Embed
Email

Privatization of Water Utilities

Document Sample

Shared by: ewghwehws
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
1
posted:
1/20/2012
language:
pages:
16
Kennedy Holt

Key Questions to Shape the

Argument

1) Do you think that safe/drinkable water is a right or a

privilege?

2) Is it the government’s responsibility to its citizens to

provide said water?

3) Do water utilities require private sector money in

order to upgrade and upkeep the ever expanding water

system?

4) Who should have access to water?

Now For Something Completely

Different…

 While the private sector of the industry champions the

many “successes” that have occurred since their

involvement began, there have been just as many, if

not more, failures to contribute to their lapses.

 Q:Why do countries continue to sell off water utilities

if the private sector has a bad track record?

 A: The IMF and the WB, which necessitate the sell of

these utilities to western companies as a condition for

debt relief and loans.

Water privatization fails in Tanzania

 This project, by City Water was supposed to be a model for other

developing nations by showcasing the ability to expand and improve

the existing system.

 “‘It was expected that, by the end of the second year of service, a capital

investment amounting to US$8.5m would have been injected into the

project, but as of today, as we approach the end of that period, only

US$4.1m, which is less than 50 per cent of the target, has been

invested,' noted Lowassa. ”

http://www.ippmedia.com/ipp/guardian/2005/05/14/39435.html

 This lack of invest led to pipes not being installed, thus no expansion,

and a decreased water quality to the residents already connected to the

supply.

 According to City Water this lack of expansion was due to “unexpected

circumstances”

Walkerton, Ontario: The E. Coli

Disaster

 7 people died and 2,300 others became ill as a result of

E. coli contamination in the drinking water.

 Testing of the town’s water was passed onto the private

company A&L Laboratories. They discovered E. coli

contamination, but failed to alert public officials for

five days since regulations did not require it to disclose

its findings.

The UK meets the Scrooge of

Water

 In 1989 the Thatcher government privatized the

regional water companies by selling their shares on the

stock exchange.

 Since this time water cutoffs tripled in the first 5 years,

with 18,636 households disconnected in 1994.

 Also these private companies have allowed for massive

leaks to develop in the piping. The reason for not

fixing them lies solely with ELLs.

More of the UK’s Problems

 Water poverty in England and Wales 2004









 Source: CCWater evidence to House of Lords

 Evidence to House of Lords select committee p.142

http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/lords_s_t_select/stwater.cfm .

South America’s Problems

 Santa Fe, Argentina entered a privatization agreement in

September 1995 with Suez-Lyonnaise des Eaux.

 In order to seal the deal the agreement fixed the limit value

of harmful substances to be found in the supplied drinking

water much above what established by Argentine law.

 This was followed by price increases and less investment

than what was negotiated in the original contract.

 Cordoba, Argentina had similar problems where the

company neglected to expand supply to low-income

communities due to lack of legal requirements.

Problems for Public Health

 More exposures to micro-organisms

 Potential for sewer gases escaping

 Puts a strain on public health resources in small or less

developed areas not able to cope with these issues

 Creates an issue with environmental justice when

these private companies make it impossible for lower

class individuals to afford water.

Micro-Organisms

 Lack of safe drinking water connections for low

income groups forces them to look for other sources.

 These other sources are not necessarily regulated or

protected from the pathogens that may enter them.

 Creates the problem of increased cases of water borne

diseases

Sewer Gases

 This problem concerns those who have their water

turned off and thus no way to refresh the water seal.

 Gases include hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, methane,

carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides.

Pressure on the PH System

 The combination of problems that can occur with the

previous two issues can put a strain on PH resources.

 Smaller or less developed areas cannot cope with a

sudden influx of individuals afflicted by these

problems.

Environmental Justice Aspect

 Most privatized water utilities drive up rates so poor

can’t afford it, or they fail to connect those low-income

individuals to the system. This results in an unfair

distribution of the water resource.

 This again creates a problems because those that can’t

afford the water can’t afford the medical costs incurred

through the increased risk of disease.

Recap

 Many of the private companies have failed to meet

investment and expansion promises they, themselves,

made.

 Following a cancellation of these contracts many of the

companies have in turn filed lawsuits attempting to

recover “loss profits”

 Even though privatization has served as a bad example

of water utility management an effective model has yet

to be found in many developing areas.

Key Questions to Shape the

Argument

1) Do you think that safe/drinkable water is a right or a

privilege? Right

2) Is it the government’s responsibility to its citizens to

provide said water? Yes

3) Do water utilities require private sector money in

order to upgrade and upkeep the ever expanding water

system? No

4) Who should have access to water? Everyone

Questions, Concerns, Innuendos

 Food for thought: If power/energy are privatized, and

water becomes privatized…







+ = 10 X Profit







…and we all know what happens after that.



Related docs
Other docs by ewghwehws
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!