Embed
Email

Form 1099

Document Sample

Shared by: linxiaoqin
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
14
posted:
2/1/2012
language:
pages:
3
Form 1099

Re-Do Changes Bring New Filing Requirements, Increased Penalties

By J. Patrick Garverick, CPA



Get ready for coming changes to Form 1099 filings, Below is a summary and timeline of the new

including increased penalties for late filings and new rules applicable to Form 1099 information returns and

filing requirements. penalties.

Internal Revenue Code Sec. 6041 requires Form

1099 information returns to be filed by every person

Increased Penalty

engaged in a trade or business who makes payments [as

Under Sec. 6721, any person required to file an

defined in IRC Sec. 6041(a)] aggregating $600 or more in

information return who fails to do so on or before the

any taxable year to a single payee in the course of that

filing date is subject to a penalty that varies based on

payor’s trade or business.

when, if at all, the correct information return is filed. For

The regulations generally exempt payments to

Form 1099 information returns required to be filed after

corporations, exempt organizations, governmental

Dec. 31, 2010, Sec. 6721 is amended to increase the failure

entities, international organizations or retirement plans.

to timely file information penalties as follows:

The penalty for failing to file an information

First-Tier Penalty: If a person files a correct

return generally is $50 for each return for which such

information return after the prescribed filing date, but

failure occurs. The total penalty on a person for all

on or before the date that is 30 days after the prescribed

failures during a calendar year cannot exceed $250,000.

filing date, the penalty will be $30 (up from $15) per

Additionally, special rules apply to reduce the per-failure

return, with a maximum penalty of $250,000 (up from

and maximum penalty where the failure is corrected

$75,000) per calendar year.

within a specified period.

Second-Tier Penalty: If a person files a correct

However, the Patient Protection and Affordable

information return after the date that is 30 days after

Care Act of 2010, signed into law in March, carries a

the prescribed filing date, but on or before Aug. 1, the

revenue raising provision that modified Form 1099

penalty will be $60 (up from $30) per return, with a

reporting requirements under Sec. 6041. Starting

maximum penalty of $500,000 (up from $150,000) per

in 2012, the new law will require businesses to file

calendar year.

an information return for all payments of goods or

Third-Tier Penalty: If a correct information return

services aggregating $600 or more in a calendar year to

is not filed on or before Aug. 1 of any year, the penalty is

a single payee (other than a payee that is a tax-exempt

$100 (up from $50) per return, with a maximum penalty

corporation). Congressional reports estimate that the

of $1.5 million (up from $250,000) per calendar year.

new requirements will raise $17.1 billion over 10 years.

Intentional Disregard Penalty: If a failure is due

Further, the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, signed

to intentional disregard of a filing requirement, the

into law in September, will require all persons who

minimum penalty for each failure is $250 (up from $100),

receive rental income (with a few exceptions) to issue

with no calendar year limit.

Form 1099s for payments of $600 or more for rental

Special lower maximum levels for this penalty

property expenses starting in 2011. The penalties for

apply to small businesses, defined as firms having

failure to file information returns on time and failure to

average annual gross receipts for the most recent

furnish a payee a statement also will be increased.

three taxable years that do not exceed $5 million. The

maximum penalties for small

businesses will be:

• $75,000 (instead of

$250,000) if the failures are

corrected on or before 30

days after the prescribed

filing date;

• $200,000 (instead of

$500,000) if the failures are

corrected on or before Aug.

1; and

• $500,000 (instead of

$1.5 million) if the failures

aren’t corrected on or before

Aug. 1.

Inflation Adjusted

Penalty: The failure to file

penalty will be adjusted to

account for inflation every

five years with the first

adjustment to take place

after 2012, effective for each



4 Tennessee CPA Journal | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2011

year thereafter. Form 1099 unless he meets the exception for duplicate

reporting below.

