Biofuels Will We See More--An Economists View

Biofuels: Will We See More? An Economists View Bruce A. McCarl Regents Professor of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Presented at Texas Renewable Energy Industries Association Texas Renewables ’06 Conference Austin Nov 13, 2006 Background Biofuels offer a potential way of using abundant agricultural resources to help reduce dependence on fossil fuel This can contribute to Improved energy security Reductions in net greenhouse gas emissions Possible lower cost Today I will look into motivations for this and reveal a little of my work Background So what? Biofuels have been known to society throughout history Their usage has diminished over the long run (we used a lot of wood in early 1900’s) and has not greatly increased in the last few years particularly in unsubsidized forms This is largely due to the availability of cheap fossil fuels. Thus for biofuels to serve significant role as GHG offset or energy security enhancement or cost reduction then forces will have to arise that will make them competitive. What will make Biofuels economic Rising energy prices due to Scarcity and demand growth Increased cost of fossill fuel production Energy Security Trade disruption Privately realized value placed on Greenhouse Gas offset Lower costs of delivered feedstock because of higher yields, improved production practices, lower transport needs Improved energy recovery efficiency Subsidies Scarcity and Fossil Fuel Cost Offshore Onshore Graph of Oil Production Source: Colin Campbell of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas (ASPO) Newsletter as in Wikapedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_oil Global Conventional Oil Production May Peak Soon US has as has Texas Scarcity and Fossil Fuel Cost Lots of Oil But recovery cost will increase Source: International Energy Agency Resources to Reserves Report http://www.iea.org/Textbase/npsum/oil_gasSUM.pdf Consumption - Global Source USDOE, Energy Information Agency, International Energy Outlook 2006 Report #:DOE/EIA-0484(2006) Release Date: June 2006 , http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/oil.html Large demand growth especially in US and Asia – China and India Consumption - Texas Source: Texas State Demographer http://txsdc.utsa.edu/tpepp/2006projections/ Source: USDOE Texas Energy Consumption http://www.eere.energy.gov/states/ state_specific_statistics.cfm/state=TX#consumption 60-80% growth in 20 years Liquid fuel rises at rate of population, electricity faster Energy Economics Conclusion Growing scarcity of conventional oil Alternative sources possible at higher cost = Higher cost future supply Growing demand for Energy (electricity and liquid fuels) Global and Texas = Higher future demand Collectively implies Higher demand for alternative energy Likely brighter future for renewables and biofuels Greenhouse Gasses Source http://ssca.usask.ca/2002conference/Bennett.htm Source : U.S. National Assessment/. Carbon Dioxide emissions highly associated with climate change, Policy around world working to limit emissions Greenhouse Gasses Source : EIA Executive summary http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/summary/index.html US Emits a lot Energy dominates Transport and electric power are big Source : Pew http://www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-basics/facts_and_figures/anthroghg.cfm Greenhouse Gasses and Biofuels Absorb CO2 Emit CO2 Feedstocks take up CO2 when they grow CO2 emited when feedstocks burned or when energy product derivatives burned But Starred areas also emit Please Pretend the growing stuff includes crops Source of underlying graphic: Smith, C.T. , L. Biles, D. Cassidy, C.D. Foster, J. Gan, W.G. Hubbard, B.D. Jackson, C. Mayfield and H.M. Rauscher, “Knowledge Products to Inform Rural Communities about Sustainable Forestry for Bioenergy and Biobased Products”, IUFRO Conference on Transfer of Forest Science Knowledge and Technology, Troutdale, Oregon, 10-13 May 2005 Offset Rates Computed Through Lifecycle Analysis Net Carbon Emission Reduction (%) E tha nol B io feedstoc k C orn S oyb ea ns S orghu m B a rley O a ts R ic e S oft W hite W hea t H a rd R ed W inter W hea t D urha m W hea t H a rd R ed S pring W hea t S uga r S w itc hgra ss H ybrid P opla r W illow S oftw ood L og R esidu e H a rdw ood L og R es idu e B a ga sse C orn R es idu e W hea t R es idu e S orghu m R es idu e B a rley R esidu e R ic e R es idu e S oftw ood M ill R es idu e H a rdw ood M ill R es idu e M a nure 45 43 39 12 42 41 39 42 28 81 72 74 68 69 86 84 79 73 56 55 76 76 87 89 94 91 91 95 91 88 76 64 62 95 95 91 43 11 96 E lectric ity B iodies el Electricity offsets higher when cofired due to Efficiency and less hauling Ethanol offsets are in comparison to gasoline Power plants offsets are in comparison to coal. Opportunities have different potentials GHG and Money    If we cap GHG