Department of Health & Human Services
Administration for Children and Families
Program Office: Administration on Children, Youth, and
Families, Children's Bureau
Funding Opportunity National Resource Center for Community-
Title: Based Child Abuse Prevention
Announcement Type: Initial
Funding Opportunity HHS-2009-ACF-ACYF-CZ-0056
Number:
CFDA Number: 93.590
Due Date for 05/26/2009
Applications:
Executive Summary:
The purpose of this funding opportunity announcement is to establish
by cooperative agreement a National Resource Center for the
Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention Program (NRCCBCAP).
NRCCBCAP will serve as a member of the Children's Bureau's (CB's)
Training and Technical Assistance Network (T/TA Network). This
network is designed to improve child welfare systems and to support
States and Tribes in achieving sustainable, systemic change that
results in greater safety, permanency, and well-being for children,
youth, and families. The NRCCBCAP will be the primary provider of
T/TA to build the capacity of Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention
(CBCAP) lead agencies and their partners. The key focus is on building
the capacity to effectively implement the requirements of the program
and support evidence-informed and evidence-based child
maltreatment prevention programs and activities. It will facilitate lead
agency efforts in the planning and development of a network of
interdisciplinary community-based programs and activities designed to
strengthen and support families to prevent child abuse and neglect. It
will also promote stronger linkages with the child welfare and other
child and family systems.
I. FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION
1
Statutory Authority
The statutory authority for this funding opportunity is Section 208 of
the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act [42 U.S.C. 5116 et
seq.].
Description
Purpose
T/TA by NRCCBCAP is intended to build the capacity of CBCAP lead
agencies and their State, local, and Tribal partners to:
Foster an understanding, appreciation, and knowledge of diverse
populations in order to be effective in preventing child abuse and
neglect;
Facilitate and assist efforts of CBCAP lead agencies in the
interagency, inter-disciplinary, coordinated planning and
development of a network of community-based, evidence-based
and evidence-informed programs and activities designed to
strengthen and support families to prevent child abuse and
neglect;
Actively engage in conducting regular and ongoing assessments
that will be used to identify unmet needs and which also
incorporate findings from other Statewide needs assessment
processes;
Increase the percentage of CBCAP funding to support and
successfully implement evidence-based and evidence-informed
prevention programs and practices;
Demonstrate a commitment to meaningful parent leadership,
especially for parents of children with disabilities, racial and
ethnic minorities, and members of other underrepresented or
underserved groups;
Maximize funding through leveraging of funds for the financing,
planning and operation of child abuse prevention programs and
activities;
Promote the development and implementation of a continuum of
program evaluation processes that include self-assessment, peer
review, outcome accountability, quantitative and qualitative
evaluation methodologies;
2
Conduct public awareness and education regarding the
importance and value of prevention and family support;
Support States in their systems reform and improvement efforts.
These efforts include Child and Family Services Reviews
(CFSRs), Program Improvement Plans (PIPs), Child and Family
Services Plans (CFSPs), Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems
(ECCS) Plans, and other related Federal initiatives.
The NRCCBCAP will also provide programmatic technical assistance
and support to the Supporting Evidence-based Home Visiting (EBHV)
discretionary grantees and support linkages to the CBCAP and other
prevention efforts.
T/TA by the NRCCBCAP is intended to build the capacity of the CBCAP
lead agencies and their State, local, and Tribal partners to:
Foster an understanding, appreciation, and knowledge of diverse
populations in order to be effective in preventing child abuse and
neglect;
Facilitate and assist efforts of CBCAP lead agencies in the
interagency, inter-disciplinary, coordinated planning and
development of a network of community-based, evidence-based
and evidence-informed programs and activities designed to
strengthen and support families to prevent child abuse and
neglect;
Actively engage in conducting regular and ongoing assessments
that will be used to identify unmet needs and which also
incorporate findings from other Statewide needs assessment
processes;
Increase the percentage of CBCAP funding to support and
successfully implement evidence-based and evidence-informed
prevention programs and practices;
Demonstrate a commitment to meaningful parent leadership,
especially for parents of children with disabilities, racial and
ethnic minorities, and members of other underrepresented or
underserved groups;
Maximize funding through leveraging of funds for the financing,
planning and operation of child abuse prevention programs and
activities;
3
Promote the development and implementation of a continuum of
program evaluation processes that include self-assessment, peer
review, outcome accountability, quantitative and qualitative
evaluation methodologies;
Conduct public awareness and education regarding the
importance and value of prevention and family support;
Support States in their systems reform and improvement efforts.
These efforts include the Child and Family Services Reviews
(CFSRs), the Program Improvement Plans (PIPs), the Child and
Family Services Plans (CFSPs), Early Childhood Comprehensive
Systems (ECCS) Plans, and other related Federal initiatives.
Background
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is the Federal
Government's principal agency for protecting the health of all
Americans and providing essential human services, especially for those
who are least able to help themselves. Within HHS, the Administration
for Children and Families (ACF) is the agency responsible for Federal
programs that promote the economic and social well-being of families,
children, individuals, and communities. The Administration on
Children, Youth and Families (ACYF), within ACF, administers national
programs for children and youth; works with States, Tribes, and local
communities to develop services that support and strengthen family
life; seeks joint ventures with the private sector to enhance the lives
of children and their families; and provides information and other
assistance to parents. Many of the programs administered by ACYF
focus on children from low-income families; abused and neglected
children; children and youth in need of foster care, independent living,
adoption or other child welfare services; preschool children; children
with disabilities; runaway and homeless youth; and children from
Native American and migrant families.
Within ACYF, the CB plans, manages, coordinates, and supports child
abuse and neglect prevention and child welfare services programs. The
CB is the agency within the Federal Government that is responsible for
assisting child welfare systems by promoting continuous improvement
in the delivery of child welfare services. CB programs are designed to
promote the safety, permanency, and well-being of all children,
including those in foster care, available for adoption, recently adopted,
abused, neglected, dependent, disabled, or homeless, and to prevent
the neglect, abuse, and exploitation of children.
4
The purpose of CB's programs is to promote strengthening of the
family unit in order to help prevent the unnecessary separation of
children from their families and to encourage reunifying families, when
possible, if separation has occurred. State and Tribal child welfare
systems are designed to deliver direct services that protect children
who have suffered maltreatment, who are at risk for maltreatment, or
who are under the care and placement responsibility of the State
and/or Tribe because their families are unable to care for them. These
systems also focus on securing permanent legal placement with
families, such as reunification, guardianship, and adoption for children
and youth who are unable to return home. (For more information
about CB's programs, visit http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb.)
Child Welfare Training and Technical Assistance Network
CB's Child Welfare T/TA Network is designed to improve child welfare
systems and to support States and Tribes in achieving sustainable,
systemic change that results in greater safety, permanency, and well-
being for children, youth, and families. The T/TA Network is currently
comprised of a group of T/TA providers funded entirely or partially by
CB through grants, contracts, and interagency agreements. For over a
decade, CB has provided funding for a growing network of National
Resource Centers (NRCs), Child Welfare Information Gateway, and
other child welfare T/TA providers.
T/TA Network members serve a variety of systems, agencies,
organizations, and institutions and perform a diverse range of services.
Despite being authorized by different statutes and charged with
diverse tasks and objectives, members of the T/TA Network are
collectively charged with the successful promotion of systems change
that will ultimately improve outcomes for children, youth, and families
in the United States and its territories. T/TA Network members hold
program-specific topical expertise in multiple aspects of child welfare
systems and across the continuum of child welfare practice and as
such, they are expected to provide States and Tribes with the
necessary information, T/TA, and consultation to build capacity within
their child welfare systems. Together, T/TA Network members are
expected to facilitate positive change in service delivery, and in some
cases comprehensive cross-system reforms, that collectively build
systemic capacity and result in more effective and promising practice.
Knowledge development and transfer, leadership development,
information management, and dissemination of effective and
promising practices have all been key objectives of the T/TA Network.
While network members have overlapping responsibilities in several of
5
these areas, their roles are also complementary. National Quality
Improvement Centers (NQICs) develop knowledge by demonstrating
and evaluating innovative practices. NRCs transfer knowledge to State,
Tribal, and local systems and identify evidence-based approaches,
while serving as repositories of national expertise in topical areas of
child welfare. Child Welfare Information Gateway houses, manages,
produces and disseminates child welfare information and resources.
The Workforce Institute delivers training and cultivates leadership
among professionals in child welfare. The Technical Assistance
Implementation Centers provide resources and in-depth, long-term
technical assistance to implement multi-year State and Tribal projects
for systemic change. (Please refer to Appendix X for additional
information on how NRCs and Implementation Centers are expected to
collaborate.) Other members of the T/TA Network support similar
activities intended to build capacity, improve systems, and improve
policy and practice in child welfare. (A list of T/TA Network members
anticipated in Fiscal Year 2010 is included in Appendix Y, and more
information about T/TA Network members can be found at
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/tta/index.htm.)
CB NRCs are important members of the CB T/TA Network. The
following table lists CB NRC funding opportunities that are being
announced in Fiscal Year 2009.
FY09 CB Child Welfare NRC funding opportunity
announcements
HHS-2009-ACF- Offers T/TA, teleconferences, and publications to
ACYF-CZ-0016 assist States and Tribes with strategic planning,
National Resource quality improvement, evaluating outcomes,
Center for Child facilitating stakeholder involvement, and
Welfare improving training and workforce development.
Organizational
Improvement
HHS-2009-ACF- Provides expert consultation and T/TA in all areas
ACYF-CZ-0015 of Child Protective Services, including intake,
National Resource assessment, case planning, and ongoing services.
Center for Child It will assist States and Tribes with system and
Protective Services practice issues that help improve the prevention,
reporting, assessment, and treatment of child
abuse and neglect, and it will provide resources
and support to State Liaison Officers (SLO) and
6
Children's Justice Act (CJA) grantees.
HHS-2009-ACF- Provides T/TA and information services to build
ACYF-CZ-0061 the capacity of State, local, and Tribal foster care
National Resource programs. Areas of T/TA will include collaboration
Center for and engagement with parents, relatives,
Permanency and stakeholders and resource families to address
Family Connections children's safety, permanency, and well-being
needs and effectively address the issues causing
children and youth to be placed in out-of-home
care.
HHS-2009-ACF- Provides a broad range of T/TA on data and
ACYF-CZ-0054 information systems issues to improve the quality
National Resource of data that is collected, build the capacity to use
Center for Child the information for decision making in daily
Welfare Data and practice, and develop or improve case
Technology management and data collection systems.
HHS-2009-ACF- Lends its expertise to State and Tribal agencies
ACYF-CZ-0067 and courts on legal and judicial aspects of child
National Resource welfare practice. Areas of focus include
Center on Child permanency decision-making, adherence to ASFA
Welfare Legal and and other Federal laws, the court's role in the
Judicial Issues Child and Family Service Reviews and child welfare
reform, high quality legal representation for all
parties, judicial and attorney workloads, quality
assurance for courts and legal offices, effective
forensic performance by agencies, the impact of
Adoption and Safe Families Act on youth in the
juvenile justice system, education needs of
children and youth in foster care, legal ethics, and
the interplay of domestic violence and child
welfare.
HHS-2009-ACF- Works with States, Tribes, and agencies to
ACYF-CZ-0065 increase their capacity in adoption and improve
National Resource the effectiveness and quality of adoption and post-
Center for Adoption adoption services provided to children, youth and
their families.
HHS-2009-ACF- Lends its expertise and provides T/TA in areas
ACYF-CZ-0066 including youth development, youth engagement
National Resource and service collaboration in child welfare policy,
Center for Youth planning, program development, and information
7
Development services promoting stakeholder involvement and
youth engagement in the CFSR processes, and
effectively implementing the Chafee Foster Care
Independence and the Education and Training
Voucher programs.
HHS-2009-ACF- Provides T/TA regarding effective and promising
ACYF-CZ-0068 alternatives to out-of-home care and will build the
National Resource capacity of State, local, and Tribal systems to
Center for In-Home provide services that will ensure the safety and
Services well-being of children and youth in their homes
while preserving, supporting, and stabilizing
families.
HHS-2009-ACF- Functions as a case manager in receiving T/TA
ACYF-CZ-0058 requests from Tribes and coordinates with the
National Resource T/TA Network to provide coordinated and
Center for Tribes culturally competent T/TA. Provides coordinated
and culturally competent T/TA to Tribes. The
center is intended to successfully engage Tribes,
to enhance their access to and utilization of the
T/TA Network, to facilitate peer-to-peer
consultation between Tribes regarding child
welfare issues, and to increase cultural
competence and sensitivity to Tribal voices in the
T/TA Network.
HHS-2009-ACF- Builds the capacity of CBCAP lead agencies and
ACYF-CZ-0056 their partners to effectively implement the
National Resource requirements of the program and support
Center for evidence-informed and evidence-based child
Community-Based maltreatment prevention programs and activities.
Child Abuse It will facilitate State, local, Tribal, public, and
Prevention private agency efforts in the interagency, inter-
disciplinary, coordinated planning and
development of a network of community-based
programs and activities designed to strengthen
and support families to prevent child abuse and
neglect and promote stronger linkages with the
child welfare system.
One T/TA Network
CB expects for its T/TA providers to function as "one T/TA Network."
Members are expected to function as a seamless entity in their
8
provision of T/TA service delivery to States and Tribes. They are
expected to individually provide topical expertise as a part of the
whole T/TA Network; each member of the Network is expected to:
collaborate; coordinate their T/TA; perform project activities that
complement one another; subscribe to common principles; cross refer
to the appropriate T/TA Network member as needed to be responsive
to the needs of States and Tribes; and participate fully in common
messaging that clearly identifies each provider with the T/TA Network.
Whenever a T/TA Network member performs activities and provides
T/TA that are either entirely or partially supported by CB, these
services must be clearly identified with the T/TA Network and
perceived by the individual provider's client to be a service of CB.
