Embed
Email

Preliminary Examination of Retention Rates of F

Document Sample
Preliminary Examination of Retention Rates of F
Preliminary Examination of Retention Rates of Full-Time Freshman Entering in Fall 2004

and 2005 by First Semester Grade Point Average

August 22, 2007

This white paper provides a preliminary overview of retention rates by first semester grade point

average of full-time entering freshmen at Central Connecticut State University. Initial findings

suggest that the success of entering full-time freshmen in their first semester is a significant

factor related to the probability that they will return for a second and third year. Full-time

freshmen entering in Fall 2004 had an overall one-year retention rate of 80%, but for the 23% of

the class who earned a first semester GPA below a 2.0, the one-year retention rate was 42% (see

Chart 1). For full-time freshmen entering in 2005, the overall retention rate was 76%, but for the

29% earning below a 2.0 first semester GPA, the one year retention rate was about 40% (see

Chart 2).

The overall two-year retention rate (to the junior year) for entering freshmen shows a similar

pattern. While the overall rate at which full-time freshmen entering CCSU in 2004 returned for a

third year at the University was 65.7%, the two-year retention rate for those who earned a GPA

below 2.0 in the first semester of their freshman year was just under 30%.



Chart 1. One-Year and Two-Year Retention Rates of the Fall 2004 First-

Time, Full-Time Freshman Cohort by First Semester GPA



100.0% 89.0% 89.2%

90.0% 87.6% 84.6%

One Year Retention Rate









80.2% 75.8%

80.0%

69.8% 82.5%

70.0% 65.7% 72.5% 75.6%

60.0% 67.1%

50.0% 52.4%

40.0% 28.9% 51.6%

30.0% 19.2%

20.0% 16.9%

10.0% 15.4%

0.0%

0

w









9









9









9









9









9









0

1.









.4









.9









.4









.9









.4









.0

a

dr









-1









-1









-2









-2









-3









-4

ow









00









50









00









50









00









50

i th









el









1.









1.









2.









2.









3.









3.

W









B









23% of Freshman Class

First Semester GPA



Retained to Second Year Retained to Third Year

Overall One-Year Retention Rate Overall Two-Year Retention Rate

Data Sources: StufileF04, StufileF04ED, StufileF05, StufileF05ED, StufileF06





125 DAVIDSON HALL · 1615 STANLEY STREET · NEW BRITAIN, CT 06050 · TEL. (860) 832-1780 · FAX (860) 832-1781

HTTP://WWW.CCSU.EDU/PLANNING · EMAIL: HOSCHBRJ@CCSU.EDU

Chart 2. One Year Retention Rates of the Fall 2005 First-Time, Full-Time

Freshman Cohort by First Semester GPA



100.0% 88.3% 88.4%

90.0% 82.0% 84.6%

75.9%

One Year Retention Rate









80.0% 76.1%

70.0%

58.4%

60.0%

50.0%

36.3%

40.0%

30.0%

16.7%

20.0%

10.0%

0.0%

0

w









9









9









9









9









9









0

1.









.4









.9









.4









.9









.4









.0

a

dr









-1









-1









-2









-2









-3









-4

ow









00









50









00









50









00









50

i th









el









1.









1.









2.









2.









3.









3.

W









B









29% of Freshman Class

First Semester GPA



One Year Retention Rate FY 2005 Overall FY Cohort Retention Rate

Data Sources: StufileF05, StufileF05ED, StufileF06



Two important hypotheses may be advanced from this preliminary examination of retention rates

by first semester GPA:

1. The GPA entering full-time freshmen earn in their first semester appears to be predictive

of progression to the next year at CCSU; students with higher GPAs are more likely to

return for subsequent years.



2. As the proportion of students who earn a first semester GPA below 2.0 decreases, overall

retention rates may tend to increase, and vice versa.



To the extent that these hypotheses may be valid, the preliminary findings suggest that a focus on

student success as an intended outcome will have a positive effect on retention and graduation

rates as indicators of institutional effectiveness.



Additional and more in-depth research will be conducted in Fall 2007 to identify the extent to

which these hypotheses may be valid. It is important to add several caveats to this sort of

analysis, however. First, it is important to recognize that GPA reflects a complex intersection of

student motivation and adjustment with academic preparation and achievement; factors such as

physical and emotional health, drive to achieve, and their external environment influence

students’ academic performance as it is registered by their GPA. Second, the findings of this

analysis should not be misconstrued as a call to lower academic standards nor to award higher

grades to students who did not earn them. Rather findings point toward a goal of improving the

level of student learning so that fewer students perform below faculty expectations.





Preliminary Examination of Retention Rates of Full-Time Freshman Entering in Fall 2004 and 2005 by First Semester GPA Page 2


Related docs
Other docs by MitchBurroughs
Power Point presentation[113]
Views: 25  |  Downloads: 2
Forms Instructions for Purchase Requisition
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
Sole Member LLC Certified Resolution
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
Study_Abroad_Course_Proposal_Form
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Analysis Basel 1A ANPR vs. Basel 1A NPR
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
Issues from the 110th Congress Letter[238]
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
Letter
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Carolyn Healy Latin America Regional Update
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!