Embed
Email

venus

Document Sample

Shared by: wuzhenguang
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
1/31/2012
language:
pages:
4
Last Updated: Thursday, 16 March 2006, 21:36 GMT



E-mail this to a friend Printable version



Doubt cast on Venus catastrophe

By Paul Rincon

BBC News science reporter, in Houston, Texas



Accepted views of how the

planet Venus evolved are

challenged by new age

dates for its surface.



Massive volcanism 500 million

years ago was thought to have

covered over much of the

planet's ancient features.



But work carried out at

Imperial College London, UK, Scientists age Solar System surfaces by

suggests a "volcanic counting craters

catastrophe" is not needed to explain the look of Venus's

surface.



The British team presented details of its research to a major

science conference in Texas, US.



Scientists will have an early opportunity to examine the new

ideas - Europe's Venus Express spacecraft is due to arrive at

the planet next month for a two-year investigation of Earth's

near-neighbour.



Crater counters



Researchers date planetary surfaces by looking at the

distribution of their impact craters.



On most planets and moons, impact craters tend to be

clustered on very old parts of the surface, due to the heavy

bombardment that is believed to have taken place in the

early Solar System.



But craters on Venus are distributed randomly over the whole

planet. This has led some scientists to the conclusion that

most of the surface is of similar age.



One way to arrive at this result is by rapid resurfacing - the

model long accepted by planetary scientists.



Timothy Bond and Mike Warner of Imperial College London

have now thrown that theory into doubt.



Using computer modelling, they came up with a suite of

possible scenarios that were compatible with the planet's

cratering record and surface features.

They concluded that there was no need to invoke massive

outpourings of lava over a short period. Instead, the planet's

present-day surface could be compatible with a slow decline

of volcanic activity, they argue.



Heat calculations



"The transition from a high rate of resurfacing to a low rate

could have lasted as long as two billion years," Timothy Bond

told the BBC News website.



Professor Warner added: "We

haven't shown that a very

short event isn't possible,

we've just shown that there

are a much wider range of

possibilities.



"A very short event is, a

priori, quite unlikely given

that there is a much wider

range of likely realities." Mission guide: Venus Express





Previous work suggests the volcanic upheaval 500 million

years ago covered up "almost all" of the ancient surface.



The models developed at Imperial College suggest about

26% of the planet's surface could be older than 700 million

years.



The findings agree with new models of heat loss from the

interior of Venus produced by Dr Richard Ghail, also of

Imperial College.



'Steady state'



Earth's surface is divided into many plates that move relative

to one another on convection currents in the mantle below.



At a type of boundary called a subduction zone, one plate is

dragged down below an adjacent plate and destroyed in the

mantle. At another, called a spreading ridge, two plates

move apart and grow as volcanism adds new material at

their edges.



These processes, called plate tectonics, continually cool the

Earth and keep it in balance - what scientists call a "steady-

state".



There is little evidence of plate tectonics on Venus.

Therefore, some scientists think heat might build up below

the Venusian crust, leading to occasional catastrophic

releases of magma along with rapid resurfacing of the planet.



However, Dr Ghail believes the surface features of Venus do

not necessarily reflect the rate of plate tectonics on the

planet.



Instead, he thinks high temperatures in the interior create a

weak zone between the crust and the mantle which

essentially decouples, or separates, them from each other.

This would allow more continual plate tectonic activity that

would leave little evidence on the surface.



"I think we're moving closer towards a steady-state model

for Venus," Dr Ghail told the BBC News website.



The researchers presented their results here at the Lunar and

Planetary Science Conference in Houston, Texas.



PLANETS COMPARED





VENUS EARTH









Distance from 108,200,000km 149,600,000km

Sun

Diameter 12,103.6km 12,756.3km

Mass 0.82 Earth masses 1.0 Earth masses

Rotation period 243 Earth days 23 hours 56 minutes

(day) (retrograde)

Year length 224.7 Earth days 365 days

Atmosphere 96% carbon dioxide 77% nitrogen

3% nitrogen 21% oxygen

Mean 464C 15C

temperature

Surface pressure 92 bars 1 bar

Moons 0 1

Global magnetic No Yes

field









E-mail this to a friend Printable version







LINKS TO MORE SCIENCE/NATURE STORIES







Select



Related docs
Other docs by wuzhenguang
Is Air Quality a Problem in My Home
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
IHRM Chapter 6
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
37.10593
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
December_break
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
Lectures for 2nd Edition
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
Google Chart
Views: 31  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!