Embed
Email

(handout)

Document Sample
(handout)
Persistence to Graduation for Transfer 

and “Native” Students: A Case Study  

John W. Miller, Ph.D.

President, Central Connecticut State University



Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D.

Director of Institutional Research & Assessment, Central Connecticut State University

Abstract 

With the expansion of the community colleges, issues surrounding access, persistence, transfer of credits

and graduation rates have grown. Some researchers find transfer students persist at a lower rate than

native students, while others say the difference between transfer and native student success is either

overstated or does not exist. This study examines graduation rates for transfer students with varying

amounts of credit at transfer versus their native peers. Findings indicate that transfers do not graduate at

the same rate as their equivalent counterparts. Numerous other results are presented and interpreted

including recommendations concerning needs of transfer students.

Methodology 

While typical graduation and retention studies place students into cohorts by their semester of entry, this

study groups students by the number of collegiate credits they have earned regardless of the amount of

time they have attended the institution. In this study, first-time students and new transfer students who

entered Central Connecticut State University between 1991 and 2006 as full-time students in a fall

semester were placed into groupings by the number of credits earned in 15-credit ranges (0-15 credits, 16-

30 credits, 31-45 credits, etc.), and persistence and time to degree were measured. A total of 28,635

unduplicated students were included in the study, although since this methodology allows for the same

students to be counted in different groups in different years, 86,342 total observations were recorded.

Major Findings 

Native students graduated at higher rates than transfer students after controlling for credits earned. The

total number of credits earned by students was observed to be the most significant predictor of graduation

in a logistic regression. Other significant predictors included first-semester GPA, number of credits

attempted each semester, and GPA in term of analysis. Use of the model improves the accuracy of

predicting graduation within six years of the term of analysis from 62% to 75%. Factors such as gender

and race/ethnicity were also observed to be significant, but their inclusion improved model accuracy by

0.1% or less.

Conclusions and Implications 

At CCSU, and likely at other institutions as well, we need to recognize the lower success rate of our

transfer students by comparing their progress to their equivalent-credit counterparts. While recognizing

and respecting the experiences of transfer students, we must appreciate that they still need similar support

to full-time, first-time students modified for them (e.g. a first-year transfer experience course). Further,

more careful exploration of our transfer compacts to determine how to better pave the way for transition

is required. Finally, we must more deeply study our “counting” of credits as meeting requirements, used

as electives, or not counted at all to ensure maximum appropriate progress toward completion at time of

transfer.



This presentation is available online at http://www.ccsu.edu/oira/research.

Comparison of CCSU "Native" and Transfer Students by Credits Earned at Start of Fall Semester 

(1991‐2006)

Graduation Rates of Students Who Enter as Full‐Time Students

Credits Earned at Beginning of Fall Semester

Yr. Of 16-30 31-45 45-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106+

Entry* FTFT Transf FTFT Transf FTFT Transf FTFT Transf FTFT Transf FTFT Transf FTFT Transf

In 1 Year Pct Graduated 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 14% 9% 46% 32% 72% 56%

91-'06 Basis Observations (N) 10,640 2,403 4,017 2,706 7,012 3,905 4,101 3,802 4,881 3,679 3,693 3,308 4,738 5,598



In 2 Years Pct Graduated 0% 1% 1% 3% 13% 11% 37% 27% 64% 46% 77% 64% 84% 75%

91-'05 Basis Observations (N) 9,858 2,217 3,648 2,503 6,481 3,595 3,671 3,481 4,408 3,390 3,286 3,025 4,160 5,160



In 3 Years Pct Graduated 11% 10% 25% 26% 54% 41% 66% 53% 78% 64% 83% 76% 87% 81%

91-'04 Basis Observations (N) 9,108 2,041 3,257 2,324 5,899 3,273 3,257 3,177 3,883 3,090 2,894 2,759 3,606 4,739



In 4 Years Pct Graduated 41% 31% 50% 44% 67% 54% 72% 61% 81% 70% 85% 79% 89% 83%

91-'03 Basis Observations (N) 8,389 1,854 2,899 2,092 5,254 2,994 2,855 2,888 3,410 2,805 2,506 2,517 3,105 4,312



In 5 Years Pct Graduated 52% 41% 56% 49% 71% 59% 74% 64% 83% 73% 86% 80% 90% 84%

91-'02 Basis Observations (N) 7,520 1,683 2,507 1,916 4,674 2,719 2,459 2,613 2,974 2,535 2,167 2,293 2,685 3,923



In 6 Years Pct Graduated 55% 44% 58% 53% 73% 62% 76% 66% 85% 75% 88% 82% 91% 85%

91-'01 Basis Observations (N) 6,765 1,513 2,128 1,721 4,096 2,464 2,106 2,346 2,552 2,314 1,839 2,059 2,260 3,522





Students are grouped by credits earned at the beginning of a fall semester, not by time of entry.



CCSU Native Students vs. All Transfer Students : Six-Year Graduation Probability of graduating from CCSU within 6 years of 

from Time of Earning Designated Number of Credits

completing specific credits

100% Probability of graduating within 6 

100%

Percent graduated









80% 80%

60% 60%

40% 40%

years









20% 20%

0%

0%









105

111

117

15

21

27

33

39

45

51

57

63

69

75

81

87

93

99

16-30 31-45 45-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106+

Credits Completed as of the Beginning of the Fall Semester Credits completed at beginning of fall term



First-Time Full-Time Students Transfer Students Native Transfer



* Transfer students excluded in Fall 2001 because of switch to SCT Banner.



Milller, J. W. and Hosch, B. (2008).  Persistence to Graduation for Transfer and "Native" Students. AIR Annual Forum, Seattle, WA.


Related docs
Other docs by MitchBurroughs
Power Point presentation[113]
Views: 25  |  Downloads: 2
Forms Instructions for Purchase Requisition
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
Sole Member LLC Certified Resolution
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
Study_Abroad_Course_Proposal_Form
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Analysis Basel 1A ANPR vs. Basel 1A NPR
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
Issues from the 110th Congress Letter[238]
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
Letter
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Carolyn Healy Latin America Regional Update
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!