Embed
Email

THE FRIDAY BURRITO

Document Sample

Shared by: jianghongl
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
1/31/2012
language:
pages:
10
THE FRIDAY BURRITO Vol. XIV #36 November 11, 2011

Three Elevens



“Education is what remains when we have

forgotten all that we have been taught.”

George Savile

“I want to stand as close to the edge as I can

without going over. Out on the edge you see all

the kinds of things you can't see from the

center.”

Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.

© 2011 Foothill Services Nevada Inc. All Rights Reserved. The Burrito contains the personal views and food for

thought of Gary Ackerman and does not reflect the views of any other person or organization other than Foothill Services Nevada, Inc.

The material is intended for adults, including the humor. If you are offended by the humor, then don’t read the Burrito. A list of

acronym definitions of terms used herein can be found here for the most recent list under the clever heading of Gary Acronym

Definitions.





I denied that winter had arrived until last weekend when I witnessed this year’s first major

snowfall in the Sierras. La Nina conditions are certainly dumping buckets of moisture

upon us, just as predicted. Combined with

Western States Playbook

the snow were frigid temperatures that kept

the powdery substance on the ground Platt’s California Power Conference:

throughout the week. The nighttime December 8-9 in San Francisco,

thermometer dropped into the teens, and Marriott Union Square. For a full

daytime highs didn’t make it above the 40s. agenda, click here.

Typically I don’t prepare my front or back CAISO Transmission Planning:

yards for heavy snow until mid-November. December 1 working group meeting

Therefore, I was caught unprepared … patio on transmission planning and

furniture, the garden hose and nozzle, lawn generation interconnection process.

benches, and a dozen solar-powered accent Meeting materials will be posted on

lights were left exposed to the early winter 11/21. RSVP by 11/23 to

reckoning until I made time to attend to smc@caiso.com.

them later in the week and that was a chore.

Home ownership is an endless set of tasks

that consumes much more time than one ever expects.



Let the insanity continue. That’s what I say. The Cappuccino issued its companion

proposed decision (PD) regarding RPS compliance in accordance with the provisions in

the legislation known as SB 2. The earlier PD, which I discussed a few weeks ago dealt

with the categories of RPS energy, you know that bucket thing. Parties entered opening

and reply comments on that matter over the last two weeks. But to review, recall that the

SB2 legislation set up three general categories for transactions: The first bucket was for

energy generation with a first point of interconnection at a California BA or from dynamic

transfers. The second category was for firmed-and-shaped energy. The third bucket or

category and the easiest to satisfy for renewable imports, was based upon unbundled

RECs. There was some heated arguments about RECs being included in the other two

“premium” buckets, but the earlier PD placed unbundled RECs entirely in the third bucket

and didn’t allow them in the others.

So, moving on to the second PD, WPTF counsel, Dan Douglass, provided me with a

summary. I read his email regarding the methodology and formulas for calculating RPS

procurement obligations, and I found myself needing a stiff drink after perusing it.



The PD is a mathematical tour de force that I can’t imagine anyone would be able to recite

from memory. But ignoring the formulae, here are the PD’s highlights:

Adopts multi-year compliance periods—2011-2013, 2014-2016, 2017-2020, and

2021 et seq.

Eliminates the carry-over of procurement deficits from one compliance period to

the next

Eliminates the directive to the Commission to adopt flexible rules for compliance

(presumably because such rules were viewed as unnecessary by the Legislature

given the flexibility afforded by multi-year compliance periods and the elimination

of carried-forward deficits)



The compliance periods in the first bullet item above are necessary because the law ramps

up the RPS target from 20% to 33%

What we believe… renewable energy in increments. I leave the

1) Competition yields lower cute formulas for those of you interested in

electricity rates. such things. Comments on the latest PD are

2) Stable and transparent rules and due on November 17.

regulations promote private

investment. Can you believe the brouhaha created in the

3) Private investors, rather than aftermath of the Solyndra debacle? No one

utilities, will spend money on is a saint when it comes to politics and

new power plants and federal handouts to private corporations. Is

transmission facilities if they can anyone surprised that one of Solyndra’s

earn a return that is balanced financial backers, George Kaiser, whose

with the risks. family foundation owned a 36% stake in

4) Private sector investment results Solyndra, promoted federal loan guarantees

in lower average prices without through his lobbying efforts? Of course, at

risking consumers’ money. this stage of the story, the Republicans and

Democrats are simply posturing to see who

can get the most mileage out of the story.

