A Tradition in Plagiarism | ComiPress
Comment viewing options
Flat list - collapsedFlat list - expandedThreaded list - collapsedThreaded list - expanded Date -
newest firstDate - oldest first 10 comments per page30 comments per page50 comments per
page70 comments per page90 comments per page150 comments per page200 comments per
page250 comments per page300 comments per page
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click
"Save settings" to activate your changes.
I don't know, but some of
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2007-07-10 15:21.
I don't know, but some of the images shown are way to obvious... Did
those Chinese artists really think nobody will notice?
Also the Tenjo Tenge/Ikkitousen one is pretty close as well, I wonder
why the artist didn't get in trouble...
The D.gray-man one was a bit out there, I mean, a guy and a girl in
the same pose count as plagiarism??!!
Korean TV Drama copies Eden no Hana, which in Copies Slam Dunk,
which copies NBA photos...too funny.
• Login To Post Comments
ha
Submitted by leonnasagawa (not verified) on Sat, 2009-08-15 21:31.
I'm surprised that the chinese plagiarised version of clamp was a lot
more detailed then the original.
• Login To Post Comments
Great article. Some of those
Submitted by Guest (not verified) on Wed, 2007-07-11 11:49.
Great article.
Some of those accusations seem a bit stretched. A few
panels, like the half face one or hair covering the eyes, are pretty
common in manga in general. It's a rather thin difference between a
cliche and copyright infringement sometimes.
• Login To Post Comments
interesting article, some of
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2007-07-11 14:42.
interesting article, some of the points are striking whilst others seem
to be a bit of a stretch. There's often a lot of stock poses that crop up
within a particular genre no matter the manga.
The Takehiko Inoue and photo's incident is interesting, to me I don't
see the problem with an artist using a reference image to capture a
particular pose though there's a difference between using a reference
and directly tracing an image.
• Login To Post Comments
Then what about tracing a
Submitted by N_ (not verified) on Wed, 2007-07-18 00:00.
Then what about tracing a photo? Things like this are very
vague...although personally I don't think the Slam Dunk/NBA photo
one had any problem, it looked like Inoue only used the photo as a
reference, that is, if he used any photo at all...when it comes to a
sport like basketball, how many different "classic" poses can you come
up with? There has to be some scenes in a basketball manga that
resembles some basketball photo from the real world.
Actually, all manga has to have some scenes that resemble events or
scenes from the real world in which the manga's topic is based on.
• Login To Post Comments
Do people ever learn?
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2007-07-19 23:32.
Some of the examples are plain sad, especially the CLAMP ones (that's
China and its loose copyright law for you, just look at those pics vs.
CLAMP cases). As for 666 Satan vs. Naruto though, since the two
authors grew up together, and what with being twin brothers and all, I
wouldn't be surprised if they received the same influences.
I can understand being unconsciously influenced though, I mean,
there's gotta be a difference between cliches and plagiarism, right?
• Login To Post Comments
Plagiarism
Submitted by dsong (not verified) on Fri, 2007-07-20 14:15.
Kanon 2006 also blatantly ripped off a Youtube video in a critical crash
scene. Laughable stuff, really.
• Login To Post Comments
'
Submitted by Rukawa (not verified) on Tue, 2007-07-24 18:59.
Hello
In France, there is a guy, Mars Maggiori, who does plagiat of some
ghibli stuff for his "professional" works. He called it 'influence' from
japan but it's more...
http://www.catsuka.com/maggiori.php
sorry french website.
http://www.catsuka.com/maggiori_jp.php
japanese version.
• Login To Post Comments
Some of these similarities
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 2007-07-28 19:32.
Some of these similarities mean nothing. There's nothing wrong with
using references. I doubt anyone can ever come up with an idea that's
"original" anymore anyways. Creators of shoujo mangas should
probably start suing each other then. How many times have you read
stories with the same plot?
• Login To Post Comments
Yes, but directly using
Submitted by Matt (not verified) on Mon, 2007-07-30 09:49.
Yes, but directly using images scene by scene from an earlier manga is
somewhat in poor taste if used frequently. One or two images here
and there can be considered as tasteful homage, anymore than that is
going too far. However, I think the Slam Dunk ones can't be
considered plagiarism. All the author did was take real-life images of
NBA basketball and transplanted it into his character's movements.
Unlike taking an established visual medium and usurping it for
personal usage, I highly doubt you can trademark and copyright an
action done in real-life to be depicted in comics and manga.
• Login To Post Comments
I agree, you can't compare
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2007-08-01 17:58.
