India and the Caste System
Alternative Form of Neo-Kinship
1
Outline: India
• 1) China, conclusion: unity of Confucianism and Daoism
• 2) Social system
– Caste and its Origins
• 3) Origin of caste system
– Original technology: iron age
• 4) Political level
– Short-lived imperial dynasties – feudal: Why?
• 5) Compare
– China – social structure
– Greece – technology
• 6) Beliefs: Karma, Reincarnation
– Bhagavad-Gita
2
1) Daoism and Rice Production
• Peasant is close to land, to nature
• Works with hands, feet in mud
• Daoism:
– let nature take its course without human
interference (i.e., without interfering high
technology)
• But what about the irrigation system?
– High technology, managed by Confucian ethica
bureaucracy
3
Rivals or Complementary?
• Revolutionary rivalry
– Daoist revolutionaries fight corrupt Confucians
– Important differences in doctrine
– Confucian focus on society v. Daoist focus on
nature
• But Confucianism is a philosophy of neo-
kinship, and so also emphasizes the natural in
society
4
Dual sources of two philosophies
• 1) China must respect limitations of nature
(12% arable land)
• 2) But China is also dependent on a complex,
state-organized artificial irrigation system
• > two indigenous Chinese philosophies
– Daoism reflects closeness to nature
– Confucianism reflects state-based social
organization
5
Unity of two philosophies
• But both reflect closer-to-nature, neo-kinship
society
• Chinese Syncretism:
– A “gentleman” can be a Confucian in his public
life,
– and a Daoist in private life.
6
2) Caste System is a Kinship System
• A caste (varna) is an intermarrying group
– Kinship; hereditary membership
• A caste eats together
– A high-caste Brahmin does not eat with someone of a
lower caste; different diets for different castes
• Divided by occupation: priest, warrior, merchant,
peasant
• Legal status, rights based on caste membership
– Gandhi was refused permission to study in England
• Visible identifiers of caste
7
Religious origin of caste hierarchy
• Dismemberment of Purusha (276)
– Head (mouth): Brahmin (priest, teacher) (white)
– Arms: Kshratriya (rulers, warriors (red)
– Legs: Vaishya (landlords, businessmen) (brown)
– Feet: Sudra (peasants) (black)
8
Outcasts
• Pariahs -- Untouchables, outcastes
– –polluting work (dealing with cowhide,
excrement, scavengers, landless laborers, etc.)
– “200 million” today
– Phoolan Devi, “The Bandit Queen”
– Dalit (oppressed); “Harijan” (Gandhi: Children of
God)
9
Development of Castes: Jati
• Subcastes of religious-based varna-castes
• Evolution of division of labor
– Occupations multiply: school teachers, brick layers
– Marry inside jati caste; observe eating, dietary
codes
• “tens of thousands” of jati-castes today
– Spodek 277
10
Advantages of Caste System
• Problem of alienation in West; Middle East
– People from different kin groups move to cities
– Work with strangers
– Legal identity is external; abstract
• Caste system precludes alienation
– Live, work with fellow kin
– Side-by-side with other kin groups
– > Requires tolerance of different groups
11
3) Origin of Caste system
• Varna = color
– Note colors assigned to each caste
• Variety of theories:
• “Apparently, the Aryan invaders were even then
thinking of a social system that separated people by
occupation and sanctioned that separation through
religion.” (276)
• =System of separation of Aryans (light-skinned,
twice-born) and others (darker skinned, once-born)
(Dravidians)
12
Neo-kinship
• Kinship + hierarchy = neo-kinship
– Kinship adapts to “civilization”
• “Twice born” castes
– Brahmin; Kshatriya; Vaishya
– Ritual rebirth
• “Once born”: Sudra
13
Cultural Cohesion in a Divided
Subcontinent
• Subtitle of chapter eight (241)
• Geographical size and complexity
– But also isolated; easy to defend from outsiders
• Narrow mountain passes: Khyber Pass
– But India is vulnerable to outsiders
• Sociological diversity before Aryans
– Hunter-gatherers (“tribes”)
– Advanced civilization of Indus-Valley Dravidians
– Waves of “Aryan” immigrants
• Caste system = adaptation to diversity
14
Early Republics
• “The leadership of the territories was centered in
specific family lineage groups, and as these lineages
grew larger and as they cleared more forest land to
expand their territorial control, the janapadas
[populated territories] began to take on the political
forms of states with urban capitals and political
administrations. Some constituted themselves as
republics, others as monarchies.” (246)
15
Iron Age neo-kinship civilization
• Clear the forests with iron tools
• Lineage groups = kinship
• Extend control over others (non-Aryans) =
neo-kinship: caste system
• States that emphasize kinship democracy:
republics
• States that emphasize hierarchical control:
monarchies
16
4) Political weakness, cultural strength of
India
• “For the following fifteen centuries *after the Maurya
Empire from 324-238 BCE], comparatively brief but
influential empires alternated with long periods of
decentralized and often weak rule. India
nevertheless retained a strong sense of cultural
unity, based in large part on the intermediate
familial, social, economic, and religious institutions
that brought cohesion to both ancient and modern
India.” Spodek 247
17
Feudal decentralization
• Recall Egypt’s and China’s long periods of
centralized rule, with short periods of feudal
decentralization.