States and Tribes should be made aware of any existing T/TA Network
efforts related to their child welfare systems. All T/TA Network
members are expected to inform their clients about the full array of
relevant T/TA Network resources when addressing requests for T/TA.
Integrated service delivery must be pursued when beneficial to the
client and collaboration shall take precedence over concerns about an
individual T/TA provider's scope of responsibility. A T/TA Network
member is expected to consult and partner with its Network peers at
the request of a client or if additional support or expertise is
appropriate, when such collaboration would increase the likelihood of
successfully achieving the objectives of the T/TA, and/or when it is
appropriate to do so in order to effectively address the T/TA needs of
the client.
Coordination
For several years, CB has worked closely with the T/TA Network to
continuously develop a more coordinated strategy and approach to
working with States and Tribes. This was a progression from the
previous work and mission of the NRCs, which historically worked
independently of one another in the provision of T/TA. Collaboration,
communication, and coordination among T/TA Network members has
greatly increased as a result of this evolution. Membership in the T/TA
Network has been expanded in response to the important contributions
that the variety of CB initiatives offer in building capacity for systemic
change. T/TA Network members have developed into a community of
resources and centers of topical expertise that are flexible, responsive,
collaborative, and coordinated in responding to changing Federal
priorities and emerging challenges from the field. To this end, CB is
committed to continuing to plan, implement, and foster a stronger,
formalized, coordinated, and seamless T/TA strategy across the
9
network of T/TA providers to support State and Tribal child welfare
systems in their change efforts.
CB does not expect any individual T/TA provider to have
comprehensive expertise across all aspects of child welfare practice in
a child welfare system. Therefore, NRCs are expected to regularly
engage their peers in joint consultation, training, and other T/TA
activities when collaboration or partnership is necessary to most
effectively serve clients' T/TA needs. NRCs will collaborate and work
closely with Federal staff in CB central and regional offices when States
and Tribes submit requests for on-site T/TA and other substantial
services. Each NRC will follow all approval and coordination procedures
for T/TA requests and will work cooperatively with the entity
designated by CB to coordinate T/TA delivery. Each NRC will be
prepared to serve, if necessary, as a facilitator of collaborative
consultation and training in response to T/TA requests related to its
area of focus and topical expertise. NRCs will refer requests to other
T/TA Network members when appropriate and collaborate when the
expertise of more than one provider is necessary to achieve the
objectives of a T/TA request or need. CB expects T/TA Network
members to operate collectively as a single, integrated T/TA service
delivery system, providing coordinated and timely implementation
delivery of T/TA that avoids delays or duplication of effort.
Child Welfare Monitoring and Technical Assistance
CB employs several monitoring tools, including the CFSRs, Title IV-E
Foster Care Eligibility Review, the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis
and Reporting System (AFCARS) Assessment Review, and the
Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System (SACWIS)
Assessment Review, to ensure conformity with Federal child welfare
requirements and to help States achieve safety, permanency, and
well-being for children. (For more information about child welfare
monitoring, see
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/cwmonitoring/index.htm.)
Section 1123A of the Social Security Act requires that technical
assistance be made available to States, to the extent feasible, to
enable them to develop and implement corrective action plans that
address those areas needing improvement. PIPs have become an
important tool for planning corrective action and pursuing strategies
for change. PIPs are expected to build on child welfare systems'
strengths and address areas needing improvement which were
identified during Federal monitoring reviews. PIPs emphasize building
10
capacity and implementing changes that will improve child welfare
outcomes.
While the work of several T/TA Network members focuses on
improving State and Tribal compliance with Federal requirements,
helping jurisdictions apply the knowledge gained from Federal child
welfare monitoring reviews, and assisting with the development and
implementation of PIPs, the ultimate purpose of the T/TA Network is to
improve child welfare systems, build capacity, and to support States
and Tribes in achieving sustainable, systemic change that yields better
outcomes for children, youth, and families. CB has learned that
systemic reform requires a proactive approach to T/TA as well as a
commitment to strategic, focused, and sustained planning and
implementation.
Specific strategies adopted by a State or Tribe to improve a particular
outcome or an area of practice must be part of a larger, cohesive, and
comprehensive vision for change that permeates the child welfare
system at all levels of responsibility and leadership. The principles that
drive the change effort need to inform and infuse each step of the
reform process and to be supported before, during, and after
implementation.
Systems of Care Framework and CFSR Guiding Principles
T/TA Network members who provide services directly to child welfare
agencies and courts are expected to subscribe to a common set of
guiding principles. The Systems of Care (SOC) framework and Child
and Family Service Review (CFSR) principles have become the
foundation for an evolving model of practice that guides the manner in
which the T/TA Network entities supports States and Tribes in their
pursuit of necessary systemic change. CB expects T/TA Network
members to operate collectively as a single, integrated T/TA service
delivery system.
Adopted from its application in the mental health field, SOC refers to a
conceptual framework and set of principles that directs child welfare
agencies and systems to pursue individualized, coordinated, and
holistic approaches to working with children, youth, and families. In
child welfare, SOC is characterized by shared, cross-cutting principles
and a continuum of integrated services from prevention to
permanency support that span programs, agencies, and institutions. A
SOC approach is community-based, child-centered, family-focused,
strengths-based, culturally competent, and comprehensive. It
addresses the physical, mental, emotional, social, educational, and
developmental needs of children, youth and their families while taking
11
into account the individual, family, community, and broader systemic
risk and protective factors that contribute to a child's safety and well-
being. (More information regarding SOC can be found at
http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/service/soc/.)
The guiding principles of the CFSR are consistent with this SOC
framework. As described under 45 C.F.R. Section 1355.25 of child
safety, permanency, and well-being are closely tied to principles of
service delivery for effective practice including: prevention services;
family-focused and community-based services; flexible, accessible,
and coordinated services; culturally appropriate services; and
strengths-based and individualized services. 45 C.F.R. Section 1355.25
further states that services should be organized along a continuum and
linked to a wide service array to meet the multiple service needs of
children, youth, and families. The principles of the CFSR are more
commonly described to be:
Family-centered practice;
Community-based services;
Individualizing services; and
Strengthening the capacity of families.
(Complete text of 45 CFR Section1355.25 can be found at
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/index.html.)
In the context of T/TA service delivery, subscribing to SOC and CFSR
principles means that NRCs are expected to collaborate with other
T/TA Network members and CB and to collectively offer client-
centered, individualized, and strengths-based services to States and
Tribes. The NRCs will occupy a critical niche in an array of T/TA service
providers who address multiple legislative and child welfare service
priorities and address practice areas across the continuum of child
welfare service delivery. The NRC's T/TA will be proactive,
collaborative, coordinated, accessible, and culturally competent.
Together, members of the T/TA Network will build relationships and
engage child welfare systems. Frequently, they will conduct joint
assessments, provide collaborative consultation, and produce shared
products, particularly in programmatic areas where T/TA entities share
responsibility for practice issues. Network members will accept
individual and shared accountability for the quality of their consultation
and products and their ability to facilitate sustainable systemic
change. Furthermore, the NRCs are responsible for ensuring that the
consumers of its T/TA, State and Tribal child welfare systems and
ultimately the children, youth, and families they serve, have a voice in
12
decision-making regarding the quality and content of service provision.
T/TA Network members will work with States and Tribes to consider
how system change activities will support a seamless experience of
service delivery for children, youth and families. (Further information
about implementing SOC principles in child welfare can be found in
Primer Hands On Child Welfare, Improving Child Welfare Outcomes
through Systems of Care: Building the Infrastructure, and other
publications at
http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/service/soc/build/soctoolkit.c
fm. More information about changing systems can be found at
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/cwmonitoring/changing_culture.
htm.)
While its approach to service delivery must be aligned with the SOC
framework and CFSR principles, the substance of the NRC's T/TA
activities will be guided by them as well. Whether assessing systemic
problems, constructing strategic plans, facilitating dialogue, or
designing T/TA with its State and Tribal consumers, NRCs will observe
and critically examine management and practice issues through the
lens of the CFSR and SOC principles. While these principles are central
to the T/TA Network's operation and vision for change, CB does not
expect the NRCs to uniformly advise States and Tribes to adopt the
SOC framework or to articulate their principles in the same way.
States and Tribes will differ significantly in their strengths and
challenges, organizational cultures, visions for the future, and
strategies for change. CB intends for SOC and CFSR principles to guide
NRC's service delivery approach rather than become prescribed
content that is uniformly disseminated to States and Tribes. NRCs are
expected to tailor their T/TA to each of its clients and to consider the
impact of service delivery as children, youth and families are
transitioned to different programs within the child welfare agency.
Once a State or Tribe has identified a particular need, barrier, or issue
that requires attention, an NRC is expected to partner with its T/TA
peers, CB, and the client to comprehensively assess and mutually
define the problem in the context of broader systemic conditions.
Rather than assuming that a problem is isolated, NRCs will approach
identified problems as opportunities for further investigation, broad
systems thinking, and change that will result in sustainable
improvement.
Working with CB Research and Demonstration Grantees
CB awards discretionary research and demonstration grants for
projects that test innovative approaches to addressing a variety of
13
child welfare issues. NRCs will be expected to consider the knowledge
being developed by these projects as a potential resource. Throughout
the life of their cooperative agreements, NRCs will work with their
Federal Project Officers (FPOs) and others to identify topically relevant
discretionary grant activities, to determine areas of knowledge being
developed by these grantees that could be utilized by the NRC as it
provides T/TA, and to make the most of potential connections between
CB's knowledge development and knowledge transfer initiatives.
Information about CB Research and Demonstration grants is available
through the Discretionary Grants Library. This is an online tool that
allows users to search for and view CB program announcements and
other information related to specific CB grant projects.
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/programs_fund/index.htm#.disc
The National Resource Center for CBCAP
Legislative Authority
Since its enactment in 1974, the Child Abuse Prevention and
Treatment Act (CAPTA) [42 U.S.C., Section 5101 et seq.,] has sought
to increase national attention to the problem of child abuse and
neglect and to improve the nation's ability to prevent and respond to
the maltreatment of children. Through its several reauthorizations over
the years, the law has worked to strengthen the entire child protective
services system. Under CAPTA, programs have been implemented for
the prevention of child maltreatment, the identification of child abuse
and neglect, initial response, assessment and investigation of
suspected child abuse reports, and prosecution of caregivers found to
be the perpetrators of the abuse.
Title I of CAPTA authorizes research and demonstration grants, data
collection and information dissemination activities and two State grant
programs: the Basic State Grant and the Children's Justice Act (CJA)
Grant. Title II of CAPTA authorizes the Community-Based Grants for
the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect, or for the sake of brevity,
the Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention (CBCAP) program. This
program assists States to develop and implement, or expand and
enhance a comprehensive statewide system of community-based
family resource and support services to prevent child
maltreatment. The CBCAP Conceptual Framework provides an
overview of the key provisions of the program (Attachment 1). Title II
also authorizes the establishment of a national network for
community-based family resource programs which is implemented
14
through a national resource center to provide technical assistance on
the provisions of the program.
Purpose
The purpose of this funding opportunity announcement is to establish,
by cooperative agreement, a NRCCBCAP. NRCCBCAP will serve as a
member of CB's T/TA Network. This network is designed to improve
child welfare systems and to support States and Tribes in achieving
sustainable, systemic change that results in greater safety,
permanency, and well-being for children, youth, and families.
NRCCBCAP will be the primary provider of T/TA to build the capacity of
CBCAP lead agencies and their partners. The key focus is on building
the capacity to effectively implement the requirements of the program
and support evidence-informed and evidence-based child
maltreatment prevention programs and activities. It will facilitate lead
agency efforts in the planning and development of a network of
interdisciplinary community-based programs and activities designed to
strengthen and support families to prevent child abuse and neglect. It
will also promote stronger linkages with the child welfare and other
child and family systems.
T/TA by NRCCBCAP is intended to build the capacity of CBCAP lead
agencies and their State, local, and Tribal partners to:
Foster an understanding, appreciation, and knowledge of diverse
populations in order to be effective in preventing child abuse and
neglect;
Facilitate and assist efforts of CBCAP lead agencies in the
interagency, inter-disciplinary, coordinated planning and
development of a network of community-based, evidence-based
and evidence-informed programs and activities designed to
strengthen and support families to prevent child abuse and
neglect;
Actively engage in conducting regular and ongoing assessments
that will be used to identify unmet needs and which also
incorporate findings from other Statewide needs assessment
processes;
Increase the percentage of CBCAP funding to support and
successfully implement evidence-based and evidence-informed
prevention programs and practices;
15
Demonstrate a commitment to meaningful parent leadership,
especially for parents of children with disabilities, racial and
ethnic minorities, and members of other underrepresented or
underserved groups;
Maximize funding through leveraging of funds for the financing,
planning and operation of child abuse prevention programs and
activities;
Promote the development and implementation of a continuum of
program evaluation processes that include self-assessment, peer
review, outcome accountability, quantitative and qualitative
evaluation methodologies;
Conduct public awareness and education regarding the
importance and value of prevention and family support; and
Support States in their systems reform and improvement efforts.
These efforts include CFSRs, PIPs, CFSPs, ECCS Plans, and other
related Federal initiatives.
TTA Focus
The target population for NRCCBCAP is the State Lead Agencies and
their partners. All States, the District of Columbia, and the territories
receive funding under the CBCAP program. In every State, the
Governor designates a Lead Agency to receive these funds. Lead
Agencies are most often the State child welfare agency, another public
agency, or the Children's Trust and Prevention Board for the State.
