APE DBQ POV exercise

Document Sample
APE DBQ POV exercise Powered By Docstoc
					AP Euro
Mr. Anderson/ Mr. Charboneau
DBQ – Point of View assignment

Directions:      Read the following DBQ questions and documents, paying special
attention to the document source information (author, time, place, political and/or
religious affiliation, etc.). For each document write a possible point of view statement
about the author. Remember, P.O.V. is NOT the author’s opinion, but rather a possible
reason why the author may hold that opinion. Point of view can sometimes be seen as the
author’s bias. A simple formula for P.O.V. is:

       What + Motive = Point of View, where “What” is the type of document, author’s
       background (social, political, religious, economic, etc.), the time period, country
       or place, etc. and “Motive” is the reason why the author might have that opinion.

This assignment is worth 60 points (4 points each).

   A. Analyze attitudes toward and responses to “the poor” in Europe
      between approximately 1450 and 1700.
   Document #1
   Source: Catholic priest, sermon, France, fifteenth century

   Whoever gives a penny to the poor for God while in good health, it will be worth 240
   pennies after [his or her] death. To give a penny in sickness is worth 20 pennies. To
   bequeath money after death, that is worth a leaden penny, because there is no great
   value in giving what one cannot hold on to.

   Document #2
   Source: Town council, resolution, Dijon, France, 1482

   In order to care for the poor begging creatures and the poor children who go shrieking
   at night throughout this city, we will rent at the city’s cost a barn or other place to put
   them for the night and to care for them as well as possible.

   Document #3
   Source: Juan Luis Vives, Spanish humanist, On Assistance to the Poor, Bruges,
   Spanish Netherlands, 1526.

   When the general funds have been expended, those without means of subsistence are
   driven to robbery in the city and on the highways; others commit theft stealthily.
   Women of eligible years put modesty aside and, no longer holding to chastity, putit
   on sale. Old women run brothels and then take up sorcery. Children of the needy
   receive a deplorable upbringing. Together with their offspring, the poor are shut out
   of the churches and wander over the land. We do not know by what law the poor
   live, nor what their practices or beliefs are.
Some know that they have a duty of charity to the poor, yet they do not perform what
has been commanded. Others are repelled by the unworthiness of the applicants.
Still others withdraw because their good intention is embarrassed by the great
number, and they are uncertain where first or most effectively to bestow their money.

Document #4
Source: Emperor Charles V, imperial decree for the Netherlands, 1531

Experience shows that if begging for alms (charity) is permitted to everyone
indiscriminately, many errors and abuses will result, for they will fall into idleness,
which is the beginning of all evils. They and their children will abandon their trade
or occupation for a wicked and contemptible life and condemn their daughters to
poverty, unhappiness, and all manner of wickedness, and vice. Above all, those who
are poor and sick, and other indigents unable to earn a living, should receive food and
sustenance, to the glory of God, our Savior, and according to His will.

Document #5
Source: Town council, meeting minutes, Rouen, France, 1542
-Those who are unwilling to work should indeed be expelled from the city, but those
who are simply unable to find work should not be treated thus. Instead, they should
be put to work on sites in the city in exchange for food until such time as they
succeed in finding work in their trades.
-Idleness is harmful to the public good and should not be tolerated. Idlers should not
be considered as poor.
-Before expelling the poor from the city we must consider whether our defensive
capacity would not suffer from such a measure. After all, it is the people, and not the
judges and the councilors who will fight if the need arises.

Document #6
Source: Poorhouse regulations, Suffolk County, England, 1588

Every strong rogue, at his or her first entrance into the house, shall have 12 stripes
with the whip on the bare skin and every young rogue or idle loiterer shall have 6
stripes in the same manner. All unruly and stubborn persons shall e corrected oftener
and given heavier shackles, a thinner diet, and harder labor until they are brought to
reasonable obedience and submission to the master of the poorhouse.