I agree, you can't compare these things to real-life images, otherwise
every single sports manga would be sued into oblivion for plagiarism.
• Login To Post Comments
Gunnm/Battle Angel vs Simon Bisley's version of Sláine
Submitted by gawdawful (not verified) on Tue, 2007-08-07 12:35.
i was doing some research on berserkers of all things and stumbled
upon this image of Simon Bisley's version of Sláine (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:SLAINE_-H-7-_16.jpg ).
In the confrontation between Gally/Alita and Makaku at the Kansas Bar
(the splash pages just before the chapter title "Hell Trap - Battle 5:
Responsibility) Gunnm creator and illustrator Yukito Kishiro drew
Makaku in an identical pose and costume.
One could claim it as an homage but it's basically an entire character
rip. When i first saw it i felt a little ripped off myself as i always held
Yukito Kishiro in the highest esteems, but now i've but to wonder if
there are more instances of this sort throughout his work.
• Login To Post Comments
It only bothers me if I know
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 2007-08-26 11:43.
It only bothers me if I know where it's taken from.
Quite a few of
those are just coincidences.
Also, I have no problem with referencing
a photograph.
• Login To Post Comments
I think everyone is
Submitted by ffxi gil (not verified) on Mon, 2008-08-18 13:47.
I think everyone is influenced by something, otherwise we'd have no
experience from which to base what we do. Just think about accents
and behavioural traits; we all get our individuality from somewhere.
With that said, there is a big difference from being subtley, even
unknowingly influenced by something else and proceeding to
intentionally emulate something for the purpose of profit.
• Login To Post Comments
woaaaaaaa
Submitted by Meaw (not verified) on Thu, 2007-09-27 20:36.
wow nana and clamp are soooo weir dO_O
that's realy copied
• Login To Post Comments
I came here upon research
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2007-10-29 15:00.
I came here upon research for Joustar plagiarism, seriously, China
definitly need to strenghten their laws regarding this issue.
I've been
following this incident since the mid summer, yet there's still no
solution to it, manga fans obviously complained to the company, but
do they learn, NO! Their new book still features they so-called-original
images they theft. And the sad thing is, the teenagers who read the
novel from the Joustar defend this company by saying: "Well, the
plagerized picture looks better than the original ones, so what's the
problem." God, I just want to slap some sense into them.
I swear,
someone need to inform the Japanese artists and have a lawsuit to
shut down this company before China will ever learn.
• Login To Post Comments
I've attempted to email
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2007-11-23 08:35.
I've attempted to email headquarters@clamp-net.com to see what
happens. I don't speak very fluent Japanese, but hopefully, they might
get the picture.
• Login To Post Comments
Comparisons
Submitted by Petitchu (not verified) on Thu, 2007-12-06 04:46.
As it's been pointed out already, a lot of these comparisons seem far
fetched.
I mean really
http://comipress.com/files/images/articles/2007/07/plagiarism/bcat3.j
pg
Matrix VS Motion ?? A lot of comics use "duplicating" bodies as a
sign of rapid movement... long before The Matrix ever released.
http://comipress.com/files/images/articles/2007/07/plagiarism/bcat2.j
pg
These two women merely have beauty marks. I'm surprised you
haven't compared them to Cindy Crawford or Marilyn Monroe. The
mark isn't even on the same side of the face.
I'm really surprised because there was a lot of great evidence to actual
plagiarism, but quoting photo reference and only slight similarities
seem like grasping at straws. It makes me respect the article less then
what originally had a lot of weight.
• Login To Post Comments
Clamp's work is very
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2008-01-11 06:49.
Clamp's work is very beautiful.
I'm very sorry to hear our Chinese
publisher have been discovered plagiarizing Clamp's work.
I'm very
angry.
Guo Ni is very shameless.
She never recognition this.
My
friends find her evidence of plagiarism.
But many students don't
belive it.
They say:'Miss Guo never do it.'And then they called we
Fools.
It's too difficult to tell they.
I hate Guo's work.She have been
discovered plagiarizing many popular's work.And she have been
discovered plagiarizing many photos too.
We try tell Guo this be not
immoral everytime.
(PS:I'm a Chinese students.My English proficiency is not very
good.sorry.)
• Login To Post Comments
Some of those accusations
Submitted by projecten (not verified) on Sat, 2008-01-19 12:35.
Some of those accusations seem a bit stretched. A few panels, like the
half face one or hair covering the eyes, are pretty common in manga
in general. It's a rather thin difference between a cliche and copyright
infringement sometimes.
