Embed
Email

Sales and Leases Loyola

Document Sample
Sales and Leases Loyola
Description

Sales and Leases Loyola document sample

Shared by: tbs19421
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
1/19/2012
language:
pages:
49
IFRS – An Overview

Beta Alpha Psi

Loyola University Maryland

Baltimore, MD

September 24, 2009

McGladrey & Pullen LLP is a member firm of RSM International – an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities.

Richard A. Rate, Jr., CPA





• Partner, National Professional Standards Group

• Member, Eastern Regional Professional Practice Office

• Member, AICPA and MACPA









2

Agenda



• Structure and Conceptual Framework of IFRS vs. 10 minutes

US GAAP

• Status of IFRS and US GAAP Convergence 5 minutes

Efforts

• Differences between IFRS and US GAAP by 20 minutes

Topical Area

• Impact to private companies 5 minutes

• Conclusion 5 minutes





3

Differences Between US GAAP and IAS/IFRS



• This presentation does not cover all the topics

• With regard to the topics covered:

– IFRS accounting is covered at a very high level

– Not all the differences between the two frameworks have been identified

• It is intended just to give a ―flavour‖ on major differences









4

5

US GAAP Hierarchy*

• Category (a), officially established • Category (c) consists of:

accounting principles, consists of: – AICPA Accounting Standards Executive

Committee (AcSEC) Practice Bulletins

– FASB Statements and Interpretations – Consensus positions of the FASB Emerging

– APB Opinions Issues Task Force

– AICPA Accounting Research Bulletins • Category (d) includes:

– AICPA accounting interpretations and

• Category (b) consists of: implementation guides ("Qs and As") published

– FASB Technical Bulletins by the FASB staff

– Practices that are widely recognized and

– AICPA Industry Audit and Accounting prevalent either generally or in the industry

Guides – FASB Staff Positions (FSPs)

– AICPA Statements of Position







*: Source: AU 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles





6

The US GAAP Literature

• Over 2,000 pronouncements

• Over 6,500 pages – FASB material alone

• Some 25,000 pages of standards and guidance in total

• 501 EITF issued until December 2007







Example: GAAP on Leasing

• 9 FAS (FAS 13 + 8 other FAS)

• 6 FIN

• 36 EITF





7

IFRS Hierarchy

• Standards and interpretations approved by the IASC/IASB

• SIC/IFRIC interpretations









IFRS is a “teenager”

compared to US GAAP







8

The IFRS Literature

• 55 pronouncements

• Some 2,500 pages (all pronouncements)





Example: GAAP on Leasing

• IAS 17

• 1 IFRIC

• 2 SIC







9

Set of Principles

What is IFRS?





Set of principles to measure assets and liabilities









Set of principles Asset and liability view



10

Set of Principles



Asset and liability view





Does it meet the definition of an

asset/liability?





How much is it?

11

Set of Principles vs Set of Rules



• Principles not rules: a question of judgement

• Principles-based standards requires a clear hierarchy of overarching

concepts

• Principles-based standards provide flexibility in order to deal with

new and different situations as they arise

• Disclosures play a key role









12

Set of Principles vs Set of Rules



• Principles-based does not mean principles-only

• Principles-based accounting standards will be accompanied by

guidance

• Additional guidance is restricted to brief explanation as well as a

small number of interpretations on major issues





“Guidance anticipates the use of judgement

whereas rules discourages judgement”

13

Set of Principles vs Set of Rules



• Focusing on principles places a significant obligation on preparers

and auditors to exercise professional judgement and users to weight

the benefits of fair presentation, or a true and fair view, against the

risks

• Use of judgement vs ―check-list‖ culture









14

Set of Principles vs Set of Rules

The diamond of trust

Standard setters







Preparers Auditors







Regulators and other Users



15

Set of Rules

How did the rules-based approach emerged?