Lead Agencies provide grants to local agencies to fund child abuse
prevention and family support services and activities. Many States
fund core services such as parent education, parent mutual support,
home visiting programs, early childhood programs, respite and crisis
care, family resource centers, and other family support services. In
addition, Lead Agencies provide leadership and support for the child
abuse prevention network in the State, offer T/TA, conduct public
awareness, and evaluate their funded programs. For the last several
years, CBCAP has focused on promoting the increased use of evidence-
based and evidence-informed prevention programs and practices. For
a list of CBCAP lead agencies and more information, visit:
www.friendsnrc.org
CBCAP lead agencies are involved in many inter-related systems
change and systems building efforts in their States. Some examples of
these efforts at the Federal level are the CFSR, the PIP, the CFSP, and
16
the ECCS plans. Findings from the States that have completed their
CFSRs thus far indicate that many States and communities lack
adequate prevention and community-based services for families. There
is also a need for comprehensive family assessments and for greater
engagement of parents in the case planning process. The ECCS plans
emphasize the need for collaborative efforts to support State early
childhood systems building across the full range of early childhood
sectors. These sectors include health, mental health and social and
emotional development, early care and education, family support, child
welfare, and parenting education. Much more work is needed to bridge
the gaps across all these related efforts to promote maximum
efficiency and effectiveness for building a comprehensive system of
support for families and communities to prevent child abuse and
neglect.
In an effort to promote stronger linkages with the discretionary
grantees, the NRCCBCAP is also tasked with providing programmatic
technical assistance to the Supporting Evidence-based Home Visiting
Program grantees. The technical assistance will focus on
implementing and sustaining evidence-based programs. On September
30, 2008, the Children's Bureau (CB) within the Administration for
Children and Families (ACF) funded cooperative agreements to support
the State and local infrastructure needed for the high quality
implementation of existing evidence-based home visiting programs to
prevent child maltreatment. Grantees will leverage these grants with
other funding sources to develop state and local funding, workforce,
and policy infrastructures to support the use of evidence-based home
visiting programs and practices. These grantees are required to
partner with the State CBCAP Lead Agencies. More information about
these grantees is available at:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/programs_fund/discretionary/20
08.htm
The most effective way to meet the challenge of preventing child
abuse and neglect is for all child abuse prevention and treatment
programs, public and private, to work together in partnership with
families and other disciplines such as social services, health and
mental health, child care, early childhood, education, law enforcement,
community faith-based and other advocacy groups in the community
to achieve their common goals. CBCAP grantees are in a unique
position of leadership as they assume responsibility for directing,
leading and evaluating the network of public-private partnerships and
the continuum of preventive services for children and families in their
States.
17
For purposes of defining the scope of NRCCBCAP and the T/TA in this
announcement, prevention is defined as efforts to prevent child
maltreatment before it occurs in the first place. These efforts must
promote the increase of protective factors and the reduction of risk
factors to strengthen and support families and communities. Efforts
may include primary prevention activities that target a universal
population, as well as secondary prevention efforts that target
populations with identified risk factors for abuse or neglect. Through
the provision of T/TA, NRCCBCAP will assist CBCAP lead agencies in
building their capacity to establish and support an array of evidence-
based and evidence-informed family support and prevention activities
that can successfully secure children's safety, strengthen parental
capacity, improve caretaking and coping skills, support healthy and
nurturing relationships, and foster physical, mental, and educational
well-being. NRCCBCAP will also work with CBCAP leads and partners to
address systemic, community-level, organizational, and practice issues
that impact the availability and quality of child maltreatment
prevention services. NRCCBCAP is expected to participate and
collaborate in joint efforts with other Federal agencies working on child
maltreatment prevention as specified by CB. As appropriate,
NRCCBCAP will collaborate and support the ongoing work of the Early
Childhood Systems Federal Partners Workgroup around technical
assistance coordination. The NRCCBCAP will also work collaboratively
with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sponsored
"Knowledge to Action (K2A) Prevention Consortium" and Child Welfare
Information Gateway in order to transfer knowledge regarding
community and societal level actions that promote safe, stable and
nurturing relationships for children.
Primary responsibility for T/TA regarding in-home services for child
welfare involved families, alternative response, child protective
services, reunification, guardianship, adoption and post-adoption has
been assigned by CB to other NRCs in the T/TA Network. NRCCBCAP is
expected to collaborate with its T/TA Network partners and to
coordinate activities with them on common issues and at points of
intersection between designated areas of focus. The overall purpose of
collaboration is to promote greater effectiveness and efficiency, to
minimize duplication, and to maximize the resources available to State
and Tribal child welfare systems.
Expectations
NRCCBCAP is expected to train and assist State lead agencies to
establish effective interagency cooperation and collaboration that
involves all stakeholders, including families, and promotes public-
18
private partnerships in the establishment and expansion of child abuse
prevention programs and activities. T/TA needs will be identified by
CBCAP lead agency staff in collaboration with ACYF central and
regional Office personnel, and coordinated with other ongoing national
T/TA efforts. Other T/TA needs will be generated by the Supporting
Evidence-based Home Visiting program grantees. CB is also working
closely with its T/TA Network to respond to T/TA needs related to
CFSRs, PIPs and other priorities. CB coordinates the Federal
Interagency Workgroup on Child Abuse and Neglect and the
NRCCBCAP will be asked to participate in other interagency initiatives
and national efforts that pertain to child maltreatment prevention.
NRCCBCAP is expected to work in partnership with Child Welfare
Information Gateway to develop and disseminate products to promote
child maltreatment prevention activities. It will be actively involved
with identifying other T/TA needs based on its work with CBCAP Lead
Agencies. Training outcomes should be achieved through a
combination of strategies, including on and off-site T/TA, use of
technology to reach a wider audience, peer learning communities, and
consultation with all appropriate stakeholder groups.
Expected outcomes of the T/TA include the enhanced capacity of each
State Lead Agency and their partners to engage in systemic change.
This will be achieved through the following:
1. Developing, supporting, and maintaining networks of
coordinated resources and activities to better strengthen and
support families to reduce the likelihood of child abuse and
neglect;
2. Conducting comprehensive interagency needs assessments of
required services;
3. Facilitating CBCAP program and policy development;
4. Coordinating the delivery of evidence-based and evidence-
informed family support and child maltreatment prevention
services and strategies at the individual, family, community and
societal levels;
5. Promoting the meaningful participation of parents in the design,
implementation and evaluation of funded services;
6. Sponsoring public awareness and education regarding the
importance and value of prevention efforts;
19
7. Conducting program evaluations that utilize a continuum of
approaches including self-assessment, peer review, outcome
evaluation, and other quantitative and qualitative
methodologies; and
8. Enhancing the capacity of the lead agencies to become active
participants in their State's systems change efforts such as the
CFSR, PIP processes, the CFSP, the ECCS plan, and other
Federal interagency related efforts.
The NRCCBCAP will also provide programmatic technical assistance
and support to the Supporting Evidence-based Home Visiting (EBHV)
discretionary grantees and support linkages to the CBCAP and other
prevention efforts.
Roles and Responsibilities
NRCCBCAP will support the delivery of child maltreatment and family
support activities in modalities which reflect family-centered, evidence-
based and evidence-informed, community-based and individual-
focused approaches. Enhancement of service delivery models which
strengthen such practices will be viewed as a relevant consideration in
development of training and technical assistance activities. It will
promote the following:
Family-centered practice is designed to strengthen and empower
families to protect and nurture their children; safely preserve
family relationships and connections when appropriate;
recognize the strong influence social systems have on individual
behavior; enhance family autonomy; respect the rights, values
and cultures of families; and focus on an entire family rather
than selected individuals within a family. The focus is also on
promoting protective factors and reducing risk factors for child
maltreatment at the individual, family, community and societal
levels.
Community-based services are designed to support the needs of
children and youth within the context of their families and
communities; emphasize prevention-oriented services and
support; and provide local communities a role in identifying,
designing, implementing and overseeing services within the
community.
Individualized services are designed to tailor interventions to
meet the specific needs of children, youth and families served;
20
recognize that children, youth and families are affected by both
individual and environmental factors; recognize that children,
youth, families and the environments in which they operate are
unique; and offer children, youth and families opportunities to
provide input into their strengths, needs, and goals and the
means to achieve those goals.
Strengthening parental capacity is achieved through practices
that enhance services and support for both parents and
recognize the value of involving both parents in care of their
children, promote parents' strengths and self-esteem by
emphasizing partnership with service providers, and balance
parental need for autonomy in decision-making with the need for
on-going support.
Evidence-Based Practices are approaches to prevention or
treatment that are validated by some form of documented
scientific evidence. This evidence could be findings established
through scientific research, such as controlled clinical studies or
other comparable and rigorous research methods.
Evidence-Informed Practices use the best available research and
practice knowledge to guide program design and implementation
within context. This informed practice allows for innovation and
incorporates the lessons learned from the existing research
literature.
In collaboration with other members of the T/TA Network and CB,
NRCCBCAP will work with Lead Agencies across the nation to improve
systems that address both specific problems and broad child
maltreatment prevention issues. NRCCBCAP will:
Subscribe to a SOC framework, systems thinking, and CFSR
principles in the coordination, administration, and delivery of
T/TA;
Support and facilitate peer-to-peer learning, mentoring and
networking between Lead Agencies, the Supporting Evidence-
based Home Visiting grantees, and their State and local
partners;
Perform outreach and marketing that will engage and inform
lead agencies and their partners and prompt their participation
in utilization of available T/TA and other resources from
appropriate members of the CB T/TA Network;
21
Build the capacity of State CBCAP Lead Agencies, the Supporting
Evidence-based Home Visiting Program grantees, and their
partners to achieve systemic change and improve outcomes for
children and families;
Partner closely with CB, other members of the T/TA Network,
States, Tribes and other stakeholders;
Partner with the Child Welfare Information Gateway to develop
and disseminate public awareness materials and resources to
promote child abuse prevention;
Partner with other related Federal interagency collaborative
efforts such as the Early Childhood Systems Federal Partners
Workgroup, Center for Disease Control's K2A Prevention
Consortium, and other appropriate efforts as determined by CB;
Provide proactive T/TA that supports the implementation of
State and Tribal strategies for improved child maltreatment
prevention practice;
Utilize the experience and expertise of CB regional offices, T/TA
Network, stakeholders, and other resources; making referrals
and developing collaborative T/TA strategies when appropriate;
Utilize state-of-the-art technical assistance strategies that are
grounded in evidence-based and evidence-informed practices;
Provide coordinated and individualized T/TA that supports
existing services and resources available to States and Tribes;
Develop and disseminate knowledge and lessons learned from
T/TA activities conducted with lead agencies and their partners;
Consider the knowledge being developed by CB discretionary
research and demonstration projects as a potential resource in
the T/TA they provide;
Develop and conduct self evaluation; and
Participate fully in any national evaluation activities sponsored
by CB, if applicable.
National Advisory Panel
22
In collaboration with CB, NRCCBCAP will establish a national advisory
panel whose members will review NRCCBCAP's approach to T/TA and
offer opinions and insights regarding its strategies to address
prevention and family support issues. The panel will be comprised of
direct and indirect consumers of NRCCBCAP's T/TA and partners from
other fields that impact the success of CBCAP services. Members will
include family members, youth, and program managers from CBCAP
agencies as well as representatives from research, policy, practice and
other partners, such as but not limited to, those in child welfare,
mental health, substance abuse, and domestic violence, early
childhood, and public health. panel members will provide NRCCBCAP
with expert consultation that contributes to its assessment (described
below in under Assessment of Prevention Practices) during Year One
and help to guide its activities throughout the project period.
Specific tasks to be performed- Planning Phase
Each applicant is required to submit a narrative (with accompanying
logic model) that clearly and concisely describes its strategy for a six-
month planning phase (Phase I) followed by a 54-month
implementation phase (Phase II).
During the Planning Phase, the NRCCBCAP will:
Meet with the CB FPO and other CB representatives to discuss
the scope of work of the NRCCBCAP in the context of the current
environment;
Work with the CB FPO to transition all materials and other
resources from the previous NRCCBCAP grantee, as appropriate
and needed;
Identify the roles and responsibilities of other new CB initiatives,
including the Supporting Evidence-based Home Visiting Program,
In-Home and Tribal Resource Centers, the Technical
Assistance Implementation Centers, and the NQICs to determine
the relationship of these entities to the work of the NRCCBCAP;
Build and strengthen relationships with CB, other members of
the T/TA Network, and other key stakeholders;
Collaborate with Child Welfare Information Gateway on the
planning for the development and dissemination of National Child
Abuse Prevention Month and year-round public awareness
activities;
23
Collaborate and coordinate with other related Federal
interagency initiatives such as the Early Childhood Systems
Federal Partners Workgroup, the CDC K2A Prevention
Consortium, and/or other child maltreatment prevention projects
at other agencies as specified by CB;
Initiate needs assessment of relevant constituents;
Prepare final marketing plan, based on draft submitted in
application, including materials and other resources to engage
and inform constituency of NRCCBCAP services and resources;
Review the work plan submitted as part of the application
process to determine areas that need to be revised or
strengthened based on new information obtained;
Work with CB FPO's, CB regional Offices (ROs), and others as
required to identify and implement the plan for coordinating with
the ROs and the other CB T/TA Network members in the
provision of TA;
Work with CB FPOs, CB Regional Offices and other NRCs and
Implementation Centers to identify any changes in process for
receiving, reviewing and approving T/TA requests from States
and Tribes;
Assess NRCCBCAP self-evaluation plan in relation to the
requirements of CB's plan for a National Cross Site Evaluation of
the CB T/TA Network;
Work with the CB FPO to design a plan for supporting grantees
through materials development, teleconferences, meetings, web
pages, and other identified resources and media;
Obtain approval from the CB FPO for revised plans; and
Respond to T/TA requests from CBCAP lead agencies.