Treatment of Rental Property Expenses

After 2010 [Sec. 6041(h)] Relief for Duplicated Reporting After 2010

For payments made after Dec. 31, 2010, recipients of The Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008 added Sec.

rental income from real estate generally are subject to the 6050W to the IRC, requiring any payment settlement

same information reporting requirements as taxpayers entity making payments (after Dec. 31, 2010) to a

engaged in a trade or business. participating payee in settlement of reportable payment

In particular, rental income recipients making transactions to report annually to the IRS and to the

payments of $600 or more to a service provider (such as a participating payee the gross amount of such reportable

plumber, painter or accountant) in the course of earning payment transactions, as well as the name, address and

rental income are required to provide an information taxpayer identification numbers of the participating

return (typically Form 1099-MISC) to the IRS and to the payees.

service provider. Exceptions to this reporting requirement A “reportable payment transaction” means any

are payments made for: payment card transaction (e.g., a credit card or debit card)

• Any individual, including any individual who is an and any third-party network transaction (e.g., PayPal

active member of the uniformed services or an employee and eBay). A third-party settlement organization is not

of the intelligence community [as defined in Sec. 121(d)(9) required to report unless the aggregate value of third

(C)(iv)], if substantially all rental income is derived from party network transactions for the year exceeds $20,000

renting the principal residence (within the meaning of and the aggregate number of such transactions exceeds

Sec. 121) of such individual on a temporary basis; 200.

• Any individual who receives rental income of not New Sec. 6041(j) allows the IRS to issue regulations

more than the minimal amount, as determined under and other guidance as may be necessary to carry out

regulations prescribed by the Secretary; and the purposes of the Form 1099 information reporting

• Any other individual for whom the requirements under Sec. 6041 and to issue rules to prevent duplicative

would cause hardship, as determined under regulations reporting transactions. The IRS issued final regulations

prescribed by the Secretary. Aug. 13 addressing business purchases made with

For example, Jane owns a rental house. In between credit or debit cards that would be exempt from the new

tenants she hires Joe to paint the interior of the rental reporting requirements [under Sec. 6041(a)] because

house for $2,500. Jane is considered to be in a trade or banks and other payment processors already report them

business and will have to issue Joe a Form 1099. under Sec. 6050W (i.e., relating to payment card and third

party network transactions).

The final regulations under Sec. 1.6041-1(a)(1)(iv)

Payments of $600 or More After 2011

and Sec. 1.6041A-1(d)(4) state that transactions that would

As mentioned above, Sec. 6041 requires Form 1099

otherwise be required to be reported on information

information returns to be filed by every person engaged

returns under Sec. 6050W and either Sec. 6041 or Sec.

in a trade or business who makes payments aggregating

6041A, are reported only under Sec. 6050W.

$600 or more in any taxable year to a single payee in the

Solely for purposes of determining whether a payer

course of that payor’s trade or business.

is eligible for relief from reporting under Sec. 6041, the de

For payments made after Dec. 31, 2011, amended

minimis threshold for third-party network transactions

Sec. 6041(a) will add “amounts in consideration for

in Sec. 1.6050W–1(c)(4) is disregarded because Sec.

property” and “gross proceeds” to the list of payments

6041 payer will be unable to determine whether the de

subject to reporting. Thus, the payments to be reported

minimis threshold applies. These regulations will apply

on a Form 1099 will now include gross proceeds paid in

to payments made after Dec. 31, 2010.

consideration for property or services.

Reg. Sec. 1.6041-1(a)(v), Example 1: Restaurant

In addition, “person” will include any corporation

owner Al, in the course of business, pays $600 of fixed or

that is not an organization exempt from tax under Sec.

determinable income to repairman Bill by credit card. Bill

501(a). Thus, payments to corporations that are not tax-

is one of a network of unrelated persons that has agreed

exempt may be subject to information reporting.

to accept Al’s credit card as payment under an agreement

Example: S Corp buys $1,000 of office supplies from

that provides standards and mechanisms for settling the

Office Company Inc. during 2012. Under Sec. 6041(a), S

transactions between a merchant acquiring bank and the

Corp is required to issue Office Company a Form

persons who accept the cards.