• It emerged primarily in US as a result of a rigorous and aggressive

regulation of financial reporting driven by:

– Desire of comparability

– Litigations









“Show me a rule that says I can‟t do this”



16

i.e. Specific literature on revenue recognition

IAS/IFRS/IFRIC/SIC U.S. GAAP literature on revenue recognition

IAS 18 Revenue 27 Statements of Financial Accounting Standards

IAS 11 Construction contract 72 EITF issues

SIC-13 Jointly Controlled Entities—Non-Monetary Contributions by Venturers 11 Statements of Position

SIC-27 Evaluating the Substance of Transactions involving the Legal Form of a 3 FASB Interpretations

Lease

SIC-31 Revenue - Barter Transactions Involving Advertising Services 4 Staff Accounting Bulletins

IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements 6 FASB Staff Positions

IFRIC 13 Customer Loyalty Programmes 2 Accounting Research Bulletins

IFRIC 15 Agreements for the Construction of the Real Estate 2 Accounting Principles Board Opinions

3 FASB Technical Bulletins

1 REG S-X

1 FASB Staff implementation guidance

Various audit and accounting guidance

Various AICPA Technical Practice Aids



8 pronouncements in total More than 130 pronouncements

17

“Six years ago when we started, if

someone said, „describe where you‟ll be in

2007‟, I wouldn‟t have described this. This

is much , much better than we thought,

and it‟s happened much, much faster“

“Getting rid of the reconciliation has been

our absolute priority”

“Major companies have got IFRS

research units set up in the US saying,

„What‟s going to happen? What do we Sir David Tweedie

Chairman of IASB

have to do ?‟ It‟s a huge change, a big (source: Accountancy Magazine,

“Tweedie’s best of breed“,

difference” January 2008)



18

“A „Pax Americana‟ in financial reporting where

everybody around the world does US GAAP is not

on the table. Ten years ago, people talked about

that. But the world‟s moved on. So it‟s likely to be

IFRS. But, in our view, it needs to be what we call

„improved IFRS‟ because there are so many

critical issues relating to the IASB and IFRS”

“The SEC could say, „we think broad choice is

just fine. No end game. Just let the market decide

between GAAP and IFRS‟”

Realistic time frame for convergence?: “I‟d say, Bob Herz

Chairman of FASB

if everything went absolutely right, it‟s a (source: Journal of

minimum of five years” Accountancy, “Change Agent”,

February 2008)





19

SEC Proposes Roadmap Toward Global Accounting

Standards

(27 August 2008)



Proposed phased approach

Targeted U.S. issuers Type First IFRS reporting date



Limited early eligible entities Optional Fiscal years ending on or after 15 December 2009



Large accelerate filers Mandatory Fiscal years ending on or after 15 December 2014



Accelerated filers Mandatory Fiscal years ending on or after 15 December 2015



Non-accelerated filers Mandatory Fiscal years ending on or after 15 December 2016





Financial statements will include two years of comparatives



20

SEC Proposes Roadmap Toward Global Accounting

Standards

(27 August 2008)



Non-accelerated filers



Accelerated filers



Limited eligible entities Large accelerated filers







2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

31 December

2006



Evaluation period

Transition date



SEC Final decision Reporting date



21

IASB Work Plan - New Standards and Major Projects

• IFRS for SMEs

• Consolidation 2009 In RED IASB-FASB

• Liabilities Joint projects



• Derecognition

• Emission Trading

• Fair Value 2010

• Income taxes



• Financial statement presentation

• Insurance contracts

• Leases

• Financial Instruments with the characteristics of equity 2011

• Post-employment benefits (including pensions)

• Revenue recognition



• Financial instruments: replacement

• Government grants TBD

• Common control transactions

22

Examples of Key Differences between US GAAP and IFRS



• Presentation of Financial Statements

• Fair value

• Goodwill

• Revenue recognition

• Intangible and tangible assets

• Leases

• Inventories









23

Financial Statements: Balance Sheet



Topic IFRS US GAAP

Balance Sheet • IAS 1 does not prescribe a particular • Similar to IFRS, but items are

format format, but minimum lines to be normally presented in decreasing order

presented of liquidity

Current/Non- • Required except for when a liquidity • An entity is elected to choose whether

current distinction presentation is used. In general, 12 to present Current/Non-current

months represents the border distinction

Offsetting • Permitted only if allowed by specific • Permitted where there is:

Standards/ Interpretations. Offset  intention of offset

involving different parties is allowed  offset is enforceable by law

• Offsetting derivatives based on  offset permitted when only two

―master netting arrangement‖ is not parties involved

allowed

• Offsetting derivatives based on

―master netting arrangement‖ is allowed



24

Financial Statements: Income Statement



Topic IFRS US GAAP

Income statement format • IAS 1 does not prescribe a • Entities are elected to choose:

particular format, but minimum lines  Full ―by function‖ format

to be presented. Both classification  Gross profit computed as Sales

―by function‖ and ―by nature‖ are less COGS. Then other costs

allowed



Extraordinary items • Expressly prohibited • Virtually not allowed









25

Financial Statements: Cash Flow Statement

Topic IFRS US GAAP

Cash flow format • Both direct and indirect methods • Similar to IFRS

are allowed. Indirect method is more

common

Definition of cash and • Includes overdraft that fluctuates • Similar to IFRS except for

cash equivalents from being positive to overdrawn. overdrafts, which are always

Investment qualifies as a cash excluded from cash and cash

equivalent only when maturity of equivalents

three months or less from the date of

acquisition

Presentation of specific • Interest paid/received and • Interest paid/received and

items dividends paid/received can be both dividends received are operating.

financing or operating Dividends paid are financing







26

Financial Statements: Comparatives



Topic IFRS US GAAP



Comparatives • One year of comparative for all • No ―pure‖ US GAAP requirement

presentation numerical information reported in the

financial statement









27

Fair Value

Topic IFRS US GAAP

Fair value • Dispersed widely in IFRS • SFAS 157

guidance • Inconsistencies:

Business combinations (tax

assets/liabilities, pension plans)

PPE: revaluation model – use fair

value if can be measured reliably

Leases: require fair value

measurement but there is no guidance

Fair value not defined in the

Framework



NB: IASB is working on the fair value

measurement project. The current project plan

envisages that an IFRS on fair value

measurement guidance will be published in 2010





28

Goodwill (IFRS 3R vs SFAS 141R)

Topic IFRS US GAAP

Negative goodwill • After reassessment any residual • Same

excess is recognised immediately in

profit or loss (not as extraordinary

gain)

Provisional accounting • Adjustments of provisional fair • Same

values can be booked against

goodwill within 12 months from

acquisition date. After, adjusted to

income statement

Goodwill • Not amortised and tested for • Not amortised but tested for

impairment at least annually at CGU impairment at least annually at

level Reporting unit level







29

CGU vs Reporting Unit

Topic IFRS US GAAP

Definition • CGU: the smallest identifiable group of • RU: an operating segment or one

assets that generates cash inflows that are level below an operating segment

largely independent of the cash inflows from (referred as to a component)

other assets or groups of assets • A component is a business for which

• If an active market exists for the output discrete financial information is

produced by a CGU, it shall be identified as available and segment management

a CGU, even if some or all of the output is regularly reviews the operating results

used internally • Components of an operating segment

• Considers various factors. i.e. how shall be aggregated and deemed a

management monitors the entity’s operations single reporting unit if have similar

or how management makes decisions about economic characteristics

continuing or disposing of the entity’s assets

and operations









30

Impairment of Goodwill

Topic IFRS US GAAP

Impairment amount • IAS 36 applies: one-step approach: • SFAS 142 applies: two-step

calculation • Impairment results from the difference approach:

methodology between the carrying amount and the 1) If the carrying amount of the

higher between the asset’s VIU and its reporting unit including goodwill is

fair value less cost to sell lesser than its fair value, then step 2

• VIU: reasonable estimate performed 2) Determine the implied fair value of

by the individual enterprise (not market goodwill and compare with goodwill

specific). But IAS 36 includes carrying amount. Implied fair value of

requirements to prevent an enterprise goodwill shall be determined in the

from using assumptions different from same manner as the amount of

the market place that are unjustified goodwill recognised in a business

combination is determined









31

Impairment of Goodwill

Topic IFRS US GAAP

Indication of impairment • IAS 36 applies: assess at each • SFAS 142 applies: tested for

reporting date whether there is any impairment on an annual basis and

indication that an asset may be between annual tests in certain

impaired and al least annually circumstances

• List of indicators • List of indicators





Reversal of impairment • Prohibited • Prohibited









32

Revenue Recognition

Topic IFRS US GAAP

Preliminary • IASB and FASB Joint project

Views on • A contract-based revenue recognition model

Revenue • Revenue is recognized when performance obligations

Recognition

are satisfied

Revenue • IAS 18 is very much principle-based • No one dedicated standard to

recognition • Goods: ―Risk and rewards‖ approach and the revenue recognition

framework seller retains neither management involvement nor • Extensive and detailed guidance

control over goods included in various statements

• Services: percentage of completion (more than 200 sources of

• Interests: effective interest method standards and guidance in

existence, including broad

• Dividends: right to receiver payment established conceptual discussions and

• Royalties: accrual basis industry-specific guidance)

• Appendix include additional guidance and • SAB 104

examples



33

Revenue Recognition

Topic IFRS US GAAP

Multiple-element • Some principle-based guidance • Revenue arrangements are

arrangements available in IAS 18 separated into units of accounting

• Little specific guidance and accounted for separately if

conditions of EITF 00-21 are met





Software • Almost non-existent specific • Detailed specific guidance,

guidance primarily SOP 97-2

• General principles apply

• US GAAP can be used to integrate

IFRS, but doesn’t have to.









34

Intangible Assets



Topic IFRS US GAAP

Development costs • Capitalised since certain criteria • Strict criteria results in very rare

are met. Cost previously expensed development costs capitalised.

cannot be capitalised in subsequent Different guidance for computer

period software to be sold which must be

•No specific guidance for software capitalised if certain criteria are met

Revaluation • Permitted only if an active market • Prohibited

exist









35

Tangible Assets

Topic IFRS US GAAP

Change in • Regarded as a change in accounting • Treated as a change in

depreciation estimate and reflected in current and accounting estimate and

method prospective periods reflected entirely in the current

year’s income statement

Subsequent • Revaluation model is allowed • Revaluation model is

measurement • Revaluation model: Changes in fair value are prohibited

recognized in OCI, depreciation and

impairment is charged to the income statement

Investment • IAS 40 includes specific guidance for •There is not a specific definition

property investment property. Entities choose between of investment properties.

fair value model or depreciated cost model Depreciated cost model must be

• Fair value model: all changes in fair value are applied

recognised in income statement





36

Leases

Conceptually similar: a finance lease is one where substantially all risks and rewards associated

with the asset are transferred to the lessee. US GAAP includes more form-driven and is more

quantitative tests oriented



US GAAP indicators IFRS IFRS indicators

Classify as finance lease if any one of Similar to US GAAP indicators

the following criteria is met: Qualitative + others

• Transfer of ownership at the end of However these are genuine

lease term indicators and not triggering

• Bargain purchase option events

• PV of minimum lease is payments

greater than 90% of the fair value

• Lease term higher than 75% of Quantitative

estimated economic life





US GAAP

37

Leases



• Leases—Preliminary Views

• IASB and FASB Joint project

• If this principle is adopted in a new

standard on lease accounting, it

would result in the lessee

recognizing:

– an asset for its right to use the leased

item (the right-of-use asset)

– a liability for its obligation to pay

rentals





38

Inventories

Topic IFRS US GAAP

Measurement • Inventories shall be measured at • Inventories shall be measured at the

the lower of cost and net realisable lower of cost and market

value • Market means current replacement cost

• Net realisable value is the (purchase or reproduction), but

estimated selling price in the • Upper limit: market should not exceed

ordinary course of business less the the net realisable value (i.e. estimated

estimated costs of completion and selling price - cost of completion and

the estimated costs necessary to disposal)

make the sale (this is not fair value) • Lower limit: market should not be less

than the net realisable value reduced by

an allowance for normal profit margin









39

Inventories

Topic IFRS US GAAP

LIFO method • Prohibited * • Permitted



FIFO • Allowed • Allowed



Average cost method • Allowed • Allowed



Retail method • May be used for convenience if the • In some situations may be both

results approximate cost practical and appropriate

Biological assets • Measured at fair value less • Not specified. Normally historical

estimated point-of-sale costs cost is used

Reversal of inventory • Required if certain criteria are met • Prohibited

write-downs



*: The use of LIFO will be banned in IFRS for SMEs as well



40

Tax implications of adopting IFRS



• U.S. companies for tax purposes must continue to follow the tax rules

of the Internal Revenue Code, Regulations and case law









41

Tax implications of adopting IFRS



• Book treatment changes may result in changes in tax methods which

require the filing of Form 3115s.

• Questions to consider:

– Does the present tax method require book conformity?

– Will the new book method omit information required to continue the tax

method?

– Is the new book method permissible for tax purposes?









42

Tax implications of adopting IFRS



• Tax accounting methods

– LIFO – Tax requires book conformity, but IFRS prohibits LIFO

– Intangible asset capitalization

– Change in depreciation method

– No revaluation allowed on assets for tax purposes

– Revenue recognition

– Lease recognition (capital leases)

– Any other change in method that does not conform to tax law or that

changes the method used for currently recognizing income or

deductions

• Expected to have a major impact on implementation of FIN 48

43

Importance of IFRS to Preparers



• Public company?

• Private company with foreign parent?

• Private company with foreign subsidiaries?

• Private company with significant foreign suppliers or customers?

• Access to foreign capital markets?









44

Importance of IFRS to Bankers



• Public borrowers?

• Loan underwriting?

• Financial debt covenants?

• Global capital markets?









45

Importance of IFRS to Attorneys



• IPO’s?

• Registrations?

• Exempt offerings?

• Securities law?

• Re-writing or renegotiation of any legal contract or agreement

containing financial information?

• Fraud implications – use of judgment?







46

First-time adoption of IFRS



• Scale of the project

• Use of experts

• IFRS Accounting manual, IFRS Group Reporting Package, Impact on

information systems, etc.

• Industry specific issues: what are key players doing?

• IFRS 1: exemptions and exceptions

• Communication to stakeholders

• Industry specific issues







47

A few things to consider before …



• Training, training, training

• Auditor preparation and status

• Management information systems

• Compensation plans

• Government accountability audits

• Users of your financial information









48

Conclusions



• Only in some cases is it possible to say that the IFRS requirements

are clearly different or equivalent to US GAAP

• In many cases the same concept is expressed using different words.

Therefore, the concept is similar but not identical

• Similar standards are not identical standards

• US GAAP literature is much more extensive compared to IFRS

• Convergence projects are underway









49


Related docs
Other docs by tbs19421
Safety Management Process
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Sales and Event Officer
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Roll on Professional Accounting Institutions
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Sample of Bank Account Confirmation Letter
Views: 46  |  Downloads: 0
Roll of Honour Certificates
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Sample of Application Letter for Architects
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Sales Plan for Mobile Application
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Sample of Check Book Summary
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
Sales Assessments
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!