• Login To Post Comments
I'm sorry, but I gotta say
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2008-02-01 19:01.
I'm sorry, but I gotta say this(and mind you this is not racist!). Those
responses about the fans of joustar blindly and pathetically defending
the plagiarism with stupid comments like the "plagiarised ones look
better" etc. and about the author who refused to apologise and yet in
utter stupidity continue to release another plagiarised piece of work
are just so typical of the people in China. A whole nation of people who
are so blindly patriotic and defensive of everything that comes out of
China! Copycat work and all included. How are they supposed to
improve and move forward if they keep this attitude? Their collective
pride and egos are only getting stronger by the day what with the
olympics and surging economy(so what?). If left unchecked, they are
only going to get more hostility from the world.
• Login To Post Comments
Not to be racist, but this
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2008-04-16 14:58.
Not to be racist, but this comment shows the general insensitivity of
Americans to foreign nationals.
I know QUITE a few Chinese who are
critical of their government, and are lobbying to have recently
incarcerated political prisoners freed.
Please think twice before you
insult an entire ethnicity.
• Login To Post Comments
"A whole nation of people
Submitted by Hana_chu (not verified) on Sun, 2008-07-13 02:39.
"A whole nation of people who are so blindly patriotic and defensive.
[...] How are they supposed to improve and move forward if they keep
this attitude? Their collective pride and egos are only getting stronger
by the day. If left unchecked, they are only going to get more hostility
from the world."
You are definitely american. Not a racist american, but a bigoted one
who feels the need to criticize a nation just because he doesn’t agree
with it.
The way you judge others, let me judge you. People like you add to
the stereotype and help us disapprove a nation like the USA.
You are a proof of that, and I think your words apply to you as well.
• Login To Post Comments
Jumping to the conclusion
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2009-06-04 10:54.
Jumping to the conclusion that he must be an "American" even when
he's just an anonymous and he doesn't say where he lives in? So
every negative comment on the internet must belong to an American
is what you're thinking Am I right? You're no better then he is to
generalize an entire nation and to think it must only be the Americans
that criticizes China. How do you know if he's even from America?
• Login To Post Comments
lol
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2009-06-24 01:06.
Really one must laugh at all the irony
• Login To Post Comments
I know I am C:
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2009-06-26 15:01.
I know I am C:
• Login To Post Comments
These cases of copyright
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2008-02-28 22:49.
These cases of copyright infringement are seriously ridiculous. I can't
believe that publishing companies are suing artists for work that
resembles another. What happened to inspiration? It's as if an artist
can't admire a piece of artwork and reproduce it without being accused
of plagiarism and getting sued.
Takehiko Inoue's pictures should naturally be based on the NBA. How
else can he draw such real poses and expressions without a real
reference?
I really can't believe the extent companies will go to sue artists for
copyright infringement. Artists should have the right to a reference.
• Login To Post Comments
On Seishi
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2008-04-16 15:11.
Oh, yeah--Seishi and Masashi are identical twins. My brother and I,
who are only siblings, (using anecdotal evidence here) come up with
the same storylines on a regular basis (much to our mutual
embarrassment). Imagine what it must be like having almost the exact
same nucleotides, growing up in the same neighborhood and obviously
choosing the same profession over the same passion with manga
growing up.
I think Seishi deserves a round of applause for coming up with
something original in some way at all, actually. It just shows how
creative these two are.
I love that video on plagiarism. It does the heart good. With any luck,
the legal mess with the so-called original manga publisher in China will
be straightened out--obviously, they need a large company like
Shueisha to breathe down their neck.
Ask yourself how the editors
are unaware of it.
Besides, the same argument can be made for a lot of books I've read
recently and all comic books in general. Originality is hard to come by,
and the more people produce, the greater the similarities.
It would have been better journalism to mention the Chinese manga
producer guilty of plagiarism in a more rounded way, explaining the
roots of plagiarism via the copyright law in greater detail and stressing
the need for original works in China to be evaluated with greater
awareness of the issue in mind.
As well as better protected--actual
manga artists, like the creator of The Ravages of Time, Chan Mou--are
also plagiarized. (Link here for the wikipedia article--wish it would
come stateside. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ravages_of_Time)
If the article were more balanced and less of an attempt for appeal,
you'd have made a very good point. While it still had impact, the
article is far from newsworthy, and doesn't evaluate with clarity.
Maybe next time.
• Login To Post Comments
Be Smart
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2008-05-01 21:38.
The Clamp one is overall pathectic, I mean c'mon, if you're gonna steal
then at the very least do it smartly. I mean, don't exactly copy the
pictures!!! That's too obvious! At least steal a little better so that when
they do find out you won't look like a moron.