The White House previously told House Republicans that it would respond to any narrow

request for documents rather than an “any and all” type of subpoena. So, what do the

House Republicans do? The opposite. The Republicans launched an open-ended fishing

expedition upon the White House last Friday looking for any and all dirt on the Solyndra

deal with respect to emails between the company officers, financial backers and the like,

and White House aides. This week, the WSJ cracked the story that George Kaiser “asked

the president to crack down on Chinese competitors of the solar-panel maker but avoided

lobbying directly for the company.” Hot dog! I guess the story does have legs after all,

and Solyndragate is off and running.



I’m surprised that no one copied me on a NYT’s article published a few weeks ago about

control room operators at balancing authorities. Matt Wald, who has been with the NYT

for as long as I can remember, wrote the article entitled “On the Front Lines of the Power

Grid,” and did a good job summarizing the drama that comes from a job that is long on

boredom and easy to screw up in a pinch. He also interviewed several people from the

CAISO. One passage caught my attention. “One aspect that makes the job complicated is

that on the grid these days, there is a market not just for electricity, but also for ‘ancillary

services.’ These include the ability to ramp up and down quickly, which will be required

as the wind and sun vary in intensity; the ability to add or subtract very large amounts of

power in tiny fractions of a second, to keep the alternating current system working as

closely as possible to 60 alternations per second; the ability to step in to control voltage;

the ability to stand by for hours or days at a time, poised to start up if something goes

wrong; and the ability, if everything goes wrong, to begin generating with no outside

power to help.” It’s nice to see our business sector spoken about in the popular media, and

with integrity. It happens so infrequently.



And while we are talking about national news stories, I read that U.S. median home prices

across the country dropped a hair less than 5% in Q3. Reading about this made me think

of a story about a friend of a friend that brings the impact of falling home prices to the

forefront. The person in question is

a single woman who is in her mid

50s and lives in the metropolitan LA

area. She inherited from her parents Learn

the house she grew up in and lived in From

as an adult. The home’s value Les

considerably escalated throughout

the early 2000s, and as her income The U.S. unemployment rate is currently 9.0%, with 13.9

million people actively seeking work and millions of others

was spotty, she borrowed against the that have stopped looking or are underemployed. Why are so

market value of the house to pay many people unemployed and more importantly, what can be

ordinary expenses. Finally, the day done to reverse this dismal situation?

of reckoning came when she could High unemployment levels are easily explained. Economics

borrow no more. She was forced 101 teaches that private firms hire more workers when the

cost of hiring is less than the revenue the worker produces.

into a bank foreclosure, and the Firms today are able to produce all of the goods and services

buyer of the home offered several that the market wants without adding employees. Firms

hundred thousand dollars less than would hire more people if the demand for goods and services

increased, so any policy initiative that only seeks to reduce

the outstanding mortgages. She will the cost of new employees will be insufficient.

be hit with a capital gains tax, plus

The critical question is how to raise aggregate demand.

the income tax on the amount of the One way would be to get consumers to spend more, but high

short sale relative to the outstanding unemployment makes that solution difficult. Liberals contend

mortgages. That’s right. When a that demand would increase by reducing income taxes on the

middle class, extending unemployment benefits, investing in

lender forgives an amount of the national/state/local infrastructure projects or increasing

outstanding debt, the debt holder government hiring. Conservatives are focusing on reducing

must declare that amount as income. taxes for all consumers and businesses plus reducing

regulations that raise the cost of doing business.

I don’t think this particular woman’s

predicament is unique. In fact, it Most of these policies have stimulated economic growth in

the past, albeit with accompanying government deficits. Yet

might be the precursor of many such no one knows if any of these policies would produce a

trust-fund babies and adult children sustainable level of economic growth to reduce

who are inheritance rich but not unemployment. Clearly, the U.S. had been losing jobs to

China, India and other nations even before the 2007-08

financially savvy. Think about it. A meltdown.

woman in her fifties suddenly goes What if none of the policies work? Economic theory says

from living in a nice single family that eventually prices and wages will fall sufficiently to make

home with an exquisite view of the U.S. goods and services more competitive. Unfortunately,

this remedy would take a long time and result in significant

LA basin to being homeless, deeply social upheavals. The bottom line is that if you can figure

in debt to the IRS, and with no out a solution to the growth question, either a Nobel Prize in

marketable skills with which to economics or the Presidency of the U.S. is in your future.

reverse her situation. That is the

story, and a very scary story about the nouveau poor.