Specific tasks to be performed- Implementation Phase
During the Implementation Phase, NRCCBCAP will:
Implement revised work plan;
24
Implement marketing and outreach plan to engage CBCAP lead
agencies, the Supporting Evidence-based Home Visiting
grantees, and their partners;
Continue assessment and analysis of needs and strengths of
CBCAP lead agencies and the Supporting Evidence-based Home
Visiting grantees;
Respond to T/TA requests and provide coordinated and
individualized T/TA that supports the implementation of
strategies for systems change;
Collaborate and regularly consult with the CB FPO, CB regional
offices, and other members of the T/TA Network;
Collaborate with other T/TA Members to develop individualized
strategies which address the specific needs of CBCAP leads and
the prevention system in their States;
Support grantees through various communication and knowledge
development strategies including web pages on the NRCCBCAP
website, teleconferences, webinars and newsletters;
Support the grantees in the development and implementation of
their annual meetings and direct their individual planning
committees in the identification of specific needs, issues, trends
and knowledge development related to child maltreatment
prevention and promoting evidence-based and evidence-
informed programs and practices;
Assist CBCAP leads and the Supporting Evidence-based Home
Visiting grantees in disseminating knowledge and promising
practices though peer-to-peer T/TA and conference
presentations;
Collaborate with Child Welfare Information Gateway to develop,
print, and disseminate the yearly Community Resource Packet
and website for child maltreatment prevention;
Actively participate in knowledge development, dissemination
and implementation initiatives, including contributing to and/or
coordinating with CDC's K2A Prevention Consortium;
Collaborate and coordinate with other Federal interagency efforts
related to child maltreatment prevention such as the Early
25
Childhood Systems Federal Partners Workgroup, and others as
specified by CB;
Annually review work plan incorporating the information gained
from T/TA and evaluation activities as well as findings from the
CFSR and other related systems change efforts;
Collect evaluation data and coordinate data collection with
National Cross Site Evaluator; and
Complete required reporting and distribute evaluation findings.
In its application, each applicant must describe how it will complete its
required and proposed activities within the planning and
implementation phases of the project. After the award of the
cooperative agreements and prior to implementation, plans may be
revised to accommodate coordination of activities with other grantees.
The applicant's plans will be subject to review, revision, and final
approval by CB.
Collaboration
NRCCBCAP will lead collaborative efforts in its area of topical expertise
and will partner with other T/TA Network members to address
important systemic and practice issues related to organizational
improvement but for which NRCCBCAP will not have principal
responsibility. In addition, NRCCBCAP will provide consultation to CB's
Implementation Centers and participate in collaborative assessment
activities and preparation that will support the execution of their
implementation projects. NRCCBCAP will work with Child Welfare
Information Gateway to ensure that products and resources are easily
accessible and effectively disseminated, and it will partner with the
National Child Welfare Resource Center for Tribes to support the
provision of effective, culturally competent, in-home services in Tribal
communities. NRCCBCAP will also explore opportunities to collaborate
with other T/TA Network members. For example, it will work with the
National Child Welfare Workforce Institute to consider training content
related to organizational improvement and NQICs to understand new
findings related to engaging nonresident fathers, establishing public-
private child welfare partnerships, implementing differential response,
and preventing maltreatment of young children. NRCCBCAP is also
expected to collaborate with the contractor conducting the national
cross-site evaluation of the Supporting Evidence-based Home Visiting
program.
26
NRCCBCAP is expected to build relationships with other Federal T/TA
providers external to CB's T/TA Network, especially those within the
Early Childhood Systems Federal Partners Workgroup. NRCCBCAP will
work with CB to identify and pursue T/TA partnerships across Federal
bureaus, offices, and agencies when appropriate.
Dissemination
NRCCBCAP will be a repository for information and resources and a
vehicle for dissemination for products that address a broad range of
issues related to its topical areas of responsibility in the T/TA Network.
NRCCBCAP is also expected to play a critical role in the dissemination
of evidence-based and evidence-informed practices.
Evidence-based practices are approaches to prevention or treatment
that are validated by some form of documented scientific evidence.
This could be findings established through scientific research, such as
controlled clinical studies, or other comparable and rigorous methods.
Evidence-informed practices use the best available research and
practice knowledge to guide program design and implementation
within context. This informed practice allows for innovation and
incorporates the lessons learned from the existing research literature.
CB expects NRCCBCAP to be point of contact for easily accessible,
well-organized, and user-friendly resources for States and Tribes. In
addition to storing and organizing information, NRCCBCAP will be
responsible for assessing the quality of its resources and for being
knowledgeable about their content. NRCCBCAP will make general
information about itself, the T/TA Network, applicable programs and
services, as well as specific training curricula, research, reports, tools,
or other resources widely available. NRCCBCAP is expected to consult
with Child Welfare Information Gateway and other T/TA Network
members to capitalize on opportunities to link useful information and
facilitate easy navigation by website users without unnecessarily
duplicating effort.
National cross-site evaluation
NRCCBCAP must allocate funds and devote sufficient resources to
participate fully in a national cross-site evaluation and to conduct its
own center-specific evaluation activities.
NRCCBCAP will participate fully in CB's National Cross-site Evaluation
of the T/TA Network. The cross-site evaluation employs a participatory
and utilization-focused approach to 1) evaluate the activities,
processes, and approaches of the CB T/TA Network members in their
27
efforts to successfully achieve systems change, and 2) examine the
degree to which networking, collaboration, information sharing,
adherence to common principles, and common messaging occurs
across the T/TA Network. The National Cross-site Evaluation of the
T/TA Network began its design phase in Federal fiscal year 2009.
NRCCBCAP will have regular contact with the cross-site evaluation
contractor and participate as an important stakeholder in the
evaluation. NRCCBCAP will be actively involved in the execution of the
cross-site evaluation, participating as necessary in the development of
evaluation instruments, collection of qualitative and quantitative
information, interpretation of data, and utilization of findings.
NRCCBCAP will be required to enter information into the T/TA
Network's automated data collection system within the timeframes set
by CB and the cross-site evaluation. CB expects regular and timely
reporting of on-site T/TA and other activities into the web-based
tracking system currently known as the Technical Assistance Tracking
Internet System (TATIS). NRCCBCAP will be responsible for including a
quality assurance component in its evaluation plan that tracks timely
and accurate reporting into the system.
Center-specific evaluation
In addition to performing evaluation activities that meet the
requirements of the cross-site evaluation, NRCCBCAP will conduct its
own center-specific evaluation activities. CB expects NRCCBCAP to
regularly evaluate its performance and to use this information to
improve its processes and services. NRCCBCAP will design and conduct
an evaluation using multiple measures, employing both qualitative and
quantitative methods, as necessary. Center-specific evaluation
activities must complement NRCCBCAP's participation in the cross-site
evaluation and avoid unnecessary duplication.
In its center-specific evaluation activities, NRCCBCAP will build on the
components of the national cross-site evaluation, addressing more
nuanced questions or examining different evaluation questions that are
likely to yield practical information and promote the improvement of
its T/TA modalities. Center-specific evaluation findings are expected to
be substantive, highlighting both project strengths and challenges.
During the course of the project period, NRCCBCAP will facilitate
communication for the purpose of T/TA improvement ("feedback
loops"), ensuring that its findings are shared with other members of
the T/TA Network and CB's central and regional offices. A list of
potential "domains" and examples of questions for center-specific
28
evaluation can be found in Section IV.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
APPROACH.
Upon award of the cooperative agreements, NRCCBCAP will share its
preliminary center-specific evaluation plans with other members of the
T/TA Network and the cross-site evaluation contractor. NRCs may
choose to include common evaluation components (i.e., methods,
collection tools, processes, outputs, and/or outcomes) in their center-
specific designs, particularly when evaluating joint activities and
collaborative T/TA that is provided to a State or Tribal child welfare
system by multiple T/TA Network members.
All evaluation plans must be approved by the FPO. Prior to beginning
its evaluation activities, NRCCBCAP will review and revise its center-
specific evaluation design in partnership with CB.
NRCCBCAP will regularly update its FPO about ongoing evaluation
activities and findings in required progress reporting and provide CB
with a written report at the end of the project. NRCs will collaborate
with each other, their State and Tribal partners, CB, the national
evaluation contractor, and other members of the T/TA Network when
necessary to produce a comprehensive evaluation report at the
conclusion of the project period and present findings to CB, the T/TA
Network, and other stakeholders.
Logic model
The applicant is required to submit in its application a logic model for
its planning and implementation. The logic model also must
accompany all subsequent submissions of plans related to this
announcement to CB.
Travel for Meetings and Presentations
Approximately six weeks after the award of the cooperative
agreement, NRCCBCAP project director, the project evaluator, and
representatives of other key partners and/or subcontractors involved
in the execution of the award, if applicable, will be required to attend a
one-day meeting with the FPO and other Federal staff in Washington,
D.C. The purpose of this meeting is to review and approve activities
and planning timelines in year one of the award and to clarify
expectations for the project.
Within six months of the award of the cooperative agreements, the
NRCCBCAP project director, project evaluator, and representatives of
other key partners and/or subcontractors involved in the execution of
the award, if applicable, must make an oral presentation to CB staff in
29
Washington, D.C., describing and supporting its implementation plans
for each of the major areas of activity.
The applicant's budget for the first 12-month budget period should
include anticipated costs for these two meetings, as well as costs for
two key staff persons to attend CB's annual grantee meeting, usually
held in the winter or spring in Washington, D.C. The focus of this
meeting is for CB grantees to network, discuss lessons learned,
and meet with their assigned FPO for monitoring purposes. In years
two through five of the cooperative agreement, NRCCBCAP is required
to send the project director and the project evaluator to the annual
grantee meeting.
In addition, the NRCCBCAP project director or another designated
representative will attend T/TA Network meetings held twice annually
in the Washington, D.C. metro area over the duration of the five-year
project period. All expenses related to attendance at these two-day
meetings also should be included in the applicant's proposed budget.
Project Requirements
The acceptance of funds for project responsive to this announcement
will signify the applicant's assurance that it will comply with the
following requirements:
1. Have the project fully functioning with 90 days following the
notification of the grant award.
2. Participate in any national evaluation or technical assistance
contract that relates to this program announcement.
3. Submit all performance indicator data, program evaluation, and
financial reports in a timely manner (See Section VI.3). CB will
accept the interim and final report on disk or electronically using
a standard word-processing program, however grantees are only
required to provide the original and two copies of performance
progress and final reports.
4. Submit an original and two copies of the final report, the final
evaluation report, and any program products to CB within 90
days of the project end date.
5. Allocate sufficient funds in the budget to provide for the project
director, the evaluator, and other key partners to attend the
meetings described in this program announcement.
30
6. Propose and justify a percentage of the project budget to be
allocated to program evaluation.
II. AWARD INFORMATION
Funding Instrument Type: Cooperative Agreement
Estimated Total Program Funding: $1,400,000
Expected Number of Awards: 1
Ceiling on Amount of Individual $1,400,000 per budget period
Awards:
Floor on Amount of Individual None
Awards:
Average Projected Award Amount: $1,400,000 per budget period
Length of Project Periods: 60-month project with five 12-month
budget periods
Other
Explanation of Other:
The cooperative agreement awarded will be for a project period of 60
months. The initial award will be for a 12-month budget period. The
award of continuation beyond each 12-month budget period will be
subject to satisfactory progress on the part of the awardee and a
determination that continued funding would be in the best interest of
the Federal Government.
Awards under this announcement are subject to the availability
of funds.
Description of Anticipated Substantial Involvement under the
Cooperative Agreement:
A cooperative agreement is a specific method of awarding Federal
assistance in which substantial Federal involvement is anticipated. A
cooperative agreement clearly defines the respective responsibilities of
CB and the grantee prior to the award. CB anticipates that agency
involvement will produce programmatic benefits to the recipient
31
otherwise unavailable to them for carrying out the project. The
involvement and collaboration includes:
CB review and approval of planning stages of the activities
before implementation phases may begin;
CB and recipient joint collaboration in the performance of key
programmatic activities (i.e., strategic planning, implementation,
information technology enhancements, T/TA, publications or
products, and evaluation);
Close monitoring by CB of the requirements stated in this
announcement that limit the grantee's discretion with respect to
scope of services offered, organizational structure, and
management processes; and
Close monitoring by CB during performance which may, in order
to ensure compliance with the intent of this funding, exceed
those Federal stewardship responsibilities customary for grant
activities.
Please see Section IV.5 for any restrictions on the use of funds for
awards made under this announcement.
III. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION
1. Eligible Applicants
Public and State controlled institutions of higher education
Nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than
institutions of higher education
Nonprofits without 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than
institutions of higher education
Private institutions of higher education
For profit organizations other than small businesses
Collaborative efforts and interdisciplinary approaches are acceptable.
Applications from collaborations must identify a primary applicant
responsible for administering the cooperative agreement.
Foreign entities are not eligible under this announcement.
32
Faith-based and community organizations are eligible to apply under
this announcement.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: None
3. Other:
Disqualification Factors
Applications with requests that exceed the ceiling on the amount of
individual awards referenced in Section II. Award Information will be
deemed non-responsive and will not be considered for funding under
this announcement.
Any application that fails to satisfy the deadline requirements
referenced in Section IV.3., Submission Dates and Times, will be
deemed non-responsive and will not be considered for funding under
this announcement.
IV. APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION
1. Address to Request Application Package:
ACYF Operations Center
c/o The Dixon Group, Inc.
ATTN: Children's Bureau
118 Q St., NE.
Washington, DC 20002-2132
Phone: 866-796-1591
Phone 2: or TTY 711
Email: cb@dixongroup.com
For hearing or speech impaired callers, contact the Federal Relay
Service at 1-800-877-8339 (TTY (Text Telephone) / ASCII (American
Standard Code For Information Interchange)).
2. Content and Form of Application Submission:
This section provides information on the required form and content of
application submissions. Applicants are required to submit one original
and two copies of all application materials if applying in hard-copy. The
original signature of the Authorized Organization Representative (AOR)
is required only on the original. Information on the required format,
Standard Forms (SFs) and other forms, D-U-N-S Requirement, Project
Description, Certifications, Assurances, Electronic Submission of
33
applications, and Hard Copy submission of applications is available in
this section. A Checklist of required application elements is available
for applicants' use in Section VIII of this announcement.