• Login To Post Comments
On Slam Dunk vs. NBA.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2008-07-14 22:54.
The similarities are uncanny because every player that is
fundamentally sound does these poses. Players often mimic their idols
and have similar stances. Basic basketball technique is same whether
you play in Japan or America. You guys are idiots.
• Login To Post Comments
I find it funny comparing
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2009-04-20 22:35.
I find it funny comparing slam dunk with real life pictures. I mean
those poses in NBA are so common...
I agree with the other one but...slam dunk and NBA photos???!!
-_- That shouldn't be a form of comparison...
• Login To Post Comments
|:
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2009-04-28 16:10.
Some of these are very very similar and may be plagiarism, but other
than that, I think you went a little 'similarity happy'. Hell, some of
these don't even look that much alike. Others are most likely purely
coincidental considering the type of panels they are and the scenes.
• Login To Post Comments
Really NOW?!
Submitted by KronicAlice (not verified) on Wed, 2009-04-29 21:39.
Okay now really?! Some of the accusation made for Hoshino are kinda
stupid....Like the Misa and Allen one...DUMB!! and the two at the
bottom with Allen standing in the middle of his friends...thats another
one that i don't get. I mean Hoshino probably used it as an
inspirational piece. I know i do that all the time. I see a pose i like and
i will draw my characters like that. Of course i will give credit where
credit is due.
But some...I can see the resemblence. Like the TriGun and DGM...that
one got me. And Jasdevi...>.> that you can't ignore. But I really hope
that Hoshino doesn't stop drawing. I mean...Kanda's past was just
being revealed and what about Lavi's eye patch?! Or everybody else's
past? I hope this doesn't affect her too much and I pray that this will
pass without harming anyone. And thats saying something since I'm
Atheist. ^-'
• Login To Post Comments
Overrated
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2009-04-30 12:09.
I don't think that the comparison between Jasdevi and that 'thing' is
reason enough for such a serious accuse as plagiarism. It's the same
as if manga artist were gonna start suing other artists for stealing their
characters' hairstyles, if you know what I mean ^^" It seemed more
like to me that Hoshino had used that 'thing' as inspiration for Jasdevi,
and as you said, one has to be allowed to do that.
As for the Trigun One, they were very alike, yes, but still; how many
other versions of an incident like that can you make? :P Maybe I'm a
bit naive about this one, but I still think plagiarism is a bit too drastic.
(I don't know what those persons from Trigun were saying in those
bubbles of theirs though... I've only read DGM)
~~
I also want to
say, not to you KronicAlice :), one has to accept the fact that some of
the authors have similar drawing techniques (D.Gray-Man and Death
Note). When you go to school and learn, everyone learns the exact
same things (2+2=4), it is later that you develop your own way of
thinking. I bet this goes for manga schools too. So if some of the
drawing techniques are similar, then I say that's just the way it is.
You want to know what plagiarism really is? Go watch Family Guy. If
you know what Simpsons is of course. ;P
My last words: Copyright is overrated.
• Login To Post Comments
I know what you mean.
Submitted by KronicAlice (not verified) on Fri, 2009-07-10 23:31.
Yeah now that I look at the pictures again I notice that alot of them
don't have alot of similaritys. Like how certain characters look. The
Jasdevi and the other guy...now that I look at it...they don't have alot
of similarities...except for hair and maybe the robe thing.
The trigun thing was more similar...but I was reading something with
almost the similar style in paneling and idea...O.o Then I understood
that alot of stuff is out there....
(I don't know either...I should read
that chapter to find out...>.>)
~~
yeah! Exactly!! The art schools
actually teach you how to be different in style and how to make your
art special and unique! C:
Actually...I was just watching that and I'm a big fan of the
Simpsons...so I thought that was a huge rip-off...>.>
True that!! :D
• Login To Post Comments
Ok some cases are pretty
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 2009-05-02 06:34.
Ok some cases are pretty surprising... but i am still going to enjoy the
series' regardless. I happen to love Samurai deeper kyo.
• Login To Post Comments
Um. Really now.
Submitted by Sama (not verified) on Mon, 2009-05-04 12:20.
Okay, the deal with Clamp and the other artist...sure. That, I can
understand, and it's really stupid to have pulled a move like that.
Shameless really.
