Embed
Email

Weight Loss Comparing Low-Carbohydrate_ Mediterranean_ and Low ...

Document Sample

Shared by: yaohongmei
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
1/31/2012
language:
pages:
32
Kate Neuhausen, MD

Family and Community Medicine

Resident at UCSF/SFGH

September 3, 2008

Intro – Low-Fat Diet

 American Heart Association guidelines

 Energy intake 1500 kcal per day for women and 1800

kcal per day for men

 Distribution of calories: 30% from fat, 10% from

saturated fat

 Intake of 300 mg cholesterol per day

 Dietary recommendations:

 Consume low-fat grains, vegetables, fruits, and legumes

 Limit additional fats, sweets, high-fat snacks

Source: http://www.vpul.upenn.edu/ohe/library/fitness/foodpyramid.htm

Intro – Mediterranean Diet

 Moderate-fat, restricted-calorie

 Energy intake 1500 kcal per day for women and 1800

kcal per day for men

 Goal distribution less than 35% calories from fat

 Dietary recommendations:

 Consume vegetables, fish, and poultry

 Limit red meat in diet

 Consume 30 to 45 g of olive oil and handful of nuts (5-7

nuts) per day

http://www.revolutionhealth.com/healthy-living/food-nutrition/food-groups-pyramids-overviews.com

Intro – Low-Carbohydrate Diet

 Non-restricted calorie diet (Atkins diet)

 Goal consumption: 20 g of carbohydrates per day for 2-

month induction phase with gradual increase to max

of 120 g per day to maintain weight loss

 No limit on intake of total calories, protein, and fat

 Dietary recommendations:

 Choose vegetarian sources of fat and protein

 Avoid trans fat

Source: http://thedivinelowcarb.blogspot.com/2007/07/anti-food-dilemma.html

Source: http://www.revolutionhealth.com/healthy-living/food-nutrition/food-groups-pyramids-overview

Source: http://www.revolutionhealth.com/healthy-living/food-nutrition/food-groups-pyramids-overviews.com

Methods - Patients

 July 2005 – July 2007

 On-site workplace medical clinic in Dimona, Isreal

 Men and women ages 40-65

 BMI at least 27 or presence of Type 2 DM or coronary heart

disease

 Exclusion Criteria:

 Pregnancy or breastfeeding

 Cr > 2

 Liver dysfunction (greater 2x increase AST/ALT)

 GI problems preventing adherence to test diet

 Cancer

Methods – Study Design

 Two-year Randomized Controlled Trial

 Efficacy trial – optimal circumstances

 Participants randomly assigned to three diet groups:

low-fat, low-carbohydrate, and Mediterranean

 Block randomization by sex, age, BMI, history of

coronary heart disease, history of Type 2 DM, and

current use of statins

Methods – Study Design

 Intensive dietary counseling with nutritionists for total

of 18 session of 90 minutes each

 Motivational phone calls lasting 10-15 min by dietitians

six times during 2-year interval with participants

having difficulties adhering to diet

 Labeling of all meals in cafeteria with number of

calories, grams of carbs, fat, and saturated fat with

color coding according to diet group

 Adherence evaluated by validated electronic food-

frequency questionnaires self-administered at

workplace at baseline, 6, 12, 24 months of follow-up

Methods – Study Design

 Participants were weighed without shoes every month

 BMI was calculated, and waist circumference

measured monthly

 BP was measured every 3 months with automated

system after 5 minutes of rest

 Blood samples obtained at 8 AM after 12-hour fast at

baseline, 6, 12, and 25 months

Methods - Outcomes

 Weight Loss

 BMI

 Waist circumference

 BP

 HbA1c

 Fasting lipids: LDL, HLD, triglycerides, cholesterol

 Fasting plasma glucose and plasma insulin

 Biomarkers: CRP, adiponectin, leptin

Results – Adherence

 Baseline characteristics:

 Mean age 52 years

 Mean BMI 31

 86% men

 Rates of adherence:

 Overall: 95.4% at 12 months; 84.6% at 24 months

 Low-fat: 90.4% at 24 months

 Mediterranean: 85.3% at 24 months

 Low-carbohydrate: 78.0% at 24 months

 Medication changes during study not significantly different

among groups:

 20 participants initiated BP treatment

 5 initiated meds for glycemic control; 1 reduced dosage

 4 started and 3 stopped cholesterol-lowering therapy

Results – Dietary Intake at 24 months

 Low-fat group: lower intake of saturated fat

 Energy change:-572.5 kcal/day from baseline

 % Carbs: 50.7% (-82.8 g/day)

 % Protein: 19.0% (-19.8 g/day)

 % Fat: 30.0% (-18.9% g/day)

 % Saturated fat: 9.6% (-6.2 g/day)

 Change in monounsaturated: saturated fat ratio: 0.02

 Change in cholesterol: -94.2 mg/day

 Change in dietary fiber: -4.7 g/day

 Level of physical activity: 21.4 MET/wk

 Detectable urine ketone bodies: 4.8% participants

Results – Dietary Intake at 24 months

 Mediterranean group: higher ratio of mono-saturated

to saturated fat and higher intake of dietary fiber

 Energy change:-371.9 kcal/day from baseline

 % Carbs: 50.2% (-50.5 g/day)

 % Protein: 18.8% (-17.5 g/day)

 % Fat: 33.1% (-10.5 g/day)

 % Saturated fat: 9.6% (4.6 g/day)

 Change in monounsaturated: saturated fat ratio: 0.11

 Change in cholesterol: -94.6 kg/day

 Change in dietary fiber: +0.29 g/day

 Level of physical activity: 15.6 MET/wk

 Detectable urine ketone bodies: 2.8% participants

Results – Dietary Intake at 24 months

 Low-Carb group: lower intake of carbs, higher intakes

of protein, total fat, saturated fat, and total cholesterol

 Energy change: -550 kcal/day from baseline

 % Carbs: 40.4% (-129.8 g/day)

 % Protein: 21.8% (-6.9 g/day)

 % Fat: 39.1% (-1.7 g/day)

 % Saturated Fat: 12.2% (+0.56 g/day)

 Change in monounsaturated: saturated fat ratio: -0.01

 Change in cholesterol: +6.51 kg/day

 Change in dietary fiber: - 10.o g/day

 Level of physical activity: 16.3 MET/wk

 Detectable urine ketone bodies: 8.3% participants

Results – Weight Loss at 24 months

 Phase of maximum weight loss from 1-6 months

 Maintenance phase from 7-24 months

 Overall weight loss among 322 participants at 24 months:

 Low-fat group: -2.9 +/- 4.2 kg

 Mediterranean: -4.4 +/- 6.0 kg

 Low-carb group: -4.7 +/- 6.5 kg

 Weight loss among 277 male participants at 24 months:

 Low-fat group: -3.4 kg

 Mediterranean : -4.0 kg

 Low-carb group: -4.9 kg

 Weight loss among 45 female participants at 24 months:

 Low-fat group: -0.1 kg

 Mediterranean: -6.2 kg

 Low carb group: - 2.4 kg

Weight Change during 2 years according to diet group









Source: Shai I et al. N Engl J Med 2008;359:229-241

Results - BMI, Waist Circumference,

BP at 24 months

 Mean BMI changes

 Low-fat group: -1.0 +/- 1.4

 Mediterranean: -1.5 +/- 2.2

 Low-carb group: -1.5 +/- 2.1

 Mean Waist Circumference Changes

 Low-fat group: -2.8 +/- 4.3 cm

 Mediterranean: -3.5 +/- 5.1 cm

 Low-carb group: -3.8 +/- 5.2 cm

 Mean BP Decrease

 Low-fat group: -4.3/0.9

 Mediterranean: -5.5/2.2

 Low-carb group: -3.9/0.8

Results - Fasting Lipid Profile

at 24 months

 HDL Cholesterol: increased in all groups with greatest

increase in low-carb group

 Low-fat group: +6.4 mg/dl

 Mediterranean: +6.3 mg/dl

 Low-carb group: +8.4 mg/dl

 Triglycerides decreased significantly in low-carb and

Mediterranean groups compared to low-fat group

 Low-fat group: -2.8 mg/dl

 Mediterranean: -21.8 mg/dl

 Low-carb group: -23.7 mg/dl

Results – Fasting Lipid Profile

at 24 months

 LDL Cholesterol: no significant changes within or

between groups

 Low-fat group: -0.05 mg/dl

 Mediterranean: -5.6 mg/dl

 Low-carb group: -3.0 mg/dl

 Ratio of Total Cholesterol HDL: decreased in all groups

with greatest improvement in low carb group

 Low-fat group: -0.6 mg/dl

 Mediterranean: -0.9 mg/dl

 Low-carb group: -1.1 mg/dl

Change in Fasting Lipid Profile over 2 yrs







Low-fat group: -2.8 +/- 4.3 cm

Mediterranean: -3.5 +/- 5.1 cm

Low-carb group: -3.8 +/- 5.2 cm









Source: Shai I et al. N Engl J Med 2008;359:229-241

Discussion

 Low-fat, Mediterranean and low-carb (Atkins) diets

produced weight loss in a group of moderately obese

participants

 Women lost significantly more weight with Mediterranean

diet vs. low-fat and low-carb diets

 Mediterranean and low-carb diets had beneficial metabolic

effects

 Similar caloric deficit achieved in all diet groups

 No decrease in need for medications among participants

 Continued improvement of biomarkers over 24 months

despite achievement of maximum weight loss by 5 months

suggests that healthy diet has benefits beyond weight

reduction

JAMA Weight Loss Study

 Randomized control trial conducted over 12 months

of 311 overwight/obese (BMI 27-40) non-diabetic,

premenopausal women recruited from community

 Compared Atkins (very low-carb), Zone (low carb),

LEARN (low-fat, high carb), Ornish (very high carb)

 Results: Women in Atkins diet group lost more weight

and had more favorable metabolic effects (higher

HDL and lower triglycerides) after 12 months than

women in Zone, LEARN, and Ornish diet groups

Key Similarities

 Studies compared different, limited diets with different

compositions of fat, carbs, and protein

 All diets (low-fat, low-carb, etc) helped participants

lose weight but Atkins worked best and resulted in

greatest weight loss

 Atkins has favorable metabolic effects, resulting in

greatest increase in HDL and greatest decrease in

triglycerides in both studies

Key Differences

 In NEJM article, women lost most weight with

Mediterranean diet while in JAMA article, women lost most

weight with Atkins diet

 JAMA article did not include Mediterranean diet

 NEJM article measured more sustained weight loss over

two years vs. one year in JAMA article

 JAMA article statistically adjusted for weight loss

differences among groups and found a combined effect of

benefit for Atkins diet attributable to both increased

weight loss and dietary composition

Strengths

 Long duration of study (follow-up over 2 years)

 One-phase design – all participants started

simultaneously

 Excellent adherence to diets

 Consistent data, participants successfully changed

dietary intake

 No missing data; used intention to treat for patients

lost to follow-up

 Multiple measurements over time

 Frequency matched for effect possible effect modifiers

during randomization (BMI, CAD, Type II DM, statin

use)

Limitations

 Unclear primary vs. secondary outcomes

 Homogenous population of Israelis

 Limited number of women enrolled in study

 Intense intervention: extremely difficult to replicate 24

hours counseling by nutritionist

 Workplace environment; difficult to generalize results

to other outpatient settings

 Difficult to control for effect of different amounts of

exercise between different groups

Bottom Line

 Significant weight loss over 2-years with all three diets:

low fat, Mediterranean, and low-carb

 Low-carb and Mediterranean diets could be discussed w/

patients in clinical practice as options if they are more

consistent w/ cultural or personal dietary practices

 Diets should be individualized according to personal

preferences and metabolic needs

 Mediterranean diet shows high efficacy in weight loss for

women and should be discussed w/ female patients

 Key may be encouraging patients to decrease calorie

consumption (smaller portions, etc)

 Low-carb, non-restricted calorie diet is an option for patients

who won’t follow low-fat or restricted calorie diet

Citations

 Shia, I., et al. Weight Loss with a Low-Carbohydrate,

Mediterranean, or Low-Fat Diet. N Engl J Med

2008;359:220-41.

 Gardner, C.D., et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Zone,

Ornish, and LEARN Diets for Change in Weight and

Related Risk Factors Among Overweight Menopausal

Women. JAMA. 2007;297:969-77.


Shared by: yaohongmei
Other docs by yaohongmei
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL - NATHALIE BIWOLE
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Telstra Rural Presence
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
“ GLEVENSIS
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Customer
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 0
Related docs
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!