Each application must contain the following items in the order listed:
Application for Federal Assistance. (Standard Form (SF) 424, SF-
424A and SF-424-B). Follow the instructions that accompany the forms
and those in Section V, Application Review Information.
Certifications/Assurances. See Forms, Assurances, and
Certifications, below.
Table of Contents. List the major sections of the application, and
show the page that each section begins on.
Project Summary/Abstract. (one page maximum, double spaced).
See Section IV.2, Project Description. Clearly mark this page with the
applicant name as shown on SF-424, identify the program
announcement and the title of the proposed project as shown on SF-
424 and the service area as shown on SF-424. The summary
description should not exceed 300 words.
Care should be taken to produce a summary/abstract that accurately
and concisely reflects the proposed project.
The Project Description. Applicants should organize their project
description in this sequence: 1) Objectives and Need for Assistance; 2)
Approach; 3) Evaluation; 4) Organizational Profiles; and 5) Budget and
Budget Justification.
Budget and Budget Justification. Include information on the
required cost item of Travel for Meetings and Presentations (see
Section I.)
Indirect Charges. If claiming indirect costs, provide documentation
that the applicant currently has an indirect cost-rate approved by the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or another
cognizant Federal agency.
Third-Party Agreements. If applicable, include a letter of
commitment or Memorandum of Understanding from each partner
and/or contractor describing their role, detailing specific project tasks
to be performed, and expressing commitment to participate if the
proposed project is funded. Note: General letters of support not
expressing specific commitments are not required and will not be
considered by reviewers under the evaluation criteria.
34
Staff and Position Data. Include job descriptions and curriculum
vitae/ resumes for proposed project staff.
Page Limit. The length of the entire application package may be less
than but must not exceed 110 pages. This includes the required
Federal Standard Forms and certifications (SF-424, SF-424A, SF-424B,
and Certification Regarding Lobbying) table of contents, project
summary, project description, logic model, Gantt chart, budget/budget
justification, supplemental documentation, proof of non-profit status,
summaries of sub-grants and contracts, letters of agreement, and any
other pages included in the application package. All pages of the
application package must be sequentially numbered, beginning with
page one. All pages of each application will be counted to determine
total length. All pages exceeding the 110-page limit will be removed
and will not be considered in the reviewing process. A cover letter and
general letters of support are not required. Applicants are reminded
that if a cover letter and general letters of support are submitted, they
will count towards the 110-page limit.
Each applicant must organize its application in the order listed in this
section and number all application pages. Pages will be counted in the
order they are submitted in hard copy and numbered when received
electronically. All pages that exceed the page limit will be removed and
will not be reviewed.
General Content and Form Information. To be considered for
funding, each application must be submitted with the Standard Federal
Forms and must follow the guidance provided. The application must be
signed by an individual authorized to act for the applicant agency and
to assume responsibility for the obligations imposed by the terms and
conditions of the award.
The project description must be typed and double-spaced on a single
side of 8.5 x 11 inch plain white paper with a least one inch margins
on all sides, using black print with 12-point size Times New Roman
font.
For charts, budget tables, supplemental letters and documents,
applicants may use a different point size and font, but no less than 10-
point size and single spaced.
Applicants that deviate from this format and page limit requirements
risk having pages removed from their applications.
All copies of an application must be submitted in a single package. A
separate package must be submitted for each funding opportunity. The
35
package must be clearly labeled for the specific funding opportunity it
is addressing.
Because each application will be duplicated, do not use or include
separate covers, binders, clips, tabs, plastic inserts, maps, brochures,
or any other items that cannot be processed easily on a photocopy
machine with an automatic feed. Do not bind, clip, staple, or fasten in
any way separate subsections of the application, including supporting
documentation. Use a clip (not a staple) to securely bind the
application together. Applicants are advised that the copies of the
application submitted, not the original, will be reproduced by the
Federal Government for review.
Tips for Preparing a Competitive Application. It is essential that
applicants read the entire announcement package carefully before
preparing an application and include all of the required application
forms and attachments. The application must reflect a thorough
understanding of and support the purpose and objectives of the
applicable legislation. Reviewers expect applicants to understand the
goals of the legislation and the Children's Bureau's interest in each
topic. A "responsive application" is one that addresses and follows all
of the evaluation criteria in ways that demonstrate this understanding.
Applications that are considered to be "unresponsive" or do not clearly
address the evaluation criteria or program requirements generally
receive very low scores and are rarely funded.
CB's website (http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb) provides a wide
range of information and links to other relevant websites. Before
preparing an application, applicants can learn more about CB's mission
and programs by exploring the website.
Organizing the Application. Reviewers will use the specific
evaluation criteria in Section V of this funding announcement to review
and evaluate each application. The applicant should address each of
these specific evaluation criteria in the project description. Applicants
should organize their project description in this sequence: 1)
Objectives and Need for Assistance; 2) Approach; 3) Evaluation; 4)
Organizational Profiles; and 5) Budget and Budget Justification. The
applicant must use the same headings as these criteria, so that
reviewers can readily find information that directly addresses each of
the specific review criteria.
Logic Model. A logic model is a tool that presents the conceptual
framework for a proposed project and explains the linkages among
program elements. While there are many versions of the logic model,
they generally summarize the logical connections among the needs
36
that are the focus of the project, project goals and objectives, the
target population, project inputs (resources), the proposed
activities/processes/outputs directed toward the target population, the
expected short- and long-term outcomes the initiative is designed to
achieve, and the evaluation plan for measuring the extent to which
proposed processes and outcomes actually occur. Information on the
development of logic models is available on the Internet at
http://childwelfare.gov/preventing/developing/toolkit/.
Evaluation. Project evaluations are very important. If the applicant
does not have the in-house capacity to conduct an objective,
comprehensive evaluation of the project, then CB advises that the
applicant contract with a third-party evaluator specializing in social
science or evaluation, or a university or college, to conduct the
evaluation. In either case, it is important that the evaluator has the
necessary independence from the project to assure objectivity. A
skilled evaluator can help develop a logic model and assist in designing
an evaluation strategy that is rigorous and appropriate given the goals
and objectives of the proposed project. Additional assistance may be
found in a document titled "Program Manager's Guide to Evaluation." A
copy of this document can be accessed at
www.childwelfare.gov/preventing/developing/toolkit/.
Protection of Human Subjects. See "Certifications" later in this
section. General information about HHS Protection of Human Subjects
regulations can be obtained at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/. Applicants
may also contact OHRP by email (ohrp@csophs.dhhs.gov) or by phone
(240-453-6900) or by Toll-Free Telephone within the U.S. (866-447-
4777.
Electronic Submission
Applicants that submit their application electronically are advised to be
sure they secure and retain their service ticket number for reference
whenever they have any interaction with the Grants.gov Contact
Center.
Non-Federal Reviewers
Since ACF will be using non-Federal reviewers in the review process,
applicants have the option of omitting from the application copies (not
the original) specific salary rates or amounts for individuals specified in
the application budget as well as Social Security Numbers, if otherwise
required for individuals. The copies may include summary salary
information.
37
If applicants are submitting their application electronically, ACF will
omit the same specific salary rate information from copies made for
use during the review and selection process.
Forms
Applicants seeking financial assistance under this announcement must
file the appropriate Standard Forms (SFs) as described in this
section. All applicants must submit an SF-424, Application for Federal
Assistance. For non-construction programs, applicants must also
submit an SF-424A, Budget Information and an SF-424B,
Assurances. For construction programs, applicants must also submit
SF-424C, Budget Information and SF-424D, Assurances. All required
Standard Forms are available at:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html.
Non-profit private organizations (not including private universities) are
encouraged to submit the "Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
Applicants" with their applications. Applicants using a hard copy
application, place the completed survey in an envelope labeled
"Applicant Survey." Seal the envelope and include it along with your
application package. Applicants applying electronically, please submit
this survey along with your application. The Survey may be found at
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html.
D-U-N-S Requirement
All applicants must have a D&B Data Universal Numbering System (D-
U-N-S) number. A D-U-N-S number is required whether an applicant
is submitting a paper application or using the government-wide
electronic portal, Grants.gov. A D-U-N-S number is required for every
application for a new award or renewal/continuation of an award,
including applications or plans under formula, entitlement, and block
grant programs. A D-U-N-S number may be acquired at no cost by
calling the dedicated toll-free D-U-N-S number request line at 1-866-
705-5711 or you may request a number online at
http://www.dnb.com.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Part I THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION OVERVIEW
PURPOSE
The project description provides the majority of information by which
an application is evaluated and ranked in competition with other
applications for available assistance. The project description should be
38
concise and complete. It should address the activity for which Federal
funds are being requested. Supporting documents should be included
where they can present information clearly and succinctly. In
preparing the project description, information that is responsive to
each of the requested evaluation criteria must be provided. Awarding
offices use this and other information in making their funding
recommendations. It is important, therefore, that this information be
included in the application in a manner that is clear and complete.
GENERAL EXPECTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
ACF is particularly interested in specific project descriptions that focus
on outcomes and convey strategies for achieving intended
performance. Project descriptions are evaluated on the basis of
substance and measurable outcomes, not length. Extensive exhibits
are not required. Cross-referencing should be used rather than
repetition. Supporting information concerning activities that will not be
directly funded by the grant or information that does not directly
pertain to an integral part of the grant-funded activity should be
placed in an appendix.
Part II GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING A FULL PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
INTRODUCTION
Applicants that are required to submit a full project description shall
prepare the project description statement in accordance with the
following instructions while being aware of the specified evaluation
criteria. The text options give a broad overview of what the project
description should include while the evaluation criteria identify the
measures that will be used to evaluate applications.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List the contents of the application including corresponding page
numbers.
PROJECT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT
Provide a summary of the project description (one page or less) with
reference to the funding request.
OBJECTIVES AND NEED FOR ASSISTANCE
Clearly identify the physical, economic, social, financial, institutional,
and/or other problem(s) requiring a solution. The need for assistance
must be demonstrated and the principal and subordinate objectives of
39
the project must be clearly stated; supporting documentation, such as
letters of support and testimonials from concerned interests other than
the applicant, may be included. Any relevant data based on planning
studies should be included or referred to in the endnotes/footnotes.
Incorporate demographic data and participant/beneficiary information,
as needed. In developing the project description, the applicant may
volunteer or be requested to provide information on the total range of
projects currently being conducted and supported (or to be initiated),
some of which may be outside the scope of the program
announcement.
APPROACH
Outline a plan of action that describes the scope and detail of how the
proposed work will be accomplished. Account for all functions or
activities identified in the application. Cite factors that might accelerate
or decelerate the work and state your reason for taking the proposed
approach rather than others. Describe any unusual features of the
project such as design or technological innovations, reductions in cost
or time, or extraordinary social and community involvement.
To illustrate project schedules, applicants may include charts, such as
a Gantt chart, or a bar chart or other chart. In describing their center-
specific evaluation plans, applicants may choose to address the
following list of potential "domains" and examples of questions for
center-specific evaluation (the domains these questions would address
are in parentheses): 1. To what extent was T/TA individualized or
tailored to the needs of the State or Tribe that was served? (Fit) 2.
How comprehensive is NRC's knowledge and resources in its area(s) of
topical child welfare expertise? Is the scope of resources sufficient to
serve its clients' needs? (Scope - Topical Service Array 3. How
effectively did NRC's T/TA meet the need(s) identified by the State or
Tribe? (Effectiveness) 4. What was the quality of the T/TA provided?
What was the quality of the consultation provided by individual NRC
employees and contracted consultants? What was the quality of the
products created by each NRC? (Quality Assurance) 5. How effective
was NRC in collecting and disseminating information about evidence-
based and promising practice in its areas of child welfare expertise?
(Evidence-Based Practice) 6. How well did NRC assess the needs of its
client? Were other T/TA Network members or other resources
involved, as necessary? (Comprehensive assessment and
responsiveness) 7. How effectively did NRC share information about
the process and the results of providing T/TA? Did feedback help
inform future decisions about T/TA? (Communication) 8. How
effectively did NRC collaborate with other T/TA Network members in its
40
provision of T/TA? How well did NRCs collaborate across their
evaluation activities, particularly when a State or Tribe is served by
multiple T/TA Network providers? (Collaboration) 9. How effective was
NRC in helping States and Tribes implement steps in their plans for
corrective action and systemic change? How effective was NRC in
helping systems improve their performance in response to federal
requirements (i.e., CFSR, IV-E, SACWIS, AFCARS, etc.)?
(Implementation and improvement) 10. To what degree did NRC
adhere to SOC and CFSR principles? (Principles)
Provide quantitative monthly or quarterly projections of the
accomplishments to be achieved for each function or activity in such
terms as the number of people to be served and the number of
activities accomplished.
When accomplishments cannot be quantified by activity or function,
list them in chronological order to show the schedule of
accomplishments and their target dates.
If any data is to be collected, maintained, and/or disseminated,
clearance may be required from OMB. This clearance pertains to any
"collection of information that is conducted or sponsored by ACF."
Provide a list of organizations, cooperating entities, consultants, or
other key individuals who will work on the project along with a short
description of the nature of their effort or contribution.
EVALUATION
Provide a narrative addressing how the conduct of the project and the
results of the project will be evaluated. In addressing the evaluation
of results, state how you will determine the extent to which the project
has achieved its stated objectives and the extent to which the
accomplishment of objectives can be attributed to the project. Discuss
the criteria to be used to evaluate results, and explain the
methodology that will be used to determine if the needs identified and
discussed are being met and if the project results and benefits are
being achieved. With respect to the conduct of the project, define the
procedures to be employed to determine whether the project is being
conducted in a manner consistent with the work plan presented and
discuss the impact of the project's various activities that address the
project's effectiveness.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The following are requests for additional information that must be
included in the application:
41
ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATION
Applicants must provide the following as certification of their
eligibility under this program announcement. Please provide:
Proof of Non-Profit Status
Non-profit organizations applying for funding are required to
submit proof of their non-profit status. Proof of non-profit status
is any one of the following:
A reference to the applicant organization's listing in the
IRS's most recent list of tax-exempt organizations
described in the IRS Code.
A copy of a currently valid IRS tax-exemption certificate.
A statement from a State taxing body, State attorney
general, or other appropriate State official certifying that
the applicant organization has non-profit status and that
none of the net earnings accrue to any private
shareholders or individuals.
A certified copy of the organization's certificate of
incorporation or similar document that clearly establishes
non-profit status.
Any of the items in the subparagraphs immediately above
for a State or national parent organization and a statement
signed by the parent organization that the applicant
organization is a local non-profit affiliate.
When applying electronically, proof of non-profit status may be
submitted as an attachment; however, proof of non-profit status
must be submitted prior to award.
LOGIC MODEL
Applicants are expected to use a model for designing and
managing their project. A logic model is a tool that presents the
conceptual framework for a proposed project and explains the
linkages among program elements. While there are many
versions of the logic model, they generally summarize the logical
connections among the needs that are the focus of the project,
project goals and objectives, the target population, project
inputs (resources), the proposed activities/processes/outputs
directed toward the target population, the expected short- and
42
long-term outcomes the initiative is designed to achieve, and the
evaluation plan for measuring the extent to which proposed
processes and outcomes actually occur.
STAFF AND POSITION DATA
Provide a biographical sketch and job description for each key
person appointed. Job descriptions for each vacant key position
should be included as well. As new key staff is appointed,
biographical sketches will also be required.
ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILES
Provide information on the applicant organization(s) and
cooperating partners, such as: organizational charts; financial
statements; audit reports or statements from Certified Public
Accountants/Licensed Public Accountants; Employer
Identification Number(s); contact persons and telephone
numbers; names of bond carriers; child care licenses and other
documentation of professional accreditation; information on
compliance with Federal/State/local government standards;
documentation of experience in the program area; and, other
pertinent information.
DISSEMINATION PLAN
Provide a plan for distributing reports and other project outputs
to colleagues and to the public. Applicants must provide a
description of the method, volume, and timing of distribution.
THIRD-PARTY AGREEMENTS
Provide written and signed agreements between grantees and
subgrantees, or subcontractors, or other cooperating entities.
These agreements must detail the scope of work to be
performed, work schedules, remuneration, and other terms and
conditions that structure or define the relationship.
BUDGET AND BUDGET JUSTIFICATION
Provide a budget with line-item detail and detailed calculations for
each budget object class identified on the Budget Information Form
(SF-424A or SF-424C). Detailed calculations must include estimation
methods, quantities, unit costs, and other similar quantitative detail
sufficient for the calculation to be duplicated. If matching is a
requirement, include a breakout by the funding sources identified in
Block 15 of the SF-424.
43
Provide a narrative budget justification that describes how the
categorical costs are derived. Discuss the necessity, reasonableness,
and allocation of the proposed costs.
GENERAL
Use the following guidelines for preparing the budget and budget
justification. Both Federal and non-Federal resources (when
required) shall be detailed and justified in the budget and budget
narrative justification. "Federal resources" refers only to the
ACF grant funds for which you are applying. "Non-Federal
resources" are all other non-ACF Federal and non-Federal
resources. It is suggested that budget amounts and
computations be presented in a columnar format: first column,
object class categories; second column, Federal budget; next
column(s), non-Federal budget(s); and last column, total
budget. The budget justification should be in a narrative form.
PERSONNEL
Description: Costs of employee salaries and wages.
Justification: Identify the project director or principal
investigator, if known at the time of application. For each staff
person, provide: the title; time commitment to the project in
months; time commitment to the project as a percentage or full-
time equivalent; annual salary; grant salary; wage rates;
etc. Do not include the costs of consultants, personnel costs of
delegate agencies, or of specific project(s) and/or businesses to
be financed by the applicant.
FRINGE BENEFITS
Description: Costs of employee fringe benefits unless treated as
part of an approved indirect cost rate.
Justification: Provide a breakdown of the amounts and
percentages that comprise fringe benefit costs such as health
insurance, FICA, retirement insurance, taxes, etc.
TRAVEL
Description: Costs of project-related travel by employees of the
applicant organization. (This item does not include costs of
consultant travel).
Justification: For each trip show: the total number of
traveler(s); travel destination; duration of trip; per diem;
mileage allowances, if privately owned vehicles will be used; and
other transportation costs and subsistence allowances. If
44
appropriate for this project, travel costs for key staff to attend
ACF-sponsored workshops should be detailed in the budget.
EQUIPMENT
Description: "Equipment" means an article of nonexpendable,
tangible personal property having a useful life of more than one
year and an acquisition cost that equals or exceeds the lesser
of: (a) the capitalization level established by the organization
for the financial statement purposes, or (b) $5,000. (Note:
Acquisition cost means the net invoice unit price of an item of
equipment, including the cost of any modifications, attachments,
accessories, or auxiliary apparatus necessary to make it usable
for the purpose for which it is acquired. Ancillary charges, such
as taxes, duty, protective in-transit insurance, freight, and
installation, shall be included in or excluded from acquisition cost
in accordance with the organization's regular written accounting
practices.)
Justification: For each type of equipment requested provide: a
description of the equipment; the cost per unit; the number of
units; the total cost; and a plan for use on the project; as well as
use and/or disposal of the equipment after the project ends. An
applicant organization that uses its own definition for equipment
should provide a copy of its policy, or section of its policy, that
includes the equipment definition.
SUPPLIES
Description: Costs of all tangible personal property other than
that included under the Equipment category.
Justification: Specify general categories of supplies and their
costs. Show computations and provide other information that
supports the amount requested.
CONTRACTUAL
Description: Costs of all contracts for services and goods except
for those that belong under other categories such as equipment,
supplies, construction, etc. Include third-party evaluation
contracts, if applicable, and contracts with secondary recipient
organizations, including delegate agencies and specific project(s)
and/or businesses to be financed by the applicant.
Justification: Demonstrate that all procurement transactions will
be conducted in a manner to provide, to the maximum extent
practical, open and free competition. Recipients and
subrecipients, other than States that are required to use 45 CFR
45
Part 92 procedures, must justify any anticipated procurement
action that is expected to be awarded without competition and
exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold fixed at 41 USC
403(11), currently set at $100,000.
Recipients might be required to make available to ACF pre-award
review and procurement documents, such as requests for
proposals or invitations for bids, independent cost estimates,
etc.
Note: Whenever the applicant intends to delegate part of the
project to another agency, the applicant must provide a detailed
budget and budget narrative for each delegate agency, by
agency title, along with the required supporting information
referred to in these instructions.
OTHER
Enter the total of all other costs. Such costs, where applicable
and appropriate, may include but are not limited to: insurance;
food; medical and dental costs (noncontractual); professional
services costs; space and equipment rentals; printing and
publication; computer use; training costs, such as tuition and
stipends; staff development costs; and administrative costs.
Justification: Provide computations, a narrative description and
a justification for each cost under this category.
INDIRECT CHARGES
Description: Total amount of indirect costs. This category
should be used only when the applicant currently has an indirect
cost rate approved by the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) or another cognizant Federal agency.
Justification: An applicant that will charge indirect costs to the
grant must enclose a copy of the current rate agreement. If the
applicant organization is in the process of initially developing or
renegotiating a rate, upon notification that an award will be
made, it should immediately develop a tentative indirect cost
rate proposal based on its most recently completed fiscal year, in
accordance with the cognizant agency's guidelines for
establishing indirect cost rates, and submit it to the cognizant
agency. Applicants awaiting approval of their indirect cost
proposals may also request indirect costs. When an indirect cost
rate is requested, those costs included in the indirect cost pool
should not be charged as direct costs to the grant. Also, if the
applicant is requesting a rate that is less than what is allowed
46
under the program, the authorized representative of the
applicant organization must submit a signed acknowledgement
that the applicant is accepting a lower rate than allowed.
PROGRAM INCOME
Description: The estimated amount of income, if any, expected
to be generated from this project.
Justification: Describe the nature, source and anticipated use of
program income in the budget or refer to the pages in the
application that contain this information.
(As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. 104-
13, the public reporting burden for the Project Description is estimated
to average 40 hours per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
reviewing the collection information. The Project Description
information collection is approved under OMB control number 0970-
0139, which expires 4/30/2010. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.)
Certifications
Applicants must furnish, prior to award, an executed copy of the
Certification Regarding Lobbying. Applicants must sign and return the
certification with their application. If any funds have been paid or will
be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an
officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or
employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with this commitment providing for the United States to
insure or guarantee a loan, the applicant shall complete and submit
Standard Form (SF)-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in
accordance with its instructions. The Certification Regarding Lobbying
may be found at:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html.
When required for programs that involve human subjects, the
Protection of Human Subjects Assurance Identification/IRB
Certification/Declaration of Exemption form must be submitted. All
forms may be reproduced for use in submitting
applications. Applicants must sign and return the appropriate standard
forms with their application. The Protection of Human Subjects
Assurance Identification/IRB Certification/Declaration of Exemption
(Common Rule) form may be found at:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html.
47
Assurances
By signing and submitting the application, applicants are making the
appropriate certification of their compliance with all Federal statutes
relating to nondiscrimination.
The Pro-Children Act of 1994, 20 U.S.C. 7183, imposes restrictions on
smoking in facilities where federally funded children's services are
provided. HHS grants are subject to these requirements only if they
meet the Act's specified coverage. The Act specifies that smoking is
prohibited in any indoor facility (owned, leased, or contracted for)
used for the routine or regular provision of kindergarten, elementary,
or secondary education or library services to children under the age of
18. In addition, smoking is prohibited in any indoor facility or portion
of a facility (owned, leased, or contracted for) used for the routine or
regular provision of federally funded health care, day care, or early
childhood development, including Head Start services to children under
the age of 18. The statutory prohibition also applies if such facilities
are constructed, operated, or maintained with Federal funds. The
statute does not apply to children's services provided in private
residences, facilities funded solely by Medicare or Medicaid funds,
portions of facilities used for inpatient drug or alcohol treatment, or
facilities where WIC coupons are redeemed. Failure to comply with the
provisions of the law may result in the imposition of a civil monetary
penalty of up to $1,000 per violation and/or the imposition of an
administrative compliance order on the responsible entity. Additional
information may be found in the HHS Grants Policy Statement at:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_related.html.
Electronic Submission
Applicants to ACF may submit their applications in either electronic or
paper (hard copy) format. To submit an application electronically,
applicants must use the http://www.Grants.gov site. ACF will not
accept applications via facsimile or email.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Before submitting an application electronically,
applicants must complete the organization registration process as well
as obtain and register "electronic signature credentials" for the
Authorized Organization Representative (AOR). Applicants also must
be registered in the Central Contractor Registry (CCR). CCR
registration must be updated annually. Applicants will not be
able to upload an application to Grants.gov without current CCR
registration and electronic signature credentials for the
AOR. This process may take more than five business days, so it
48
is important to start this process early, well in advance of the
application deadline.
Be sure to complete all Grants.gov registration processes listed
on the Organization Registration Checklist
at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/registration_checklist.html.
Applicants will be able to download a copy of the application package,
complete it off-line, and then upload and submit the application via the
Grants.gov site.
If planning to submit an application electronically via
http://www.Grants.gov:
It is strongly recommended that applicants do not wait
until the application due date to begin the application
process through Grants.gov. Applicants are encouraged to
submit their applications well before the closing date and time so
that, if difficulties are encountered, there will still be sufficient
time to submit a hard copy via express mail.
In order to address any difficulties that may be
encountered during the submission process, it may be to
an applicant's advantage to submit their applications 24
hours ahead of the closing date and time.
Applicants are encouraged to check the Grants.gov webpage for
announcements concerning system issues and updates that may
affect the submission of applications.
Checklists and registration brochures are maintained at the
Grants.gov website to assist applicants in the registration
process and may be found at:
http://www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp
If any difficulties are encountered in using Grants.gov, contact
the Grants.gov Contact Center at: 1-800-518-4726, or by email
at support@grants.gov, to report the problem and obtain
assistance. Remember to retain your service ticket number
for reference whenever you have any interaction with the
Grants.gov Contact Center.
Electronic submission is voluntary, but strongly
encouraged. Applicants will not receive additional point value for
submitting an application in electronic format, nor will ACF
penalize any applicant that submits an application in hard copy.
49
Applicants may access the electronic application and
downloadable application package for this program
announcement by using the FIND function at
http://www.Grants.gov.
Applicants may submit all required documents electronically,
including all information typically included on the SF-424s,
narratives, charts, etc.
Electronic formats for the application attachments, such as
narratives, charts, etc., should use standard software formats,
e.g., Microsoft (Word and Excel), Word Perfect, Adobe PDF,
JPEG, and GIF, etc..
Though applying electronically, the application must still comply
with any page limitation requirements described in this program
announcement.
When submitting an application via Grants.gov, applicants must
comply with all due dates AND times referenced in Section
IV.3. Submission Dates and Times of this program
announcement.
Applicants that must demonstrate proof of non-profit status may
submit proof at the time of application by attaching the
documentation to the electronic application, if they wish to do
so. Proof of non-profit status, and any other required
documentation, may be scanned and attached as an "Other
Attachment." Assurances, certifications, and/or proof of non-
profit status that are not submitted electronically at the time of
application, are required to be submitted to ACF by the time of
award and in hard copy. Acceptable types of proof of non-profit
status are stated earlier in this section of the program
announcement under "Eligibility Certification."
It is strongly recommended that the applicant retain a printed
hard copy of the application in case a hard copy must be
submitted to ACF.
After the application is submitted electronically, the applicant will
receive two emails from Grants.gov:
An automatic acknowledgement of the application's submission
that will provide a Grants.gov tracking number.
50
An acknowledgement that the submitted application package has
passed or failed a series of checks and validations.
ACF will retrieve the electronically submitted application from
Grants.gov. Applicants will receive an email notification from ACF
acknowledging that ACF has received the application.