But in terms of DGM, Slam Dunk!, and some of the other "Panel
copied" manga- I have to say this as an aspiring artist- A Good huge
bit of it is absolutely ridiculous. I mean, sure, there are a lot of poses-
but in what is learned as a manga-ka, there are specific poses used for
dramatic feeling. Now those are pretty limited- so chances are there
are ALWAYS going to be a panel or so that looks copied. Sit down and
leaf through a bunch of manga one day and compare.
Artists use others artwork as inspiration. I'd be thrilled if someone
ever used my stuff as inspiration, definitely not sue-happy. Artist
borrow all the time :/ Or sometimes just think they're stuff is original
and oops! Someone did it before hand.
I'll never get this copyright-one-thing-looks-too-similar thing. :U
• Login To Post Comments
Great article. But to be
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2009-05-08 09:50.
Great article.
But to be honest, when it comes to the D. gray-man one, it is kind of
difficult to believe some of them are plagiarism.. I mean, the one with
the half face or whatever has been used in many other mangas, and
the last ones weren't all that similar. Only the other two examples
showed seem exactly the same (well, similar).. And as a DGM fan, I
really couldn't care less if some panels really were plagiarized - as long
as the story itself is original. All I want is to know how it ends.
I don't really know the other ones, so I can't talk much, but the
Chinese examples were just SO obvious...
• Login To Post Comments
It's fucking stupid how you
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2009-05-11 13:27.
It's fucking stupid how you actually compare REAL pictures to manga
pictures. Jesus christ.
• Login To Post Comments
Plagiarism?
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2009-05-18 13:19.
Not half of this counts as Plagiarism. It's simply gathering references.
Even talented artists need to use references every once in a while.
Gathering references from camera angles, poses, clothing and hair is
pretty common, not to mention pretty useful.
A lot of it counts as inspiration, as well. Yes - inspiration, NOT
plagiarism.
Just because something resemles another, doesn't mean
it plagiarism. You're overreacting over all this.
Sure, things back in the 50's and whatnot might have been original,
because it was new and exotic and for a change. Now that everything
has become a part of the daily life, not to mention of a large selection,
resemlances are to be found. That doesn't mean it's plagiarism. What
counts as original is what first hit the stage decades ago. No one can
expect others to come up with new, revolutionary footage every time a
new manga or movie or whatever comes up. It's not that easy.
• Login To Post Comments
D. Gray Man : Allen Walker vs. Edward Elric
Submitted by you, but sleep-typing (not verified) on Thu, 2009-06-11
00:06.
Speaking of accidental similarities and cliches, I think it's pretty much
common knowledge in the dgm fandom that Allen Walker (esp. w/
long hair in chapter 159) looks uncannily like Edward Elric from
Fullmetal Alchemist.
The link below, if it chooses to work, got the
Allen Walker page (no comparison, sorry )
http://wateria.deviantart.com/art/Edward-Lookalike-Allen-Walker-858
65744
Also, there are some character similarities, like:
both characters have
an artificial limb, can eat a small country into bankruptcy, are short,
and get insulted for it (both called bean sprout, i think)by a rivaling
male character (Kanda and Roy Mustang --> voiced in the English dub
by the same voice actor!! ^ ^)
I'm not, even for a second, suggesting that one plagirized the
other--the character traits are just vague similarity and the look-alike
thing is such a cool coincedence, I was squeeling happily for hours.
Just thought I would mention it anywayz--> lighten up the mood.
I
love D. Gray Man and I hope all this silliness gets resolved ASAP, so
we can tackle Kanda already!!
• Login To Post Comments
Allen's arm is not
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2009-06-18 22:23.
Allen's arm is not artificial. His arm is real, it's just messed up because
he has a parasite type Innocence. Edward lost his arm and his
brother's body due to a failed invocation, and replaces it with one
made of metal. His is artificial, Allen's is not. You could say both has a
deformity relating to their arms.
It is actually quite easy to compare
FMA and D.Gray-Man. True, both are very different, but some of the
plot points and characters can seem similar at times. I personally think
King Bradley and Leverrier are very similar characters. Ignoring their
shared love of their own creepy mustaches, both seem to be very
angry looking good guys at the start. However, we all know Bradley
turns out to be the Homunculi known as Wrath. And Leverrier seems
to have ties to the opposing sides as well, since he's trying to drag
down Allen and since he sent the broken part of the egg to Renee in
order to construct the Third Exorcists.
• Login To Post Comments
Is it just me or does
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2009-06-26 15:18.
Is it just me or does Bradley and Leverrier(more so) look like Hitler???
• Login To Post Comments
- It's a Long Post.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2009-06-19 04:42.
