Until another appeals court rules otherwise, New York must recognize same-sex marriages
conducted in other states. So held the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth
Department this past Friday, February 1, 2008.
The decision in Martinez v. County of Monroe arose out of Martinez's quest to obtain spousal
health care benefits from Monroe Community College for Lisa Golden, whom she married in Ontario,
Canada. There was no question that the marriage was legal where performed. And then they returned
to New York.
In the absence of a New York statute forbidding same-sex marriage, the Court found no reason
not to recognize the marriage. It held that the marriage "is entitled to recognition in New York State."
Is this a silent invitation to the New York State legislature to pass a law deciding this issue one way or
the other? Maybe.
After the lawsuit was started but before the court's decision, the college changed its health
insurance policy to cover same-sex spouses. This gave rise to an interesting wrinkle in this case, for if
Lisa Golden was getting health insurance anyway, what was there left to sue over? In legal terms we
ask if there was any longer a "justiciable controversy." The Court said that there was, as the college
would be liable for damages for the time period that it refused to give health insurance coverage to the
plaintiff's spouse. We don't know if those damages are great or small. They might be the cost of Lisa
Golden going to the doctor's office, or her out-of-pocket expense to purchase her own health insurance
or whatever.
Thus, it seems that the court had a potential way out here if it wanted to duck the controversy
entirely. It may have decided that since the college is now providing health benefits, there wasn't
justiciable controversy so the lawsuit was "moot." Instead, the court waded in and addressed the gay
marriage issue head-on, giving a favorable and enlightened reading to the facts before it. No cowards
on this Appellate Division, Fourth Department panel.
Commentary: Gay advocates hail the decision as only a first step towards what they consider
truly would be fair: permitting gay marriages in New York State. I and my lawyer friends look forward
to the day when gay marriage is legal in New York; where there are gay marriages, there WILL be gay
divorces.
Until another appeals court rules otherwise, New York must recognize same-sex marriages
conducted in other states. So held the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth
Department this past Friday, February 1, 2008.
The decision in Martinez v. County of Monroe arose out of Martinez's quest to obtain spousal
health care benefits from Monroe Community College for Lisa Golden, whom she married in Ontario,
Canada. There was no question that the marriage was legal where performed. And then they returned
to New York.
In the absence of a New York statute forbidding same-sex marriage, the Court found no reason
not to recognize the marriage. It held that the marriage "is entitled to recognition in New York State."
Is this a silent invitation to the New York State legislature to pass a law deciding this issue one way or
the other? Maybe.
After the lawsuit was started but before the court's decision, the college changed its health
insurance policy to cover same-sex spouses. This gave rise to an interesting wrinkle in this case, for if
Lisa Golden was getting health insurance anyway, what was there left to sue over? In legal terms we
ask if there was any longer a "justiciable controversy." The Court said that there was, as the college
would be liable for damages for the time period that it refused to give health insurance coverage to the
plaintiff's spouse. We don't know if those damages are great or small. They might be the cost of Lisa
Golden going to the doctor's office, or her out-of-pocket expense to purchase her own health insurance
or whatever.
Thus, it seems that the court had a potential way out here if it wanted to duck the controversy
entirely. It may have decided that since the college is now providing health benefits, there wasn't
justiciable controversy so the lawsuit was "moot." Instead, the court waded in and addressed the gay
marriage issue head-on, giving a favorable and enlightened reading to the facts before it. No cowards
on this Appellate Division, Fourth Department panel.
Commentary: Gay advocates hail the decision as only a first step towards what they consider
truly would be fair: permitting gay marriages in New York State. I and my lawyer friends look forward
to the day when gay marriage is legal in New York; where there are gay marriages, there WILL be gay
divorces.
FREE books and reports! For more information about New York car accidents and personal
injury request my FREE book: Warning! Things That Can Destroy Your CarAccident Case (And the
Insurance Companies Already Know These Things) at http://www.GreatlegalBooks.com. For more
information and FREE reports, visit my website, http://www.InjuryAtty.net.
Article Source:
http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gary_E_Rosenberg
If you are about to have a same sex wedding in New York and are looking for GAY
WEDDING CEREMONY IDEAS, then you simply have to look at The Hotel
Indigo East End. Right in between the Hamptons and wine country on the east end
of Long Island IndigoEastEnd.com is a stunning option for gay weddings.