• In India, the reverse is the case: feudal
decentralization predominates
– = Rule of local powers
• Evolution: from early republics (within ruling
group emphasized) to later monarchies (rule
over others emphasized)
– Recall China: clans rule over clans
18
Short-lived dynasties
• 700-600 early states
– Republics; monarchies
• 324-185 BCE Mauryas (Spodek, 244)
• 320-540 CE Guptas (Spodek, 244)
• Conquests by Hunas, Muslims, English
• => Weakness of political system: feudalism
• Corollary of difference in forms of neo-kinship
19
Indian Indifference to Politics
• Caste business of Kshatria: rule the state
• Caste business of Sudra: work, service
• => outside Kshatria caste, indifference to
politics: none of your business
• Highest caste: Brahmins – superior to rulers
• => politics is not the highest
• => difficulty of rule
20
5) Compare to Confucian China
• Long-lasting dynasties
• Politics starts in the home: everyone’s private
business is the business of state
• “Mandate of Heaven” = religious basis of state
> right of revolution
– =Political religion; religious politics
21
Unity v. Diversity
• China’s neo-kinship system unifies
– Clans conquer other clans with similar culture
– Head of ruling clan: father of all
– Unites society under ruler
• India’s neo-kinship system divides
– Aryan group rules others of dissimilar culture
– Aim: preserve unity of ruling group versus assimilation by
others
– Divides society into different groups
22
Comparative civilizations
• 1) Regarding technology
– Iron age civilization
– Early republics found along Ganges
– So: like Greece and Rome
• 2) Regarding social structure – neo-kinship
– Like China in preserving kinship
• =>Neo-kinship society that emphasizes
freedom of the individual
23
6) Arjuna’s Crisis
• Scene of battle field of Kurukshetra
• Arjuna: man of action, perfect Kshatria
nobleman warrior
• Discovers that he cannot perform his duty
(dharma)
• He must kill his kinsmen—for what?
24
• “Better to live on beggar’s bread
• With those we love alive,
• Than taste their blood in rich feasts spread
• And guiltily survive!”
25
Crisis of kinship morality
• Focus on moral consciousness, duty
– As warrior
– Ordinary goals of warrior: power, wealth, pleasure
• But this action leads to conflict with kinship relations
– As brother, nephew, cousin
• How enjoy victory at such cost?
– Compare to Antigone: did Antigone’s brothers cry over
having to fight each other?
– Who cried? Explain
• Appeals to charioteer Krishna for guidance
– Divine “avatar”
26
Solution to Arjuna’s problem
• Do your duty as a warrior prince – your destiny in
this life
• Without attachment to consequences (joy over
victory, sorrow over deaths etc.)
– emotional rollercoaster
• What is killed is not the true Self, but the shadow,
the illusion – which does not really exist anyway
• What is real, the truth Self, is unkillable
27
Karma and Reincarnation
• Karma (action): we make our own reality
– Recall Greek idea of self-determined destiny
– We are free, but because of our blindness, we produce
what we don’t want
• I’m not responsible for being be born in my (lower)
caste
• Yes you are, because of actions in a previous lifetime
28
Different concepts of Reincarnation
• Plato’s NDE of Er
– Ulysses chooses quite lifetime
– Freedom is to determine one’s own life
• Later concept of empire: freedom is affirmed
in unfreedom
– Stoicism in powerful Roman empire: You can’t
determine external events
– Hinduism of Indian feudalism: yes you can
29
Two Conceptions of Karma/Action
• 1) Debased conception of action/Karma as
justification of caste system
– Purusha is divided into four castes
– Modern person discovers: “I am not the feet of
Purusha!”
• 2) Higher conception of Bhagavad-Gita:
– Four parts of Pursha represent four basic spiritual
personalities, without hierarchy
30
Karma and Duty/Destiny
• (Bad) Karma: letting worry over external
consequences decide one’s action
– Arjuna worries about killing his relatives
– Unlike Polynices and Eteocles
– Arjuna is like Antigone!
• Duty—Destiny: deciding on the basis of one’s
duty:
– Arjuna is a warrior, and should do his duty, follow
his destiny, without concern for consequences
31