emissions biofuel prices and demand will rise Biofuels will likely not create items sold in carbon market Fossil energy production or consumption will require emission permits raising price to consumers of fossil fuel use  Biofuel combustion will likely not require such permits and price will rise on a BTU or other basis to price of fossil fuel  Biofuel manufacturers will have to pay higher price for fossil fuels or use biofuel products in energy production thus offsetting GHG earnings by emissions or reduced production   Money to be made more for larger offsets Negative emissions with Carbon Capture and Storage McCarl Project Goals    Examine the portfolio of land based biofuel possibilities Bring in a full cost and GHG accounting Look at motivations for their use in terms of energy prices, and GHG mitigation strategies  Look comparatively across many possibilities including Afforestation, Forest mgt, Biofuels, Ag soil, Animals, Fertilization, Rice, Grassland expansion, Manure, Crop mix  Look at market, energy price, time and technology conditions under which strategies dominate  Look at market effects and co benefits/ costs Bio feedstocks into Energy Bio feedstocks can be direct inputs into power plants to substitute for coal They also can be used to produce liquid fuels such as ethanol and biodiesel For Example  Energy crops, crop residues, manure and trees can fire or co-fire power plants  Ethanol can be made from the cellulosic content of energy crops, residues and trees Grains and sugar can be processed into ethanol Fats and oils can be made into biodiesel   Portfolio Composition Energy prices increases with CO2 price Ag soil goes up fast then plateaus and even comes down Why – Congruence and partial low cost Lower per acre rates than higher cost alternatives Biofuel takes higher price but takes off Electricity gives big numbers due to plant expansion Other small and slowly increasing Portfolio Composition Dynamic Portfolio Composition More biofuels over time In at zero carbon price Biofuel Portfolio Composition Gas price 0.94 Lower carbon dioxide price Upper carbon dioxide price Corn into ethanol through wet milling Corn into ethanol through dry milling Make wheat into ethanol Make sorghum into ethanol xx xx xx -1 10 xx xx 10 30 xx xx 30 50 xx xx 50 5000 xx xx xx xx xx -1 10 xx xx Gas price 2.00 10 30 xx xx 30 50 xx xx xx 50 5000 xx Make sugarcane Bagasse into ethanol Make corn residues into ethanol Make wheat residues into ethanol Make sorghum residues into ethanol Make rice residues into ethanol Make soybean oil into biodiesel Make corn oil into biodiesel xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx GHG offset and energy price send similar signals Cellulosic at higher prices, switchgrass and residue 200 Findings  Biofuels could play an important part in a GHGE mitigating 150 world if price was above $5 per ton of carbon dioxide or if energy price is higher.  At low prices opportunity cost 100 feedstocks generated. Biomass for Power Plants of Soil Carbon exceeds value resources Sequestration Pine Trees on AG-Land Ethanol as Gasoline of  Competitiveness in GHG arena arises because biofuels continually offset fossil fuel emissions in comparison to 50 changing tillage which saturates  Cellulosic lignin goes into electricity generation 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Carbon Value in Dollars per TCE 200 Findings  Tradeoffs with food and fuel and exports if we produce biofuels  150 Strong degree of income support  Raises Consumer Food Costs 100 Biomass for Power Plants Soil Carbon Sequestration Pine Trees on AG-Land Ethanol as Gasoline  Biofuels also yield other ancillary benefits. Erosion 50 Nutrient runoff Energy security 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Carbon Value in Dollars per TCE 200 Big questions  Will society choose to reward biofuel carbon recycling characteristics? 150  Will energy prices remain high in short run? Biomass for  Will ethanol and biodiesel subsidies persist? Power Plants  100 When will cellulosic ethanol be  Can we increase biofuel feedstock yields? Soil Carbon Sequestration Pine Trees on AG-Land producable at scale? Ethanol as Gasoline  Can we increase efficiency of recovery of energy from 50 biofeedstocks?  Would it be sensible to switch farm subsidies to energy or carbon subsidies? 0  Will the food technical progress remain high?  Will we think about this as we plot future of Texas energy? Carbon Value in Dollars per TCE 0 100 200 300 400 500 For more information http://agecon2.tamu.edu/people/faculty/mccarl-bruce/biomass.html Biofuel feedstocks • Agricultural and forestry products: • Grains -Corn, Wheat, Sorghum, Rice • Sugar Cane • Timber • Production residues: • Crop Residue • Logging Residue • Manure • Processing products and by products: • Corn Oil • Rendered Animal Fat • Milling Residue • Energy crops: • Switchgrass • Willow • Hybrid Poplar Not doing red items today