Document #7
Source: Jean Maillefer, wealthy merchant, letter to his children, Reims, France, 1674

I have heard the poor talk and learned that those who have grown accustomed to this
life cannot leave it. They have no cares, pay no rents or taxes, have no losses to fear.
They are independent, they warm themselves by the sun, sleep and laugh as long as
they like, are at home everywhere, have the sky for a blanket, the earth for a mattress.
In a word, they have no worries.
B. Analyze the various responses to the outbreaks of plague from the
   fifteenth to the eighteenth centuries. Discuss the beliefs and
   concerns that these responses express.
Document #1
Source: Erasmus of Rotterdam, letter, 1512

The plague and sickness in England is due to the filth in the streets and the sputum
and dogs’ urine clogging the rushes on the floors of the houses.

Document #2
Source: Lisabetta Centenni, Italian housewife, legal deposition, 1624

My husband Ottavio had a malignant fever. We were sure he would die. Sister
Angelica del Macchia, prioress at Crocetta, sent me a little piece of bread that had
touched the body of St. Domenica. I fed it to my husband and suddenly the fever

Document #3
Source: Father Dragoni, priest, letter to the Health Magistracy of Florince, 1630

I have accompanied severity with compassion and charity. I have managed and fed
the convalescents and servants of two pest houses; I have paid guards and
gravediggers with the alms your lordships have sent me.

Document #4
Source: M. Bertrand, physician at Marseilles, A Historical Relation of the Plague at
Marseilles in the Year 1720

The plague must be considered a particular chastisement exercised by an angry God
over a sinful and offending people rather than a calamity proceeding from common
and natural causes. Consequently, it is little subject to the remedies pursued in cases
of ordinary maladies.

C. Using specific examples from the documents below, analyze the
   purposes that rituals and festivals served in traditional European

Document #1
Source: Baltasar Rusow, Lutheran pastor, commenting on saint’s feast day festival in
mid-June. Estonia, sixteenth century.

The festival was marked by flames of joy over the whole country. Around thses
bonfires people danced, sang and leapt with great pleasue, and did not spare the
bagpipes. Many loads of beer were brought. What disorder, whoring, fighting,
killing and dreadful idolatry took place there!

Document #2
Source: Report from the police inspector, Toulouse, France, April 1833

When a royalist widower of of the Couteliers neighborhood remarried, he began
receiving raucous visits night after night. Most of the people who took too active a
part were sent to the police court. But that sort of prosecution was not very
intimidating, and did not produce the desired effect. The disorders continued. One
noticed, in fact, that the people who got involved in the disturbances no longer came,
as one might expect, from the inferior classes. Law students, students at the
veterinary school and youngsters from good city families had joined in. Seditious
shouts had arisen in certain groups, and we learned that the new troublemakers meant
to keep the charivari going until King Louis Philippe’s birthday, in hopes of
producing another sort of disorder.

It was especially on the evening of Sunday the 28th of April 1833 that the political
nature of these gatherings appeared unequivocally. All of a sudden shouts of LONG
LIVE THE REPUBLIC were heard. It was all the clearer what was going on because
the majority of the agitators were people whose ordinary clothing itself announced
that they weren’t there for a simple charivari.

Document # 3
Source. Mrs. Elizabeth Gaskell, English author, writing to her friend, Mary Hewitt,
about the customs of Cheshire, 1838

When any woman, a wife more particularly, has been scolding, beating or otherwise
abusing the other sex, and is publicly known, she is made to “ride stang.” A crowd of
people assemble toward the evening after work hours, with an old shabby, broken
down horse. They hunt out the delinquent and mount her on the horse asride with her
face to tail. So they parade her through the nearest village or twon, drowning her
scolding and clamour with the noise of frying pans, just as you would scare a swarm
of bees. And though I have seen this done many times, I have never knew a woman
to seek redress, or the avengers to proceed to any more disorderly conduct after they
had once made the guilty one “ride stang.”

Document #4
Source: Russian official, report on an incident in a village in Novgorod Province,
Russia, late nineteenth century.

Crosida Anisimova was apprehended for berry-picking in the village’s communal
berry patch before the customary time. A village policeman brought her before the
village assembly, where they hung on her neck the basket of berries she had gathered,
and the entire community led her through the streets with shouts, laughter, songs and
dancing to the noise of washtubs, frying pans, and bells. The punishment had such a
strong effect on her that she was ill for several days, but the thought of complaining
against the offenders never entered her mind.

Shared By: