Embed
Email

Lean in healthcare

Document Sample

Shared by: huanghengdong
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
1/21/2012
language:
pages:
65
From the Venetian Arsenal to

Henry Ford to Taiichi Ohno:

Putting a Global Perspective on

Healthcare Process Improvement



Keith A. Willoughby, Ph.D.

Hanlon Scholar in International Business

Edwards School of Business

One-slide bio

 Born and raised in Canada

 B.Comm. – University of Saskatchewan (U of S)

 M.Sc. - UBC

 Transportation analyst, BC Transit

 Ph.D. - University of Calgary

 Professor, U of S, 1997-1999

 Professor, Bucknell University (Lewisburg, PA), 1999-2005

 Senior Operations Research Specialist, Saskatchewan Health

Quality Council, 2005-2008

 Professor, U of S, 2008-present

Purpose (long version)

Discuss the application of process improvement

methods and principles (known as “Lean”) to

investigate, analyze and improve health care

systems

Demonstrate the global nature of health care

process improvement

Purpose (medium version)

Lean methods are advantageous and

valuable

Hospital systems have boatloads of

inefficient processes

Can we connect the two?

Purpose (short version)





To make common sense common practice

Presentation overview

1. Historical background

2. Overview of Lean process improvement

3. Description of Lean tools

4. Case study

Words of warning

I am not a clinician… but I will be talking

about the delivery of health care

I am not an historian… but I will be

discussing global history

I am a “process engineer”

Is this “international” research?

Health care is

perhaps the most

international of all our

industries

Is this material relevant?

In various

circumstances and

situations, the

delivery of health care

affects each and

everyone of us

Some sobering statistics...

Total Canadian health care expenditure

per capita

4,500



4,000



3,500



3,000



2,500



2,000



1,500



1,000



500



0

Total Canadian health care expenditure

(% of GDP)

12.0





10.0





8.0





6.0





4.0





2.0





0.0

Total expenditure per capita (US$)

United States

Norway

Canada

Belgium

Austria

Germany

France

Sweden

United Kingdom

Finland

New Zealand

Korea

Czech Republic

Mexico

Turkey



0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

How can we improve the situation?

Rewind to 2005…

Application of Lean principles

in health care

Two years later

2007: UK hosted the First Global Lean

Healthcare summit

What is “Lean”?

A set of quality improvement tools and

philosophy designed to eliminate the sources of

waste in a system



“The least wasteful way to provide better, safer

healthcare to patients – with no delays”

– Going Lean in the NHS (2007)

Why did they call it “Lean”?

 Jim Womack (1990)



 5-year, $5 million study of

global vehicle production

– International Motor Vehicle

Program



 Co-authored “The Machine

That Changed the World”

with Dan Jones and Dan

Roos







18

Japan’s contribution

 Taiichi Ohno (1912-1990)



 1950’s: Toyota Production

System

– Continuous Flow Production

– Just-in-Time (JIT)

– Eliminate defects

– Top management commitment

– Employee participation



 1969: Established the Operations

Management Consulting Group

– “Trainers” commissioned to

promote Lean thinking within

Toyota and the firms in its supplier

group



19

Earlier contributions

 Henry Ford, 1920s



 Continuous Flow Assembly



 Reduce wasted time

– 1913-1914: doubled

production with no

increase in workforce



– 1920-1926: Cycle time

dropped from 21 days to

2 days



20

But this was all based upon…

 The Venetian arsenal



 Republic of Venice, early

16th century



 Could produce nearly one

ship each day

– Standardized parts

– Production-line basis

The 8 sources of waste

Correction (defects) Waiting







Overproduction Inventory







Motion Overprocessing







Material movement Underutilized human talent

(transportation)

Correction or Defects

Overproduction

Motion

Waiting

Waiting

Ever feel like you’ve been waiting too long?

Excess inventory

Overprocessing

How do production methods apply

to Healthcare?

 Healthcare has several “production” processes



 Manufactured products and health care services involve the

concepts of quality, safety, customer satisfaction, staff

satisfaction and cost effectiveness



 The completion of a product involves thousands of processes-

many of them very complex.



 Many products, if they fail, can cause fatality

Two Lean tools

Poka-yokes

– Fail-safe measures





5S

– Order, organization, visual display

Vehicles

 Gas cap tether does

not allow the motorist

to drive off without the

cap



 Arrow to indicate

location of fuel tanks

(driver/ passenger

side)

– Great for rental

vehicles

Poka-yokes in London streets



Tourists used to

right-hand side

driving



Instructions are

printed right on the

asphalt

At the airport

If your bag fits

in the size-wise

unit it will fit in

the overhead

compartment

Here’s one from my old neck of the

woods!

Route 220 in

central

Pennsylvania



In theory… helps

motorists to drive

safely



Is it followed?

Sandwich trays

Preventing

customers from

discarding the

tray means

making the trash

can opening

smaller than the

tray

In the kitchen

This stove burner

turns off

automatically

when a pot or

pan is removed

Poka yokes in health care

Medical gas outlets

are designed so

that the proper

valves will only fit in

their corresponding

outlets.

The philosophy of 5S

“5S” stands for 5 Japanese words each

beginning with the letter “S”



English translation:

– Sort, Set, Shine, Standardize, Sustain

5S in practice

A system for making

the abnormal look

visually obvious

More 5S

Inventory organization

from a Saskatchewan

health care unit

Case study

Applying Lean methods and principles in

Emergency department patient flow

Background









Saskatoon Star-Phoenix (Jan. 12, 2002)

And some more









Saskatoon Star-Phoenix (April 17, 2003)

It’s a political issue







Regina Leader-Post

(June 10, 2004)

Data collection

City Royal St. Pasqua General

Hospital University Paul’s







Total 217 536 324 324 327

patients

observed

A walk through the Emergency

Department…

Triage Initial

+ + ED Occupancy time

time Wait

time

What did the data tell us?

400



350



300

Time (minutes)









250



200 ED occupancy time

Initial wait time

150

Triage time

100



50



0

H









al

PH









a

H









U





qu







er

C









R

S

S









en

as





G

P

Improvement efforts

Selected physician reassessment wait

times at Saskatoon’s Royal University

Hospital (RUH)

Saskatoon improvement project

Collaborated with RUH Quality

Improvement (QI) teams



Used Model for Improvement and Plan-

Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles

PDSA cycles

 Small tests of change, with multiple attempts of each idea



 1. Create colour-code for responsible ED physician for each patient



 2. Create visual cue on white board indicating patient is ready for

reassessment



 3. Create “Think Reassessment” worksheets to help ED RNs know

the appropriate time to ask MD to reassess

– Development of standard processes

Physician Reassessment

Wait Times

100



80 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

Time (minutes)









60



40



20



0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Wait times 42 19 42 44 54 48 58 23 50 38 43 59 5 5 3 2 4 10 48 3 7 20 0 5 0 15 30 15 5 30

Median 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43

Achieving process improvement



Much more difficult than the previous slide

makes it appear



Admittedly, we struggled to carry out 3

days of PDSA cycles

Tale from the front

Saskatoon teams

were repeatedly

pulled back from

QI duties due to

busy conditions

in the ED

Conclusions

 Patients who visit EDs spend a significant amount of time waiting

(50% of visit)



 For some high-level processes, wait times are substantially longer

than service times



 Lengthy wait times:

– Bed ready, consultations, physician reassessment



 QI teams can generate improvements with minimal materials cost

Impediments

Staff turnover



QI teams pulled back into regular care duties

Impediments

Data gathering takes time and costs

money



Every one in the care team needs to be

involved

Lessons learned: #1



All seem to acknowledge the value of

Lean tools

Lessons learned: #2

How do you create/facilitate a culture that

can accept/adopt/implement such

improvement methods?

Lessons learned: #3

Listen to the voice of the patient… but be

prepared to act on their voice!

Lessons learned: #4

The wording is important



Is “Lean” the best term?



UK has recently begun an initiative called

“Releasing Time to Care”

Lessons learned: #5

Top-down + Bottom-up = Success

One final word

 “Improving the ED is like

trying to change your fan

belt with the engine

running”

Dr. Les Vertesi, Associate

Director of Health

Research (Fraser Health

Authority, British Columbia)





 There are no quick fixes

Thank you for your time

Questions?



Related docs
Other docs by huanghengdong
Which Stage of Public school development
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
ArchitectureandReuse
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
measureSize
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
exam2
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Newsletter_12.11.09
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
luke_Images
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!