Embed
Email

England

Document Sample

Shared by: yurtgc548
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
4
posted:
1/23/2012
language:
pages:
21
Economic History of the United States

 Scarcity

 Plenty

 Trade

 Economies of Scale

 Assume the firm can change all factors

 No fixed Resources (Land)

 Labor and Capital

 Production and Firm Size

 Constant Returns to Scale

 Increasing Returns to Scale

 Decreasing Returns to Scale

 If as the firm get larger, output increases in exact

proportion to inputs

 If the firm add 10% more inputs, it gets 10%

more output.

Returns to Scale

Value of the Massachusetts Cotton Mill’s units of input and output in thousand of dollars

∆ in cost per unit Output in Output in Inputs in Inputs in

of output Period 2 Period 2 Period 1 Period 1

Constant Returns

to Scale 1 20 10 20 10

Increasing

Returns to Scale .8 22 10 20 10

Decreasing

Returns to Scale 1.2 18 10 20 10



Constant Returns

∆Inputs 20-20 = 10

=1

∆Outputs 20-20 = 10

 If as the firm get larger, output increases are

greater than inputs

 Example: suppose a firm adds 10% more inputs

and gets 12% more output.

Returns to Scale

Value of the Massachusetts Cotton Mill’s units of input and output in thousand of dollars

∆ in cost per unit Output in Output in Inputs in Inputs in

of output Period 2 Period 2 Period 2 Period 1

Constant Returns

to Scale 1 20 10 20 10

Increasing

Returns to Scale .8 22 10 20 10

Decreasing

Returns to Scale 1.2 18 10 20 10



Increasing Returns

∆Inputs 20-10 = 10

= .8

∆Outputs 22-10 = 12

 If as the firm get larger, output increases are

greater than inputs

 Example: suppose a firm adds 10% more inputs

and gets 12% more output.

 The firm’s costs per unit of output fall; as the firm

get bigger, it become more efficient. Economists

label this phenomena economies of scale

 A firm’s average costs fall because it gets bigger

 Specialization

 Teamwork

 Bulk Buying

 Additional Specialized Capital

 Research and Development

The biggest plum (John D. Rockefeller and Standard Oil

Corporation) dangled before the (Lake Shore) railroad was a

promise to supply (it) with an astonishing sixty carloads of

refined oil daily. . . . For any railroad, the prospect of steady

shipments was irresistible, for they could dispatch trains

composed solely of oil-tank cars instead of a motley

assortment of freight cars picking up different products at

different places. By consolidating many small shippers into one

big shipper making regular, uniform shipments in massive

quantities, the railroads could reduce the average round-trip

time of their trains to New York from thirty days to ten and

operate a fleet of 600 cars instead of 1800.

-- Ron Chernow, Titan: The Life of John D. Rockefeller, 1998, p. 133.

 If as the firm get larger, output increases are

greater than inputs

 Example: suppose a firm adds 10% more inputs

and but only gets 8% more output.

Returns to Scale

Value of the Massachusetts Cotton Mill’s units of input and output in thousand of dollars

∆ in cost per unit Output in Output in Inputs in Inputs in

of output Period 2 Period 2 Period 1 Period 1

Constant Returns

to Scale 1 20 10 20 10

Increasing

Returns to Scale .8 22 10 20 10

Decreasing

Returns to Scale 1.2 18 10 20 10



Decreasing Returns

∆Inputs 20-10 = 10

= 1.2

∆Output 18-10 = 8

 If as the firm get larger, output increases are

greater than inputs

 Example: suppose a firm adds 10% more inputs

and but only gets 8% more output.

 The firm’s costs per unit of output will rise; as the

firm get bigger, it become more inefficient.

Economists label this phenomena diseconomies

of scale

 A firm’s average costs rise because it gets bigger

 Non-Productive Employees

 Management by Rules Rather then Productivity

 Difficulty in Change and Innovation

 Hierarchical Organization

Top

Management



Middle Management



Production Management



Producing Employees

Skeptics doubt that any manager . . . can manage today's

colossi. "Devotees of bigness are really fighting against all the

forces that are at work in the economic world," says James W.

Brock, . . . Among such forces, he includes the power that

computers can put in a worker's hands, as well as the rising

need for speed in business. Both factors are fueling a surge in

small start-ups, which can be more efficient, more innovative

and more globally competitive.

By contrast, large organizations "become hidebound and

muscle-bound and rule-bound and bureaucratic-bound, [and]

lose touch with what's going on in the world and markets and

so forth. You get layers and layers of people and

management," Prof. Brock says. "It is a challenge to try to

manage it, and I think it's an insuperable challenge beyond a

certain size."

-- Matt Murray, As Huge Firms Keep Growing, CEOs Struggle to Keep Pace, The

Wall Street Journal, February 8, 2001, P. A1.

 Vertical Integration

 Horizontal Integration

1/23/2012 17

Price of Steel Rails at Carnegie

Steel ($/ton)

1867 $166

1870 $107

1875 $69

1880 $68

1885 $29

1890 $32

1895 $32









1/23/2012 18

Andrew Carnegie

1/23/2012 19

1/23/2012 20

Kerosene Lamp John D. Rockefeller



Other docs by yurtgc548
AC120 lecture 26
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
ABSTRACT - GPCET MCA EMERALDS
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Absolute Garbage Systems
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Abnormal Psychology
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
ABC of Arterial and venous Disease
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Abacus Fund Management LLC Presentation
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!