ACF may request that the applicant provide original signatures on
forms at a later date.
The Grants.gov website complies with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973. Grants.gov webpages are designed to work with
assistive technologies such as screen readers. If an applicant uses
assistive technology and is unable to access any material on the site,
contact the Grants.gov Contact Center at support@grants.gov for
assistance.
Hard Copy Submission of Applications
Applicants that are submitting their application in paper format should
submit one original and two copies of the complete application with all
attachments, unless directed otherwise. The original and each of the
two copies must include all required forms, certifications, assurances,
and appendices, be signed by the Authorized Organization
Representative (AOR), and be unbound. The original copy of the
application must have original signature(s). See Section IV.6 of this
announcement for address information for application submissions.
Please refer to Section VIII for a checklist of application requirements,
their location and due dates that applicants may use in developing and
organizing application materials.
Please refer to Section IV.3 for details concerning acknowledgement of
received applications.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Due Date for Applications: 05/26/2009
Explanation of Due Dates
The due date for receipt of applications is referenced
above. Applications received after 4:30 p.m., eastern time, on the
due date will be classified as late and will not be considered in the
current competition.
51
Applicants are responsible for ensuring that applications are mailed or
hand-delivered or submitted electronically well in advance of the
application due date and time.
Mail
Applications that are submitted by mail must be received no later than
4:30 p.m., eastern time, on the due date referenced above at the
address listed in Section IV.6.
Hand Delivery
Applications hand carried by applicants, applicant couriers, other
representatives of the applicant, or by overnight/express mail couriers
must be received on or before the due date referenced above, between
the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., eastern time, at the address
referenced in Section IV.6., between Monday and Friday (excluding
Federal holidays).
Electronic Submission
Applications submitted electronically via Grants.gov must be submitted
no later than 4:30 p.m., eastern time, on the due date referenced
above.
ACF cannot accommodate transmission of applications by facsimile or
email.
Late Applications
Applications that do not meet the requirements above are considered
late applications. ACF shall notify each late applicant that its
application will not be considered in the current competition.
ANY APPLICATION RECEIVED AFTER 4:30 P.M., EASTERN TIME,
ON THE DUE DATE WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR
COMPETITION.
Extension of Deadlines
ACF may extend application deadlines when circumstances such as
acts of God (floods, hurricanes, etc.) occur; when there are
widespread disruptions of mail service; or in other rare cases. A
determination to extend or waive deadline requirements rests with the
Chief Grants Management Officer.
Acknowledgement of Received Application
52
ACF will not provide acknowledgement of receipt of hard copy
application packages submitted via mail, courier services, or by hand
delivery. Applicants who submit their application packages
electronically via http://www.Grants.gov will receive two email
acknowledgements from that website:
An automatic acknowledgement of the application's submission
that will provide a Grants.gov tracking number.
An acknowledgement that the submitted application package has
passed or failed a series of checks and validations.
4. Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs:
State Single Point of Contact (SPOC)
This program is covered under Executive Order (E.O.) 12372,
"Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs," and 45 CFR Part
100, "Intergovernmental Review of Department of Health and Human
Services Programs and Activities". Under the Executive Order, States
may design their own processes for reviewing and commenting on
proposed Federal assistance under covered programs.
Applicants should go to the following URL for the official list of the
jurisdictions that have elected to participate in E.O. 12372
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants_spoc/.
Applicants from participating jurisdictions should contact their SPOC,
as soon as possible, to alert them of their prospective applications and
to receive instructions on their jurisdiction's procedures. Applicants
must submit all required application materials to the SPOC and
indicate the date of submission on the Standard Form (SF) 424 at item
19.
Under 45 CFR 100.8(a)(2), a SPOC has 60 days from the application
due date to comment on proposed new awards.
SPOC comments may be submitted directly to ACF to: U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children
and Families, Office of Grants Management, Division of Discretionary
Grants, 370 L'Enfant Promenade SW., 6th Floor East, Washington, DC
20447.
Entities that meet the eligibility requirements of this announcement
are still eligible to apply for a grant even if a State, Territory or
Commonwealth, etc., does not have a SPOC or has chosen not to
participate in the process. Applicants from non-participating
53
jurisdictions need take no action with regard to E.O.
12372. Applications from Federally-recognized Indian Tribal
governments are not subject to E.O. 12372.
5. Funding Restrictions:
Costs of organized fund raising, including financial campaigns,
endowment drives, solicitation of gifts and bequests, and similar
expenses incurred solely to raise capital or obtain contributions, are
unallowable under this grant award.
Grant awards will not allow reimbursement of pre-award costs.
Construction is not an allowable activity or expenditure under this
grant award.
Purchase of real property is not an allowable activity or expenditure
under this grant award.
6. Other Submission Requirements:
Submit applications to one of the following addresses:
Submission by Mail
ACYF Operations Center
c/o The Dixon Group, Inc.
ATTN: Children's Bureau
118 Q St., NE.
Washington, DC 20002-2132
Hand Delivery
ACYF Operations Center
c/o The Dixon Group, Inc.
ATTN: Children's Bureau
118 Q St., NE.
Washington, DC 20002-2132
Electronic Submission
See Section IV.2 for application requirements and for guidance when
submitting applications electronically via http://www.Grants.gov.
For all submissions, see Section IV.3 for information on due dates.
54
V. APPLICATION REVIEW INFORMATION
1. CRITERIA:
In considering how applicants will carry out the responsibilities
addressed under this announcement, competing applications for
financial assistance will be reviewed and evaluated against the
following criteria:
OBJECTIVES AND NEED FOR ASSISTANCE - 20 points
In reviewing the objectives and need for assistance, reviewers will
consider the extent to which:
1) The application demonstrates a clear understanding of the need
for providing training and technical assistance to public and private
agencies linked to the CBCAP program, and demonstrates a clear
understanding of the goals of the legislative mandate.
2) The applicant demonstrates a strong understanding of 1) the
SOC framework, systems thinking, and the CFSR principles that will
guide the project's activities, and 2) the structure and purpose of the
T/TA Network.
3) The applicant demonstrates a thorough understanding of
implementation, systemic intervention, and organizational change and
the barriers that prevent systemic change from occurring.
4) The applicant presents a clear, concise, and appropriate vision
for the proposed project and discusses the overall vision for the
training and technical assistance approach will effectively enable
CBCAP Lead Agencies to fulfill the requirements of the program.
5) The T/TA objectives of the project will effectively build the
capacity of State CBCAP Lead Agencies to support effective evidence-
based and evidence-informed community-based efforts and initiatives
aimed at the prevention of child abuse and neglect.
6) The applicant provides a clear description of the activities and
services to be provided to the CBCAP Lead Agencies, the Supporting
Evidence-based Home Visiting grantees, and their partners. The
activities and services are linked to a reasonable statement of the
goals (the intended end products of an effective project) and
objectives (measurable steps for reaching these goals) of the proposed
project.
APPROACH - 40 points
55
In reviewing the approach, reviewers will consider the extent to which:
1) The applicant clearly demonstrates that it would function as a
member of "one T/TA Network" as described in the Background section
of this funding opportunity announcement. The application includes a
detailed description of how it would collaborate, coordinate its T/TA,
perform project activities that complement the work of its CB T/TA
Network partners, subscribe to common principles, and participate
fully in common messaging that would clearly identify itself with the
T/TA Network.
2) The applicant provides a clear and reasonable timeline (e.g.
charts such as a Gantt chart, bar chart or other chart that illustrates
project schedules) for implementing the proposed project, including
the activities to be conducted in chronological order, showing a
reasonable schedule of accomplishments and target dates and the
factors that may accelerate or decelerate the work.
3) The application provides a workable plan of action. The plan
relates to the stated objectives and scope of the project and reflects
the intent of the legislative mandates.
4) The application presents a sound and feasible Planning Phase
and Implementation Phase that is consistent with the expectations
described in this announcement.
5) The application describes sound strategies for effectively
providing technical assistance and building the capacity of State, and
local public and private agencies to create and support excellent
networks of coordinated resources and activities designed to
strengthen and support families to prevent child abuse and neglect.
6) The applicant details how its TA will be highly accessible,
coordinated, and individualized. The applicant explains how T/TA
Network members and stakeholders will be engaged and facilitated to
support its CBCAP Lead Agencies and their partners and how the
duplication of efforts and services will be avoided. The applicant's
approach to TA is client-directed and includes sound plans for
supporting CBCAP Lead Agencies and their partners with expert
consultation in assessment, strategic planning, and implementation
that is likely to result in systemic change.
7) The applicant demonstrates a commitment to follow all approval
and coordination procedures for T/TA requests and work
collaboratively with any national T/TA coordinating entity that CB
chooses to establish during the course of the project period.
56
8) The application describes strategies to help lead agencies
promote the movement towards evidence-based and evidence-
informed programs and practices and describes the technical
assistance strategies to successfully adopt, implement, and sustain
these programs. These strategies include plans for technical
assistance to the Supporting Evidence-based Home Visiting
discretionary grant program/
9) The application describes a sound process for providing technical
assistance to the lead agencies on the development and
implementation of evaluation processes that will determine the efficacy
and impact of their networks, programs, and activities. These
evaluation processes encompass a continuum of approaches from self-
assessment, peer reviews, outcome accountability, and other
quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods.
10) The applicant provides a convincing plan for delivering
intensive TA to its State and/or Tribal partners. The applicant
describes the types of TA that it expects to provide and the frequency
and intensity of services that will be available.
11) The application describes effective strategies to help lead
agencies develop a child-focused, family-centered approach to the
delivery of child abuse prevention programs and activities that
reinforce and complement the State's efforts to provide services to
preserve and support families. The plan includes strategies that will
enhance the lead agency's capacity to promote protective factors and
reduce risk factors for child maltreatment at the individual,
community, and societal levels. The plan includes strategies that
promote parent leadership and involve parents in the planning,
implementation, and evaluation of funded programs.
12) The project would promote: (1) interagency collaboration and
implementation of new procedures for blending and leveraging funding
streams; (2) collaborative long-range planning of child abuse
prevention, family support services and service delivery options; and
(3) management improvement strategies that facilitate interagency
coordination. The awardee would assist Lead Agencies to become more
active participants in various systems change efforts such as the CFSR,
PIPs, CFSP, the ECCS Plan, and other related Federal and State
initiatives.
13) The applicant demonstrates a commitment to developing
protocols and other joint efforts for coordinated T/TA to States and
Tribes with other members of the T/TA Network.
57
14) The applicant presents a sound plan for promoting, strengthening,
and formalizing peer-to-peer consultation and problem-solving across
State CBCAP Lead Agencies, the Supporting Evidence-based Home
Visiting grantees and their partners. The applicant should propose
networking activities that are likely to increase peer-to-peer learning
and transfer of knowledge and communication across these groups.
15) The applicant's networking plan demonstrates a sophisticated
understanding of the barriers to successful consultation and
partnership across jurisdictions. The applicant proposes feasible
approaches or steps to building a collaborative network that take these
barriers into consideration.
16) The application describes a sound plan for establishing an
advisory panel that will provide useful overall program direction and
guidance to the activities of the resource center. The application
describes effective strategies for efficiently and effectively utilizing
their expertise.
17) The applicant will effectively coordinate activities with other
members of the T/TA Network funded by CB, especially linkages with
the NRC for In-Home Services, NRC for Child Protective Services, the
National Quality Improvement Center on Early Childhood (a.k.a.
Preventing the Abuse and Neglect of Infants and Young Children), the
National Quality Improvement Center on Differential Response, the
NRC for Tribes, and the Supporting Evidence-Based Home Visiting
Programs grantees.
18) The applicant includes plans to collaborate and coordinate with
other Federal and national efforts. The application describes how the
Resource Center will coordinate with the Early Childhood Systems
Federal Partners Workgroup, CDC's K2A Prevention Consortium or
other related efforts.
19) The resource center's services, program activities, and materials
will be developed and provided in a manner that is racially and
culturally sensitive to the population being served.
20) The applicant describes how it will utilize the knowledge being
developed by CB discretionary research and demonstration projects
and other related research in its T/TA activities.
EVALUATION - 15 points
In reviewing the evaluation plan, reviewers will consider the extent to
which:
58
1) The logic model effectively illustrates the project's approach and
guides it evaluation plan. The extent to which the evaluation strategy
addresses both the process and outcomes. The extent to which this
plan includes methods and criteria to evaluate the results and benefits
of the technical assistance project in terms of its stated objectives. The
extent to which goals and objectives are stated in specific measurable
form and will document change, improvement, and effectiveness. The
extent to which the awardee will collect appropriate data. The extent
to which the project proposes appropriate measure(s) for each goal,
objective, result or benefit.
2) The applicant presents a reasonable preliminary center-specific
evaluation plan that can be expected to provide regular, meaningful
feedback to the NRCCBCAP for project improvement. The applicant
identifies specific evaluation questions for investigation, appropriate
methods (e.g., written surveys, questionnaires, conference calls, focus
groups, and unstructured telephone or in-person interviews), and
realistic timeframes. Its proposed methods and quantitative and
qualitative measures are appropriate for the objectives of the
evaluation. The applicant proposes a sound process for making certain
that evaluation findings are shared and used at multiple levels of
responsibility within NRCCBCAP .The proposed measures are aligned
with the principles of the SOC framework and CFSR principles, and the
evaluation design is likely to support the NRCCBCAP's efforts to
subscribe to a coherent vision for TA with the TTA Network.
3) The applicant demonstrates sufficient in-house capacity to conduct
an objective evaluation of the project, or provides a sound plan for
contracting with a third party evaluator specializing in social science or
evaluation, or a university or college to conduct the evaluation.
4) The applicant presents a sound plan for documenting project
activities and results, including the development of a data collection
infrastructure that is sufficient to support a methodologically sound
evaluation. Appropriate data sources are identified and relevant data
would be collected. There is a sound plan for collecting and analyzing
these data, securing informed consent and implementing an IRB
review and Tribal review, if applicable.