In the food corner this week, Dan Brin offered a tasty recipe for braised short ribs. He

told me he made the item for a dinner that was held on the rooftop of a friend’s Brooklyn

apartment building … it was a charity event. Since Dan’s recipe doesn’t require a

sweeping view of Manhattan, I guess you can make it anywhere.



Braised short ribs, especially this recipe, should be made at least one day ahead of serving.

In a large skillet, heat 2 tbsp. of canola oil. Season 6 flanken-style short ribs with the bone

in and cut 2 inches thick (about 4 lbs. total) with salt and pepper. Add them to the skillet

and cook over a moderate heat, turning once, until the meat is browned and crusty, about

18 minutes. Transfer the ribs to a shallow baking dish in a single layer.



In the same skillet place 1 large onion finely chopped, 2 carrots peeled and sliced, 3 celery

ribs sliced, and 3 thickly-sliced garlic cloves and cook over a low heat, stirring

occasionally, until the vegetables are

Amy’s Apps very soft and lightly browned, about

20 minutes. Add a 750 ml bottle of a

dry red wine such as a Cab or a Pinot

Noir, and 4 thyme sprigs and bring to

a boil over a high heat. Pour the hot

Hanging With Friends

marinade over the ribs in the baking

Rating: 3 out of 5 Commistars dish and let the ensemble cool a bit.

Cover and refrigerate overnight,

Hanging With Friends is Zynga’s version of hang man. You turning the ribs once. You can

start out by creating a word for another person to guess.

They also make up a word for you to guess. You each try to marinate the ribs for up to 2 days.

solve the word without getting too many strikes. If you get

too many strikes, one of your balloons pops. Did I mention

Preheat the oven to 350°. Transfer the

you have a character hanging from balloons? Instead of an

ribs and marinade into a large,

actual hang man, Zynga chose a more politically correct

enameled cast-iron casserole pot. Add

image of hanging your character from balloons. Too many

popped balloons and you fall into the lava and lose the

3 cups of chicken stock and bring to a

game. It’s linked to Words With Friends, so you can easily

boil. Cover and cook in the lower

monitor your Scrabble games. If you’re really bad at hang

third of the oven for 1½ hours, or until

man, you can spend lots of real money on coins which can

buy you various forms of assistance throughout the game.

the meat is tender but not falling

apart. Uncover and braise for 45

minutes longer, turning the ribs once or twice, until the sauce is reduced by about half and

the meat is very tender.



Transfer the meat to a clean shallow baking dish, and discard the bones as they fall off.

Strain the remaining sauce into a heatproof measuring cup and skim off as much fat as

possible. Pour the sauce over the meat; there should be about 2 cups.



For the final step, preheat the broiler. Broil the meat, turning once or twice, until glazed

and sizzling for about 10 minutes. Transfer the meat on to your dinner plates, spoon the

sauce on top and serve. Don’t forget some mashed potatoes, buttered noodles or crusty

bread to go with this savory dish.



Damn, that sounds good. Here is your ribbing for this week:



>>> Things in the People’s Republic of California

@@@ California Transmission Costs As Seen by the Municipal Utilities



>>> Shout Outs

>>> Odds & Ends (_!_)



>>> Things in the People’s Republic of California

@@@ California Transmission Costs As Seen by the Municipal Utilities



A group of three Bay Area municipal utilities (Palo Alto, Silicon Valley Power, and City

of Alameda) October 5 filed comments on the CEC Staff’s Draft Report on Renewable

Power in California: Status and Issues. The group of three refers to themselves in their

comments as the Bay Area Municipal Transmission Group (BAMx), and offer what I

think are some reasonable ideas about transmission planning in California. In a nutshell,

BAMx believes that the CEC isn’t paying enough attention to consumer costs for

transmission. The munis are CAISO transmission customers, and, therefore, they and

their consumers are on the hook to pay their volumetric share of the CAISO’s

transmission access charge (TAC). As customers, they are concerned about unchecked

escalation for interconnecting renewable generation to the grid, and foisting such costs on









transmission customers. IOU retail customers should be equally concerned, but in a sense,

those customers are too dispersed to effectively organize on matters such as transmission

costs, whereas the municipal utility community is relatively more concentrated and more

focused on cost issues.



