulations or Policies
Administrative/Disciplinary Remedies
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 7
DICIB
Investigative Focus
Employee Cases and Hotlines
Travel Fraud
Time & Attendance Fraud
Contract Fraud
Systems Fraud
Workers Comp Fraud
Death Match Fraud
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 8
DFAS INTERNAL REVIEW
DICIB Mission Statement: To be the DFAS investigative
source of choice, and to provide investigation services
that are relevant, timely, effective and which add value to
Internal Review’s overall mission.
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 9
How do we start?
Integrity - Service - Innovation
Referrals
IR Audit
Other investigative agencies
Public
Proactive initiatives
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 11
Once we receive a referral
Develop an Investigative Plan
Provides a frame of reference
Do we have a crime?
Do we have jurisdiction?
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 12
Investigative Plans
Why are they so important?
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 13
Investigative Plans
Focuses the investigative process to ensure all
offense elements are addressed.
Limits unnecessary procedures and step duplication
Provides stability to the investigation if staff changes
occur
Enhances communication with prosecuting officials
by providing an outline of the investigation and
identifying strengths and weaknesses in the case
Provides framework for the final report
Becomes a training aid for inexperienced staff
members.
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 14
Components of an Investigative Plan
Predication
Elements
Preliminary Steps
Investigative Steps
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 15
Predication
What particular offenses may have been committed.
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 16
Elements
What is needed to establish a criminal violation.
For Example 18 U.S.C – 1001 –
Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter
within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of
the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully— (1)
falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a
material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to
contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
entry;
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 17
Preliminary Steps
Basic Background Information
File review
Review of public records
Criminal background checks
Etc
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 18
Investigative Steps
FINALLY!!!!!!
Whose going to be
interviewed
Records to obtain and
examine
Subpoenas
Search Warrants
Briefing prosecuting
officials
Briefing DFAS
management (never
ending!)
Preparing a final report
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 19
DICIB - Case Studies
Travel Fraud
Former employee allegedly relocated from Dayton to Columbus
Took a large advance for the move
Didn’t actually move—joined a carpool from Dayton to
Columbus (along with her mom)
Submitted fraudulent travel vouchers for reimbursement
Vouchers included bogus receipts for hotels and groceries
Employee was interviewed and confessed to the theft
Was convicted in state court, sentenced to three years
supervised probation, ordered to pay restitution to DFAS of
approx. $6700
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 20
DICIB Case Studies
Worker’s Comp Fraud
This is a true “gold mine” for many former Federal workers
Office of Worker’s Compensation (OWCP) has the same
motto as Nationwide Insurance; “Nationwide is on your side”
OWCP accepts almost everything issue for compensation
Benefits are tax free and almost always more than what one
takes home if working everyday
Recipients can choose to receive retirement annuity at 66%
and taxed or worker’s comp benefits at 75% not taxed
Here’s the “BIG” question: Which would you choose?
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 21
DICIB Case Studies
Sec. 1920.: False statement or fraud to obtain Federal employees‘
compensation
STATUTE
Whoever knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up a
material fact, or makes a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
representation, or makes or uses a false statement or report knowing
the same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
entry in connection with the application for or receipt of compensation
or other benefit or payment under subchapter I or III of chapter 81 of
title 5, shall be guilty of perjury, and on conviction thereof shall be
punished by a fine under this title, or by imprisonment for not more
than 5 years, or both; but if the amount of the benefits falsely obtained
does not exceed $1,000, such person shall be punished by a fine
under this title, or by imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or both.
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 22
DICIB Case Studies
Worker’s Comp Fraud
Former Employee – Sprain of Neck, Sprain of Lumbosacral (Joint)
Ligament), Ankle Sprain
Sustained September 1991 and re-injury 1994, 1996 and 1997
First incident - a filing cabinet fell on her
1996 injury - she heard a loud crashing noise, became startled,
and jumped and jerked her body out of her chair
1997 injury – while walking behind another employee who was
answering the phone, the employee with phone suddenly turned,
with telephone in hand, and hit Ms. X. Ms. X stated the other
employee hit her in the head -- the other employee stated she hit
her in the chest.
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 23
DICIB Case Studies
Worker’s Comp Fraud
Other accepted conditions accepted:
Contusion of face, scalp, and neck (bruises)
Migraine Unspecified
Post-concussion syndrome
Contusion of Back; Lumbago (backache)
Contusion (bruise) of knee; Ankle sprain
Other psychogenic pain; Reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the
upper limb;
Calcifying tendonitis of shoulder; Other tenosynovitis of hand and
wrist
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 24
DICIB Case Studies
Deceased Retiree/Annuitant Fraud
DFAS pays retirement benefits to US military veterans
and also to surviving spouses or others designated under
the Survivors Benefit Program
DFAS generally count on family member to report a
retiree or annuitant’s death
DFAS also uses a match with the Social Security Death
Index to determine when retirees/annuitants have passed
away
DFAS also coordinates with the US Dept of Veterans
Affairs to reconcile inconsistencies in suspected
retiree/annuitant deaths
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 25
Deceased Retiree/Annuitant Fraud
1. Mary Johnson (Deceased), an annuitant, died on 12/29/97. Her daughter, Debra
Stiles, was also on her mother’s bank account and failed to report her mother’s death
while continuing to collecting her mother’s annuity payments. Ms. Stiles was
interviewed and confessed to taking the money. This investigation resulted in Ms.
Stile’s prosecution in a Federal District court where she signed a guilty plea to one
count of 18 USC 641 – Theft of Public Monies. Ms. Stiles was sentenced to 6 months
home confinement, five years probation and order to pay DFAS restitution in the
amount of $67,628.00.
2. Deceased (an annuitant) died on 10/25/2004; she and her husband are listed on the
VA gravesite locator. Her son was granted power of attorney in May, 2001. DFAS
issued the Deceased’s annuity payments via Electronic Funds Transfer and the
account Deceased’s funds were going into changed several times. The total loss to
DFAS is $36,822.25. On August 6, 2009, the Deceased’s son was arrested and is
awaiting trial.
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 26
DICIB Case Studies
Deceased Retiree/Annuitant Fraud
Penelope Jordan, 61, kept the mummified remains of her mother who
had been missing for as much as six years, in her home. Jordan kept
the Deceased, Mrs. Timmie Jordan, on the bed in a back bedroom of
the house. She covered her mother with lye to mask the smell and
then covered the body with a blanket. She did all of this so she could
continue cashing the Deceased’s Social Security and military pension
checks, which she had been doing for the past six years.
On September 21, 2009, Jordan was convicted in a U.S. Federal
court on one charge of Theft of Public Money. She was sentenced to
366 days in prison, ordered to pay $237, 876 in restitution ($170K to
DFAS & $67.8K to SSA), and serve three years of supervised
probation upon release.
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 27
DICIB
How to reach us:
Warren Anderson – warren.anderson@dfas.mil
(614) 693-4805
Susan Marbach – susan.marbach@dfas.mil
(317) 212-4352
Michael Vega – michael.vega@dfas.mil
(614) 693-5202
Hotline@dfas.mil
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 28
DICIB
Criminal Investigations
Questions
2/7/2012 Integrity - Service - Innovation 29
Get documents about "