To begin with, if we consider using references as plagiarism, then for
god's sake... What an easy way to make money! *spits (Pretend to
pose for someone who needs a reference for some kind of posture,
after that, two time the person and report that the artist
COPYRIGHTED your image by showing a REAL LIFE photo of THAT
POSE and the artist's work. God... Court case? Law suit? Arguments?
BE damned.)
Sorry, I had been talking to myself ever since I came to this page and
looked at all the "supposed" plagiarism cases.
Well, as mentioned by some reviewers in the above posts, some of it is
seriously ridiculous. I won't say what exactly because majority of it
has all been said.
My point of view is this; only FAMOUS or renowned works are found
and accused of plagiarism. 'Cuz people read the manga, and thought,
"hey! This looks like... " Like c'mon, everyday and at anytime,
someone is drawing their favourite character by:
a) tracing
b) reference
C) anything else you can think of
That's a form of 'plagiarism', 'cept that these works are kept to be
admired by "themselves" and as ways to be praised. (like c'mon, I do
it all the time. 8) ] THat so, then why was the manga allowed to be
out in the first place? Why didn't the company that allowed the
distribution thought, "Hey, doesn't this look like so-and-so's work?
ARt? Whatever?"
Heck.
THe fact that it's out there goes to show that IT'S ACCEPTED.
IT'S LEGAL.
And like c'mon, we're humans. How many poses can we do? How
many hairstyles can we have? (There's this thing about DGM ALlen's
hairstyle resembling Sasuke's one...) And like, if we've read and seen
many pieces of artwork etc, OF COURSE we get influenced by them.
Hell, unconsciously influenced? MOst possible since the "pose" is
somewhere in your sub-conscious swimming around.
And yeah, there's always this chance that the works are published
without even knowing that they bear similiarites to the archaic ones.
Who has the ability to read the first comic/manga produced to the
latest one? Believe me, by the time "you've" done that, your creative
juices have run dry. There's no way in hell you're brain's able to
function with all the pictures zooming around in your head.
Want originality?
Think of an out-of-this world hairstyle for the most action pack and
tension-filled manga piece you're creating (I'm using an analogy), in
the end? It's all humour since one cannot go to the next page after
staring at all the weird hairstyles that are so DAMN original.
All the natural hairstyles have already been used, real world, people.
Reference, and influence. Wear a hat, style your hair into the shape of
who-knows-what.
THat's originality. Cuz that's what no one would do, unless you're dead
set on producing comedy. Gosh.
Oh, one last bit. (pardon me). In anime/manga/whateverRELATED,
you start with the basics, don't ya? With a small change in eye size,
cheeks, nose, mouth, even a mole, you'll get either a totally different
person or a totally identical person as someone whom you may not
know. Believe me, take a random picture of someone or something
and add freckles to the picture, scar, anything!! You're bound to get
someone... similar.
And definitely, while watching animes and such, I do notice similarities
in character designs between the characters. Different, but still similar.
So, what's that now?
I'm so sorry for writing this much. I was seriously piqued by all this
plagiarism deals. GOsh.
Was the video for humour? If it was, I was unable to enjoy it. Or
perhaps I could say that, I was smirking with indignation.
Preposterous, seriously...
Still, I thank this website for hosting this plagiarism
stuff/things/whatever.
I'm now, at a loss for words...
(Excuse my insanely long post. I just NEEDED to type my opinions
out.)
Have a nice day. :) :D =) =D
• Login To Post Comments
Thanks, you said what I
Submitted by Anon (not verified) on Sat, 2009-06-20 16:08.
Thanks, you said what I wanted to.
Copyright laws are getting out of hand. Walt Disney bought copyrights
for the Happy Birthday song. Donald Trump copyrighted his line,
"you're fired," and Paris Hilton copyrighted her line, "That's so hot."
People can't even draw mickey mouse on, say...their house wall or
whatever. This is outrageous.
• Login To Post Comments
plagiarism
Submitted by misa-chan (not verified) on Fri, 2009-06-19 12:48.
this topic of plagiarism is pretty obvious when compared between the
chinese artists and clamp works. i mean... that is really really obvious
that the chinese artists copied practically line by line from clamp!!!
as for the d.gray.man i beg to differ. i mean it is slightly different, and
i believe in hoshino. because her case is not as extreme as those
chinese artists. at least she did not draw line for line!
for the nana and slamdunk one. i think it is like completely out of
topic. i mean sometimes the managaka might use real life items/ppl
for inspiration to draw their own characters and poses. what happens
when i use the london bridge as a reference and draw it in my
manga... am i plagiarising? maybe it would help if they put some
references to whom they are getting their ideas from to clear the air
that they might not be intentionally copying.