The chart above was referred to during the recent WITG Transmission Roundtable in

Sacramento. It documents to some degree the forecast of a $16/MWh TAC, which is

considerably higher than today’s $6/MWh TAC. Per the BAMx comments, “Although the

CPUC has the major responsibility to implement cost containment, the CEC needs to

recognize its responsibility to assist in this effort. We are surprised how little cost

containment is addressed in the current draft report.”

BAMx points to the CAISO’s TPP-GIP as the natural starting point to refine the

transmission queue. The CAISO is in the throes of improving the TPP-GIP so that it

“implement[s] an economic assessment that would require an [interconnection customer]

to pay for the network upgrade that it causes, if the project is neither identified as

economic nor policy-driven under the TPP.” Additionally, BAMx recommends that the

CEC and the CAISO integrate the CEC’s annual assessment of the renewable net short

position into the CAISO transmission planning process, something like a feedback

mechanism to improve forecasting accuracy regarding the need for incremental

transmission.



One section in BAMx’s comments that pleased me dealt with California’s overreliance on

in-state renewable generation to acheive the RPS target. “It is very reasonable to assume

that a part of 33% RPS goal would be achieved most economically and with least

environmental impact if [out of state]

renewable resources, delivered over existing What we believe (cont.) …

transmission, is allowed to freely compete 5) However, when IOUs do the

with instate resources to meet our 33% goal.” investing, the risks to them

The emphasis for BAMx is that existing are minimal or non-existent

transmission lines are sufficient to bring in because ratepayers cover all

more renewable imports that can compete of the costs.

with in-state renewable resources. Well, if 6) Overcapacity lowers

that’s the case, then incremental inter-state electricity spot market prices;

transmission lines would allow for even more yet retail rates can increase in

competitive renewable energy that would put this case due to full cost-of-

downward pressure on the prices and the cost service regulation.

to meet RPS compliance. Alas, SB2 killed 7) Markets work best when there

that idea. However, I digress. The are many buyers and sellers.

“transmission” question becomes one of 8) At-risk money will be put to

which parties are bearing the cost: TAC work and attract new

payers or parties outside of the TAC region? investment where markets

exist that are legitimate and

>>> Shout Outs yield credible prices.



Congrats to Greg Wolfe who recently joined NextEra as a Senior Director of Origination.

Greg will remain in Portland and he can be contacted at Greg.wolfe@nexteraenergy.com,

or 503-819-7783.



Also in a new job is Jolly Hayden. Jolly joined Energy Infrastructure Alliance of

America, L.L.C. as its VP of Electric Business Development. He will be leading electric

infrastructure project development efforts across the U.S. Jolly’s new company was

formed in 2010 as a REIT to invest in companies that own and develop electric

transmission and distribution utility assets. The founding members include: Hunt Power,

Marubeni Corporation, John Hancock Life Insurance, TIAA-CREF, and OPTrust Private

Markets Group. The fund has committed a combined total of $2.1 billion in equity capital

commitments and assets. EIAA’s current assets and development projects are primarily

based in Texas and the desert Southwest. Good luck old friend. Jolly can be contacted at

jhayden@eiaareit.com, or at (512) 721-2704.



Dan Richard about whom I waxed eloquent in last week’s edition regarding California’s

High-Speed Rail project wrote: “Thanks for the shout out on high speed rail. I do have to

point out that the price tag in our business plan was $98.5 Billion in year-of-expenditure

dollars (i.e., inflated $), not constant dollars, over the next 22 years (about $65 Billion in

FY 2010 dollars). We use a 3% inflation rate, which is probably high. Using the last

three years' rate for the next three years and then jumping to 3 percent immediately shaves

$5 billion off the cost.