5) The center-specific evaluation plan is likely to yield substantive
and useful information in the domains listed in Section VI.2 PROJECT
DESCRIPTION - APPROACH. The plan clearly identifies the domains in
which evaluation findings will be pursued and provides sound rationale
for these selections.
ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILES - 20 points
59
In reviewing the organizational profiles, reviewers will consider the
extent to which:
1) The applicant organization and its staff document experience
and expertise in successful collaboration with a variety of partners in
the provision of T/TA. The applicant makes a strong case that it has
the capacity and the commitment to function as a member of "one
T/TA Network" as described in the Background section of this funding
opportunity announcement.
2) The applicant (and its partners and contractors, if applicable)
demonstrates sufficient and relevant experience and expertise in
administration, development, implementation, management, and
evaluation of similar projects. The applicant has sufficient experience
and expertise in strategic implementation, organizational change, and
systemic intervention to provide high quality TA. The applicant is
grounded in experience and demonstrates a thorough understanding
of child welfare systems, child maltreatment prevention, child abuse
related issues, and evidence-informed or evidence-based practice. The
applicant possesses sufficient knowledge about State and Tribal child
welfare systems and populations in its geographic service area to
develop sound, regionally-focused and culturally competent outreach
and networking activities.
3) The proposal clearly demonstrates the applicant's ability to
administer and implement the project effectively and efficiently. The
applicant and any partnering organizations collectively have sufficient
experience and expertise in: (1) identifying the training and technical
assistance needs of an agency or organization; (2) developing or
participating in the development of a plan to meet those needs; (3)
designing, developing and delivering training and technical assistance
including recruiting, assigning, and deploying staff with appropriate
experience; (4) developing evaluation strategies and providing
technical assistance on evaluation methodologies, and (5) designing,
developing, delivering and evaluating training materials. If the project
involves partnerships with additional agencies, organizations or
subcontractors; each partnering organization has the ability and
organizational capacity to fulfill its roles and functions.
4) The roles, responsibilities, and time commitments of each
proposed key project staff position, including consultants,
subcontractors and/or partnering agencies or organizations, are clearly
defined and appropriate for the successful implementation of the
proposed project. The applicant has secured commitments from its
key partners, if applicable. The application includes appropriate MOUs
60
or letters of commitment from key partnering organization(s) as
appropriate. (Evidence of formal agreements between the successful
applicant and its State and/or Tribal partners will be secured after a
proposal process in year one of the award and are not expected in this
application.)
5) The proposed project director and key project staff possess
sufficient relevant knowledge, experience and capabilities to
implement and manage a project of this size, scope and complexity
effectively. The role, responsibilities and time commitments of each
proposed project staff position, including consultants, subcontractors
and/or partners, are clearly defined and appropriate to the successful
implementation of the proposed project.
6) There is a sound management plan for achieving the objectives
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks and ensuring quality. The plan clearly defines the role
and responsibilities of the lead agency. The plan clearly describes the
effective management and coordination of activities carried out by any
partners, subcontractors and consultants (if appropriate). There would
be a mutually beneficial relationship between the proposed project and
other work planned, anticipated or underway with Federal assistance
by the applicant.
7) The applicant possesses the organizational capability to
successfully perform the activities described in this announcement and
to fulfill its assigned role and function within the larger T/TA Network.
BUDGET AND BUDGET JUSTIFICATION - 5 points
In reviewing the budget and budget justification, reviewers will
consider the extent to which:
1) The costs of the proposed project are reasonable, in view of the
activities to be conducted and expected results and benefits. The
budget includes the costs associated with producing the child
maltreatment prevention Community Resource Packet or other
materials each year for National Child Abuse Prevention Month. The
budget includes costs associated with providing technical assistance
and support for the Supporting Evidence-based Home Visiting
grantees. The applicant proposes and justifies the amount and
percentage of the project budget to be allocated to program
evaluation.
61
2) The applicant's fiscal controls and accounting procedures would
ensure prudent use, proper and timely disbursement and accurate
accounting of funds received under this program announcement.
2. Review and Selection Process:
No grant award will be made under this announcement on the basis of
an incomplete application.
Initial ACF Screening: Each application will be screened to determine
whether it was received by the closing date and time and whether the
requested amount exceeds the stated ceiling. Late applications or
those exceeding the funding limit will be returned to the applicants
with a notation that they were unacceptable and will not be reviewed.
A panel of at least three reviewers (primarily experts from outside the
Federal Government) will use the evaluation criteria described in this
announcement to evaluate each application. The reviewers will
determine the strengths and weaknesses of each application, provide
comments about the strengths and weaknesses, and give each
application a numerical score.
The results of the competitive review are a primary factor in making
funding decisions. In addition, Federal staff conducts administrative
reviews of the applications and, in light of the results of the
competitive review, will recommend applications for funding to the
ACYF Commissioner. ACYF may also solicit and consider comments
from ACF regional office staff in making funding decisions. ACYF may
take into consideration of the programmatic staff of the private sector,
national, or State or community organizations. ACYF may elect not to
fund any applicants having known management, fiscal, reporting,
programmatic, or other problems that make it unlikely that they would
be able to provide effective services or effectively complete the
proposed activity.
With the results of the peer review and the information from Federal
staff, the Commissioner of ACYF makes the final funding decisions. The
Commissioner may give special consideration to applications proposing
services of special interest to the Federal Government and to achieve
geographic distributions of grant awards. Applications of special
interest may include, but are not limited to, applications focusing on
underserved or inadequately served clients or service areas and
programs addressing diverse ethnic populations.
Approved but Unfunded Applications
62
Applications that are approved but unfunded may be held over for
funding in the next funding cycle, pending the availability of funds, for
a period not to exceed one year.
3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates:
Applications will be reviewed during the Summer 2009. Grant awards
will have a start date no later than September 30, 2009.
VI. AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
1. Award Notices:
Successful applicants will be notified through the issuance of a Notice
of Award (NoA) document that sets forth the amount of funds granted,
the terms and conditions of the grant, the effective date of the grant,
the budget period for which initial support will be given, the non-
Federal share to be provided (if applicable), and the total project
period for which support is contemplated. The NoA will be signed by
the Grants Officer and transmitted via postal mail.
Following the finalization of funding decisions, organizations whose
applications will not be funded will be notified by letter, signed by the
Program Office head.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements:
Grantees are subject to the administrative requirements in 45 CFR Part
74 (for non-governmental entities) or 45 CFR Part 92 (for
governmental entities).
Direct Federal grants, sub-award funds, or contracts under this ACF
program shall not be used to support inherently religious activities
such as religious instruction, worship, or proselytization. Therefore,
organizations must take steps to separate, in time or location, their
inherently religious activities from the services funded under this
program. Regulations pertaining to the Equal Treatment for Faith-
Based Organizations, which includes the prohibition against Federal
funding of inherently religious activities, can be found at the HHS web
site at: http://www.hhs.gov/fbci/waisgate21.pdf.
A faith-based organization receiving HHS funds retains its
independence from Federal, State, and local governments, and may
continue to carry out its mission, including the definition, practice, and
expression of its religious beliefs. For example, a faith-based
63
organization may use space in its facilities to provide secular programs
or services funded with Federal funds without removing religious art,
icons, scriptures, or other religious symbols. In addition, a faith-based
organization that receives Federal funds retains its authority over its
internal governance, and it may retain religious terms in its
organization's name, select its board members on a religious basis,
and include religious references in its organization's mission
statements and other governing documents in accordance with all
program requirements, statutes, and other applicable requirements
governing the conduct of HHS funded activities.
Additional information on "Understanding the Regulations Related to
the Faith-Based and Community Initiative" can be found at:
http://www.hhs.gov/fbci/regulations/index.html.
HHS Grants Policy Statement
The HHS Grants Policy Statement (GPS) is the Department of Health
and Human Services new single policy guide for discretionary grants
and cooperative agreements. Unlike previous HHS policy documents,
the GPS is intended to be shared with and used by grantees. It
became effective October 1, 2006 and is applicable to all Operating
Divisions (OPDIVS), such as the Administration for Children and
Families (ACF), except the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The GPS
covers basic grants processes, standard terms and conditions, and
points of contact, as well as important OPDIV-specific requirements.
Appendices include a glossary of terms and a list of standard
abbreviations for ease of reference. The GPS may be accessed at
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_related.html.
3. Reporting Requirements:
Grantees will be required to submit performance progress and financial
reports periodically throughout the project period. Frequency of
reporting is listed later in this section.
Beginning with FY 2009 awards, most ACF grantees will begin using
the a Standard Form (SF) for required performance progress reporting
(PPR). The SF-PPR is a standard government-wide performance
progress reporting format consisting of a series of forms implemented
by Federal agencies to collect performance information from award
recipients. Most ACF grantees will begin using the standard format
implemented through ACF's Office of Grants Management (OGM),
entitled the "ACF-OGM-SF-PPR." Use of the ACF-OGM-SF-PPR will
begin for new awards and continuation awards made by ACF in FY
2009. At a minimum, grantees will be required to submit the ACF-
64
OGM-SF-PPR, which consists of the ACF-OGM-SF-PPR Coversheet and
the ACF-OGM-SF-PPR Appendix B Program Indicators.
ACF Programs that utilize other SF-PPR reporting formats, or other
reporting forms or formats that differ from the new ACF-OGM-SF-PPR,
have listed those forms or formats below. Grant award documents will
inform grantees of the appropriate performance progress report form
or format to use beginning in FY 2009.
Grantees will continue to use the Financial Status Report (FSR) SF-269
(long form) for required financial reporting.
The SF-269 (long form) and the ACF-OGM-SF-PPR may be found at
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html. Grantees
should consult their award documents to determine the appropriate
performance progress report format required under their award.
Performance progress and financial reports are due 30 days after the
end of the reporting period. Final program performance and financial
reports are due 90 days after the close of the project period.
Final reports may be submitted in hard copy to the Grants
Management Office Contact listed in Section VII. of this
announcement.
Program Progress Reports: Semi-Annually
Financial Reports: Semi-Annually
VII. AGENCY CONTACTS
Program Office Contact:
Melissa Brodowski
Children's Bureau
Portals Office Building, 8th Floor
1250 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20024
Phone: 202-205-2629
Email: melissa.brodowski@acf.hhs.gov
For hearing or speech impaired callers, contact the Federal Relay
Service at 1-800-877-8339 (TTY (Text Telephone) / ASCII (American
Standard Code For Information Interchange)).
Grants Management Office Contact:
65
Ben Sharp, Grants Officer
Division of Discretionary Grants
ACYF/ Operations Center
c/o Dixon Group, Inc. ATTN: Children's Bureau
118 Q St., NE.
Washington, DC 20002-2132
Phone: 866-796-1591
Phone 2: or TTY 711
Email: cb@dixongroup.com
For hearing or speech impaired callers, contact the Federal Relay
Service at 1-800-877-8339 (TTY (Text Telephone) / ASCII (American
Standard Code For Information Interchange)).
VIII. OTHER INFORMATION
Additional information about this program and its purpose can be
located on the following website:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/
For general information regarding this announcement please contact:
Operations Center
c/o The Dixon Group, Inc.
ATTN: Children's Bureau
118 Q St., NE.
Washington, DC 20002-2132
Phone: 866-796-1591 or TTY 711
Email: cb@dixongroup.com
Checklist
You may use the checklist below as a guide when preparing your
application package.
When to
What to Submit Where Found Submit
SF-424 Referenced in Section IV.2 under "Forms" and found By
at application
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html due date
found in
Overview
and
Section
66
IV.3.
SF-424A Referenced in Section IV.2 under "Forms" and found By
at application
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html due date
found in
Overview
and
Section
IV.3.
SF-424B Referenced in Section IV.2 under "Forms" and found By
at application
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html due date
found in
Overview
and
Section
IV.3.
SF-LLL "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying" is referenced in By
Section IV.2 under "Certifications" and found at application
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html due date
Submission of this form is required if any funds have found in
been paid, or will be paid, to any person for Overview
influencing, or attempting to influence, an officer or and
employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an Section
officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a IV.3.
Member of Congress in connection with this
commitment providing for the United States to insure
or guarantee a loan.
Certification Regarding Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement By date of
Lobbying under "Certifications" and found at award.
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html
Table of Contents Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement. By
application
due date
found in
Overview
and
Section
IV.3.
Project Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement. By
Summary/Abstract application
due date
found in
Overview
and
Section
IV.3.
67
Project Description Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement. By
application
due date
found in
Overview
and
Section
IV.3.
Budget and Budget Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement. By
Justification application
due date
found in
Overview
and
Section
IV.3.
Third-Party Agreements Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement By
under "Project Description." application
due date
found in
Overview
and
Section
IV.3.
Proof of Non-Profit Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement By date of
Status under "Eligibility Certification." award.
Protection of Human Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement By date of
Subjects Assurance under "Certifications" and found at award.
Identification/IRB http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html
Certification/Declaration
of Exemption Form
This program is covered Applicants should go to the following URL for the By
under E.O. 12372, official list of the jurisdictions that have elected to application
"Intergovernmental participate in E.O. 12372 due date
Review of Federal http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants_spoc/ as found in
Programs," and 45 CFR indicated in Section IV.4 of this announcement. Overview
Part 100, and
"Intergovernmental Section
Review of Department IV.3.
of Health and Human
Services Programs and
activities". Applicants
must submit all
required application
materials to the State
Single Point of Contact
(SPOC) and indicate the
date of submission on
the Standard Form (SF)
68
424 at item 19.
Logic Model Referenced in Sections I, IV.2 (Project Requirements) By
and V (Review Criteria). application
due date
found in
Overview
and
Section
IV.3.
Date: 03/23/1009 Maiso Bryant
Acting Commissioner
Administration on Children, Youth and Families
Appendix 1
CBCAP CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK (pdf - 52kb)
69