1099 unless they meet the exception for duplicate

Merchant acquiring Bank Y is responsible for

reporting below.

making the payment to Bill. Al, as payer, is not required

Example: Dan, a sole proprietor, travels away from

to file an information return under Sec. 6041 with respect

home on a business trip for a week. While on the road he

to the transaction because Bank Y, as the payment

pays $800 for his stay at Hotel Inc. of America. Under Sec.

settlement entity for the payment card transaction, is

6041(a), Dan is required to issue Hotel Inc. of America a





JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2011 | Tennessee CPA Journal 5

continued from page 5





required to file an information return under Sec. 6050W. Could the Form 1099

Reg. Sec. 1.6041A-1(d)(4), Example 2: In the course

of business, service recipient Amy pays $600 of fixed or Requirements be Repealed?

determinable income to repairman Bob through a third-

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus,

party payment network. Bob is one of a substantial

D-Mont., continues to urge the Senate to pass legislation

number of persons who have established accounts

with Yehay, a third-party settlement organization that to eliminate the expanded 1099 reporting requirements for

provides standards and mechanisms for settling the businesses in the health care reform bill.

transactions and guarantees payments to those persons Eliminating the bookkeeping and filing requirements

for goods or services purchased through the network. would free up resources for small businesses to grow

Yehay is responsible for making the payment to and create jobs, he argued. Baucus asked for unanimous

Bob. Amy is not required to file an information return consent in the Senate to eliminate the additional reporting

under Sec. 6041A(a) with respect to the transaction requirements for small businesses during the debate over

because the transaction is a third-party network extending the Bush-era tax cut rates and unemployment

transaction that is subject to reporting under Sec. benefits, but members objected to passing the measures in

6050W. Solely for purposes of determining whether the the midst of that process.

transaction is subject to reporting under Sec. 6050W, “Small-business owners want us to repeal Form

the de minimis threshold for third party network 1099 reporting requirements so they have additional

transactions in Sec.1.6050W-1(c)(4) is disregarded. resources to grow their businesses and hire new workers,”

The new Form 1099 filing requirements will said Baucus. “Today we should have – and could have

impact all businesses and increase the burden and – delivered the paperwork relief small businesses need.

expense of reporting. Businesses will now have to Eliminating these paperwork requirements is a simple,

obtain a taxpayer information number for all vendors, common-sense idea that senators on both sides of the aisle

track all purchases made to each vendor, distinguish support, and it is deeply disappointing to see partisanship

between cash and credit/debit card purchases and stand in the way of progress for small-business owners.”

issue a Form 1099 to the vendor and the IRS showing Baucus has been pushing to repeal the new

the amount of total purchases that are not exempt from requirements for small businesses to report payments

reporting. n made for goods and services using 1099-MISC forms. A

total of 95 senators have supported repealing the 1099

About the Author: reporting requirements in the past. Small-business

J. Patrick Garverick, CPA, runs Garverick CPE and owners have expressed concern that the resources

is a frequent TSCPA seminar speaker. You can reach him at required in January 2012 to complete the forms may be

www.garverickcpe.com. more than they can accommodate.

In November, Baucus introduced legislation to repeal

Reprinted with permission from the California Society the requirements, but the bill failed to pass.

of CPAs. Repealing the requirements this year would

give small-business owners the certainty of knowing

they do not have to prepare to implement these new

recordkeeping and recording provisions in 2012, Baucus

noted.

The AICPA has called on Congress to repeal the new

Form 1099 requirements as well, because “businesses do

not need the added cost of more regulatory requirements

at a time when their efforts must be focused on

profitability and sustainability.”

The first 1099 forms would be due in 2013, so

businesses would need to begin keeping records in

2012. Under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, similar

reporting requirements would apply to owners of rental

property for expenses related to the rental property and

would take effect in 2011 for reporting in 2012.

The business implementation costs associated with

the likely generation and receipt of millions of forms and

the potentially challenging reconciliation processes for

taxpayers should be weighed against the uncertainty of

the benefit to be derived by the government, the AICPA

said.









6 Tennessee CPA Journal | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2011



Related docs
Other docs by linxiaoqin
Volume 9 Issue 1- Winter 2-4-2004 _Read-Only_
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
VOLUME 35_ NUMBER 5 DECEMBER 10_ 2007
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
Volmer Axel-Antero
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 0
Voices for Change
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
Voice 0907.pub - Florida 4-H Youth Development
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
Vocation Vacation
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
visit us online at www.extraordinaryevents.net
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
VISIT OUR SHOP CONTACT US
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 0
Visit of cellars
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!