• Login To Post Comments
What the hell? They stopped
Submitted by Mrs.Freakshow (not verified) on Wed, 2009-06-24
15:43.
What the hell? They stopped D.Gray Man for coicidences ?
Some of theese so called plagiarisms are stupid , I mean some artists
DO use refences , from reals pics , mostly background and poses
though
The Chinese and CLAMP are way to obvious , but the rest?
Most poses have become 'traditional' in some way , but whatever I say
probably won't work against the REAL problem , of how artists are
being sued for fake plagiarism , they're being sued for coincidences . e
• Login To Post Comments
D.Gray-Man? Come on! That's
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2009-06-30 22:10.
D.Gray-Man? Come on! That's not plagiarism, people are really blind to
think like that...
• Login To Post Comments
EXACTLY!!
Submitted by KronicAlice (not verified) on Fri, 2009-07-10 23:35.
Exactly!! i'm glad someone else see's what I see!!!
• Login To Post Comments
Seriously.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2009-08-13 23:15.
Those shots are used all the time. You can't copyright an angle, that's
just ridiculous. That's like a photographer saying no one else can take
a picture of the Liberty Bell head-on. what kind of shit is that? What if
an artist up and said "You can't draw a picture of ANY character with a
two-point perspective from above. At all. It's illegal now, you do it and
I'll sue you." Really? Really? Come on, people. This is just plain idiotic
now. I drew a picture of someone using the same shot as Hoshino and
Obata. Shit, will I be sued to? I can't draw a close-up of a girl with the
wind blowing anymore? HOT DAMN, someone shoot me for using a
very common close-up. I better not leave my house, Obata might sue
me for it.
I'm sorry, but how mentally inept do you have to be to go
for this? Tell me, who here hasn't based the appearance or personality
of an OC off of something you've seen before? Even if it was
unintentional, I'm pretty damn sure at LEAST 85% of people have.
Damn, can we not make fanart anymore without adding a disclaimer?
No more doujinshis? No more fan-based RPs? Fanfics? Fan OCs? I have
to discontinue my DGM, Death Note, DBZ [and others] OC RPs
because I'll get sued? So what if someone used the same shot as you,
take it as a compliment. They liked your work, so you sue them for it?
Jesus Christ, and I thought people were getting smarter.
• Login To Post Comments
Common!!!!!
Submitted by Shirokaze (not verified) on Sat, 2009-08-15 19:58.
OMFG
get real!
NBA and Slam Dunk!?
omg
some1 pls needs to go and make clear things
between plagiarims and
inspiration
i mean , HELLO
IN THAT CASE WE CAN NOT DRAW ANYTHING
ANYMORE
cos everything has been done already
or similar to it
there was another article where they show that a picture of a lamp,
and the table of a restaurant was copied...
i was like
ok.. WTF?!
so i must creat my own table and lamp?
hahahaha
this is so stupid
• Login To Post Comments
interesting but who cares...
Submitted by leonnasagawa (not verified) on Sun, 2009-08-16 05:17.
I find it very interesting how similar other manga is to other manga
but overall who the hell cares. I mean there is only so much you can
do to be original and pretty much almost every plotline, character
design and pose has been all used up in older manga.
Also the whole thing about D.Gray-man being plagiarized is crap
because as similiar as it is to other manga like Trigun, the styles are
still very different. Overall, I'm glad I found this site because I find all
of this to be interesting and fun but to call some of these works
plagiarised is still dumb. Just as dumb as the cabury dairy milk
company trying to sue another chocolate company because they were
using purple wrapping as their chocolates cover.
I'm also glad I found this site because I learned of the existence of
666 Satan which is so similar to the manga I love that it makes me
happy and now I want to read it. Lol I find it funny that the plagiarized
chinese company did a better job and had more detail in their
plagiarized works than the original Clamp.
• Login To Post Comments
bwa ha
Submitted by ignorant wanderer (not verified) on Mon, 2009-08-17
05:42.
after some time reading all the comments, i have to say that everyone
made a point.
yes, obviously everyone needs inspiration and
reference.
some of the assumed 'copycats as you call them' is jut a
coincidence.
this is completely stupid.
i mean come on, if you were
to 'plagiarize', you'd have to do a better job.
it's like a careless and
stupid theft. and it's waay too obvious.
if i were to do this, i'd look up
to loads of different sources and pick up bits from here and there and
a bit of my ideas and there you have it, a genuine artwork. lol.
