Embed
Email

Media Cover-up: Ron Paul’s Standing Not Discussed in Iowa Vote Reshuffle

Document Sample
Media Cover-up: Ron Paul’s Standing Not Discussed in Iowa Vote Reshuffle
Description

Republican officials in Iowa today said that
there was no clear winner in the caucus
held there on January 3. Party officials said
results from eight of the 1,774 precincts
were missing when they conducted the vote
certification process, meaning they likely
will never know what the final tallies were
for the candidates.

Media Cover-up: Ron Paul’s Standing

Not Discussed in Iowa Vote Reshuffle

Kurt Nimmo

Infowars.com

January 19, 2012



Republican officials in Iowa today said that

there was no clear winner in the caucus

held there on January 3. Party officials said

results from eight of the 1,774 precincts

were missing when they conducted the vote

certification process, meaning they likely

will never know what the final tallies were

for the candidates.



Despite the ambiguity, Rick Santorum

was quick to declare a “virtual tie” in the

race and the establishment media obliged

him on the claim while ignoring how the

change effected Ron Paul’s standing.

According to the



1. Iowa Caucus website, the certified results of 1,766 precincts made public Thursday show

Santorum with 29,839 votes, followed by Romney with 29,805, Ron Paul in third with 26,036,

and Newt Gingrich with 16,163, Rick Perry with 12,557, Michele Bachmann with 6,046 and Jon

Huntsman with 739. Party officials said 121,503 votes were certified.

The admission of voting irregularities and uncounted votes in the state adds more weight to the

argument that the race was fixed in order to discount Ron Paul and push him to the periphery in a

concerted effort to minimize his popularity among voters and upstage the handpicked

establishment candidates.



On January 4, we reported on the

Republican establishment’s decision to

conduct the vote count in secret after

vague threats issued by the shadowy

Anonymous hacker group and

protests planned by Occupy the Iowa

Caucus.

“Also abusing suddenly lax ID

registration may have created many fake

votes for neocons Santorum and

Romney,” Brad Funkhouser

wrote.

In addition to ID problems, the



1. Clinton County Republican

Women’s Club reported

mysterious “computer glitches”

during the vote.



“This is the biggest fraud since

Kennedy stole the West Virginia

Primary,” Funkhouser said.



If, as Santorum claims, he is virtually tied with Romney in Iowa, that would mean Ron Paul came

in second, not third. The establishment media has neglected to report this fact. Instead, it has

ignored Paul and continued its campaign to portray Romney and Santorum as the only viable

candidates wrestling to gain the nomination.



Moreover, a reshuffling of the vote will

change the dynamics on delegates as the

front-runners head into the Republican

national convention in Tampa, Florida during

the week of August 27, 2012.



The new spin on the Iowa caucus reveals the

obvious fact that establishment controlled

caucuses, primaries and elections are highly

manipulated and stage managed affairs. Only

candidates handpicked by the ruling elite will

be allowed to contend for the office of

president, a job that has been reduced largely

to an acting and script-reading position.



Hacking Democracy VIDEO BELOW A MUST WATCH

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7926958774822130737

Perry Drops Out Of Presidential Race

Steve Watson

Infowars.com

January 19, 2012



Another one bites the dust



Texas Governor Rick Perry has dropped out of

the 2012 presidential race ahead of the South

Carolina primary on Saturday.

Perry has, unsurprisingly, officially endorsed

Newt Gingrich.



“I have come to the conclusion that this is no

viable path forward for me in this 2012

campaign,” said Perry at a news conference in

North Charleston, South Carolina this morning.

“Therefore I am suspending my campaign and

endorsing Newt Gingrich for president of the

United States.”

Perry Quits - Endorses Newt

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJX60Rt0VbQ

“Newt is not perfect, but who among us is,” said Perry, seemingly referring to the

1. emerging scandal involving Gingrich and his ex-wife. “The fact is, there is forgiveness for

those who seek God. And I believe in the power of redemption, for it is a central tenant of my

Christian faith.”



Perry went on to call Gingrich a “conservative visionary who will transform our country.”

“I have no doubt Newt Gingrich is a man with a the heart of a conservative reformer, the ability to

rally and captivate the conservative

movement, the courage to tell those

Washington interests to take a hike, if

that’s what’s in the best interest of our

country.” Perry said.



“I’ve never believed that the cause of

conservativism is embodied by one

individual,” Perry said. “Our mission is

not only to defeat Barack Obama, but to

replace him with a conservative leader

who will bring about real change.” he

added.

Perry finished dead last in the New Hampshire

primary with less than 1 percent of the vote,

despite spending months campaigning in the

state.



The latest polls out of South Carolina had

Perry floundering in fifth place once again with

less than 4 percent.



Earlier in the week, Perry made a last ditch

effort to appeal to staunch conservative voters

by wading into the scandal involving US

troops being filmed urinating on the dead

corpses of Taliban fighters.



Perry defended the soldiers, and used the scandal to attack the Obama administration, claiming

that under his presidency he would not tolerate “over-the-top rhetoric” and “disdain for the

military”.



However, that has had no effect whatsoever on Perry’s numbers and now he has finally given up

the ghost.



Infowars was first to report that Perry would

run for president a full two months before he

officially threw his hat in the ring. Perry insiders

informed Alex Jones in June 2011 that the Texas

Governor was preparing his campaign.



When Perry eventually joined the race in

August, he stormed to the top of the polls.

However, a series of terrible debate

performances, culminating in the infamous

“oops” moment where Perry forgot which

federal agencies he wanted to abolish, left him

slithering down the polls and floundering at the

bottom of the pile.



Exposure of Perry’s past record also left him

without a leg to stand on as his rivals all egded past him in the race for the Republican

nomination.

Gingrich Scandal Could Hand Ron Paul Shock

Second Place Finish

Paul Joseph Watson

Infowars.com

Thursday, January 19, 2012



Interview with Newt’s ex-wife ‘could end

Gingrich’s career’

A bombshell interview with Newt Gingrich’s ex-

wife set to air tonight could catapult Ron Paul

into a shock second placed finish in South

Carolina and confirm the Congressman as Mitt

Romney’s main rival. The interview with

Marianne Gingrich, Newt’s wife of 18 years,

“could end her ex-husband’s career,” according

to a



1. Drudge Report exclusive.



Despite a “civil war” erupting within ABC News

over whether or not to air the interview before Saturday’s primary, the broadcast will go out

tonight on Nightline, less than 48 hours before SC voters head to the polls.



Gingrich is set to hold a press conference today during which he will try to engage in damage

control.



With current polls showing Gingrich in second place behind Romney, with Ron Paul and Rick

Santorum virtually tied in third, any collapse in Gingrich’s support on the back of the interview

would directly benefit the candidates immediately behind him in the polls.



If Ron Paul beats Santorum to second in South Carolina, and the scandal torpedoes Gingrich’s

wider presidential campaign, it would virtually guarantee a Romney-Paul head to head for the rest

of the primary contest.



The interview with Marianne Gingrich is

said to contain “explosive revelations”.

Newt proposed to her before the divorce

of his first wife had been finalized, and

when he and Marianne divorced in 2000,

Gingrich had already taken up with

Callista Bisek, his third wife.



“The interview, should it air before

Saturday’s primary, would shine a

spotlight on a part of Gingrich’s past that

could turn off Republican voters in a state

filled with religious and cultural

conservatives who may cringe at Gingrich’s

two divorces and acknowledged infidelity,”

reports ABC News.

Gingrich’s dishonesty when it comes to his

personal life mirrors his political career.

According to Gingrich’s first wife, Jackie

Battley, Newt shocked her by demanding a

divorce while she was still in hospital

recovering from cancer surgery. According

to L. H. Carter, Gingrich’s former campaign

treasurer, Gingrich said of Battley: “She’s

not young enough or pretty enough to be the wife of the President. And besides, she has cancer.”



As we have documented, Gingrich is a ruthless Washington insider who routinely violates

constitutional principles to serve the establishment. Gingrich is the ultimate RINO Republican,

supporting Nancy Pelosi’s cap and trade plan, socialized health care, global government, and a

plethora of other big government initiatives.

Despite obtaining the frontrunner position, when

revelations about Herman Cain’s private life

emerged last year, he was forced to drop out of the

Republican race altogether.



Should the interview sink Gingrich’s presidential

aspirations, the establishment will merely continue

to throw its weight behind the anointed selection –

Mitt Romney – who himself has a record of

political deception on a par with Newt Gingrich.

The Real Newt Gingrich Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02HX5v5Thpk

The Real Newt Gingrich Part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksmCU9Nbksw

The Real Newt Gingrich Part 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exs41FdfqpY

The Real Newt Gingrich Part 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xk_0Ot9z3xg

Newt Gingrich Allow Terror Attacks To Happen

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvBwcf4kfCc

Congress Retreats on SOPA and PIPA

Kurt Nimmo

Infowars.com

January 19, 2012



Following widespread protests

against the Stop Online Piracy Act

(SOPA) and the Protect IP Act

(PIPA), a number of members of

Congress have declared they will no

longer support the internet

censorship legislation.



Senate Republicans are in full retreat

fearing a political backlash. Roy

Blunt, Orrin Hatch, John Boozman,

Marco Rubio, Chuck Grassley, Mark

Kirk, and Jim DeMint dropped their support.



Anti-SOPA rally in San Francisco

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjfyJsZLhsI

John Cornyn of Texas said the legislation should be put on hold while DeMint said in a tweet any

legislation directed against online piracy “must not undermine free speech, threaten economic

growth or impose burdensome regulations.”

Hatch, Rubio, Blunt and Boozman were sponsors of the Senate bill.



Kentucky Senator Rand Paul went beyond rhetoric and pledged to oppose both SOPA and

PIPA. “I will not sit idly by while PIPA and SOPA

eliminate the constitutionally protected rights to

due process and free speech. For these reasons, I

have pledged to oppose, filibuster and do

everything in my power to stop government

censorship of the Internet,” he declared.

In the House, Reps. Jim McDermott, Patty

Murray, Rick Larsen, Adam Smith, Jay Inslee, and

Norm Dicks opposed the legislation.



Despite the theatrics in response to massive

opposition, Congress will be forced to show its

true colors next Tuesday when PIPA comes up for

a cloture vote in the Senate. A cloture vote will

end debate and force an immediate vote on the

legislation.



4.5 million people signed a Google

petition opposing the legislation on

Wednesday and Congress was

deluged with hundreds of thousands

of emails. Countless websites either

went dark for the day or showed

support by masking out logos and

posting statements. Protesters held

rallies in Seattle, New York, San

Francisco and Las Vegas.



Wikipedia to RT: SOPA sledgehammer could smash any site on web

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNi7wE5Lto

Former Senator



1. Chris Dodd, now CEO and chairman of the Motion Picture Association of America, released a

statement calling the protests a

“gimmick” and “an irresponsible

response and a disservice to people

who rely on them for information and

use their services.”

“Only days after the White House and

chief sponsors of the legislation

responded to the major concern

expressed by opponents and then

called for all parties to work

cooperatively together, some

technology business interests are

resorting to stunts that punish their

users or turn them into their corporate

pawns, rather than coming to the table to find solutions to a problem that all now seem to agree is

very real and damaging,” Dodd said.


Related docs
Other docs by kynize