“Your question about the price comparison with alternatives is a valid one; that will be

part of the debate. However, I do want to point out that we will only build each segment

when (a) we have the funds identified; (b) there is stand-alone value for that leg if nothing

else were ever done and (3) after the initial construction, that each leg would be able to

cover its going-forward O&M costs. I know it's sticker shock, but it would be the same

as if we asked the price of all the new power plants that are needed over the next 25 years,

when in fact we procure them in tranches.”



Thanks, Dan.



Arlin Travis inked his thoughts regarding Ben Hobbs’ letter from last week regarding

CARB’s exemption of BPA: “Powerex points out the BPA exemption for carbon is unfair

treatment for soveriegns under NAFTA. Ben Hobbs points out that the BPA exemption for

Carbon just results in resource shuffling as clean power is diverted to Calif and the ‘dirty’

stuff shifted elsewhere. He thinks that is a false feeling of good. What should feel worse

and more unfair and if not corrected, get someone

… and, what we should do: fired is the shuffling of money from the

1. Believe in ourselves. California economy to BPA to further subsidize

2. Encourage creation of electricity prices in Oregon and Washington. If

independent, multi-state BPA pays the carbon charge, then the money

regional transmission goes back into the CA economy (albeit after first

organizations that being laundered through the sticky wallets of the

coordinate policies with California electric utilities). If BPA doesn't pay,

respective state utility then BPA will capture the $13/MWh spread and

commissions. expatriate the money to the already heavily

3. Support rules for resource federally subsidized rate payers of the PNW.

adequacy that apply Powerex is right, wake up California, treat BPA

uniformly among all load- power the same under the rules as Powerex

serving entities. power.”



Mark Bryfogle picked up his pen after a long Burrito hiatus, and responded to my

summary of the Houston Chapter meeting. “As far as I know, there is still considerable

uncertainty between FERC and CFTC regarding administrative authority under Dodd-

Frank. However, position limits certainly seem to be under CFTC. One doesn’t hear too

much about CFTC interaction with electricity, but there is implicit interaction via natural

gas and crude.



Listen to an interview with CFTC Commissioner Brad Chilton at the following link. To

me, Chilton sounds like he is on the ball. Chilton thinks position limits might be set

within two weeks. He says that swaps need to be DEFINED first. (Not to pick on the

CFTC, but one would have thought that a swaps definition would have been hashed out

ages ago.) Limits will be implemented over 60 days after swaps are defined. Most

importantly, Chilton thinks that there will be significant reductions in financial trading of

commodities. Specifically, ‘positions limit exemptions’ will be restrictioned to

institutions with a need for a commodity or ‘business risk’ (equals convenience risk?) as

an end user – and have to be justified DAILY albeit reported monthly.”

Next week I’ll put in a dialgue that I facilitated via email between Mark and Garth

Lawrence on the Dodd/Frank impact of moving swaps from over-the-counter (OTC)

transactions to exchanges. My reading of their emails showed me that I have much to

learn regarding D/F. It’s a whole new language.



Jack Ellis is back with a powerful note regarding the recent bankruptcy declaration of

Beacon Power. “I wasn’t aware of Beacon Power’s financial difficulties when I first wrote

about the cost of energy storage a few Burritos ago, but they were one of the firms I had in

mind when suggesting a ‘pay for performance’ policy. Advocates of such should be

careful what they ask for. Even with pay-for-performance, it’s not clear Beacon’s

technology would be financially viable based on market revenues alone. A report on the

Platt’s web site suggests that Beacon’s 20 MW plant in New York will cost $70 million,

or around $3,500/kW, which means they’d need revenues in excess of $500/kW/year to

recover and earn a return on invested capital. In 2009, the New York ISO’s annual report

shows an annual average price for regulation was $37.70/MWh, or $330/kW/year, which

leaves a $170/kW/year shortfall. Conditions worsened in 2010 as the price for regulation

fell to $28.80 ($252/kW/year) and the trend headed lower, not higher. If the average

mileage payment set out in FERC Order 755 was $1/MW, Beacon’s flywheel plant would

have to be dispatched to full reversal every six minutes based on 2009 regulation prices

and every four minutes based on 2010 regulation prices!