• Login To Post Comments
D.grey man vs. deathnote
Submitted by ddrt (not verified) on Wed, 2009-08-19 12:36.
I dare you to find a manga that has a long haired man and then show
me a profile picture that doesn't look the exact same. I have even
drawn a picture like that but I've read neither d. grey man or Death
note. (which I probably should they look pretty interesting
• Login To Post Comments
WTF?! d.gray-man?? no fucking way!!
Submitted by imsomad (not verified) on Thu, 2009-08-20 00:17.
oh c'mon now ppl!! oh well, at least the plot is very original..but shes
still being called for plagiarism..?? and bout that tyki's hair closing his
face..thats just dont make sense at all..grrrrr..wtf! i luv both
d.gray-man and death note..but..this allegation just ..urrgg..oh
well..stop stop!!
• Login To Post Comments
Wow
Submitted by angryfangirl (not verified) on Tue, 2009-08-25 08:30.
D.gray-man plagiarism is a piece of crap. It cant be helped to have the
same reaction when that happens. I mean come on!! the pictures too..
its too pathetic. If ever that's the reason why it has been discontinued
then those people are crazy!
Slam dunk and NBA...lol
it seriously made me laugh. Of course they
will have the same position, posture, etc. Its the same game for crying
out loud!!
next thing we'll know is Prince of Tennis has been sued for
plagiarism too.
• Login To Post Comments
hmmm..
Submitted by dina (not verified) on Thu, 2009-09-03 11:55.
some points are valid.. some are quite a bit of stretch.. artists use ref.
photos all the time. in cases they did not buy the photo as long as
there's enough changes. there's no infringement. if their drawings bear
enough resemblance to the original photo. as long as they purchase
rights to use photo, there's no infringement of copyright laws. often
when you purchase the rights to photo you're allow to do whatever
you want with it.
you need to understand copyright laws better before writing this type
of article. b/c plagarism is a serious accusation for a comic book artist.
also this is why most japanese manga artist take their own photos for
ref. this way if there's a disput the artist has original photos they've
taken themselves to back them up.
also if you draw enough manga frames invariably you'll end up with a
character or frames that look like something from another manga. the
chinese case to clamp is obvious plagerism but the slum duck vs .
MBA.. com'on!!
dina
• Login To Post Comments
Well....
Submitted by JustMe (not verified) on Mon, 2009-09-14 14:17.
I'm not surprised by the chinese copying anything anymore >__>
• Login To Post Comments
Do some research before you write an article like this!
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2009-09-16 18:33.
I would just like to point out that you really need to do more research.
The photograph that you compare to a peice by Ai Yazawa is actually
a royalty free stock image. Would you like me to repeat this again so
you understand? ROYALTY FREE.
It HAS no laws against plagerism
affecting it because it is MEANT to be used as a reference or basis.
Hence ROYALTY FREE STOCK.
It even says this on the EXACT website
that you linked to to prove your point! Oh the irony, dont you love to
spread it on toast in the morning?
I would also like to say that i wholeheartedly agree with those people
posting above on the Slam Dunk issue.
So, next time sweetheart, find out what you are actually writing about
before you make a complete fool of yourself.
• Login To Post Comments
DGM ...
Submitted by Fang (not verified) on Wed, 2009-10-28 08:37.
I felt sick looking at this ..
._. I was so eager looking forward reading DGM..
D: and plus i have wait so long for it..
Just because of some similarities with another manga (..does it even
look the same?)
sick.sick.sick.
I love mangas and animes.
I hate it when without any
proof a mangaka is getting accused of plagiarism. Have you even ask
the mangaka themselves before you accused them of something?
D: Posts like these makes me want to cry(abit.). -.-
• Login To Post Comments
CLAMP and the CHINESE WORKS
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2009-10-30 09:45.
That caught me like WTF?
and for people who said the chinese
version are prettier and more detailed, truthfully, i just dont really
understand. I found CLAMPS's are far better than theirs. CLAMP's line
are clearer. I must admit the chinese colourings are good, however
since i dont really like the style, this is out of my league.
and for
people who still defencing the shinese author... Please. dont go around
defending cheaters. in the end it may ended up making CLAMP
stopping their works and then we are left with nothing to read/ see/
drooling over or in their case, to 'reference' from.
for other comics... I agree. we need to see real world, refrence from it.
like a lamp. or sportman. we dont want to see an unbelieveably bulk
guy (like HULK, for instance) for a basketballer just because the
mangaka was forced to draw something that could be define as
plagiarism.
I am Chinese myself and I hate that publisher. cheers.