“In California, the economic case for a similar plant that only provides regulation is even

less favorable than it is in New York. CAISO revenues from providing regulation have

been under $50/kW/year for the last couple of years, which leaves a $450/kW/year

revenue shortfall. At $1/MW for mileage, a flywheel or battery plant providing regulation

would have to be switched from full charging to full discharging on average once every

two and a half minutes. Perhaps the

CAISO needs this kind of performance, …and, what we should do (cont.):

but my gut feeling is the reversals would 4. Enforce competitive solicitations

take place far less often. Moreover, by utilities for purchasing either

there’s a lot of infra-marginal supply thermal or renewable power.

competing for the opportunity to provide 5. Support choice among retail

regulation, and I suspect suppliers would electricity customers.

be willing to accept smaller mileage 6. Lobby for core/non-core split of

payments or perhaps even no mileage retail customers.

payment in order to get something for their 7. Advocate against policies that

capacity. limit, through bid mitigation,

merchant returns on investment

“Beacon and other proponents of pay-for- that are utility-like returns.

performance have also argued their fast

response technologies reduce the amount of regulation that needs to be procured. They

may in fact be correct, but all that means is there will be more downward pressure on

prices as increasing supply, including certain kinds of flexible loads that have relatively

low market entry costs, meets flat or decreasing demand. Order 755 will spur a lot of

competition, but flywheels and batteries built specifically to provide frequency regulation

in organized markets won’t be viable unless they can be built at much lower cost.”



I received the following anonymous letter regarding a reserves market in the Pacific

Northwest in lieu of an energy imbalance market: “Interesting story about the NWPP and

EIM. I heard about a meeting recently and the title was ‘Loss of Wind Task Force’. It’s

interesting that at least one party is taking the leap that a daily reserves market could be a

mechanism for a BA to acquire balancing energy. All of the IOU BA's in the Pacific

Northwest (except for Northwestern) and BPA get their imbalance energy from their

merchant side. Having the BA go to a reserves pool instead would be an interesting

idea...albeit a very complicated change from current practice.”



Finally, our own Amy from Amy’s Apps wrote in response to Aaron Johnson’s use of a

Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) for his fresh vegetables: “The CSA I use lets

you exclude whatever produce you don't want. You can also make special requests for

them to add certain things. The produce isn't quite as good as some of the other ones, but

it's worth it for the flexibility. They also deliver right to my door whereas others require

pickup. Check it out at http://www.farmfreshtoyou.com.”



>>> Odds & Ends (_!_)



The pooch parade continues. The picture

on the left is Sam Enoka’s dogs: Bree (the

Ibizan Hound) and Kahi (the miniature

dachshund) - they're 8 years old now. On

the right is a picture of Laura Beane’s pup

named Otis, who is 7-years old. Laura

wrote, “I simply do not understand how

people can survive without a dog.”



Randy Jones sent me the picture to the right of Bitsy, his family’s 3-

month old “tiny toy party poodle with a huge attitude.” Finally,

Halley, who is only 7-months old, is shown on the left when she was a

wee little pup. Her owner really wanted y’all

to see how cute she was then. She’s kind of a

handful now. However, she still has that

quizzical look when she wants something …

like food or attention.



Keep those pictures and stories coming.



Now that we’ve had some fun, it’s time for more fun. It’s story time. Hell, this whole

Burrito has been one continuous story:









What is Celibacy?



Celibacy can be a choice in life, or a condition imposed by circumstances. While attending

a Marriage Weekend, Frank and his wife Ann listened to the instructor declare, "It is

essential that husbands and wives know the things that are important to each other."

He then addressed the men. "Can you name and describe your wife's favorite flower?"

Frank leaned over, touched Ann's arm gently, and whispered, "Gold Medal-All-Purpose,

isn't it?"



And thus began Frank's life of celibacy...



I might have run that one before. After all, it’s been 13 years of trying to remember each

story, and I don’t always recall. Here’s an original for sure:









Well, that concludes another week. Have a great weekend, and start thinking about

sending me holiday cooking recipes, along with all the other assignments I have given

you.



gba


Shared by: jianghongl
Other docs by jianghongl
“Well Seasoned CHEFS”
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
“PREZ
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
“GENERATION G”
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
“Cooking Class Venues”
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
“Bundle” of Joy
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 0
Related docs